Cytogenetics of the vegetable crops IV. Legumes (continued)
Article
- 97 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Keywords
Seed Coat Botanical Review Lima Bean Seed Coat Color Snap Bean
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
- 1.Acosta, J. C., andL. M. Petrache. 1960. The transfer of the bushy character from cowpea (Vigna sinensis (Linn.) Savi) to Sitao (Figna sesquipedalis Fruw.). Philipp. Agr.43(9): 535–547.Google Scholar
- 2.Afanasiev, M. M., andH. E. Morris. 1952. Bean virus 2 (yellow) on Great Northern bean in Montana. Phytopath.42: 101–104.Google Scholar
- 3.Ahmed, Q. A. 1949. Varietal resistance and susceptibility ofPhaseolus radiatus towards Cercospora. Science and Culture14: 436.Google Scholar
- 4.Ali, M. A. K. 1949. Genetics of resistance to the common bean mosaic virus (bean virus 1) in the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Phytopath.39: 1.Google Scholar
- 5.Ali, Mohamed A. 1950. Genetics of resistance to the common bean mosaic virus (bean virus 1) in the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Phytopath.40: 69–79.Google Scholar
- 6.Allard, H. A., andH. F. Allard. 1940. The wild beanPhaseolus polystachyus (L.) B.S.P.: its chromosome number. J. Wash. Acad. Sci.30: 335–337.Google Scholar
- 7.-, andW. J. Zaumeyer. 1944. Responses of beans (Phaseolus) and other legumes to length of day. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 867.Google Scholar
- 8.Allard, R. W. 1952. Inheritance of hypocotyl color in lima beans. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.60: 387–390.Google Scholar
- 9.— 1953. Inheritance of some seed-coat colors and patterns in lima beans. Hilgardia22: 167–177.Google Scholar
- 10.— 1953. Inheritance of four morphological characters in lima beans. Hilgardia22: 383–389.Google Scholar
- 11.— 1953. A gene in lima beans pleiotropically affecting male-sterility and seedling abnormality. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.61: 467–471.Google Scholar
- 12.— 1954. Natural hybridization in lima beans in California. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.64: 410–416.Google Scholar
- 13.— 1954. New heat tolerant lima bean. Calif. Agr.8 (3): 5.Google Scholar
- 14.— 1954. Sources of root-knot nematode resistance in lima beans. Phytopath.44: 1–4.Google Scholar
- 15.— 1956. Estimation of prepotency from lima bean diallel cross data. Agron. J.48: 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.— 1956. Genes modifying theCc andRr loci in lima beans. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.68: 386–391.Google Scholar
- 17.— 1963. An additional gametophyte factor in the lima bean. Züchter33: 212–216.Google Scholar
- 18.— 1963. Evidence for genetic restriction of recombination in the lima bean. Genetics48: 1389–1395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.—, andW. M. Clement. 1960. Linkage in lima beans. J. Hered.50: 63–67.Google Scholar
- 20.Anderson, A. L., andE. E. Down. 1954. Inheritance of resistance to the variant strain of the common bean mosaic virus. Phytopath.44: 481.Google Scholar
- 21.Anderson, M. E. 1941. Sensation Refugees, two new mosaic-resistant varieties. Canner92 (7): 14–15.Google Scholar
- 22.Andrus, C. F., andJ. C. Hoffman. 1950. Fullgreen, a blight resistant bush snap bean. Seed World66 (9): 16, 18.Google Scholar
- 23.—, andW. D. Moore. 1935.Colletotrichum truncatum (Schw.) n. comb., on garden and lima beans. Phytopath.25: 121–125.Google Scholar
- 24.-, andB. L. Wade. 1942. The factorial interpretation of anthracnose resistance in beans. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 810.Google Scholar
- 25.Anonymous. 1951. Bean rust now attacks dwarf beans. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales.62: 308–309.Google Scholar
- 26.Anonymous. 1959. Phaseolus. 5e Jaarverslag. Proefstation voor de Groenteteelt in de Volle Grond in Nederland. Alkmaar 1959: 44–48.Google Scholar
- 27.Anonymous. 1947. Resistance of hybrid cowpea strains to bean fly. Queensland Bur. Sugar Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.47: 124.Google Scholar
- 28.Arant, F. S. 1932. Control of the cowpea curculio (Chalcodermus aeneus Boh.). Alabama Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.43: 22–23.Google Scholar
- 29.-. 1938. Life history and control of the cowpea curculio. Alabama Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 246.Google Scholar
- 30.Atkin, J. D. 1958. Relative susceptibility of snap bean varieties to mechanical injury of seed. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.72: 370–373.Google Scholar
- 31.— 1961. Possible nature of the flat-pod vogue in snap beans. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop.4: 4–5.Google Scholar
- 32.— 1961. Seed abortion in snap beans. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop.4: 5–6.Google Scholar
- 33.Azzam, H. A. 1958. Inheritance of resistance to Fusarium root rot inPhaseolus vulgaris L., andPhaseolus coccineus L. Diss. Abstr.18: 32–33.Google Scholar
- 34.Babb, M. F., J. E. Kraus, B. L. Wade, andW. J. Zaumeyer. 1941. Drought tolerance in snap beans. J. Agr. Res.62: 543–555.Google Scholar
- 35.Baggett, J. R. 1956. The inheritance of resistance to strains of bean yellow mosaic virus in the interspecific crossPhaseolus vulgaris × P. coccineus. Pl. Dis. Rept.40: 702–707.Google Scholar
- 36.— 1957. Effects of genetic segregation inPhaseolus vulgaris on the symptoms induced by bean yellow mosaic virus. Phytopath.47: 365–368.Google Scholar
- 37.—, andW. A. Frazier. 1957. The inheritance of resistance to bean yellow mosaic virus inPhaseolus vulgaris. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.70: 325–333.Google Scholar
- 38.——. 1959. Disease resistance in the runner bean,Phaseolus coccineus L. Pl. Dis. Rept.43: 137–143.Google Scholar
- 39.Bailey, L. H. (Ed.) 1935. Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture. 3 vols. Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
- 40.— 1940.Phaseolus lunatus and relatives. Gentes Herbarum4: 336–341.Google Scholar
- 41.— 1949. Manual of cultivated plants, pp. 1116. Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
- 42.Bailey, S. F. 1937. The bean thrips. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 609.Google Scholar
- 43.Bailey, W. K. 1939. Puerto Rican wild lima beans seem resistant to pod borers. Puerto Rico Agr. Exp. Sta. Rept.1938: 77.Google Scholar
- 44.— 1940. Resistance of lima beans toEmpoasca. Puerto Rico Agr. Exp. Sta. Rept.1939: 59–62.Google Scholar
- 45.Ballon, F. B., andT. L. York. 1959. Crossing the common and scarlet bean (Phaseolus spp.) withVigna species. Philipp. Agr.42: 454–455.Google Scholar
- 46.Barrons, K. C. 1940. Root-knot resistance in beans. J. Hered.31: 35–38.Google Scholar
- 47.Barrus, M. F. 1911. Variation of varieties of beans in their susceptibility to anthracnose. Phytopath.1: 190–195.Google Scholar
- 48.— 1915. An anthracnose-resistant Red Kidney bean. Phytopath.5: 303–311.Google Scholar
- 49.— 1918. Varietal susceptibility of bean to strains ofColletotrichum Lindemuthianum (S. & M.) B. & C. Phytopath.8: 589–614.Google Scholar
- 50.Bemis, W. P. 1957. Inheritance of a base seed-coat color factor in lima beans. J. Hered.48: 124–127.Google Scholar
- 51.— 1959. Selective fertilization in lima beans. Genetics44: 555–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.—, andN. Kedar. 1961. Inheritance of morphological abnormalities in seedlings of two species ofPhaseolus. J. Hered.52: 171–178.Google Scholar
- 53.Beyer, A. H. 1922. The bean leafhopper and hopperburn with methods of control. Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.164: 61–88.Google Scholar
- 54.Blakeslee, A. F., andB. T. Avery. 1917. Adzuki beans and Jimson weeds. J. Hered.8: 125–131.Google Scholar
- 55.Blazey, P. A., P. G. Smith, A. G. Gentile, andS. T. Miyagawa. 1964. Nematode resistance in the common bean. J. Hered.55: 20–22.Google Scholar
- 56.Bredemann, G., andH. Ten Doornkaat-Koolman. 1927. Zur Immunitätszüchtung beiPhaseolus vulgaris gegenüberColletotrichum Lindemuthianum und seinen Biotypen. Z. Pflanzenzucht.12: 209–217.Google Scholar
- 57.Brittingham, W. H. 1946. A key to the horticultural groups of varieties of the southern pea,Vigna sinensis. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.48: 478–480.Google Scholar
- 58.— 1950. The inheritance of date of pod maturity, pod length, seed shape and seed size in the southern pea,Vigna sinensis. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.56: 381–388.Google Scholar
- 59.—, andJ. A. Mortensen. 1951. Varietal differences in shellout percentages in the southern pea,Vigna sinensis. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.58: 257–262.Google Scholar
- 60.Brock, R. D. 1951. Resistance to angular leaf spot among varieties of beans. J. Australian Inst. Agr. Sci.17: 25–30.Google Scholar
- 61.Buishand, T. 1955. Eenige ervaringen met het veredelen van Bonen (I) (Phaseolus spp.) A. Het kruisen van Bonen. B. Ervaringen met het. veredelen tot de F2 generatie. [Some experiences in breeding beans (I) (Phaseolus spp.). A. The crossing of beans. B. Experiences in breeding up to the F2 generation.] Medel. Proefst. Groenteteelt 1, 48 pp.Google Scholar
- 62.— 1956. The crossing of beans (Phaseolus spp.). Euphytica5: 41–50.Google Scholar
- 63.Burkart, A., andH. Brucher. 1953.Phaseolus aborigineus Burkart, die mutmassliche andine Stammform der Kulturbohne. Züchter23: 65–72.Google Scholar
- 64.Burke, D. W., andG. H. Starr. 1950. Studies on bean root rot in northern Wyoming. J. Colorado-Wyoming Acad. Sci.4: 58–59.Google Scholar
- 65.Burkholder, W. H. 1918. The production of an anthracnose-resistant white marrow bean. Phytopath.8: 353–359.Google Scholar
- 66.— 1923. The gamma strain ofColletotrichum lindemuthianutn (Sacc. & Magn.). Phytopath.13: 316–323.Google Scholar
- 67.— 1924. Varietal susceptibility among beans to the bacterial blight. Phytopath.14: 1–7.Google Scholar
- 68.— 1926. A new bacterial disease of the bean. Phytopath.16: 915–927.Google Scholar
- 69.—, andE. T. Bullard. 1946. Varietal susceptibility of beans toXanthomonas phaseoli var.fuscans. Pl. Dis. Rept.30: 446–448.Google Scholar
- 70.-, andI. M. Hawley. 1923. Diseases and insects and other pests of the field bean in New York. New York Cornell Agr. Ext. Bull. 58.Google Scholar
- 71.—, andA. S. Muller. 1926. Hereditary abnormalities resembling certain infectious diseases in beans. Phytopath.16: 731–737.Google Scholar
- 72.—, andK. Zaleski. 1932. Varietal susceptibility of beans to an American and a European strain ofPhytomonas medicaginis var.phaseolicola and a comparison of the strains in culture. Phytopath.22: 85–94.Google Scholar
- 73.Buttonschön, H. 1963. Über die Genetik der Virusresistenz beiPhaseolus vulgaris L. und ihre Anwendung in der Züchtung von Gartenbohnen. Z. Pflanzenzücht.50: 9–20.Google Scholar
- 74.Calderón Guevara, J. 1958. The development and use of varieties of beans resistant to certain insect pests of legumes. Diss. Abstr.18: 1931.Google Scholar
- 75.Campbell, J. A., andJ. C. Hoffman. 1950. Contender, a new fresh-market snap bean. Seed World66 (2): 14, 16, 46.Google Scholar
- 76.Candolle, Alphonse de. 1884. Origin of Cultivated Plants.Google Scholar
- 77.Capinpin, J. M. 1935. A genetic study of certain characters in varietal hybrids of cowpea. Philipp. J. Sci.57: 149–165.Google Scholar
- 78.—, andT. A. Irabagon. 1950. A genetic study of pod and seed characters inVigna. Philipp. Agr.33: 263–277.Google Scholar
- 79.Cardona-Alvarez, C. 1962. Herencia de la resistencia a la mancha angular en frijol. Agr. Trop.18: 330–331.Google Scholar
- 80.Cetas, R. C., andR. E. Wester. 1956. Natural crossing in lima beans on Long Island, New York, in 1955. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.68: 392–393.Google Scholar
- 81.Charlton, J. 1926. The selection of Burma beans (Phaseolus lunatus) for low prussic acid content. India Dept. Agr. Mem., Chem. Ser.,9: 36.Google Scholar
- 82.Childers, N. F., H. F. Winters, P. S. Rubles, andH. K. Plank. 1946. Resistance of beans toEmpoasca fabalis DeLong. U. S. Dept. Agr., Office Exp. Sta., Federal Exp. Sta. in Puerto Rico, Rept.1945: 31–33.Google Scholar
- 83.Christow, A. 1934. Einege Versuche über die Bakterienkrankheit bei Bohen. Phytopath. Z.7: 537–544.Google Scholar
- 84.Clausen, J., D. D. Keck, W. M. Hiesey, andP. Grun. 1950. Experimental taxonomy.In: Carnegie Institution of Washington Yrbk.49: 101–114.Google Scholar
- 85.Cottier, W. 1948. Resistance of dwarf beans to field infestation by bean weevil (Bruchus obtectus Say.). New Zealand J. Sci. Technol.29: 284–286.Google Scholar
- 86.Couturier, A. 1943. Observations sur un ennemi peu connu du haricot: la pyrale des haricots (Etiella zinckenella Treitschke. Lgpidop. Pyral.). Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France29: 292–293.Google Scholar
- 87.Coyne, D. P. 1964. Species hybridization inPhaseolus. J. Hered.55: 5–6.Google Scholar
- 88.—,M. L. Schuster, andS. Al-Yasiri. 1963. Reaction studies of bean species and varieties to common blight and bacterial wilt. Pl. Dis. Rept.47: 534–537.Google Scholar
- 89.Crispin, A., andS. Dongo. 1962. New physiologic races of bean rust,Uromyces phaseoli typica, from Mexico. Pl. Dis. Rept.46: 411–413.Google Scholar
- 90.Currence, T. M. 1930. Inheritance studies inPhaseolus vulgaris. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 68.Google Scholar
- 91.— 1931. A new pod color in snap beans. J. Hered.22: 21–23.Google Scholar
- 92.DaCosta, G. C. 1954. Factors causing varietal differences in germination of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Diss. Abstr.14: 6564.Google Scholar
- 93.Dana, B. F. 1940. Resistance and susceptibility to curly top in varieties of common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytopath.30: 786.Google Scholar
- 94.Davidson, J. 1923. Biological studies ofAphis rumicis L. The penetration of plant tissues and the source of food supply of aphids. Ann. Appl. Biol.10: 35–54.Google Scholar
- 95.Dean, L. L., andC. W. Hungerford. 1954. Idaho Bountiful and Golden Gem: curly topand mosaic-resistant snap beans. Phytopath.44: 486.Google Scholar
- 96.—,V. E. Wilson, R. E. Thornton, andO. Agenbroad. 1959. Unusual reactions of two snap bean varieties to two strains of common bean-mosaic virus. Pl. Dis. Rept.43: 131–132.Google Scholar
- 97.DeZeeuw, D. J., andJ. C. Ballard. 1959. Inheritance in cowpea of resistance to tobacco ringspot virus. Phytopath.49: 332–334.Google Scholar
- 98.—, andR. A. Crum. 1963. Inheritance of resistance to tobacco ringspot and cucumber mosaic viruses in Black cowpea crosses. Phytopath.53: 337–340.Google Scholar
- 99.Dhaliwal, A. S., L. H. Pollard, andA. P. Lorz. 1962. Cytological behavior of an F1 species cross (Phaseolus lunatus L. var. Fordhook ×Phaseolus polystachyus L.). Cytologia27: 369–374.Google Scholar
- 100.Ditmar, E. E. 1930. A contribution to the question of the origin of cultivated beans. Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. Pl. Breed.23: 309–406.Google Scholar
- 101.Down, E. E., andJ. W. Thayer, Jr. 1938. The Michelite bean. Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Spec. Bull. 295.Google Scholar
- 102.Dunavan, D., andM. B. Hughes. 1947. Cowpea curculio (Calcodermis aeneus Boh.). South Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.59: 69.Google Scholar
- 103.Dundas, B. 1936. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew in beans. Hilgardia10: 241–253.Google Scholar
- 104.— 1939. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew in runner beans (Phaseolus coccineus), tepary beans (P. acutifolius), yard-long beans (Vigna sesquipedalis) and cowpeas (Vigna sinensis). Phytopath.29: 824.Google Scholar
- 105.— 1941. Further studies on the inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew of beans. Hilgardia13: 551–565.Google Scholar
- 106.— 1942. Breeding beans for resistance to powdery mildew and rust. Phytopath.32: 828.Google Scholar
- 107.Dunlop, W. R. 1915. The poisonous forms of “Phaseoluslunatus” (the lima bean). W. Indian Bull. 15:29–35.Google Scholar
- 108.Eberle, P. 1961. Tetraploiden vonPhaseolus multiflorus Lam. undPhaseolus vulgaris L. Deut. Bot. Ges. Ber.74: 441–448.Google Scholar
- 109.Edgerton, C. W. 1910. The bean anthracnose. Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 119.Google Scholar
- 110.-, andC. C. Moreland. 1916. Experiments on varietal resistance to the bean and cotton anthracnose diseases. Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 155.Google Scholar
- 111.Emerson, R. A. 1902. Preliminary account of variation in bean hybrids. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.15: 30–49.Google Scholar
- 112.— 1904. Heredity in bean hybrids (Phaseolus vulgaris). Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.17: 33–68.Google Scholar
- 113.— 1909. Factors for mottling in beans. Amer. Breed. Ass.5: 368–376.Google Scholar
- 114.— 1909. Inheritance of color in seeds of the common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Rept.22: 65–101.Google Scholar
- 115.— 1910. Inheritance of sizes and shapes in plants. Amer. Nat.44: 736–746.Google Scholar
- 116.— 1916. A genetic study of plant height inPhaseolus vulgaris. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull.7: 3–75.Google Scholar
- 117.Enken, V. B. 1949. (Susceptibility ofPhaseolus species to bacterial attack.) Trud. Priklad. Bot. Genet. Seleck.28: 90–118.Google Scholar
- 118.Farooqui, H. M., andJ. P. McCollum. 1954. Relation of morphological structure and development to seed coat rupture in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.63: 333–341.Google Scholar
- 119.Feenstra, W. J. 1960. Biochemical aspects of seedcoat colour inheritance inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Mededel. Landbouwhogesch.60 (2): 1–53.Google Scholar
- 120.Fennell, J. L. 1948. New cowpeas resistant to mildew. J. Hered.39: 275–279.Google Scholar
- 121.Fermond, Ch. 1855. Recherches sur les fécondations réciproques de quelques végétaux. Bull. Soc. Bot. France2: 748–754.Google Scholar
- 122.Fernando, M. 1941. The relative resistance of some cowpea varieties toAgromyza phaseoli Coq. Trop. Agr.96: 221–224.Google Scholar
- 123.Fish, S., andA. T. Pugsley, 1936. Halo blight of beans. Control by resistant varieties. J. Dept. Agr. Victoria34: 278.Google Scholar
- 124.Floresca, E. T., J. M. Capinpin, andJ. V. Pancho. 1960. A cytogenetic study of Bush Sitao and its parental types. Philipp. Agr.44: 290–298.Google Scholar
- 125.Fluiter, H. J. de, andG. W. Ankersmit. 1948. Gegevens betreffende de aantasting van bonen (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) door de zwarte bonenluis (Aphis Doralis) Fabae Scop). [Data on the infestation of beans byAphis fabae]. Tijdschr. over Plantenziekton54: 1–13.Google Scholar
- 126.Fozdar, B. S. 1962. Cytological investigation of parents, offspring and backcross derivatives in the interspecific crossPhaseolus lunatus L. ×P. polystachyus (L.) B.S.P. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
- 127.Frandsen, N. O. 1952. Untersuchungen zur Virusresistenzüchtung beiPhaseolus vulgaris L. I. Phytopatholgische Untersuchungen. Z. Pflanzenzücht.31: 381–420.Google Scholar
- 128.Frazier, W. A., J. R. Baggett, andW. A. Sistrunk. 1958. Transfer of certain Blue Lake bean pod characters to bush beans. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.71: 416–421.Google Scholar
- 129.—,J. W. Hendrix, andK. Kikuta. 1948. Breeding rust resistant pole green beans for Hawaii. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.51: 468–470.Google Scholar
- 130.Frets, G. P. 1951. The heredity of the dimensions and the weight of the seeds ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Genetica25: 338–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 131.Fromme, F. D., andS. A. Wingard. 1921. Varietal susceptibility of beans to rust. J. Agr. Res.21: 385–404.Google Scholar
- 132.Fulton, H. R. 1908. Diseases of pepper and beans. Louisiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 101.Google Scholar
- 133.Gardner, M. W., andE. B. Mains. 1929. Indiana plant diseases. Indiana Acad. Sci.39: 85–99.Google Scholar
- 134.Gates, Doris. 1945. Varietal resistance of beans to the potato leafhopper. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.58: 61.Google Scholar
- 135.Giménez Martin, G. 1957. Hacia el esclarecimento del porque de una polimorfa generación F1. (Towards the elucidation of the reason for a polymorphic F1 generation.) Genet. Iber.9: 225–282.Google Scholar
- 136.Gloyer, W. O. 1928. The two new varieties of red kidney bean: Geneva and York. New York, Geneva Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 145.Google Scholar
- 137.Grogan, R. G., andJ. C. Walker. 1948. The relation of common mosaic to black rot of bean. J. Agr. Res.77: 315–331.Google Scholar
- 138.Guevara, C., J. Patino, andE. Casas. 1960. Selección de variedades de frijol resistentes al picudo del ejote. Agr. Tec. Mexico.1960: 10–12.Google Scholar
- 139.Gui, H. L. 1945. Susceptibility of bean varieties to insect infestation. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.659: 112–113.Google Scholar
- 140.Guignard, L. 1907. Physiologie végétale—sur la greffe des plantes à acide cyanhydrique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris145: 1376–1380.Google Scholar
- 141.Haigh, J. C., andJ. V. Lochrie. 1929. Investigation of a Mendelian ratio inVigna sinensis by a consideration of the progeny from successive daily crosses. Ann. Bot.43: 783–802.Google Scholar
- 142.Halsted, B. D. 1907. Experiments with bush beans. Ann. Rept. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta.28: 340–343.Google Scholar
- 143.Hare, W. W. 1950. Many varieties compared in effort to develop cowpeas resistant to disease. Mississippi Farm Res.13: 1.Google Scholar
- 144.— 1952. Reaction of cowpea varieties toFusarium wilt. Phytopath.42: 283.Google Scholar
- 145.— 1953. A new race ofFusarium causing wilt of cowpea. Phytopath.43: 291.Google Scholar
- 146.— 1955. Resistance toFusarium wilt in Brown Sugar Crowder cowpeas. Phytopath.45: 347.Google Scholar
- 147.— 1956. Some characters identified in cowpeas segregating for resistance toFusarium wilt. Phytopath.46: 14.Google Scholar
- 148.— 1957. Inheritance of resistance ofFusarium wilt in cowpeas. Phytopath.47: 312–313.Google Scholar
- 149.— 1959. Resistance to root-knot nematodes in cowpea. Phytopath.49: 318.Google Scholar
- 150.Harland, S. C. 1919. Notes on inheritance in the cowpea. Agr. News, Barbados.18: 20, 68.Google Scholar
- 151.— 1919. Inheritance of certain characters in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). J. Genet.8: 101–132.Google Scholar
- 152.— 1920. Inheritance of certain characters in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). II. J. Genet.10: 193–205.Google Scholar
- 153.— 1922. Inheritance of certain characters in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). III. The very small-eye pattern of the seed coat. J. Genet.12: 254.Google Scholar
- 154.Harrison, A. L. 1936. Varietal susceptibility of lima beans to mosaic. Pl. Dis. Rept.20: 291.Google Scholar
- 155.Harter, L. L. 1930. Thresher injury a cause of baldhead in beans. J. Agr. Res.40: 371–384.Google Scholar
- 156.— 1938. Mosaic of lima beans (Phaseolus lunatus macrocarpus). J. Agr. Res.56: 895–906.Google Scholar
- 157.—,C. F. Andrus, andW. J. Zaumeyer. 1935. Studies on bean rust caused byUromyces phaseoli typica. J. Agr. Res.50: 737–759.Google Scholar
- 158.-, andW. J. Zaumeyer. 1932. Bean diseases and their control. U. S. Dept. Agr. Farm. Bull. 1692.Google Scholar
- 159.——. 1941. Differentiation of physiologic races ofUromyces phaseoli typica on bean. J. Agr. Res.62: 717–732.Google Scholar
- 160.-, and -. 1957. A monographic study of bean diseases and methods for their control. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 868.Google Scholar
- 161.Hawthorne, P. L. 1943. The breeding and improvement of edible cowpeas. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 562–564.Google Scholar
- 162.Hayden, F. R., P. H. Heinze, andB. L. Wade. 1948. Vitamin content of snap beans grown in South Carolina. Food Res.13: 143–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 163.Heinze, P. H., M. S. Kanapaux, B. L. Wade, P. C. Grimball, andR. L. Foster. 1944. Ascorbic acid content of 39 varieties of snap beans. Food Res.9: 19–26.Google Scholar
- 164.Hernandes Xolocotzi, E., S. Miranda Colín, andCz. Prywer. 1959. El origen dePhaseolus coccineus L.darwinianus Hdz. X. & C. Miranda subspecies nova. Rev. Soc. Mexico. Hist. Nat.20: 99–121.Google Scholar
- 165.Higgins, B. B. 1930. “Halo spot” of beans and kudzu. Georgia Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 161.Google Scholar
- 166.Hilpert, M. M. 1949. Genetic studies inPhaseolus vulgaris. Summ. Ph.D. Thes. Univ. Minnesota3: 19–20.Google Scholar
- 167.Hocquette, M., andMme. M. Hocquette. 1953. Les régions hétérochromatiques du noyau quiescent deCucurbita et dePhaseolus. Action de l’acide folique. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.236: 841–844.Google Scholar
- 168.Hofmann, F. W. 1926. Hybrid vigor in cowpeas. J. Hered.17: 209–211.Google Scholar
- 169.Hoffman, James C. 1959. Extender bean. Seed World84 (4): 28.Google Scholar
- 170.—, andM. S. Kanapaux. 1952. Wade, a new all purpose snap bean. Seed World70 (2): 38–39, 46.Google Scholar
- 171.Holdaway, F. G. 1940. Differential susceptibility of varieties of garden bean to oviposition by melon fly,Dacus cucurbitae Coq. Hawaii Ent. Soc. Proc.10: 421–422.Google Scholar
- 172.Honma, Shigemi. 1956. A bean interspecific hybrid. J. Hered.47: 217–220.Google Scholar
- 173.—, andO. Heeckt. 1958. Bean interspecific hybrid involvingPhaseolus coccineus andP. lunatus. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.72: 360–364.Google Scholar
- 174.——. 1959. Interspecific hybrid betweenPhaseolus vulgaris andP. lunatus. J. Hered.50: 233–237.Google Scholar
- 175.Hubbeling, N. 1946. (Susceptibility to seedborne diseases shown by varieties of dwarf Frenchbeans). Inst. voor de Vereleling van Tuinbouwgewassen (Wageningen) Med.1: 1–9.Google Scholar
- 176.— 1957. New aspects of breeding for disease resistance in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica6: 111–141.Google Scholar
- 177.— 1961. Inheritance and interaction of genes for disease resistance inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Internat. Bot. Cong. 1959. Recent Advn. Bot.9: 438–443.Google Scholar
- 178.Hungerford, C. W. 1951. Plant breeders develop beans resistant to curly-top. Idaho Agr. Coll., Idaho Agr. Sci.36 (3): 5.Google Scholar
- 179.Hutton, E. M., andL. B. Beall. 1957. Root-knot nematode resistance in two pasture species ofPhaseolus. J. Australian Inst. Agr. Sci.23: 158.Google Scholar
- 180.Isarlishvili, S. L. 1940. (On the degree of susceptibility of various varieties of beans to anthracnose in the Georgian SSR.) (Bull. Georgian Exp. Sta. Plant Protect. Ser. A., Phytopath.)2: 227–252.Google Scholar
- 181.Isbell, C. L. 1931. Nematode-resistance studies with pole snap beans. J. Hered.22: 191–198.Google Scholar
- 182.Ivanov, N. R. 1928. Peculiarities in the originating of forms ofPhaseolus L. in the Old and in the New World. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet, and Pl. Breed.19: 185–212.Google Scholar
- 183.Jensen, J. H., andR. W. Goss. 1942. Physiological resistance to halo blight in beans. Phytopath.32: 246–253.Google Scholar
- 184.Johannesen, W. 1909. Über Knospenmutation beiPhaseolus. Z. Ind. Abst. Vererb.1: 1–10.Google Scholar
- 185.Jones, V. H. 1952. Material from the Hemonway archaeological expedition (1887–88) as a factor in establishing the American origin of the garden bean. Proc. 29th Intern. Cong. Americanists3: 177–184.Google Scholar
- 186.Kajanus, B. 1914. Zur Genetik der Samen vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Z. Pflanzenzucht.2: 377–388.Google Scholar
- 187.Kakazaki, Yoichi. 1923. Linked inheritance of certain characters in the Adzuki bean. Genetics8: 168–177.Google Scholar
- 188.Kaplan, L. 1956. The cultivated beans of the prehistoric Southwest. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden43: 189–251.Google Scholar
- 189.—, andR. S. MacNeish. 1960. Prehistoric bean remains from caves in the Ocampo region of Tamaulipas, Mexico. Harvard Univ. Bot. Mus. Leaflet19: 33–56.Google Scholar
- 190.Karpechenko, G. D. 1925. (On the chromosomes of Phaseolinae). Bull. Appl. Bot. Plant Breed.14: 143–148.Google Scholar
- 191.Kawakami, I. 1930. Chromosome numbers in Leguminosae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo44: 319–328.Google Scholar
- 192.Kedar, N., andW. P. Bemis. 1960. Hybridization between two species ofPhaseolus separated by physiological and morphological blocks. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.76: 397–402.Google Scholar
- 193.Kendrick, J. B. 1936. A cowpea resistant toFusarium wilt and nematode root knot. Phytopath.26: 98.Google Scholar
- 194.—, andR. W. Allard. 1955. Lima bean tolerant to stem rot. Calif. Agr.9 (10): 8, 15.Google Scholar
- 195.Kennedy, P. B., andB. A. Madson. 1935. The mat bean (Phaseolus aconitifolius). Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 396.Google Scholar
- 196.Khadilkar, B. T. 1963. Inheritance of two characters in green gram (Phaseolus aureus Roxb. Piper). Akola Agr. Coll. Mag.3: 29–32.Google Scholar
- 197.Kihara, H., Y. Yamamoto, andS. Hosono. 1931. A list of chromosome numbers of plants cultivated in Japan. Reprint from Studies on Chromosome Numbers of Plants. Yokendo, Tokyo.Google Scholar
- 198.Kooiman, H. N. 1920. On the heredity of the seed-coat colour inPhaseolus vulgaris. Bussum, van Dishoeck, Utrecht, 98 pp.Google Scholar
- 199.— 1931. Monograph on the genetics ofPhaseolus (especiallyPh. vulgaris andPh. multiflorus). Bibliogr. Genetica.8: 259–409.Google Scholar
- 200.Kornicki. 1876. Über die Resultate des BastardesPhaseolus multiflorus undvulgaris. Verh. naturh. Vereines Preuss. Rheinl. Westafalen33: 47, 48, 244.Google Scholar
- 201.Krishnaswamy, N., K. K. Nambiar, andA. Mariakulandal. 1945. Studies in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Madras Agr. J.33: 145–160., 193–200.Google Scholar
- 202.Kristofferson, K. B. 1924. Colour inheritance in the seed coat ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Hereditas5: 33–43.Google Scholar
- 203.Kroh, M. 1962. Vergleichende Untersuchungen anPhaseolus coccineus Selbstungen und Kreuzungen zwischenPh. vulgaris undPh. coccineus. Z. Pflanzenzucht.47: 201–216.Google Scholar
- 204.Kumar, L. S. S. 1945. A comparative study of autotetraploid, and diploid types in Mung,Phaseolus radiatus Linn. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.B21: 266–268.Google Scholar
- 205.—, andA. Abraham. 1942. Induction of polyploidy in crop plants. Curr. Sci.11: 112–113.Google Scholar
- 206.Kyle, J. H. 1959. Factors influencing water entry through the micropyle inPhaseolus vulgaris L. and their significance in inheritance studies of hard seeds. Diss. Abstr.20: 840.Google Scholar
- 207.Lakon, Georg. 1916. Über die Empfänglichkeit vonPhaseolus vulgaris L. undPhaseolus multiflorus W. für Bohnenrost und andere Krakheiten. Z. Pflanzenkrankh.26: 83–97.Google Scholar
- 208.Lambeth, Victor N. 1950. Some factors influencing pod set and yield of the lima bean. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 466.Google Scholar
- 209.Lamprecht, Herbert. 1932. Beitrage zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Zur Vererbung der Testafarbe. Hereditas16: 169–211.Google Scholar
- 210.—. 1932. Beitrage zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris. II. Über Vererbung von Hülsenfarbe und Hülsenform. Hereditas16: 295–340.Google Scholar
- 211.—. 1932. Beiträge zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris. III. Zwieter Beitrag zur Vererbung der Testafarbe. Hereditas17: 1–20.Google Scholar
- 212.—. 1932. Zur genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris. IV. Studien über Genenkoppelung, mit einem Fall von erblich bedingtem welchselnden Crossoverprozent. Hereditas17: 21–53.Google Scholar
- 213.—. 1932. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, V. Spaltungsergebnisse nach Kreuzung einer weissamigen mit gefärbtsamigen Bohenlinien. Hereditas17: 54–66.Google Scholar
- 214.—. 1933. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, VI. Vierter Beitrag zur Vererbung der Testa farbe. Hereditas17: 249–316.Google Scholar
- 215.—. 1934. Zur Zenetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, VII. Zwei weitere Gene für Sameneigenschaften,Cor undFast. Hereditas19: 163–176.Google Scholar
- 216.—. 1934. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, VIII. Über Farbenverteilung und Vererbung der Teilfarbigkeit der Testa. Hereditas19: 177–222.Google Scholar
- 217.—. 1934. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, IX. Über der Einfluss des GenpaaresR-r auf die Testa färbe. Hereditas20: 32–46.Google Scholar
- 218.—. 1934. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, X. Über Infloreszenztypen und ihre Vererbung. Hereditas20: 71–93.Google Scholar
- 219.—. 1934. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XI. Eine Mutante mit einfachen Blättern und ihre Vererbungsweise. Hereditas20: 238–250.Google Scholar
- 220.—. 1934. Komplexe und homologe Mutationen insbesondere beiPhaseolus vulgaris, Ph. multifiorus undPisum sativum. Hereditas20: 273–288.Google Scholar
- 221.—. 1935. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XII. Über die Vererbung der Blüten- und Stammfarbe. Hereditas21: 129–166.Google Scholar
- 222.—. 1936. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XIII. Ein neues Grundgen für Testafarben, ein weiteres Testafarben sowie etwas über Blütenfarben. Hereditas22: 241–268.Google Scholar
- 223.—. 1937. Über einen Phaseolus—Typus mit abwärts geneigten Blättern und seine Vererbung. Bot. Notiser1937: 341–354.Google Scholar
- 224.—. 1939. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XIV. Über die Wirkung der GeneP, C, J, Ins, Can, G, B, V, Vir, Och undFlav. Hereditas25: 255–288.Google Scholar
- 225.—. 1940. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XV. Über die Vererbung der Merfarbigkeit Testa. Hereditas26: 65–99.Google Scholar
- 226.—. 1940. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XVI. Weitere Beiträge zur Vererbung der Teilferbigkeit. Hereditas26: 277–291.Google Scholar
- 227.—. 1940. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris, XVII-XVIII. Hereditas26: 292–304.Google Scholar
- 228.—. 1941. Die Artgranze zwischenPhaseolus vulgaris L. undmultifiorus Lam. Hereditas27: 51–175.Google Scholar
- 229.—. 1944. Om sambandet mellan fröproduktion och baljfärg hos trädgårds-bönor, sarskilt med hänsyn till effekten av klorofyll och xantofyll. Agri Hort. Genet.2: 1–19. (Swedish with English summary.)Google Scholar
- 230.—. 1944. Die genisch-plasmatische Grundlage der Artbarriere. Agri Hort. Genet.2: 75–141.Google Scholar
- 231.—. 1945. En ny prydnadsväxt ur korsningen mellan trädgårdsoch blomsterböna, jämte ett klarläggande av artbegreppet. Agri Hort. Genet.3: 14–32. (Swedish with English summary.)Google Scholar
- 232.—. 1945. Intra- and interspecific genes. Agri Hort. Genet.3: 45–60.Google Scholar
- 233.—. 1947. The seven alleles of the geneR ofPhaseolus. Agri Hort. Genet.5: 46–64.Google Scholar
- 234.—. 1947. The inheritance of the slender-type ofPhaseolus vulgaris and some other results. Agri Hort. Genet.5: 72–84.Google Scholar
- 235.—. 1948. Die Terminalverstärkung der Blütenfarbe vonPhaseolus vulgaris und ihre Vererbung. Agri Hort. Genet.6: 49–63.Google Scholar
- 236.—. 1948. On the effect and linkage of genes transmitted fromPhaseolus coccineus to Ph. vulgaris. Agri Hort. Genet.6: 64–81.Google Scholar
- 237.—. 1948. The genetic basis of evolution. Agri Hort. Genet.6: 83–86.Google Scholar
- 238.—. 1948. Zur Lösung der Artproblems. Agri Hort. Genet.6: 87–141.Google Scholar
- 239.—. 1951. Die Vererbung der Testafarbe beiPhaseolus vulgaris L. Agri Hort. Genet.9: 18–83.Google Scholar
- 240.—. 1951. Über die Vererbung der roten Hülsenfarbe beiPhaseolus vulgaris. Agri Hort. Genet.9: 84–87.Google Scholar
- 241.—. 1951. EinPhaseolus coccineus—Typ mit scheckigen Blüten und seine Vererbung. Agri. Hort. Genet.9: 135–138.Google Scholar
- 242.—. 1952. Ein Gen Fürtruncata—samen bei Phaseolus. Agri Hort. Genet.10: 105–112.Google Scholar
- 243.—. 1952. Weitere Kopplungsgruppen vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Agri Hort. Genet.10: 141–151.Google Scholar
- 244.—. 1955. Die Vererbung der Caruncula-warze beiPhaseolus vulgaris und die KopplungsgruppeSur-Y-Cau-Te-Miv-P. Agri Hort. Genet.13: 143–153.Google Scholar
- 245.—. 1957. Artifizielle Umwandlung einer Spezies in eine andere. Agri Hort. Genet.15: 194–206.Google Scholar
- 246.—. 1958. Weitere Studien über die aphyllus—Mutant vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Agri Hort. Genet.16: 103–111.Google Scholar
- 247.—. 1959. Der Artbegriff, sein Entwicklung und experimentelle Klarlegung. Agri Hort. Genet.17: 103–264.Google Scholar
- 248.—. 1960. The synonymy of the genesSh andD withJ andB for the seed coat colour ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Agri Hort. Genet.18: 205–208.Google Scholar
- 249.—. 1961. Die Vererbung eines Phaseolus—typs mit drei Kotyledon sowie über die Wirkung von drei neven Genen. Agri Hort. Genet.19: 333–343.Google Scholar
- 250.—. 1961. Weitere Kopplungsstudien anPhaseolus vulgaris mit einer Übersicht über die Koppelungsgruppen, Agri Hort. Genet.19: 319–332.Google Scholar
- 251.—. 1961. Die Vererbung der rezessiv roten Testafarbe vonPhaseolus. Sowie Bemerking en zur Manifestation und Symbolik von Testafarbgenen. Agri Hort. Genet.19: 344–359.Google Scholar
- 252.Lebedeff, G. A. 1943. Heredity and environment in the production of hard seeds in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Puerto Rico Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 4.Google Scholar
- 253.— 1947. Studies on the inheritance of hard seeds in beans. J. Agr. Res.74: 205–215.Google Scholar
- 254.Lefevre, P. C. 1950.Bruchus obtectus Say ou bruche des haricots (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Publ. Inst. Nat. Agron. Congo Belge No. 48.Google Scholar
- 255.Leitch, I. 1921. A study of the segregation of a quantitative character in a cross between a pure line of beans and a mutant from it. J. Genetics11: 183–204.Google Scholar
- 256.Lock, R. H. 1906. Studies in plant breeding in the tropics III. Experiments with maize (Zea mays L.). Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Peradeniya3: 95–184.Google Scholar
- 257.Lorz, A. P. 1952. An interspecific cross involving the lima beanPhaseolus lunatus L. Science115: 702–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 258.— 1954. The development of new varieties of table legumes for production in Florida. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Florida13: 64–70.Google Scholar
- 259.Mackie, W. W. 1932, A hitherto unreported disease of maize and beans. Phytopath.22: 637–644.Google Scholar
- 260.— 1939. Breeding for resistance in Blackeye cowpeas to cowpea wilt, charcoal rot, and root-knot nematode. Phytopath.29: 826.Google Scholar
- 261.— 1943. Origin, dispersal, and variability of the lima bean,Phaseolus lunatus. Hilgardia15: 1–29.Google Scholar
- 262.-. 1946. Blackeye beans in California. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 696.Google Scholar
- 263.—, andK. Esau. 1932. A preliminary report on resistance to curly top of sugar beets in bean hybrids and varieties. Phytopath.22: 207–216.Google Scholar
- 264.MacLeod, G. F. 1935. Plant varietal resistance to insect injury. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.48: 100.Google Scholar
- 265.Magruder, R., andR. E. Wester. 1941. Green cotyledon, a new character in the mature lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 581–584.Google Scholar
- 266.Malinowski, E. 1924. Expériences sur les hybrides duPhaseolus vulgaris et le problème de l’hétérose (“heterosis”). Mém. de l’Inst. de Génét., École Sup. d’Agr,. Varsovie,2: 1–68.Google Scholar
- 267.— 1928. A peculiar case of heterosis inPhaseolus vulgaris. Z. ind. Abst. Vererb. Supplement bandII: 1090–1093.Google Scholar
- 268.— 1935. Studies on hybrid vigor inPhaseolus vulgaris (L.) Savi. Z. Ind. Abst. Vererb.70: 96–124.Google Scholar
- 269.Mann, Albert. 1914. Coloration of the seed coat of cowpeas. J. Agr. Res.2: 33–56.Google Scholar
- 270.Mastenbrock, C. 1953. Breeding haricot beans for resistance to halo blight. Transactions Netherlands Study Center Pl. Breed. 496–503.Google Scholar
- 271.— 1960. A breeding programme for resistance to anthracnose in dry shell haricot beans, based on a new gene. Euphytica9: 177–258.Google Scholar
- 272.Matsuura, H. 1933. A bibliographical monograph on plant genetics (genie analysis). Hokkaido Imper. Univ. 2nd ed.Phaseolus pp. 296–319.Google Scholar
- 273.McCollum, J. P. 1953. Factors affecting cotyledonal cracking during the germination of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Pl. Phys.28: 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 274.McFarlane, J. S., andG. H. Rieman. 1943. Leafhopper resistance among the bean varieties. J. Econ. Ent.36: 639.Google Scholar
- 275.McGuire, D. C., andR. W. Allard. 1958. Testing nematode resistance in the field. Pl. Dis. Rept.42: 1169–1172.Google Scholar
- 276.——, andJ. A. Harding. 1961. Inheritance of root knot nematode [Meloidogyne spp.] resistance in lima beans. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.78: 302–307.Google Scholar
- 277.McKinney, K. B. 1938. Physical characteristics of the foliage of beans and tomatoes that tend to control some small insect pests. J. Econ. Ent.31: 630–631.Google Scholar
- 278.McRostie, G. P. 1919. Inheritance of anthracnose resistance as indicated by a cross between a resistant and a susceptible bean. Phytopath.9: 141–148.Google Scholar
- 279.— 1921. Inheritance of disease resistance in the common bean. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.13: 15–32.Google Scholar
- 280.Mendel, Gregor. 1865. Versuche über Pflanzen-hybriden. Verhand. Naturf. ver. Brunn.4: 3–47.Google Scholar
- 281.Metcalf, H. N. (1949) 1951. Observations on pod-color ratio in a Cuban stock of the Black Turtle Soup bean. Proc. Montana Acad. Sci.9: 29–31.Google Scholar
- 282.Miller, L. W. 1947. Populations ofThrips tabaci Lind, on bean varieties. J. Australian Inst. Agri. Sci.13: 141–142.Google Scholar
- 283.Ministerio de Agr., Oficina de Invest. Especiales. 1957. Sexto Informe Anual. 1955–56Phaseolus. Rev. Nac. Agr. Bogotá51: 1–89.Google Scholar
- 284.Miyake, Kiichi, Y. Imai, andK. Tabuchi. 1930. Contributions to the genetics ofPhaseolus vulgaris. J. Coll. Agr., Imp. Univ. Tokyo.11: 1–20.Google Scholar
- 285.Moore, W. D. 1936. Powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) on garden snap beans. Phytopath.26: 1135–1144.Google Scholar
- 286.Monge, S. F., andC. C. Moh. 1963. Estudio citologica de plantas autotetraploides de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris). Turrialba13 (1): 14–21.Google Scholar
- 287.Mortensen, J. A., andW. H. Brittingham. The inheritance of pod color in the southern pea,Vigna sinensis. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.59: 451–456.Google Scholar
- 288.Moutia, A. 1945. The bean fly,Melangromyza phaseoli Coq. Mauritius Dept. Agr., Div. Ent. Rept.1944: 14–19.Google Scholar
- 289.Murphy, D. M. 1940. A Great Northern bean resistant to curly-top and common bean-mosaic viruses. Phytopath.30: 779–784.Google Scholar
- 290.—, andW. H. Pierce. 1938. A mosaic-resistant small red bean. Phytopath.28: 270–273.Google Scholar
- 291.Muto, A. 1929. Chromosome arrangement. II. The meiotic divisions on the pollen mother cells ofPhaseolus chrysanthos Say. andCassia occidentalis L. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ. Ser. B.4: 265–271.Google Scholar
- 292.Nagl, W. 1962. 4096-Ploidie und “Riesenchromosomen” im Suspensor vonPhaseolus coccineus. Naturwissensch.49: 261–262.Google Scholar
- 293.Nakayama, R. 1957. Genetical studies of French beans. I. On the inheritance of abnormal dwarfness. (Bull. Fac. Agr. Hirosaki Univ.)3: 26–29. (In Japanese.)Google Scholar
- 294.— 1958. Genetical studies on kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). II. On the inheritance of hypocotyl color. (Bull. Fac. Agr. Hirosaki Univ.)4: 80–87.Google Scholar
- 295.— 1959. Genetic studies on kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). III. On inheritance of chlorina-a type of chlorophyll deficiencies. (Bull. Fac. Agr. Hirosaki Univ.)5: 1–5.Google Scholar
- 296.— 1959. Genetic studies on kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). IV. On the inheritance of hypocotyl color 2. (Bull. Fac. Agr. Hirosaki Univ.)5: 6–13.Google Scholar
- 297.— 1960. Genetical studies on kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). V. On the inheritance of seedcoat color. (Bull. Fac. Agr. Hirosaki Univ.)6: 21–36.Google Scholar
- 298.— 1961. Genetical studies on kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). VI. Genetical behavior of plant color, with special reference to seedcoat color in the hybrids between white kidney and other varieties. (Bull. Fac. Agr. Hirosaki Univ.)7: 37–65.Google Scholar
- 299.Neal, D. C. 1924. Blight resistant beans suitable for planting in Mississippi. Mississippi State Plant Quart. Bull.3: 34.Google Scholar
- 300.Neuburg, W. B., J. H. MacGillivray, Mas Yamaguchi, andL. K. Mann. 1954. Wrinkled seed coat defect in green lima beans for freezing. Pl. Dis. Rept.38: 464–466.Google Scholar
- 301.Nilsson, E. 1929. Eine einfaktorielle Rezessivabweichung in Bezug auf die Farbe des Samenschale beiPhaseolus. Hereditas12: 41–52.Google Scholar
- 302.North, C., andF. L. Squibbs. 1952. A description of dwarf French bean varieties grown in the United Kingdom. J. Nat. Inst. Agr. Bot.6: 196–211.Google Scholar
- 303.Norton, J. B. 1915. Inheritance of habit in the common bean. Amer. Nat.49: 547–561.Google Scholar
- 304.Norton, J. D. 1961. Inheritance of growth habit and flowering response of the southern peaVigna sinensis. Endl. Diss. Abstr.22: 36.Google Scholar
- 305.Olave L., C. A. 1958. Resistancia de algunas variedades y líneas de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) alIsariopsis griseola Sacc. Acta Agron., Palmira8: 197–219.Google Scholar
- 306.Orman, A. C. 1949. Field bean improvement. Two projects being undertaken. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales60: 198.Google Scholar
- 307.Orton, W. A. 1902. Some diseases of the cowpea. I. The wilt disease of the cowpea and its control U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bull. 17.Google Scholar
- 308.— 1913. The development of disease resistant varieties of plants. Compt. Rend. & Rapp. IVe Conf. Intern. Genet.1911: 247–265.Google Scholar
- 309.Owen, E. J. 1911. Inheritance studies with beans. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.31: 277–281.Google Scholar
- 310.Owen, F. V., I. M. Burgess, andC. R. Burnham. 1928. The influence of environmental factors on pigment pattern in varieties of common beans. J. Agr. Res.37: 435–442.Google Scholar
- 311.Parker, M. C. 1933. The inheritance of a yellow-spot character in the bean. J. Hered.24: 481–487.Google Scholar
- 312.— 1934. Inheritance of a leaf variegation in the common bean. J. Hered.25: 165–170.Google Scholar
- 313.— 1936. Inheritance of resistance to the common mosaic virus in the bean. J. Agr. Res.52: 895–915.Google Scholar
- 314.Parsons, P. A., andR. W. Allard. 1960. Seasonal variation in lima bean seed size: an example of genotypic-environmental interaction. Heredity14: 115–123.Google Scholar
- 315.Pathak, G. N., andBalram Singh. 1963. Inheritance studies in green gram. Indian J. Genet.23: 215–218.Google Scholar
- 316.Pattimore, E. D., andR. W. Allard. 1962. Host-parasite interactions between lima bean strains and four species of root-knot nematodes. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.81: 299–303.Google Scholar
- 317.Pearl, R., andF. M. Surface. 1915. Studies on bean breeding. I. Standard types of yellow-eye beans. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 293.Google Scholar
- 318.Petersen, H. J. 1958. Beiträge zur genetik der Reaktion vonPhaseolus vulgaris L. auf Infektion mit Phaseolus-Virus 1 Stamm Voldagsen. Z. Pflanzenzücht.39: 187–224.Google Scholar
- 319.Pierce, W. H. 1934. Resistance to common bean mosaic in the Great Northern field bean. J. Agr. Res.49: 183–188.Google Scholar
- 320.— 1934. Viruses of the bean. Phytopath.24: 87–115.Google Scholar
- 321.— 1935. The inheritance of resistance to common bean mosaic in field and garden beans. Phytopath.25: 875–883.Google Scholar
- 322.—, andJ. C. Walker. 1933. The development of mosaic resistant Refugee beans. Canner77 (26): 7–9.Google Scholar
- 323.Piper, C. V. 1912. Agricultural varieties of the cowpea and immediately related species. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bull.229: 1–160.Google Scholar
- 324.-. 1913. The wild prototype of the cowpea. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Circ. 124D.Google Scholar
- 325.— 1926. Studies of American Phaseolinae. Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb.22: 663–701.Google Scholar
- 326.-, andW. J. Morse. 1914. Five oriental species of beans. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 119.Google Scholar
- 327.Prakken, R. 1934. Inheritance of colours and pod characters inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica16: 177–294.Google Scholar
- 328.— 1937. Linkage relations inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica19: 242–272.Google Scholar
- 329.— 1940-41. Inheritance of colours inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Genetica22: 331–408.Google Scholar
- 330.Price, W. C. 1930. Local lesions on bean leaves inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus. Amer. J. Bot.17: 694–702.Google Scholar
- 331.Pryor, D. E., andR. E. Wester. 1946. Relative resistance and susceptibility of U. S. 243 and U. S. 343 lima beans to lima-bean mosaic. Phytopath.36: 170–172.Google Scholar
- 332.Puerta, J., andA. Alonso. 1958. Pruebas de resistencia a diferentes enfermedades en diversa variedades de judias. Bol. Inst. Invest. Agron., Madrid.18 (38): 37–48.Google Scholar
- 333.Pugsley, A. T. 1936. Halo blight of beans. Varietal resistance tests. J. Dept. Agr. Victoria34: 311–315.Google Scholar
- 334.Quantz, L. 1958. Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung mosaik-resistenter, überempfindlicher Gartenbonensorten (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) im Labortest. Phytopath. Z.31: 319–330.Google Scholar
- 335.Rands, R. D., andWilbur Brotherton, Jr. 1925. Bean varietal tests for disease resistance. J. Agr. Res.31: 101–154.Google Scholar
- 336.Rau, N. S. 1929. Further contribution to the cytology of some crop plants of South India. J. Indian Bot. Soc., Madras,8: 201–206.Google Scholar
- 337.Reddick, Donald. 1922. A hybrid bean resistant to anthracnose and to mosaic. Phytopath.12: 47.Google Scholar
- 338.—, andV. B. Stewart. 1918. Varieties of beans susceptible to mosaic. Phytopath.8: 530–534.Google Scholar
- 339.——. 1919. Additional varieties of bean susceptible to mosaic. Phytopath.9: 149–152.Google Scholar
- 340.Reid, W. D. 1934. Production of wilt-free beans. New Zealand J. Agr.49: 164–169.Google Scholar
- 341.— 1945. Resistance of beans to halo-blight and anthracnose and the occurrence of bean-mosaic and bean-weevil. New Zealand J. Sci. and Technol.27: 331–335.Google Scholar
- 342.(Report on Agricultural Research in the Netherlands). 1956. pp. 146. (In Dutch.) (Pl. Breed. Abstr.28: 3861. 1958).Google Scholar
- 343.Rhind, D. 1933. A note on the inheritance of seed-coat colour inPhaseolus lunatus L. Indian J. Agr. Sci.3: 360–364.Google Scholar
- 344.Richards, B. L., andW. H. Burkholder. 1943. A new mosaic disease of beans. Phytopath.33: 1215–1216.Google Scholar
- 345.Richmond, T. E. 1926. Legume inoculation as influenced by stock and scion. Bot. Gaz.82: 438–442.Google Scholar
- 346.Rodrigo, E. 1943. Resistance of cowpeas to aphids andAgromyza. Ceylon Adm. Rept. Act. Direct. Agr.1942: 1–16.Google Scholar
- 347.Roy, R. S., andR. H. Richharia. 1948. Breeding and inheritance studies on cowpeas. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.40: 479–489.Google Scholar
- 348.Rudorf, W. 1955. Die Übertragung der Resistenz gegen die Bohnenmosaik-Viren 1 (gewohnliches Bohnenmosaik) und 2 (gelbes Bohnenmosaik) ausPhaseolus coccineus in fertile Bastardpflanzen aus der KreuzungPhaseolus vulgaris × Phaseolus coccineus. Naturwissensch.42: 19–20.Google Scholar
- 349.— 1956. Neue Beobachtungen an Bastarden vonPhaseolus vulgaris L. ×Phaseolus multifiorus Lam. undPh. multiflorus × Ph. vulgaris. Proc. Internat. Cong. Genet.9: 844–845.Google Scholar
- 350.— 1958. Ein Beitrag zur Genetik der Resistenz gegen das Bohnenmosaik virus 1. Phytopath. Z.31: 371–380.Google Scholar
- 351.— 1958. Genetics ofPhaseolus aborigineus Burkart. Proc. X Intern. Cong. Genet2: 243.Google Scholar
- 352.— 1960. Über die mutagene Winkung von S35 beiPhaseolus vulgaris. Z. Pflanzenzücht.45: 69–90.Google Scholar
- 353.— 1961. Untersuchungen über die bei der Bastardierung vonPhaseolus vulgaris L. ×Phaseolus coccineus L. und der reziproken Bastardierung auftrenden besonderen Probleme. II. Untersuchungen über die Genetik der Spaltung der F1. Z. Pflanzenzucht.46: 307–324.Google Scholar
- 354.Ryder, E. J. 1958. The effects of complementary epistasis on the inheritance of a quantitative character, seed size inheritance in lima beans. Agron. J.50: 298–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 355.Saginadze, G. V. 1961. (Hybridization ofPhaseolus vulgaris (L.) Savi andGlycine hispida (Moench.) Maz. Preliminary communication). Tbilisskii Bot. Inst. Trudy21: 301–308. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
- 356.Sasaki, T. 1922. (Inheritance of eye and flower-color in the cowpea). J. Sci. Agr. Soc.232: 19–38. (In Japanese, cited by Matsuura.)Google Scholar
- 357.Saunders, A. R. 1952. Complementary lethal genes in the cowpea. South African J. Sci.48: 195–197.Google Scholar
- 358.— 1959. Inheritance in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis Endb.). I. Colour of the seed coat. South African J. Agr. Sci.2: 285–307.Google Scholar
- 359.— 1960. Inheritance in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis Endb.). II. Seed coat colour pattern; flower, plant and pod colour. South African J. Agr. Sci.3: 141–162.Google Scholar
- 360.— 1960. Inheritance in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis Endb.). III. Mutations and linkages. South African J. Agr. Sci.3: 327–348.Google Scholar
- 361.—. 1960. Inheritance in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis Endb.). IV. Lethal combinations. South African J. Agr. Sci.3: 497–515.Google Scholar
- 362.Sax, K. 1923. The association of size differences with seed-coat pattern and pigmentation inPhaseolus vulgaris. Genetics8: 552–560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 363.— 1924. The nature of size inheritance. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.10: 224–227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 364.— 1926. Quantitative inheritance inPhaseolus. J. Agr. Res.33: 349–354.Google Scholar
- 365.— 1926. A genetical interpretation of ecological adaptation. Bot. Gaz.82: 223–227.Google Scholar
- 366.—, andH. C. McPhee. 1923. Color factors in bean hybrids. J. Hered.14: 205–208.Google Scholar
- 367.Schertz, K. F., W. Jurgelsky, Jr., andW. C. Boyd. 1960. Inheritance of anti-A1 hemagglutinating activity in lima beans,Phaseolus lunatus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.46: 529–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 368.Schreiber, Fritz. 1932. Resistenzzüchtung beiPhaseolus vulgaris. Phytopath. Z.4: 415–454.Google Scholar
- 369.—. 1933. Resistenz-züchtung bei Buschbohnen. Kühn-Arch.38: 287–292.Google Scholar
- 370.—. 1934. Zur Genetik der weissen Samenfarbe beiPhaseolus vulgaris. Züchter6: 53–61.Google Scholar
- 371.—. 1940. Die Genetik der Teilfarbung der Bohnensamen (Phaseolus vulgaris). Z. Abst. Vererb.78: 59–114.Google Scholar
- 372.Schroeder, W. T., andR. Provvidenti. 1962. A strain of bean virus 2 that overcomes resistance in peas conditioned by themo mo genotype. Phytopath.52: 751.Google Scholar
- 373.Schultz, H. K., andL. L. Dean. 1947. Inheritance of curly top disease reaction in the bean,Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.39: 47–51.Google Scholar
- 374.Schuster, M. L. 1950. A genetic study of halo blight reaction inPhaseolus vulgaris. Phytopath.40: 604–612.Google Scholar
- 375.Schwarze, P. 1959. Untersuchungen über die gesteigerte Flavonoidproduktion in Phaseolus-Artbastarden (Phaseolus vulgaris × Phaseolus coccineus). Planta54: 152–161.Google Scholar
- 376.Scott, L. B. 1940. The bean pod borers in Puerto Rico. J. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico24: 35–47.Google Scholar
- 377.Sen, N. K., andJ. G. Bhowal. 1960. Colchicine-induced tetraploids of six varieties ofVigna sinensis. Indian J. Agr. Sci.30: 149–161.Google Scholar
- 378.——. 1960. Cytotaxonomic studies onVigna. Cytologia25: 195–207.Google Scholar
- 379.——. 1961. Genetics ofVigna sinensis (L.) Savi. Genetica32: 247–266.Google Scholar
- 380.—. 1962. A male-sterile mutant cowpea. J. Hered.53: 44–46.Google Scholar
- 381.—, andA. K. Ghosh. (1960) 1963. Interspecific hybridization betweenPhaseolus aureus Roxb. (green gram) andPh. mungo L. (black gram). Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal14: 1–4.Google Scholar
- 382.——. (1960) 1963. Inheritance of a chlorophyll deficient mutant in green gram (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.). Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal14: 80–81.Google Scholar
- 383.Senn, H. A. 1938. Chromosome number relationships in the Leguminosae. Bibliog. Genetica12: 175–336.Google Scholar
- 384.Shaw, G. W. 1913. The selective improvement of the lima bean. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 238.Google Scholar
- 385.-, andM. E. Sherwin. 1911. The production of the lima bean: the need and possibility of its improvement. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 224.Google Scholar
- 386.Shaw, J. K. 1913. Color correlation in garden beans. Science38: 126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 387.— 1913. The inheritance of blossom color in beans. Massachusetts Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.25: 182–203.Google Scholar
- 388.-, andJ. B. Norton. 1918. The inheritance of seed coat color in beans. Massachusetts Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 185.Google Scholar
- 389.Sherman, I., andW. M. Upholt. 1940. Cowpea curculio. Variety tests. South Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.53: 60–61.Google Scholar
- 390.Sherman, W. C., andW. D. Salmon. 1939. Carotene content of different varieties of green and mature soybeans and cowpeas. Food Res.4: 371–380.Google Scholar
- 391.Sherwin, Helen S., andC. L. Lefebvre. 1951. Reactions of cowpea varieties to bacterial canker. Pl. Dis. Rept.35: 303–317.Google Scholar
- 392.Shull, G. H. 1907. Some latent characters of a white bean. Science25: 828–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 393.— 1908. A new Mendelian ratio and several types of latency. Amer. Nat.42:433–451.Google Scholar
- 394.Shull, W. E. 1933. An investigation of the Lygus species which are pests of beans (Hemiptera, Miridae). Idaho Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 11.Google Scholar
- 395.Silberschmidt, K., andM. Kramer. 1941. Brazilian bean varieties as plant indicators for the tobacco-mosaic virus. Phytopath.31: 430–439.Google Scholar
- 396.Sill, W. H., Jr., andJ. C. Walker. 1952. A strain of cowpea susceptible to systemic infection by various strains of common cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopath.42: 442.Google Scholar
- 397.Sinclair, J. B., andJ. C. Walker. 1954. Inheritance of resistance to common cucumber mosaic virus in cowpea. Phytopath.44: 506.Google Scholar
- 398.Singh, D., andT. R. Mehta. 1953. Inheritance of lobed leaf margin in mung (Phaseolus aureus L.). Curr. Sci.22: 348.Google Scholar
- 399.Sirks, M. J. 1922. The colour factors of the seed coat inPhaseolus vulgaris L. and inPh. multifiorus Willd. Genetica4: 97–138.Google Scholar
- 400.— 1925. The inheritance of seedweight in the gardenbean (Phaseolus vuls). Genetica7: 119–169.Google Scholar
- 401.— 1938. A case of budvariation inPhaseolus caused by a transitory plasmatic change. Genetica20: 121–158.Google Scholar
- 402.Skalinska, Marie. 1925. Contributions à la connaissance des pigments des graines dePhaseolus vulgaris. Compte Rendu Soc. de Biol.93: 780–781.Google Scholar
- 403.Skoog, H. A. 1952. Studies on host-parasite relations of bean varieties resistant and susceptible toPseudomonas phaseolicola and toxin production by the parasite. Phytopath.42:475.Google Scholar
- 404.Small, J. K. 1933. Manual of the Southeastern Flora. New York.Google Scholar
- 405.Smith, F. L. 1934. Pale, an hereditary chlorophyll deficiency in beans. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.26: 893–897.Google Scholar
- 406.— 1931. A genetic analysis of red seedcoat color inPhaseolus vulgaris. Hilgardia12: 551–616.Google Scholar
- 407.— 1947. Inheritance of seedcoat color in derivatives of Pinto beans. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.39: 1039–1052.Google Scholar
- 408.— 1956. Inheritance of three seedcoat color genes inVigna sinensis. Hilgardia24: 279–296.Google Scholar
- 409.— 1961. Seed-coat color genes in six commercial varieties of beans. Hilgardia31: 1–14.Google Scholar
- 410.—, andB. R. Houston. 1960. Root rot resistance in common beans sought in plant breeding program. Calif. Agr.14 (9): 8.Google Scholar
- 411.—, andCatherine B. Madsen. 1948. Seed-color inheritance in beans. Interaction of the alleles at theR, Rk andBl loci inPhaseolus vulgaris. J. Hered.39: 190–194.Google Scholar
- 412.Spillman, W. J. 1911. Inheritance of the “eye” inVigna. Amer. Nat.45: 513–523.Google Scholar
- 413.— 1912. The present status of the genetics problem. Science35: 757–767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 414.— 1913. Color correlation in cowpea. Science38: 302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 415.—, andW. J. Sando. 1929. Mendelian factors in the cowpea (Vigna species). Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts & Let.11: 249–283.Google Scholar
- 416.Stapp, C. 1933. Verfahren zur Prüfung von Bohnen auf Resistenz gegenPseudomonas medicaginis var.phaseolicola Burkh, den Erreger der Fettfleckenkrankheit. Angew. Bot.15: 241–246.Google Scholar
- 417.— 1935. Fortgeführte Untersuchungen über die Resistenzverschiedenheiten von Bohnen (Ph. vulgaris) gegenPseudomonas medicaginis var.phaseolicola Burkh. Angew Bot.17: 23–42.Google Scholar
- 418.Steen, C. R., andV. H. Jones. 1941. Prehistoric lima beans in the Southwest. El Palacia48: 197–203.Google Scholar
- 419.Strand, A. B. 1943. Species crosses in the genusPhaseolus. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 569–573.Google Scholar
- 420.-. 1950. Further studies of crosses in the genusPhaseolus. Mimeographed. Presented at Southern Agricultural Workers Meeting, Biloxi, Mississippi.Google Scholar
- 421.Strider, D. L., andR. W. Toler. 1963. Efficacy of screening southern peas in the seedling stage for Cladosporium spot resistance. Pl. Dis. Rept.47: 493–496.Google Scholar
- 422.Stroman, G. N., J. Carter, andS. Paur. 1950. Pinto bean breeding investigations in New Mexico. New Mexico Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 354.Google Scholar
- 423.Sturtevant, E. L. 1889. History of garden vegetables. Lima bean,Phaseolus lunatus L. Amer. Nat.23: 665–667.Google Scholar
- 424.-. 1919. Sturtevant’s notes on edible plants. (U. P. Hedrick, Ed.) New York State Agr. Exp. Sta. Twenty-seventh Ann. Rept.2: 1–686.Google Scholar
- 425.Suit, R. F. 1934. Preliminary report on investigations of bacterial blight of beans. Quebec Soc. Protect. Plants Ann. Rept.1932-34: 25–26, 75–79.Google Scholar
- 426.Surface, F. M. 1916. A note on the inheritance of eye pattern in beans and its relation to type of vine. Amer. Nat.50: 577–586.Google Scholar
- 427.Tavcar, A. 1926. Die Vererbung der Samendimension vonPhaseolus vulgaris L. Z. Abst. Verer.40: 83–107.Google Scholar
- 428.Thomas, H. R., Hans Jorgensen, andR. E. Wester. 1952. Resistance to downy mildew in lima bean, and its inheritance. Phytopath.42: 43–45.Google Scholar
- 429.—, andW. J. Zaumeyer. 1950. Inheritance of symptom expression of pod mottle virus. Phytopath.40: 1007–1010.Google Scholar
- 430.——. 1953. A strain of yellow bean mosaic virus producing local lesions on tobacco. Phytopath.43: 11–15.Google Scholar
- 431.—,W. J. Zaumeyer, andHans Jorgensen. 1951. Inheritance of resistance to lima bean mosaic virus in the lima bean. Phytopath.41: 231–234.Google Scholar
- 432.Thomas, W. D., Jr. 1949. Reaction of different bean varieties to the Colorado red node virus. Pl. Dis. Rept.33: 244–246.Google Scholar
- 433.Thomason, I. J., andH. E. McKinney. 1960. Reaction of cowpeas,Vigna sinensis, to root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne spp. Pl. Dis. Rept.44: 51–53.Google Scholar
- 434.Thompson, A. E., R. L. Lower, andH. H. Thornberry. 1962. Inheritance in beans of the necrotic reaction to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Hered.63: 89–91.Google Scholar
- 435.Tissot, A. N. 1932. Studies of the bean jassid. Resistance of beans toEmpoasca. Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rept.1932: 74.Google Scholar
- 436.Tjebbes, K. 1923. Ganzfarbige Samen bei gefleckten Bohnenrassen. Ber. Bot. Ges.41: 217–224.Google Scholar
- 437.— 1925. Die Zeichnung der Samenschale vonPhaseolus multiflorus. Hereditas7: 129–144.Google Scholar
- 438.— 1927. Die Samenfarbe in Kreuzungen vonPhaseolus vulgaris × multiflorus. Hereditas9: 199–208.Google Scholar
- 439.— 1931. Two linkage groups in the garden bean. Hereditas15: 185–193.44Google Scholar
- 440.—, andH. N. Kooiman. 1919. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. I. Kruising van Kievitsboon en bruine boon (Cross of dwarf Prague bean and yellow bean). II. Constante gevlektheid bij een spontane bastaard vanPhaseolus vulgaris (True breeding mottling in a spontaneous hybrid ofPh. vulgaris). Genetica1: 323–346. (French summary.)Google Scholar
- 441.——. 1919. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. III. Albinisme. Genetica1: 532–538. (English summary.)Google Scholar
- 442.——. 1921. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. IV. Over den strepingsfactor. Een geval van volkomen afstooting tusschen twee factoren. V. Analyse eener spontane kruising van de stokkievitsboon. Genetica3: 28–40. 1921. (Not seen.)Google Scholar
- 443.——. 1922. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. VI. Vervolg van de proeven met kievitsboonen. (Continuation of the experiments with Speckled Cranberry beans). Genetica4: 62–63. (French summary.)Google Scholar
- 444.——. 1922. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. VII. Bloemkleur en zaadhuidkleur. (Flower color and seed coat color.) VIII. Over de erfelijkheid van de eigenschap dorschbaarheid van de peul. (On the genetics of parchmented and tender pods.) Genetica4: 447–456. (French summary.)Google Scholar
- 445.Toole, E. H., Vivian K. Toole, B. J. Ley, andJanice T. Crowder. 1951. Injury to seed beans during threshing and processing. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 874.Google Scholar
- 446.Toole, V. K., R. E. Wester, andE. H. Toole. 1951. Relative germination response of some lima bean varieties to low temperatures in sterilized and unsterilized soil. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.58: 153–159.Google Scholar
- 447.Townsend, G. R. 1939. Diseases of beans in southern Florida. Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 336.Google Scholar
- 448.—, andB. L. Wade. 1943. Close-up of something new in snap beans. South. Seedsman6 (2): 9, 40.Google Scholar
- 449.Tschechow, W., andN. Kartaschowa. 1932. Karyologische-systematische Untersuchungen der Tribus Loteae und Phaseoleae Unterfam. Papilionatae. Cytologia3: 221–229.Google Scholar
- 450.Tschermak, E. von. 1912. Bastardierungsversuche an Levkojen, Erbsen und Bohnen mit Rücksicht auf die Faktorenlehre. Z. Abst. Vererb.7: 81–234.Google Scholar
- 451.—. 1916. Ueber den gegenwärtigen Stand der Gemüsezüchtung. Z. Pflanzenzucht.4: 65–104.Google Scholar
- 452.—. 1919. Bastardierungsversuche mit der grünsamigen Chevrier-Bohne. Z. Pflanzenzücht.7: 57–61.Google Scholar
- 453.—. 1922. Ueber die Vererbung des Samengewichtes bei Bastardierung verschiedener Rassen vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Z. Abst. Vererb.28: 23–52.Google Scholar
- 454.—. 1933. Über einige bei reziproker Kreuzung nur selten gelingende Bastarde. Züchter5: 123–128.Google Scholar
- 455.—, andA. Tschermak. 1927. Zur mathematischen Charakteristik reiner Liner und ihrer Bastarde nach Untersuchungen am Samengewicht von Bohnen. Hereditas9: 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 456.Tschermak-Seysenegg, E. von. 1942. Über Bastarde zwischen Fisole (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) und Feverbohn (Phaseolus multiflorus Lam.) und ihre eventuelle practische Verwertbarkeit. Züchter14: 153–164.Google Scholar
- 457.Uphof, J. C. Th. 1922. Eine polymorphe F1-Generation aus der Kreuzung vonPhaseolus vulgaris andPhaseolus multiflorus. Z. Vererb.29: 186–192.Google Scholar
- 458.Valenta, J. R., andH. D. Sisler. 1962. Evidence for a chemical basis of resistance of lima beans to downy mildew. Phytopath.52: 1030–1037.Google Scholar
- 459.Van Eseltine, G. P. 1931. Variation in the lima bean,Phaseolus lunatus L., as illustrated by its synonymy. New York State Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 182.Google Scholar
- 460.Vavilov, N. I. 1950. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron. Bot.13: 1–364.Google Scholar
- 461.Viehoever, A. 1940. Edible and poisonous beans of the lima type (P. lunatus L.). A comparative study, including other similar beans. Thai Sci. Bull. (Bangkok)2: 1–100.Google Scholar
- 462.Wade, B. L. 1937. Breeding and improvement of peas and beans. U. S. Dept. Agr. Yrbk.1937: 251–282.Google Scholar
- 463.— 1941. Genetic studies of variegation in snap beans. J. Agr. Res.63: 661–669.Google Scholar
- 464.— 1943. Logan, a new hardy snap bean. Seed World53 (5): 12–13, 40–41.Google Scholar
- 465.—, andC. F. Andrus. 1941. A genetic study of common bean mosaic under conditions of natural field transmission. J. Agr. Res.63: 389–393.Google Scholar
- 466.—,P. H. Heinze, M. S. Kanapaux, andC. F. Gaetjens. 1945. Inheritance of ascorbic acid content in snap beans. J. Agr. Res.70: 170–174.Google Scholar
- 467.—, andMargaret S. Kanapaux. 1943. Ascorbic acid content of strains of snap beans. J. Agr. Res.66: 313–324.Google Scholar
- 468.——. 1943. Yield of hardy snap bean strains. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.43: 239–245.Google Scholar
- 469.-, andW. J. Zaumeyer. 1938. U. S. No. 5 Refugee, a new mosaic-resistant Refugee bean. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 500.Google Scholar
- 470.——. 1940. Genetic studies of resistance to alfalfa mosaic virus and stringiness inPhaseolus vulgaris. J. Amer. Soc. Agron.32: 127–134.Google Scholar
- 471.Wager, Harold. 1904. The nucleolus and nuclear division in the root-apex ofPhaseolus. Ann. Bot.18: 29–55.Google Scholar
- 472.Wager, V. A. 1936, Bacterial wilt and blight of French beans. Union South Africa Dept. Agr. and Forestry (Pl. Ind. Ser. 14), Sci. Bull. 149.Google Scholar
- 473.Wall, J. R. 1956. Interspecific hybridization inPhaseolus and inCucurbita.I–II. Diss. Abstr.16: 436.Google Scholar
- 474.—, andT. L. York. 1957. Inheritance of seedling cotyledon position inPhaseolus species. J. Hered.48: 71–74.Google Scholar
- 475.Wartenberg, H. 1929. Über primäre and seeundäre Kälteresistenz bei Bohnensippen. Eine Vorstudie zur Genetik der Kälteresistenz. Planta7: 347–381.Google Scholar
- 476.Warth, E. J., andK. K. Gyi. 1918. Prussic acid in Burma beans. Agr. Res. Inst. Pusa Bull. 79.Google Scholar
- 477.Waterhouse, W. L. 1955. Studies of bean anthracnose in Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales80: 71–83.Google Scholar
- 478.Webber, H. J., andW. A. Orton. 1902. Some diseases of the cowpea. II. A cowpea resistant to root-knot (Heterodera radicicola). U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bull. 17.Google Scholar
- 479.Wei, C. T. 1937. Rust resistance in the garden bean. Phytopath.27: 1090–1105.Google Scholar
- 480.Weinstein, A. J. 1926. Cytological studies onPhaseolus vulgaris. Amer. J. Bot.13: 248–263.Google Scholar
- 481.Weisäth, Gunnar. Genanalytische Untersuchung eines teilfarbigen Samentyps vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Agri Hort. Genet.7: 79–83.Google Scholar
- 482.Wellensiek, S. J. 1922. Heredity of stringlessness ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. varieties. Genetica4: 443–446.Google Scholar
- 483.Wells, D. G., andRaphael Deba. 1961. Sources of resistance to the cowpea yellow mosaic virus. Pl. Dis. Rept.45: 878–881.Google Scholar
- 484.Wester, R. E. 1950. A comparison of greenhouse and field methods for evaluating lima beans for resistance to root knot nematodes. Proc. Amer. Soc., Hort. Sci.56: 395–400.Google Scholar
- 485.— 1960. Resistance to stem anthracnose of lima beans. Phytopath.50: 573–574.Google Scholar
- 486.—, andC. A. Weigel. 1949. Effect of DDT and wetting agent on plant growth of Triumph and Peerless varieties of bush lima beans. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.54: 373–377.Google Scholar
- 487.Whiting, A. F. 1939. Ethnobotany of the Hopi. Mus. N. Arizona Bull. 15.Google Scholar
- 488.Wight, W. F. 1907. History of the cowpea and its introduction into America. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bull.102: 43–60.Google Scholar
- 489.Wilson, R. D. 1950. Resistance to anthracnose of Brown Beauty beans. Austral. Pl. Dis. Recorder2: 50. (Mimeo.)Google Scholar
- 490.Wingard, S. A. 1922. Yeast-spot of lima beans. Phytopath.12: 525–532.Google Scholar
- 491.— 1927. The immediate effect of cross-pollination on the size and shape of bean seed. Genetics12: 115–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 492.-. 1933. The development of rust resistant beans by hybridization. Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 51.Google Scholar
- 493.Wittmack, L. 1879. Über Bohnen, welche von Dr. Reiss und Dr. Stübel in peruanischen Gräbern gefunden worden sind, und über die Heimath vonPhaseolus vulgaris, L. undP. lunatus, L. Verh. Bot. Vereins. Brandenburg,21: 176–184.Google Scholar
- 494.— 1888. Die Heimet der Bohnen und Kürbisse. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.6: 374–380.Google Scholar
- 495.Wolf, E. A., andW. A. Hills. 1954. Seminole—a new disease-resistant green, round-podded bush bean. Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. S-73.Google Scholar
- 496.Wolfenbarger, D., andJ. P. Sleesman. 1961. Plant characters ofPhaseolus vulgaris associated with potato leaf-hopper nymphal infestation. J. Econ. Ent.54: 705–707.Google Scholar
- 497.——. 1961. Resistance to the potato leafhopper in lima bean lines, interspecificPhaseolus crosses,Phaseolus spp., the cowpea, and the Bonavist bean. J. Econ. Ent.54: 1077–1079.Google Scholar
- 498.Woycicki, S. 1927. Genetische Studien über die Hülsenformen bei den Bohnen. Acta Soc. bot. Polon5: 20–51. (Polish with German summary.) (Not seen.)Google Scholar
- 499.Yen, D. E. 1957. A shiny-podded mutant in pole bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). New Zealand J. Sci. Tech. Sec. A.38: 820–824.Google Scholar
- 500.— 1960. French-bean rust (Uromyces appendiculatus) studies on resistance and determination of rust races present in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Agr. Res.3: 358–363.Google Scholar
- 501.Yerkes, W. D., Jr., andG. F. Freytag. 1956.Phaseolus coccineus as a source of root-rot resistance for the common bean. Phytopath.46: 32.Google Scholar
- 502.—, andM. T. Ortiz. 1956. New races ofColletotrichum lindemuthianum in Mexico. Phytopath.46: 564–567.Google Scholar
- 503.Zaumeyer, W. J. 1930. The bacterial blight of beans caused byBacterium phaseoli. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 186.Google Scholar
- 504.— 1938. A heritable abnormality of beans resembling mosaic. Phytopath.28: 520–522.Google Scholar
- 505.— 1942. The inheritance of a leaf variegation in beans. J. Agr. Res.64: 119–127.Google Scholar
- 506.— 1950. Topcrop, a new processing snap bean. Canner110 (12): 12–15.Google Scholar
- 507.— 1963. Some new Tendercrop mutants. Seed World92 (6): 8, 10.Google Scholar
- 508.—, andH. H. Fisher. 1951. Potentialities of southern bean mosaic in the field. Phytopath.41: 567.Google Scholar
- 509.—, andL. L. Harter. 1941. Inheritance of resistance to six physiologic races of bean rust. J. Agr. Res.63: 599–622.Google Scholar
- 510.——. 1943. Inheritance of symptom expression of bean mosaic virus 4. J. Agr. Res.67: 295–300.Google Scholar
- 511.——. 1943. Two new virus diseases of beans. J. Agr. Res.67: 305–328.Google Scholar
- 512.——. 1946. Pintos 5 and 14. New rust-resistant beans for dryland areas of the West. South. Seedsman9: (8): 15, 50, 54.Google Scholar
- 513.-, andH. Rex Thomas. 1957. A monographic study of bean diseases and methods for their control. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 868. (Rev.)Google Scholar
- 514.—, andB. L. Wade. 1935. The relation of certain legume mosaics to bean. J. Agr. Res.51: 715–749.Google Scholar
- 515.Zukovskij, P. M. (Abridged Transl, by P. S. Hudson). 1962. Cultivated plants and their wild relatives. Misc. Pub. Commonw. Bur. Pl. Breed. & Genet. Cambridge. Commonwealth Agr. Bur., Farnham Royal, England.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© The New York Botanical Garden 1965