Economic Botany

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 315–345 | Cite as

Arecanut: India’s popular masticatory —history, chemistry and utilization

  • V. Raghavan
  • H. K. Baruah
Article

Abstract

To the Indians, Malayans, or the Indonesians, betel-nut chewing is as familiar as chewing gum to the Americans. In India the use of arecanut and its cultivation constitute a distinct agricultural practice scarcely less important than that of other economic crops, but little attention has been given to a proper assessment of the fruit either in India or elsewhere.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdul Latif and M. H. Khundkar. Active carbon from jute-stalk and betelnut husk. Pakist. Jour. Sci. Res. 5: 37–44. 1953.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agharkar, S. P. Gazetteer of Bombay State, Part I—Medicinal Plants. Bombay. 1953.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aiyer, A. K. Y. Field Crops of India. Bangalore City. 1950.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allport, N. L. The Chemistry and Pharmacy of Vegetable Drugs. London. 1943.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Areca cultivation near Thirthahalli— Shimoga district. Areca. Bull. 6: 3–5. 1955-56.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Badhwar, R. L., and I. C. Chopra. Reputed abortifacient plants of India. Indian Jour. Agric. Sci. 16: 342–355. 1946.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    —, A. C. Dey and M. V. Edwards. The vegetable tanning materials of India. Indian For. Lean. 72: 1–43. 1944.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baens, L. Possible utilization of tannins from the kernels of green betel nuts. Rev. Filipinia Med. Farm. 32: 143–145. 1941.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    —. Tannin from kernels of green betel nuts. Philipp. Jour. Sci. 75: 3–367. 1941.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bailey, L. H. A Manual of Cultivated Plants. New York. 1949.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    -. The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture. New York. 1922.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balendra, W. Effects of betel chewing on the dental and oral tissues and its possible relation to buccal carcinoma. Brit. Dental Jour. 87: 83–87. 1949.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baruah, H. K., and V. Raghavan. Analysis of factors influencing fruit-set and sterility in arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.). In: Maheshwari, P. (Ed.), “Modern Developments in Plant Physi- o’ogy”, Univ. of Delhi, 115–117. 1957.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    -,-. On factors influencing fruit-set and sterility in arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.). III. Influence of air- spora originating from fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes on the normal course of pollination and fertilization. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —, —. and K. N. Murthy. Investigations on the utilization of byproducts of arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.): Part I—Biochemistry of the husk. Jour. Sci. Industr. Res. 16C: 89–95. 1957.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bavappa, K. V. A. Merits of different nursery practices in arecanut cultivation. Areca. Jour. 7: 61–63. 1956–57.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    —, G. I. Patel and K. Shama Bhat. Germination and vigour of seedlings as influenced by the quality of seed arecanut. Areca. Jour. 8: 27–31. 1957–58.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    — and P. C. Sahadevan. A note on fruit-cracking in arecanut. Madras Agric. Jour. 39: 386–387. 1954.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beccari, O. The palms of the Philippine Islands. Philipp. Jour. Sci. 14: 295- 362. 1919.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhargava, N. M. Arecanuts in India. Agric. Situation India. 8: 801–808. 1953–54.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blatter, E. The Palms of British India and Ceylon. Oxford. 1926.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    —. Flora Arabica. Rec. Bot. Surv. India. 8: 469. 1936.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    British Veterinary Codex, 1953. London.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Broker, R., and J. V. Bhatt. Phagocytic coefficient as a measure for evaluating plant antibiotics. Indian Jour. Pharm. 15: 309–310. 1953.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    —, K. T. Gajjar, and J. V. Bhat. Phagocytic response in guinea pigs to certain indigenous medicinal plant extracts. Curr. Sci. 22: 44–45. 1953.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown, W. H. Minor Products of Philippine Forests. Vol. 1. Manila. 1920.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    -. Useful Plants of the Philippines. Vol. 1. Manila. 1951.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burkill, I. H. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula Vol. 1. London. 1935.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burret, M. Die palmen Arabiens. Bot. Jahr. Syst. 73: 175–190. 1943–44.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Butler, E. J. Some diseases of palms (Betel nut plague in Sylhet). Agric. Jour. India 1: 302–304. 1908.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    —.Fomes lucidus (Leys.) Fr. A suspected parasite. Indian For. 35: 514–518. 1909.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Caius, J. F. The medicinal and poisonous palms of India. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 37: 917–941. 1934–35.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    — and M. H. Mhaskar. The correction between the chemical composition of anthelmintics and their therapeutic values in connection with the hookworm inquiry in the Madras Presidency. Indian Jour. Med. Res. 9: 106–109. 1921–22.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chakravarthy, J. Arecanut in West Bengal and possibility of its improvement. Areca. Bull. 5: 130–133. 1954–55.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chemnitius, F. Zur herstellung des arecolins. Jour. Pr. Chem. 117: 147–150. 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chopra, R. N. Indigenous Drugs of India. Calcutta. 1933.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    — and R. L. Badhwar. Poisonous plants of India. Indian Jour. Agric. Sci. 10: 1–44. 1940.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    -, S. L. Nayar and I. C. Chopra. Glossary of Indian medicinal Plants. New Delhi. 1956.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chowdhury, J. K., K. M. Chakravarthy and A. K. Bhattacharya. Preparation of activated carbon from rice and betel- nut husks. I. Activation with zinc chloride. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. Indus. & News Ed. 4: 72–76. 1941.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    , —, and —. Preparation of activated carbon from rice and betel nut husks. II. Activation with steam and carbon dioxide. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. Indus. & News Ed. 4: 77–82. 1941.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Claus, E. P. Pharmacognosy. London. 1956.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Coleman, L. C. Anabe roga of supari. Ann. Rep. Agric. Chem. Mysore 1909- 10. 6. 1911.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    —. The control ofKoleroga of the areca palm, a disease caused byPhytophthora omnivora var.arecae. Agric. Jour. India 10: 129–136. 1915.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cowen, D. V. Flowering Trees and Shrubs in India. Bombay. 1950.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Daji, J. A. Manganese toxicity as a probable cause of theBand disease of areca palm. Curr. Sci. 17: 259–260. 1948.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    astur, J. F. Medicinal Plants of India and Pakistan. Bombay. 1951.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    -. Useful Plants of India and Pakistan. Bombay. 1951.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Davis, T. A. Branching in some Indian palms. Indian Coco. Jour. 3: 135–145. 1949–50.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    de Candolle, A. C. The Origin of Cultivated Plants. (English Translation). London. 1894.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dorasami, L. S. A brief note on areca industry in Mysore State. Areca. Jour. 7: 58–61. 1956–57.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dutt, N. B. Commercial Drugs of India. Calcutta & Simla. 1928.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Erfan Ali and M. H. Khundkar. Studies on rice husk, betelnut husk and bamboo lignins. Part I. Isolation by different methods. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. 30: 551–555. 1953.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    — and —. Studies on rice husk, betelnut husk and bamboo lignins. Part II. Nitrolignins. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. 31: 471- 474. 1954.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    — and —. Studies on rice husk, betelnut husk and bamboo lignins. Part III. Oxalic acid from lignin. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. 31: 474–479. 1954.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    The Extra Pharmacopoeia (Martindale). Vol. 1. London. 1952.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Feng, L. C. Arecanut and its extracts in the treatment of human tapeworms. Peking Nat. Hist. Bull. 18: 63–72. 1949.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    —, C. Lin, H. C. Ting and J. C. Hwang. The action of areca not (Areca catechu L.) and its extracts on tapeworm. Peking Nat. Hist. Bull. 17: 233–240. 1940.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ferguson, N. M. A Textbook of Pharmacognosy. New York. 1956.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Firminger’s Manual of Gardening for India. Calcutta. 1947.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Githens, T. S. Drug Plants of Africa. Philadelphia. 1948.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Grading of sliced boiled arecanuts. Areca. Bull. 6: 40–44. 63–67, 82–86, 101–105, 117–120, 170–178. 1955–56.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Grasser, G. A propos de quelques tanins de Japon meridional. Cuir. Tech. 18: 225–230. 1929.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Grist, D. H. The betel-nut industry. Malayan Agric. Jour. 14: 219–230. 1926.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    -. An Outline of Malayan Agriculture. London. 1950.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Guanzon, G. H., and T. G. Megia. Possibility ofMacranga tanarius as a catalyst for industrial alcohol production. Sugar News 19: 227. 1938.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Harcharan Singh. Production of furfural from coconut shells and arecanut husk. Comp. Wool 3: 47–50. 1956.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Henry, T. H. The Piant Alkaloids. London. 1949.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hill, A. F. Economic Botany. Second Ed. New York. 1952.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hooker, J. D. The Flora of British India. Vol. VI. London. 1894.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hooper, D. Indian tanning materials. Agric. Ledger 1: 1–56. 1902.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Howes, F. N. Vegetable Tanning Materials. London. 1953.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Hsiao-Liang, L. Betel nut as a useful teniafuge. Chinese Med. Jour. 50: 1273–1278. 1936.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ishikawa, I. Materials containing tannin used in Japan. Chem. News 42: 274- 277. 1880.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Joshi, N. V., and S. G. Joshi. Experiments on the control of the ‘band’ disease of areca palms. Sci.& Cult. 19: 387–391. 1953-54.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Jahns, E. Ueber die alkaloide der arecanuss. Ber. 21: 3404–3409. 1888.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    —. Ueber die alkaloide der arecanuss. Ber. 23: 2972–2978, 1890.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    —. Ueber die alkaloide der arecanuss. Ber. 24: 2615–2617. 1891.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    —. Über die alkaloide der arekanufs. Arch. Pharm. 29: 669–707. 1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kapadia, G. A. Timber wealth of Maha- Gujarat. Jour. Gujarat Res. Soc. 16: 3–25. 1954.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kariyone, T., and L. Fwa Tung. Crude drugs of Southern Asia. I. The use of areca alkaloids. Jour. Pharm. Soc. Japan 64: 67. 1944.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kay and Bastow. J. S. D. & C. 3: 132. 1887. (Quoted from Davis, W. A. and S. S. Sadtler. Allen’s Commercial Organic Analysis. London. 1911.)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Khan, A. H. The wood rotting fungi of Pakistan and their control. Pakist. Jour. Sci. 4: 65–80. 1952.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Khandige, S. B. The influence of drying on the germination of seed arecanuts (Areca catechu L.). Madras Agric. Jour. 43: 3–6. 1956.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    —, G. I. Patel and K. V. A. Bavappa. Preliminary observations on the “yellow leaf disease” of arecanut palms. Areca. Jour. 8: 61–62. 1957–58.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kirtikar, K. R. and B. D. Basu. Indian Medicinal plants. Vol. 4. Allahabad. 1933.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kuwada, S., and S. Yoshiki. Sterols. VI. Unsaponifiable constituent ofAreca catechu. Jour. Pharm. Soc. Japan 57: 266–269. 1934.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kwasnieuwski, V. Indifferent drugs of great toxicity. Pharm. Zentralb. 89: 376–382. 1950.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lal, A., and R. Chandra. Storage rot of betel nuts caused byAspergillus niger arecae. Jour. Sci. Res. Benares H’ndu Univ. 3: 119–129. 1952–53.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Lewis, F. The Vegetable Products of Ceylon. Colombo. 1934.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lushington, A. W. Vernacular List of Trees, Shrubs and Woody Climbers in the Madras Presidency. Vol. II-A. Madras. 1915.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Marker, R. E., R. B. Wagner, P. R. Ulshafer, E. L. Wittbecker, D. P. J. Goldsmith and C. H. Ruof. New sources for sapogenins. Jour. Amer. Chem. Soc. 69: 2242. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Marudarajan, D., and S. Kalyanasubramanyam. The use of plain Bordeaux mixture for the successful control of fruit rot (Mahali) of arecanuts caused byPhytophthora arecae (P. palmivora). Madras Agric. Jour. 35: 169–178. 1948.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Meenakshi, S. When arecanut reduced the desire for alcohol. Areca. Jour. 8: 88–90. 1957–58.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Meijer, Th. Vegetable oils and fats of Java. Olien Vetten en. Oliezanden 30: 187–190. 1946.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Mhaskar, K. S. and J. F. Caius. Indian plant remedies used in snake-bite. Indian Med. Res. Mem. 19: 18. 1931.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Modi, J. P. A textbook of medical Juris- prudence and Toxicology. Bombay. 1945.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Molegode, W. The arecanut in Ceylon. Trop. Agriculturist 100: 102–105. 1944.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mundkar, B. B. Fungi and Plant Diseases. London. 1949.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Nadkarni, A. K. Indian Materia Medica. Vol. 1. Bombay. 1954.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Nambiar, K. K. A Survey of Arecanut Crop in the Indian Union. Kottayam. 1949.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    -. Arecanuts in Malaya. Kozhikode. 1954.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    —. Grow more arecanuts. Areca. Bull. 6: 59–60. 1955–56.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    —, and P. A. Sreenivasan. Arecanut cultivation in West Bengal. Areca. Bull. 5: 114–117. 1954–55.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Narasimhan, M. J. Oil Bordeaux mixture against Koleroga of arecanut. Mysore Agric. Cal. 21–25. 1934.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Narayanamurti, D. and Harcharan Singh. Acid hydrolysis of coconut shells and arecanut husk for furfural and derived plastics. Comp. Wood 2: 112–117. 1955.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    —, V. Ranganathan and J. George. Building boards. I. Utilisation of arecanut husk. Indian For. Lean. No. 112: 1–9. 1947.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Nayar, S. L. Poisonous seeds of India. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 52: 88–105. 1954–55.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Nayar, P. N. Freaks in arecanut. Madras Agric. Jour. 31: 121. 1943.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Neal, M. C. In Gardens of Hawaii. Honolulu. 1948.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Notes on articles contributed to the museum of the Royal Gardens, Kew from the colonial and Indian exhibition, 1886. Kew Bull. 9: 4–21. 1887.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    A note on the parent locality, parent palm and seednut selection and technique of raising arecanut nursery. Areca. Jour. 8: 12–13. 1957-58.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Patel, G. I. Scope of arecanut improvement by breeding. Jour. Sci. Club, Calcutta 11: 13–15. 1957.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Pathak, S. P. and S. S. Mathur. The component acids and glycerides of areca-nut (Areca catechu) fat. Jour. Sci. Food & Agric. 10: 461–465. 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Petelot, M. M., L. Frontou and P. Carton. Note sur l’arequier en Indochine. Bull. Econ. Indochine 21: 321–326. 1926.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Puttarudriah, M. and G. P. Channa Basavanna. Some new insects and mites on areca palm in Mysore. Areca. Jour. 8: 10–11. 1957–58.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Patwardhan, V. N. and S. Ranganathan. The nutritive value of Indian foods and the planning of satisfactory diets. Hlth Bull. 23: 55–56. 1951.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Quisumbing, E. Medicinal plants of the Philippines. Manila. 1951.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Raghavan, V. On certain abnormal male flowers in arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.). Sci. & Cult. 22: 460–463. 1956–57.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    -. On certain aspects of the biology of arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.) and utilisation of its by-products in industry. Thesis approved for the D.Phil. degree of the Gauhati University, Assam. 1958.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    — and H. K. Baruah. On factors influencing fruit-set and sterility in arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.): I. Studies on pollen grains. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc. 35: 139–151. 1956.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    — and —. On certain aspects of the morphology of arecanuts (Areca catechu Linn.). Jour. Univ. Gauhati 7: 23–40. 1956.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    — and —. On arecanut and its scope. Sci. & Cult. 22: 150–153. 1956–57.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    — and —. On factors influencing fruit-set and sterility in arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.): II. Germination of pollen grains and growth of pollen tubes under the influence of certain auxins, vitamins and trace elements. ФYTON 7: 77–88. 1956.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    — and —. Studies on the tannins of arecanut (Areca catechu L.): I. Development of the tannin cells. ФYTON 10: 35–42. 1958.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    -,-. Studies on fats of arecanut (Areca catechu Linn.). Sci. & Cult, (in press).Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    — and K. N. Murthy. Occurrence of bisexual flowers in an arecanut palm. Sci. & Cult 20: 239. 1954–55.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Ramakrishnan, T. S. Sunscorch in areca. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 43B: 258–263. 1956.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    —, and V. Seethalakshmi. Studies in the genusPhytophthora. III. Homothallic strains ofPhytophthora onAreca catechu. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 43B: 308–313. 1956.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Rao, C. V. Embryological studies on Palmae—I. Proc. Indian Sci. Cong. 230–231. 1955.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    -. Embryological studies on Palmae —III. Ibid. 232. 1955.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    —. Embryo development in areeanut. Nature 175: 432–433. 1955.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Rau, M. K. V. The sweet arecanut,Areca catechu var.deliciosa. Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 23: 793. 1914–15.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    —. Anabe roga. Mysore Agric. Cal. 30: 27. 1917.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Reports of the recent investigations at the Imperial Institute, London. Paper making materials from India and Nigeria. Bull. Imp. Inst. London 20: 287–292. 1922.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Ridley, H. N. Flora of Malay Peninsula. Vol. 5. London. 1925.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Sands, W. N. Observations on the betel-nut palm and betel-nuts. Malayan Agric. Jour. 14: 202–218. 1926.Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Selvarangan, R. Arecanut as a tanning material. Bull. Cent. Leath. Res. Inst. 1(10): 4–7. 1955.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Shetty, K. T. A study of arecanut production in South India. Madras Agric. Jour. 36: 163–177. 1949.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Steinmetz. Materia Medica Vegetabilis. Vol. 1. Amsterdam. 1954.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Sundararaman, S., C. K. Krishnan Nayar and T. S. Ramakrishnan. The stem- bleeding disease of arecanut (Areca catechu) caused byThielaviopsis paradoxa von Hon. Bull. Agric. Res. Inst. Pusa. 169: 1–12. 1928.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Swamy, B. G. L. Embryological studies in Palmae (A preliminary note on the megasporogenesis inAreca catechu Linn.). Curr. Sci. 11: 109. 1942.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Tackholm, V., and M. Drar. Flora of Egypt. Vol. II. Cairo. 1950.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Tirumalachar, M. J. Bud rot of areca palms in Mysore. Nature 157: 108- 107. 1946.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Treasp, G. E. A Text-Book of Pharma-cognosy. London. 1952.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Venkatakrishniah, N. S.Anabe roga of coconut and arecanut palms caused byGanoderma lucidum and its eradication. Mysore Agric. Jour. 31: 227–231. 1956.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Venkatarayan, S. V. The biology ofGanoderma lucidum on areca and coconut palms. Phytopath. 26: 153–175. 1936.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    —. Bud-rot of areca palms and ‘Hidimundige’ in Mysore. Nature 158: 882. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    —. The trunk splitting disease of areca palms. Areca. Bull. 5: 181–182. 1954–55.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Waheed Khan, W., and I. D. Chughtai. Nutritive value of food stuffs. V. Miscellaneous food stuffs. Pakist. Jour. Sci. Res. 8: 155–160. 1956.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Watt, G. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of India. Vol. 1. Calcutta. 1889.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    -. The Commercial Products of India. London. 1908.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    —. A plague in the betel-nut palms, and the destruction of the tissues by what appears to be a form of tyloses. Agric. Ledger 8: 129–179. 1909.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    The Wealth of India. Vol. 1. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Wehmer, C. Die Pflanzenstoffe. Vol. 1. Jena. 1921.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Wu, P. N., and H. H. Chen. The treatment of humanFasciolopsiasis buski with betelnut. Peking Nat. Hist. Bull. 18: 151–154. 1950.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Yamamoto, Y. Materials for a flora of south eastern Asia including Formosa and Ryū-Kyū, South China. Jour. Soc. Trop. Agric. (Taiwan) 11: 275–281. 1939.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Yamamoto, R., and T. Muraoka. The catechol in the fruit ofAreca catechu L. Sci. Papers Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. Tokyo 19: 142–143. 1932.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1958

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Raghavan
    • 1
  • H. K. Baruah
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyGauhati UniversityAssamIndia

Personalised recommendations