Economic Botany

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 379–392 | Cite as

The origin of the cultivated tomato

  • J. A. Jenkins

Abstract

The ancestral form of the cultivated tomato was originally confined to the Peru-Ecuador area. After spreading north possibly as a weed in pre-Columbian times it was not extensively domesticated until it reached Mexico, and from there the cultivated forms were disseminated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Acosta, José de. 1590. Historia natural y moral de las Indias.Google Scholar
  2. Anguillara, Luigi. 1561. Semplici dell’ eccellente M.L.A., Liquali in piu Pareri a diversi nobili huomini scritti appaiono, Et. Nuovamente da M. Giovanni Martinello mandati in luce.Google Scholar
  3. Bancroft, H. H. 1883. History of Mexico.Google Scholar
  4. Bauhinus, Casparus [Bauhin, Gaspard]. 1623. Pinax theatri botanici . . . Basileae, Helvet, Ludovici Regis.Google Scholar
  5. Camerarius, Joachim. 1588. Hortus medicus et philosophicus . . . Francofurte, Moenum.Google Scholar
  6. Candolle, A. P. de. 1884. Origin of cultivated plants.Google Scholar
  7. Clusius, C. [l’Ecluse, Charles de]. 1576. Rariorum aliquot stirpum per Hispanias orservatarum Historia.Google Scholar
  8. Dodonaeus, Rembertus [Dodoens, Rembert]. 1554. Cruÿdeboeck. 1563. [Another edition.]Google Scholar
  9. Gerarde, John. 1597. The herball of general historie of plants.Google Scholar
  10. Guilandini, Melchioris. 1572. Papyrus hoc est comentarius in tria Plinii maioris de papyro capita.Google Scholar
  11. Hernandez, Francisco. 1651. Nova plantarum animalium et mineralium mexicanorum historia.Google Scholar
  12. Humboldt, A. de [Humboldt, A. von] 1811. Essai politique sur le royaume de Nouvelle Espagne.Google Scholar
  13. Lindstrom, E. W. 1935. Segregation of quantitative genes in tetraploid tomato hybrids as evidence for dominance relations of size characters. Genetics20: 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. — 1941. Genetic stability of haploid, diploid and tetraploid genotypes in the tomato. Genetics26: 387–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Luckwill, L. C. The evolution of the cultivated tomato. Royal Hort. Soc., Jour.68: 19-25.Google Scholar
  16. -. 1943b. The genusLycopersicon. An historical, bibliological and taxonomic survey of the wild and cultivated tomatoes.Google Scholar
  17. MacArthur, J. S. and L. Butler. 1938. Size inheritance and geometric growth processes in the tomato fruit. Genetics23: 253–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Martinez, M. 1937. Catologo de nombres vulgares y cientificos de plantas Mexicanas.Google Scholar
  19. Matthiolus, Petrus Andreas [Mattioli, Pierandrea]. 1544. Di Pedacio Dioscoride Anazarbeo libri cinque della historia, et materia medcicinale tradotti in lingua volgare Italiana, Venetia.Google Scholar
  20. -. 1554. [Another Edition] Commentarii, in libros sex Pedacci Dioscoricis Anazarbei, de madica materia.Google Scholar
  21. -. 1586. [Another Edition] De plantis epitome utilissima, Petri Andreae Matthioli ... (ed. Joachimus Camerarius).Google Scholar
  22. Muller, C. H. 1940a. A revision of the genusLycopersicon. U. S. Dept. Agr., Misc. Pub. No. 382.Google Scholar
  23. — 1940b. The taxonomy and distribution of the genusLycopersicon. Nat. Hort. Mag.19: 157–160.Google Scholar
  24. Phillips, H. 1821. Pomarium britannicum. An historical and botanical account of the fruits known in Great Britain.Google Scholar
  25. Powers, L. 1942. The nature of the series of environmental variances and the elimination of the genetic variances and the geometric means in crosses involving species ofLycopersicon. Genetics27: 561–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rick, C. M. 1945. A survey of cytogenetic causes of unfruitfulness in the tomato Genetics30: 347–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sabine, J. 1819. On the love apple or tomato. Royal Hort. Soc., Trans.3: 342–354.Google Scholar
  28. Standley, P. C. 1928. Flora of the Panama Canal Zone. Smithsonian Inst., U. S. Nat. Mus. 27.Google Scholar
  29. -. 1931. Flora of the Langcetilla Valley Honduras. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser. 10 No. 283.Google Scholar
  30. Vavilov, N. I. 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed. 16 (2).Google Scholar
  31. -, Mexico and Central America as the principal centre of origin of cultivated plants of New World. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed.26: 135-199.Google Scholar
  32. -. 1940. The new systematics of cultivated plants.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Jenkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of GeneticsUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations