Economic Botany

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 120–131

The origin of cornbelt maize: The isozyme evidence

  • John Doebley
  • Jonathan D. Wendel
  • J. S. C. Smith
  • Charles W. Stuber
  • Major M. Goodman
Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Historical records show t hat the Midwestern dent corns of the United States originated from hybridization of two landraces, Northern Flint and Southern Dent. We examined the origin of Southern and Midwestern Dents by means of isozyme electrophoresis. Isozyme genotypes were determined for 23 loci in 12 plants each of 32 accessions of Southern Dent. Previously published isozyme data for maize landraces of Mexico and North America and for U.S. Midwestern Dents were included for comparative purposes. The data show that Northern Flint and Southern Dent are among the isozymically most divergent maize landraces. Nei’s genetic identities between populations of these two landraces are very low for conspecific populations (ca. 0.80). Southern Dent of the southeastern U.S. appears closely related to similar dent corns of southern Mexico, supporting a previously published hypothesis that U.S. Southern Dent is largely derived from the dent corns of southern Mexico. The Midwestern Dents, which resulted from crosses of Southern Dent and Northern Flint, are much more like Southern Dent than Northern Flint in their isozyme profile. Similarly, public inbreds show greater affinity to Southern Dent with the exception of sweet corn lines, which resemble Northern Flint in their isozyme allele frequencies. North American public inbreds do not contain appreciable isozymic variation beyond that found in Northern Flint and Southern Dent.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, E., and W. L. Brown. 1952. Origin of corn belt maize and its genetic significance. Pages 124–148in J. W. Gowen, ed., Heterosis. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  2. —, and H. C. Cutler. 1942. Racesof Zea mays: I. Their recognition and classification. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 29:69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, R. 1984. Some of the open pollinated varieties that contributed the most to modern hybrid corn. 20th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders School Proc, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, W. L., and J. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27:325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, W. L., and E. Anderson. 1947. The Northern Flint corns. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 34:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —. 1948. The Southern Dent corns. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 35:255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardy, B. J., C. W. Stuber, J. F. Wendel, and M. M. Goodman. 1983. Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize (Zea mays L.). Inst. of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 1317R, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh. 31 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, D. J. 1983. Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. Pages 257–287in S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton, eds., Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Doebley, J. F., M. M. Goodman, and C. W. Stuber. 1983. Isozyme variation in maize from the southwestern United States: taxonomic and anthropological implications. Maydica 28:94–120.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1984. Isozyme variation inZea (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 9:203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. —. 1985. Isozyme variation in the races of maize from Mexico. Amer. J. Bot. 72:629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. 1986. Exceptional genetic divergence of Northern Flint Corn. Amer. J. Bot. 73:64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duvick, D. L. 1984. Genetic diversity in major farm crops on the farm and in reserve. Econ. Bot. 38:161–178.Google Scholar
  14. Galinat, W. C. 1971. The evolution of sweet corn. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 591.Google Scholar
  15. — 1985. Domestication and diffusion of maize. Pages 245–278in R. I. Ford, ed., Prehistoric food production in North America. Anthropological Papers No. 75, Museum of Anthropology, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  16. —, and R. G. Campbell. 1967. The diffusion of eight rowed maize from the Southwest to the Central Plains. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. Monogr. Ser. 1:1–16.Google Scholar
  17. —, and J. H. Gunnerson. 1963. Spread of eight-rowed maize from the prehistoric Southwest. Bot. Mus. Lean. 20:117–160.Google Scholar
  18. Goodman, M. M., and C. W. Stuber. 1983. Maize. Pages 1–33 in S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton, eds., Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. —, C. N. Lee, and F. M. Johnson. 1980. Genetic control of malate dehydrogenase isozymes in maize. Genetics 94:153–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Helentjaris, T., G. King, M. Slocum, C. Siedenstrong, and S. Wegman. 1985. Restriction fragment polymorphisms as probes for plant diversity and their development as tools for applied plant breeding. PL Molec. Biol. 5:109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernández Xolocotzi, E. 1985. Maize and man in the greater Southwest. Econ. Bot. 39:416–430.Google Scholar
  22. Johns, M. A., J. N. Strommer, and M. Freeling. 1983. Exceptionally high levels of restriction site polymorphism in DNA near maize Adhl gene. Genetics 105:733–743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Laurie, D. A., and M. D. Bennett. 1985. Nuclear DNA content in the generaZea and Sorghum. Intergeneric, interspecific and intraspecific variation. Heredity 55:307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1974. Corn: its origin, evolution, and improvement. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. McClintock, B., T. A. Kato Y., and A. Blumenschein. 1981. Chromosome constitution of races of maize. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Mexico.Google Scholar
  26. Moll, R.H., J. H. Lonnquist, J. V. Fortuno, and E. C. Johnson. 1965. The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Naturalist 106:283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rayburn, A. L., H. J. Price, J. D. Smith, and J. R. Gold. 1985. C-banding, heterochromatin and DNA content inZea mays. Amer. J. Bot. 72:1610–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shull, G. H. 1909. A pure-line method of corn breeding. Rep. Amer. Breeder’s Assoc. 5:51–59.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, J. S. C. 1986. Genetic diversity within the corn belt dent racial complex of maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 31: 349–367.Google Scholar
  31. —, M. M. Goodman, and C. W. Stuber. 1985. Genetic variability within U.S. maize germplasm. I. Historically important lines. Crop Sci. (Madison) 25:550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stuber, C. W., and M. M. Goodman. 1983a. Allozyme genotypes for popular and historically important inbred lines of corn,Zea mays L. USDA Agric. Res. Results, Southern Series, No. 16.Google Scholar
  33. —, and—. 1983b. Inheritance, intracellular localization and genetic variation of phosphoglucomutase isozymes in maize (Zea mays L.). Biochem. Genet. 21:667–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. —. 1984. Inheritance, intracellular localization, and genetic variation of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase isozymes in maize. Maydica 29:453–471.Google Scholar
  35. —, and F. M. Johnson. 1977. Genetic control and racial variation of B-glucosidase isozymes in maize (Zea mays L.). Biochem. Genet. 15:383–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallace, H. A., and W. L. Brown. 1956. Corn and its early fathers. Michigan State Univ. Press, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  37. Weatherwax, P. 1954. Indian corn in old America. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Doebley
    • 1
  • Jonathan D. Wendel
    • 2
  • J. S. C. Smith
    • 3
  • Charles W. Stuber
    • 4
  • Major M. Goodman
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. Paul
  2. 2.Department of BotanyIowa State UniversityAmes
  3. 3.Division of Plant BreedingPioneer Hi-Bred, InternationalJohnston
  4. 4.Department of Genetics and USDA-ARSNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleigh
  5. 5.Department of Crop ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleigh

Personalised recommendations