Pulse domestication before cultivation
Comparative studies of the pulses of the Middle East and of their wild progenitors indicate that the pattern of pulse domestication is completely different from that of cereals in the same region. Wild legumes are not suitable for cultivation because of their conspicuous seed dormancy. Pre-adaptation of wild pulses for cultivation through loss of the seed dormancy mechanism apparently occurred in wild populations and may have been influenced by the gathering practices of man in pre-agricultural times. Pod indehiscence was of low value in pulse domestication and had evolved after the crop was well established and widespread.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ben Ze’ev, N., and D. Zohary. 1973. Species relationships in the genusPisum L. Israel J. Bot. 22: 73–91.Google Scholar
- Harlan, J.R. 1967. A wild wheat harvest in Turkey. Archeology 20:197–201.Google Scholar
- —. 1975. Crops and man. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- Ladizinsky, G. 1975. Collection of wild cereals in the upper Jordan Valley. Econ. Bot. 29:264–267.Google Scholar
- — 1979b. The genetics of several morphological traits in the lentils. J. Hered. 70:135–137.Google Scholar
- —. 1985b. Founder effect in crop plant evolution. Econ. Bot. 39:191–199.Google Scholar
- Zohary, D. 1969. The progenitors of wheat and barley in relation to domestication and agricultural dispersal in the Old World.In P. J. Ucko and G. W. Dimbleby, eds., The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals, p. 47–66. G. Duckworth & Co., London.Google Scholar