Economic Botany

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 332–341 | Cite as

Arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea), food, feed, fuel, and fiber resource

  • M. D. Erdman
  • B. A. Erdman


Arrowroot biomass and processing residues were evaluated as as a feed, fuel and fiber resource. Ensiled aerial biomass and coarse and fine arrowroot processing residues contained 10.8–21.1% crude protein; 11.1–30.2% crude fiber; 3.8–17.0% ash; and an in vitro dry matter digestibility of 38.5–60.3%. Theoretical yields of 0.27 and 1.60 l of methane at standard temperature and pressure per liter of rhizome wash water and starch-settling water were calculated, respectively. Fuel alcohol production potential from yeast-supplemented aerial biomass and coarse residue were identified. Laboratory pulping of coarse residue was performed. The coarse residue has qualities that may be suited to tear-resistant specialty grade papers, such as wrapping paper and bags. The utilization of arrowroot by-products may lead to increased cultivation of this species as a food, feed, fuel and fiber resource. By-product utilization will also reduce environmental pollution presently resulting from direct discharge of unused by-products.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1966. Oxygen bomb calorimetry and combustion methods. Technical Manual No. 153. Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1975. Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed. Association of Offical Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Aung, U. M. 1961. Bleachable pulp from Burmese bamboo by the chlorination process. Pulp Paper Mag., Canada 62: T?230-T?232.Google Scholar
  4. Bolt, A. 1962. Monopoly island arrowroot. World Crops 14: 386–388.Google Scholar
  5. Ciacco, C. F., and B. L. D’Appolonia. 1976. Characterization of starches from various tubers and their use in bread-baking. Cereal Chem. 54: 1096–1108.Google Scholar
  6. Conrad, H. R., J. W. Hibbs, and J. R. Staubus. 1969. Guidelines for increasing urea utilization in rations for dairy cows. Res. Bull. 1018, Ohio Agric. Res. Devel. Center, Wooster, OH.Google Scholar
  7. DiCorcia, A., and R. Samperi. 1974. Determination of trace amounts of C2-C5 acids in aqueous solutions by gas chromatography. Anal. Chem. 46: 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ensminger, M. E., and C. G. Olentine, Jr. 1978. Silages and haylages.In M. E. Ensminger, Feeds & Nutrition-complete, 1st ed, p. 1417. Clovis, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization. 1952. Papers presented at 5th meeting, September 1951. FAO Technical Committee on Wood Chemistry, Appleton, WI.Google Scholar
  10. Gartside, G., and N. G. Langfors. 1981. Developing the potential of Australian bagasse as a paper resource. Proc. Australian Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 11: 233–238.Google Scholar
  11. Greenberg, A. E., J. J. Connors, D. Jenkins, and M. A. H. Franson, ed. 1981. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 15th ed. Amer. Public Health Assoc, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Helwig, J. T., and K. A. Council. 1979. SAS User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  13. Holdeman, L. V., and W. E. C. Moore. 1973. Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., p. 113–115. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, J. B. 1977. Elemental analysis of soil extracts and plant tissue ash by plasma emission spectroscopy. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 8: 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kay, D. E. 1973. Arrowroot(Maranta arundinacea). In No. 2 Root crops, Tropical Products Inst., p. 16–23. London, England.Google Scholar
  16. Lawton, O. 1956. New West Indian arrowroot factory. Food 25: 368–372.Google Scholar
  17. Lii, C, and S. Chang. 1978. Studies on the starches in Taiwan. 1. Sweet potato, cassava, yam, and arrowroot starches. Proc. Natl. Sci. Council, Republic of China 2: 416–423.Google Scholar
  18. Maury, K. R., and S. Barooah. 1976. Grow arrowroot in Assam. Intensive Agriculture 14: 14–15.Google Scholar
  19. McCarty, P. L. 1974. Anaerobic process. Birmingham short course on design aspects of biological treatment. Int. Assoc. Water Pollution Res., Birmingham, England.Google Scholar
  20. Motaldo, A. 1967. Bibliografia de raices y tuberculos tropicales. Revista Fac. Agron. (Maracay) 13: 479–538.Google Scholar
  21. National Academy of Sciences. 1975. Nutrient requirements of sheep. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. -. 1976. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Raymond, W. D., and J. Squires. 1959. Sources of starch in colonial territories II: Arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea Linn.). Trop. Sci. 1: 182–192.Google Scholar
  24. Stafford, D. A., D. L. Hawkes, and R. Horton. 1980. Methane production from waste organic matter, p. 285. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  25. Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry. 1970. Laboratory processing of pulp (Beater Method). T200 os-70. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  26. -. 1971. Physical testing of pulp handsheets. T220 os-71. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  27. -. 1981. Forming handsheets for physical tests of pulp. T205 om-81. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  28. Tilley, J. M. A., and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Brit. Grassland Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wise, D. L. 1981. In situ methane fermentation of combined agricultural residues. Resources and Conservation 6: 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wurzburg, O. B. 1952. Root starches other than those of white and sweet potato. Econ. Bot. 6:211–215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Erdman
  • B. A. Erdman
    • 1
  1. 1.USDASouthern Agricultural Energy CenterTifton

Personalised recommendations