The Botanical Review

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 172–201 | Cite as

Action potentials in higher plants

  • Barbara G. Pickard

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Auger, D. 1928. Conduction de la variation négative dans les tissus végétaux. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. (Paris)99: 1822–1824.Google Scholar
  2. Benolken, R. M. &S. L. Jacobson. 1970. Response properties of a sensory hair excised from Venus’s flytrap. J. Gen. Physiol.56: 64–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, L. J. &R. C. Hoyt. 1943a. Polarization and stimulation of the onion root by direct current. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)18: 372–396.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, L. J. &R. C. Hoyt. 1943b. Stimulation of the onion root by alternating current. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)18: 570–587.Google Scholar
  5. Biedermann, W. 1898. Electro-physiology Vol. II (transl. by F. A. Welby). MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bose, J. C. 1907. Comparative Electro-physiology. Longman, Green and Co., London.Google Scholar
  7. Bose, J. C. 1914. An automatic method for the investigation of velocity of transmission of excitation inMimosa. Phil. Trans. B204: 63–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdon-Sanderson, J. 1873. Note on the electrical phenomena which accompany stimulation of the leaf ofDionaea muscipula. Proc. Roy. Soc. London21: 495–496.Google Scholar
  9. Burdon-Sanderson, J. 1882. On the electromotive properties ofDionaea in the excited and unexcited states. Phil. Trans.173: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burdon-Sanderson, J. 1888. On the electromotive properties of the leaf ofDionaea in the excited and unexcited states. Phil. Trans. B179: 417–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdon-Sanderson, J. 1911. The excitability of plants. In: Sir John Burdon-Sanderson, a memoir... with a selection from his papers and addresses (G. Burdon-Sanderson et al., Eds.) p. 172–198. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Burdon-Sanderson, J. &F. J. M. Page. 1876. On the mechanical effects and on the electrical disturbance consequent on excitation of the leaf ofDionaea muscipula. Proc. Roy. Soc. London25: 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulson, C. L., A. L. Christy, D. A. Cataldo &C. A. Swanson. 1972. Carbohydrate translocation in sugar beet petioles in relation to petiolar respiration and adenosine 5′-triphosphate. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)49: 919–923.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, W. R., H. Kende &K. Raschke. 1971. Specificity and reversibility of the rapid stomatal response to abscisic acid. Planta (Berl.)99: 347–351.Google Scholar
  15. Eckert, R. 1965a,b. Bioelectric control of bioluminescence in the dinoflagellateNoctiluca I. Specific nature of triggering events; II. A synchronous flash initiation by a propagated triggering potential. Science147: 1140–1142; 1142–1145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckert, R. 1972. Bioelectric control of ciliary activity. Science176: 473–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eckert, R. &T. Sibaoka. 1967. Bioelectric regulation of tentacle movement in a dinoflagellate. J. Exp. Biol.47: 433–446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Epstein, E. 1971. Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Ettienne, E. M. 1970. Control of contractility inSpirostomum by dissociated calcium ions. J. Gen. Physiol.56: 168–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuller, F. B. &B. G. Pickard. 1972. Spontaneous electrical activity inCoprinus. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.67: 291–292.Google Scholar
  21. Goeschl, J. D., H. K. Pratt &B. A. Bonner. 1967. An effect of light on the production of ethylene and the growth of the plumular portion of etiolated pea seedlings. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)43: 1077–1080.Google Scholar
  22. Goeschl, J. D., L. Rappaport &H. K. Pratt. 1966. Ethylene as a factor regulating the growth of pea epicotyls subjected to physical stress. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)41: 877–884.Google Scholar
  23. Green, T. R. &C. A. Ryan. 1972. Wound-induced proteinase inhibitor in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science175: 776–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunar, I. I., L. A. Panichkin &A. P. Maslov. 1970. Bioelectrical response reaction of seedlings as index of varietal difference in winter wheat. Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, Bot.195: 186–188.Google Scholar
  25. Gunar, I. I. &A. M. Sinyukhin. 1962. A spreading wave of excitation in higher plants. Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, Bot.142: 214–215.Google Scholar
  26. Gunar, I. I. &A. M. Sinyukhin. 1963. Functional significance of action currents affecting the gas exchange of higher plants. Soviet Pl. Physiol.10: 219–226.Google Scholar
  27. Hesse, G., B. Banerjee &H. Schildknecht. 1957. Die Reizbewegungen der Mimosoideen und ihre Hormone. Experientia13: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Houwink, A. L. 1935. The conduction of excitation inMimosa pudica. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.32: 51–91.Google Scholar
  29. Houwink, A. H. 1938. The conduction of excitation inClematis zeylanica and inMimosa pudica. Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg48: 10–16.Google Scholar
  30. Karlsson, L. 1972a. Nonrandom bioelectrical signals in plant tissue. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)49: 982–986.Google Scholar
  31. Karlsson, L. 1972b. Instrumentation for measuring bioelectrical signals in plants. Rev. Sci. Instr.43: 458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karmanov, V. G., O. O. Lyalin &G. G. Mamulashvili. 1972. Form of action potentials and cooperativeness of excited elements in winter squash stems. Soviet Pl. Physiol.19: 354–430.Google Scholar
  33. Kawano, K. 1955. Electrical change caused by blazing in a non-sensitive plant. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)68: 337–341.Google Scholar
  34. Kleinig, H., I. Dörr, C. Weber &R. Kollmann. 1971. Filamentous proteins from plant sieve tubes. Nature New Biol.229: 152–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kôketsu, R. 1923. Über die Wirkungen der Electrischen Reizung an den Pflanzenlichen Zellgebilden. J. Dept. Agric. Kyushu Imp. Univ.1: 1–133.Google Scholar
  36. Kriedemann, P. E., B. R. Loveys, G. L. Fuller &A. C. Leopold. 1972. Abscisic acid and stomatal regulation. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster)49: 842–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lou, C.-H. 1958. O peredache razdrazheniya elektricheskim tokom u rasteniy. Zh. Obshch Biol.19: 329–337.Google Scholar
  38. Lysikov, V. N. &A. I. Dukhovnyi. 1966. Izmenenie biopotentsialov v generativnykh organakh kukuruzy. Tr. Kishinevsk. Sel’skokhoz. Inst.45: 72–75.Google Scholar
  39. Mackie, G. O. 1970. Neuroid conduction and the evolution of conducting tissues. Quart. Rev. Biol.45: 319–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacRobbie, E. A. C. 1971. Phloem translocation—Facts and mechanisms: a comparative survey. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.46: 429–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mamulashvili, G. G., M. S. Krasavina &O. O. Lyalin. 1972. Sravnitel’noye izucheniye elektricheskoy aktivnosti kornyaiste’lya rasteniy. Fiziol. Rast.19: 551–557.Google Scholar
  42. Maslobrod, S. N. 1972. Electrical responses of different parts of the leaf to photic and chemical stimulation. Soviet Pl. Physiol.19: 107–117.Google Scholar
  43. Maslobrod, S. N. &V. N. Lysikov. 1972. Bioelectric polarity of plant leaf upon light and chemical stimulation. Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, Bot.203: 57–59.Google Scholar
  44. Montemartini, L. 1970. Sulla transmissione degli stimoli nelle foglie e in modo particolare nelle foglie delle leguminose. Atti. Ist. Bot. Univ. Pavia Ser. II13: 177–193.Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, P. G. &J. H. Peacock. 1972. Acetylcholine responses in L cells. Science177: 1005–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson, P. G., J. Peacock &J. Minna. 1972. An active electrical response in fibroblasts. J. Gen. Physiol.60: 58–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Okamoto, H. 1955. On the excitation phenomena in embryonic plants ofVigna sesquipedalis caused by electric stimuli, and the presence of polarities concerning the excitability. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)68: 141–149.Google Scholar
  48. Pallaghy, C. K. 1968. Electrophysiological studies in guard cells of tobacco. Planta (Berl.)80: 147–153.Google Scholar
  49. Pickard, B. G. 1971a. Action potentials resulting from mechanical stimulation of pea epicotyls. Planta (Berl.)97: 106–115.Google Scholar
  50. Pickard, B. G. 1971b. Putative action potentials inPhycomyces, Ipomoea, andXanthium. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster) 47 suppl.: 26.Google Scholar
  51. Pickard, B. G. 1972. Spontaneous electrical activity in shoots ofIpomoea, Pisum, andXanthium. Planta (Berl.)102: 91–114.Google Scholar
  52. Ricca, U. 1916. Solution d’un probléme de physiologie: la propagation de stimulus dans la sensitive. Arch. Ital. Biol. (Pisa)65: 219–232.Google Scholar
  53. Roberts, A. 1971. The role of propagated skin impulses in the sensory system of young tadpoles. Z. Vergl. Physiol.75: 388–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roberts, A. &C. A. Stirling. 1971. The properties and propagation of a cardiaclike impulse in the skin of young tadpoles. Z. Vergl. Physiol.71: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sibaoka, T. 1953. Some aspects on the slow conduction of stimuli in the leaf ofMimosa pudica. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., Biol.20: 72–88.Google Scholar
  56. Sibaoka, T. 1962. Excitable cells inMimosa. Science137: 226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sebaoka, T. 1966. Action potentials in plant organs. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.20: 49–73.Google Scholar
  58. Sibaoka, T. 1969. Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Pl. Physiol.20: 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sibaoka, T. &R. Eckert. 1967. An electrophysiological study of the tentacleregulating potentials inNoctiluca. J. Exp. Biol.47: 447–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Siniuchin (= Sinyukhin), A. &J. Stolárek. 1961. O prezewodzeniu prądów czynnościowych przez wiązki przewodzące dyni zwyczajnej (Cucurbita pepo). Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie—Skłodowska, Sect. 3, Biol.16: 215–228.Google Scholar
  61. Sinyukhin, A. M. 1964. Elektrofiziologicheskiye issledovaniya kletok flozmy vysshikh rasteniy. Izv. Timiryazevsk. Sel’skokhoz. Akad.3: 59–70.Google Scholar
  62. Sinyukhin, A. M. &E. A. Brittkov. 1967a. Generation of potentials in the pistils ofIncarvillea and lily in conjunction with movement of the stigma and fertilization. Soviet Pl. Physiol.14: 393–403.Google Scholar
  63. Sinyukhin, A. M. &E. A. Britikov. 1967b. Action potentials in the reproductive system of plants. Nature215: 1278–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sinyukhin, A. M. &V. V. Gorchakov. 1966a. Action potentials of higher plants not possessing motor activity. Biophysics11: 966–975.Google Scholar
  65. Sinyukhin, A. M. &V. V. Gorchakov. 1966b. Characteristics of the action potentials of the conducting systems of pumpkin stems evoked by various stimuli. Soviet Pl. Physiol.13: 727–733.Google Scholar
  66. Sinyukhin, A. M. &V. V. Gorchakov. 1968. Role of the vascular bundles of the stem in long-distance transmission of stimulation by means of bioelectric impulses. Soviet Pl. Physiol.15: 400–407.Google Scholar
  67. Sinyukhin, A. M. &I. V. Rutkovskii. 1966. An electrophysiological method of recording the vitality of woody plants. Soviet Pl. Physiol.13: 310–316.Google Scholar
  68. Umrath, K. 1937. Über den Erregungsvorgang und sonstige reizbedingte Veränderungen in der Oberepidermis der Zweibeischuppen vonAllium cepa. Protoplasma (Wien)28: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Umrath, K. 1959. Die Erregungsvorgang. In: Encycl. Pl. Physiol., Vol. 17, Pt. 1 (W. Ruhland, Ed.) p. 24–110. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  70. Umrath, K. 1962. Autonome Bewegungen von Blättern und autonome Erregungsvorgänge in Blättern. In: Encycl. Pl. Physiol., Vol. 17, Pt. 2 (W. Ruhland, Ed.) p. 542–561. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  71. Vyskrebentseva, E. I. &A. M. Sinyukhin. 1967. Influence of potassium ions on generation and conduction of action potentials in the vascular bundles of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) stems. Soviet Pl. Physiol.14: 692–699.Google Scholar
  72. Weis-Fogh, T. &W. B. Amos. 1972. Evidence for a new mechanism of cell motility. Nature236: 301–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Went, F. W. &K. V. Thimann. 1937. Phytohormones. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, S. E. &B. G. Pickard. 1972a. Receptor potentials and action potentials inDrosera tentacles. Planta (Berl.)103: 193–221.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, S. E. &B. G. Pickard. 1972b. Properties of action potentials inDrosera tentacles. Planta (Berl.)103: 222–240.Google Scholar
  76. Williams, S. E. &R. M. Spanswick. 1972. Intracellular recordings of the action potentials which mediate the thigmonastic movements ofDrosera. Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster) 49 suppl.: 64.Google Scholar
  77. Wood, D. C. 1970. Electrophysiological studies of the protozoan,Stentor coeruleus. J. Neurobiol.1: 363–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara G. Pickard
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations