The Botanical Review

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 24–55

Cytogenetics of the vegetable crops. garden pepper,capsicum sp.

  • L. F. Lippert
  • P. G. Smith
  • B. O. Bergh
Interpreting Botanical Progress


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Abd-El-Maksoud Mohamed, M. 1953. Cytogenetics of hybrids betweenCapsicum annuum andC. frutescens. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Davis, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Aleksic, D. 1960. (The induction of tetraploidy in peppers). Arh. Poljopr. Nauk.13: 106–113.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1940. Mutation in chilli. Indian Farming 1: 178.Google Scholar
  4. Atkins, W. R. G., andG. O. Sherrard. 1915. The pigments of fruits in relation to some genetic experiments ofCapsicum annuum. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., N. S.,14: 328–335.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, L. H. 1890. Notes upon methods of herbaceous grafting. New York (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.25: 175–177.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1923.Capsicum. Gentes Herb.1: 128–129.Google Scholar
  7. Bausor, S. C. 1935. A monstrous fruit ofCapsicum. Amer. Jour. Bot.22: 826–828.Google Scholar
  8. Bazan de Segura, Consuelo. 1962. Search for sources of resistance in red pepper to the fungusPhytophthora citrophthora. Turrialba12: 16–24.Google Scholar
  9. Bergh, B. O., andL. F. Lippert. 1964. Six new mutant genes in the pepper,Capsicum annuum L. Jour. Hered.55: 296–300.Google Scholar
  10. ——. 1965. A gene difference that affects female fertility inCapsicum annuum L. Amer. Nat.99: 159–166.Google Scholar
  11. -, -, andP. G. Smith. Inheritance of the yellow petal spot ofCapsicum pendulum Willd. Amer. Jour. Bot. (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Bonifacio, P. 1951. Grafting solanaceous plants. Riv. Ortoflorofruttic. Ital.35: 42–43.Google Scholar
  13. Boswell, V. R. 1949. Garden pepper, both a vegetable and a condiment.In Our vegetable travelers. Natl. Geogr.96: 145–217 (pp.166-167).Google Scholar
  14. Brauer, O. 1962. Untersuchungen über Qualitätseigenschaften in F1-Hybriden von Paprika,Capsicum annuum L. Zeitschr. Pflanzenz.48: 259–276.Google Scholar
  15. Bukasov, S. M. 1930. The cultivated plants of Mexico, Guatemala and Columbia. Bull. Appl. Bot. Genet. and Plant Breed., Suppl. No.47: 261–273.Google Scholar
  16. Campos, Filomena F., andD. T. Morgan, Jr. 1958. Haploid pepper from a sperm; an androgenetic haploid ofCapsicum frutescens. Jour Hered.49: 134–137.Google Scholar
  17. ——. 1960. Genetic control of haploidy inCapsicum frutescens L. following crosses with untreated and x-rayed pollen. Cytologia25: 362–372.Google Scholar
  18. Candolle,, 1886. Origin of cultivated plants. (Reprint of 2nd ed.) Hafner Publishing Co., 1959, pp. 288–290.Google Scholar
  19. Carlsson, G. 1962. (Inheritance of fruit size and its relation to leaf size and fruit set and the significance of these characters in breedingCapsicum annuum). Sverig. Utsädesfören. Tidskr.72: 249–255.Google Scholar
  20. Chennaveeraiah, M. S. 1947. A preliminary note on the karyotype inCapsicum fastigiatum B1. Curr. Sci.16: 384–385.Google Scholar
  21. Christensen, Hilde M., andR. Bamford. 1943. Haploids in twin seedlings of pepper,Capsicum annuum L. Jour. Hered.34: 99–104.Google Scholar
  22. Cochran, H. L. 1934. Abnormalities in the flower and fruit ofCapsicum frutescens. Jour. Agr. Res.48: 737–748.Google Scholar
  23. —. 1935. Morphology of an internal type of abnormality in the fruit of the pepper. Bot. Gaz.97: 408–415.Google Scholar
  24. —. 1939. A chlorophyll deficient pimiento. Jour. Hered.30: 81–83.Google Scholar
  25. Cook, A. A. 1960a. Syndrome of potato virus Y in progenies from crosses between susceptible Large Bell Hot and two resistant pepper varieties. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.76: 482–485.Google Scholar
  26. —. 1960b. Genetics of resistance inCapsicum annuum to two virus diseases. Phytopathology50: 364–367.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1961a. A mutation for resistance to potato virus Y in pepper. Phytopathology51: 550–552.Google Scholar
  28. —. 1961b. Inheritance of mutant-1 phenotype in the pepper. Jour. Hered.52: 154–158.Google Scholar
  29. —. 1962. Studies of a foliage variegation in pepper. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.81: 390–395.Google Scholar
  30. —. 1963a. Genetics of response in pepper to three strains of potato virus Y. Phytopathology53: 720–722.Google Scholar
  31. —. 1963b. Dominant resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in an exotic pepper. Plant Dis. Rep.47: 783–786.Google Scholar
  32. —, andC. W. Anderson. 1959. Multiple virus disease resistance in a strain ofCapsicum annuum. Phytopathology49: 198–201.Google Scholar
  33. ——. 1960. Inheritance of resistance to potato virus Y derived from two strains ofCapsicum annuum. Phytopathology50: 73–75.Google Scholar
  34. —, andR. E. Stall. 1963. Inheritance of resistance in pepper to bacterial spot. Phytopathology53: 1060–1062.Google Scholar
  35. Curtis, L. C., andJ. Scarchuk. 1948. Seedless peppers. A single mendelian recessive character. Jour. Hered.39: 159–160.Google Scholar
  36. Dale, E. E. 1928. Inheritance of fruit-length inCapsicum. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci.9: 89–110.Google Scholar
  37. —. 1930a. Inheritance of dwarf inCapsicum. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci.13: 1–4.Google Scholar
  38. —. 1930b. Maternal inheritance in a chlorophyll variegation inCapsicum. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci.13: 5–8.Google Scholar
  39. Dempsey, A. H. 1960. Inheritance studies of certain fruit and plant characters inCapsicum frutescens. Diss. Abstr.20: 2506–2507.Google Scholar
  40. Deshpande, R. B. 1933. Studies in Indian chillies. 3. The inheritance of some characters inCapsicum annuum L. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.3: 219–300.Google Scholar
  41. —. 1935. Studies in Indian chillies. 4. Inheritance of pungency inCapsicum annuum L. Indían Jour. Agr. Sci.5: 513–516.Google Scholar
  42. —. 1939a. Studies in Indian chillies. 5. Inheritance of anther color and its relation to color in petal and node inCapsicum annuum L. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.9: 185–192.Google Scholar
  43. —. 1939b. A case of variegation inCapsicum annuum L. Curr. Sci.8: 313–314.Google Scholar
  44. —. 1944. Inheritance of bunchy habit in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Indian Jour. Genet. Plant Breed.4: 54.Google Scholar
  45. Dixit, P. D. 1931. A cytological study ofCapsicum annuum. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 419–433.Google Scholar
  46. Dort, H. W.Van. 1947.Solanum capsicastrum onCapsicum annuum. Bloemisterij21: 3–4.Google Scholar
  47. Duvick, D. N. 1959. The use of cytoplasmic male-sterility in hybrid seed production. Econ. Bot.13: 167–195.Google Scholar
  48. Endo, T. 1953. Inheritance of fruit color inCapsicum. Ann. Rep. Natl. Inst. Genet., Japan,3: 46–47.Google Scholar
  49. Erwin, A. T. 1932. The peppers. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.293: 121–152.Google Scholar
  50. —. 1949. An interesting Guatemalan chilli (Capsicum guatemalense Bitt.). Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.371: 612–614.Google Scholar
  51. Eshbaugh, W. H. 1964. A numerical taxonomic and cytogenetic study of certain species of the genusCapsicum. Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 112 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Fingerhuth, K. A. 1832. Monographia Generis Capsici. Dusseldorpii, Arnz and Comp., 32+ pp.Google Scholar
  53. Fujii, K., W. Masabavashi, andT. Kuwahara. 1959. Studies on the utilization of F2 generations of red-pepper crosses. Agr. and Hort.34: 667–668.Google Scholar
  54. Georgieva, P. 1959. Caractère de la mutabilité dans les poivrons autotetraploïdes obtenus par manière expérimentale. Nauc. Trud. Viss. Selskostopan. Inst. G. Dimitrov7: 173–194.Google Scholar
  55. Greenleaf, W. H. 1947. A spontaneous tetraploid hybrid in pepper (Capsicum frutescens). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.49: 231–232.Google Scholar
  56. —. 1952. Inheritance of pungency and of the deciduous character in peppers (Capsicum annuum). Proc. Assoc. South. Agr. Workers49: 110–111. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  57. —. 1953. Effects of tobacco-etch virus on peppers (Capsicum sp.). Phytopathology43: 564–570.Google Scholar
  58. —. 1956. Inheritance of resistance to tobacco-etch virus inCapsicum frutescens and inCapsicum annuum. Phytopathology46: 371–375.Google Scholar
  59. —. 1960. Resistance levels to the bacterial leaf spot disease in peppers. Proc. Assoc. South. Agr. Workers57: 238–239. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  60. Györffy, B. 1939. (Tetraploid paprika.) Acta Univ. Szeged., Acta Biol. Pars. Bot.5: 30–38.Google Scholar
  61. —. 1949. The inheritance of the ascorbic acid content of paprika and tomato. Proc. Eighth Int. Congr. Genet.8: 585–586. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  62. Haciwara, T., K. Hanagata, andT. Takano. 1959. Inheritance of fruit-colour inCapsicum annuum. Jap. Jour. Breed.9: 49–50. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  63. —, andY. Oomura. 1939. Plastic inheritance of variegation inCapsicum annuum. Jap. Jour. Genet.15: 328–330.Google Scholar
  64. ——. 1947. On linkage inCapsicum annuum L. Jap. Jour. Genet., Suppl.1: 87–96.Google Scholar
  65. Halsted, B. D. 1891. Botanical note. A strange thing on peppers. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club18: 151.Google Scholar
  66. -. 1909. Experiments with peppers. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rep. 1909, pp. 308–317.Google Scholar
  67. -,E. J. Owen, andN. D. Shore. 1908. Report of the botanist. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rep. 1908, pp. 285–290.Google Scholar
  68. Hare, W. W. 1956a. Resistance in pepper toMeloidogyne incognita acrita. Phytopathology46: 98–104.Google Scholar
  69. —. 1956b. Comparative resistance of seven pepper varieties to five root-knot nematodes. Phytopathology46: 669–672.Google Scholar
  70. —. 1957a. Inheritance ofCercospora resistance in pepper. Phytopathology47: 15. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  71. —. 1957b. Inheritance of resistance to root-knot nematodes in pepper. Phytopathology47: 455–459.Google Scholar
  72. Harris, J. A. 1906. Proliferation of the fruit inCapsicum andPassiflora. Missouri Bot. Gard. Ann. Rep.17: 133–145.Google Scholar
  73. Heiser, C, B., Jr., andP. G. Smith. 1948. Observations on another species of cultivated pepper,Capsicum pubescens R. & P. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.52: 331–335.Google Scholar
  74. ——. 1958. New species ofCapsicum from South America. Brittonia10: 194–201.Google Scholar
  75. Hirose, T., S. Nishi, andS. TakashimA. 1960. Studies on the interspecies crossing in cultivatedCapsicum. I. On crossability between species. Kyoto Prefectural Univ. Fac. Agr. Sci. Rep.12: 40–46.Google Scholar
  76. Holmes, F. O. 1934. Inheritance of ability to localize tobacco-mosaic virus. Phytopathology24: 984–1002.Google Scholar
  77. —. 1937. Inheritance of resistance to tobacco-mosaic disease in the pepper. Phytopathology27: 637–642.Google Scholar
  78. Horsfall, J. G., andA. D. McDonnell. 1940. Varietal susceptibility of peppers to bacterial spot. Plant Dis. Rep.24: 34–36.Google Scholar
  79. Hunziker, A. T. 1950. Estudios sobre Solanaceae. I. Sinopsis de las especies silvestres deCapsicum de Argentina y Paraguay. Darwiniana9: 225–247.Google Scholar
  80. —. 1954 (1956). Synopsis of the genusCapsicum. Congr. Int. Bot., Rapp. et Comm., Deuxième Sér.,8: 73–74.Google Scholar
  81. —. 1961a. Studies on Solanaceae. III. Notes on the generaPhysalis L. andCapsicum L. with the description of a new South American species. Kurtziana1: 207–216.Google Scholar
  82. —. 1961b. Noticia sobre el cultivo deCapsicum baccatum L. (Solanaceae) en Argentina. Kurtziana1: 303.Google Scholar
  83. Huskins, C. L., andL. La-Cour. 1930. Chromosome numbers inCapsicum. Amer. Nat.64: 382–383.Google Scholar
  84. Ikeno, S. 1913. Studien über die Bastarde von Paprika (Capsicum annuum). Zeitschr. Ind. Abst. Vererb.10: 99–114.Google Scholar
  85. —. 1916. Studies on the hybrids ofCapsicum annuum. II. On some variegated races. Jour. Genet.6: 201–230.Google Scholar
  86. —. 1928. Change of dominance in a cross of two strains ofCapsicum annuum. Proc. Imp. Acad. (Tokyo)4: 400–403.Google Scholar
  87. Imai, Y. 1938. The mechanism of variegation inPlantago andCapsicum. Jour. Genet.35: 375–382.Google Scholar
  88. Irish, H. C. 1898. A revision of the genusCapsicum with especial reference to garden varieties. Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard.9: 53–110.Google Scholar
  89. Isbell, C. L. 1944. Pass the word to gardeners: Graft tomatoes onto weeds. Southern Seedsman7: 14, 42.Google Scholar
  90. Jeswani, L. M., R. B. Deshpande, andA. B. Joshi. 1956. Inheritance of some fruit characters in chilli. Indian Jour. Genet. Plant Breed.16: 138–143.Google Scholar
  91. Joshi, B. C. 1962. A long-leaved mutant in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) Curr. Sci.31: 425–426.Google Scholar
  92. Kaiser, S. 1935a. The inheritance of a geotropic response inCapsicum fruits. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club62: 75–80.Google Scholar
  93. —. 1935b. The factors governing shape and size inCapsicum fruits; a genetic and developmental analysis. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club62: 433–454.Google Scholar
  94. Khambanonda, I. 1948. Polygenic inheritance of fruit size in red pepper. Iowa State Coll. Jour. Sci.23: 48–49.Google Scholar
  95. —. 1950. Quantitative inheritance of fruit size in red pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.). Genetics35: 322–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Khan, A. R., andM. Munir. 1954. Inheritance studies in the common chillies (Capsi-cum annuum L.). Proc. Sixth Pakistan Sci. Conf., Karachi, 1954, Part III, pp. 14–16. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  97. Khazina, E. P. 1949. (Change of heredity in the seed generation of a vegetative hybrid). Agrobiologiya1949: 120–122.Google Scholar
  98. —. 1956. (New varieties of sweet pepper obtained by vegetative hybridization). Agrobiologiya1956: 47–54.Google Scholar
  99. —. 1961. (New varieties of sweet pepper obtained by vegetative hybridization). Agrobiollogiya1961: 617–619.Google Scholar
  100. Khristov, S., andS. Genchev. 1961. (Studies on the physiological properties of certain varieties and hybrid combinations of peppers). Plovdiv. Nauch. Inst. po Zelenchukovite Kult. Maritsa. Izv.1: 29–43.Google Scholar
  101. Kimble, K. A., andR. G. Grogan. 1960. Resistance toPhytophthora root rot in pepper. Plant Dis. Rep.44: 872–873.Google Scholar
  102. Kormos, J. 1954a. (Investigations on sterility in paprika). Ann. Inst. Biol. Tihany22: 235–252.Google Scholar
  103. —. 1954b. (Inheritance of carotenoid pigment). Ann. Inst. Biol. Tihany22: 253–259.Google Scholar
  104. —. 1962. Einige Bermerkungen über die Karotenfarben der Paprikafrucht. Acta Bot. (Acad. Sci. Hung.)8: 279–281.Google Scholar
  105. —., andJózsefné Kormos. 1955a. (A contribution to the genetics of chlorophyll-deficiency). Ann. Inst. Biol. Tihany23: 177–186.Google Scholar
  106. ——. 1955b. (Affinity in grafting). Ann. Inst. Biol. Tihany23: 161–175.Google Scholar
  107. ——. 1956a. (Determinate growth in paprika). Növenytermeles5: 1–10.Google Scholar
  108. ——. 1956b. (Variations in color and gland in green pepper fruits). Növenytermeles5: 141–152.Google Scholar
  109. ——. 1956c. (Experimental data on the morphogenesis of flowering plants). Comm. Sect. Bot. Soc. Biol. Hungary1956: 207–217.Google Scholar
  110. ——. 1957. (Soft green pepper). Növenytermeles6: 33–44.Google Scholar
  111. —, undK. Kormos. 1960. Die genetischen Typen der Carotinoid-Systeme der Paprikafrucht. Acta Bot. (Acad. Sci. Hung.)6: 305–319.Google Scholar
  112. Kostoff, D. 1926. Die Bildung der Pollenkörner bei einigen Varietäten vonCapsicum annuum. Jahrb. Univ. Sofia4: 101–126.Google Scholar
  113. —. 1929. Acquired immunity in plants. Genetics14: 37–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Kuntze, O. 1891. Revisio generum plantarum. Pars. II, pp. 447–450.Google Scholar
  115. Kuzdowicz, A. 1954. (Reciprocal grafting of tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum) and red pepper (Capsicum annuum)). Acta Agrobot.2: 97–102.Google Scholar
  116. Limberk, J. 1951. (Grafting herbaceous plants on woody plants. II. Experiments on grafting tomato and red pepper onLycium barbatum). Sbornik Cesk. Akad. Zemedelske24: 335–340.Google Scholar
  117. Lippert, L. F., B. O. Berch, andA. A. Cook. 1964. Three variegated seedling mutants in the pepper. Multiple allelism indicated in crossing studies. Jour. Hered.55: 79–83.Google Scholar
  118. —, andP. G. Smith. 1965. Gene list for the pepper. Jour. Hered.56: 30–34.Google Scholar
  119. Lutes, D. D. 1954. Inheritance of resistance to systemic tobacco mosaic infection in pepper. Diss. Abstr.14: 1900–1901.Google Scholar
  120. Marks, G. E. 1952. A controllable carmine technique for plants with small chromosomes. Stain Tech.27: 333–336.Google Scholar
  121. Martin, J. A. 1948. Bacterial spot resistance in peppers. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.52: 336–340.Google Scholar
  122. —. 1949. Preliminary studies on the influence of F2 and F2 seed on the yield of Cayenne peppers. Proc. Assoc. South. Agr. Workers46: 111. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
  123. —, andJ. H. Crawford. 1951. Several types of sterility inCapsicum frutescens. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.57: 335–338.Google Scholar
  124. McKinney, H. H. 1952. Two strains of tobacco-mosaic virus, one of which is seedborne in an etch-immune pungent pepper. Plant Dis. Rep.36: 184–187.Google Scholar
  125. Miller, J. C., andZ. M. Fineman. 1937. A genetic study of some qualitative and quantitative characters of the genusCapsicum. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 544–550.Google Scholar
  126. Mississippi. 1957. Seventieth Ann. Rep. Mississippi Agr. Exp. Sta. for year ending June 30, 1957, p. 35.Google Scholar
  127. MiyazAwa, A. 1953. On genes controlling quantitative characters inCapsicum annuum L. Ann. Rep. Natl. Inst. Genet., Japan,3: 47–48.Google Scholar
  128. Morgan, D. T., Jr., andR. D. Rappleye. 1950. Twin and triplet pepper seedlings: A study of polyembryony inCapsicum frutescens. Jour. Hered.41: 91–95.Google Scholar
  129. ——. 1954. A cytogenetic study on the origin of multiple seedlings ofCapsicum frutescens. Amer. Jour. Bot.41: 576–585.Google Scholar
  130. Murthy, B. S., andN. S. R. Murthy. 1959. A cluster chilli mutant (Capsicum annuum). Andhra Agr. Jour.6: 208–211.Google Scholar
  131. Murthy, N. S. R., andB. S. Murthy. 1962a. Inheritance studies on chilli (Capsicum annuum). Andhra Agr. Jour.9: 140–144.Google Scholar
  132. —. 1962b. Proliferation of the central axis inCapsicum, a fruit abnormality inCapsicum annuum var.grossum (a preliminary note). Andhra Agr. Jour.9: 348–349.Google Scholar
  133. Nelson, E. K. 1910. Capsaicin, the pungent principle ofCapsicum and the detection of capsicum. Jour. Ind. Eng. Chem.2: 419–421.Google Scholar
  134. New Delhi. 1942. Scientific reports of the Imperial Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, for the year ending June 30, 1941, 73 pp.Google Scholar
  135. Nishiyama, I. 1939. (Studies on artificial polyploid plants. I. Production of tetraploids by treatment with colchicine). Agr. Hort.14: 1411–1422.Google Scholar
  136. —. 1940. (Studies on artificial polyploid plants. IV. Comparative studies on a polyploid series in red pepper). Bot. and Zool.8: 905–913.Google Scholar
  137. —, andH. Karasawa. 1954. Somatoplastic sterility in reciprocal crosses between 2xand 4x-plants inCapsicum. Jap. Jour. Breed.3: 36–40.Google Scholar
  138. Odland, M. L. 1948. Inheritance studies in the pepper,Capsicum frutescens. Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.179: 1–32.Google Scholar
  139. —. 1960. Inheritance of flower color inCapsicum annuum L. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.76: 475–481.Google Scholar
  140. —, andA. M. Porter. 1938. Inheritance of the immature fruit color of peppers. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 647–651.Google Scholar
  141. Ohta, Y. 1961a. Cytogenetical studies in the genusCapsicum. I.C. frutescens ×C. annuum. Jap. Jour. Genet.36: 105–111.Google Scholar
  142. —. 1961b. Grafting and cytoplasmic male sterility inCapsicum. Seiken Ziho/ Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res.12: 35–39.Google Scholar
  143. —. 1961c. The use of cytoplasmic male sterility inCapsicum breeding. Seiken Ziho/Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res.12: 59–60.Google Scholar
  144. —. 1962a. Genetical studies in the genusCapsicum. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res.1962: 1–94.Google Scholar
  145. —. 1962b. Cytogenetical studies on polyploid red pepper. Seiken Ziho/Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res.13: 89–92.Google Scholar
  146. —. 1962c. Caryotypes ofCapsicum. Seiken Ziho/Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res.13: 93–99.Google Scholar
  147. —. 1962d. Physiological and genetical studies on the pungency ofCapsicum. IV. Secretory organs, receptacles and distribution of capsaicin in theCapsicum fruit. Jap. Jour. Breed.12: 179–183.Google Scholar
  148. Pal, B. P. 1945. Studies in hybrid vigour. 1. Notes on the manifestation of hybrid vigour in grams, sesamum, chilli and maize. Indian Jour. Genet. Plant Breed.5: 106–121.Google Scholar
  149. —, andS. Ramanujam. 1939. Induction of polyploidy in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) by colchicine. Nature143: 245–246.Google Scholar
  150. ——. 1940. Asynapsis in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Curr. Sci.9: 126–128.Google Scholar
  151. ——, andA. B. Joshi. 1941. Colchicine-induced polyploidy in crop plants. II. Chilli [Capsicum annuum L.). Indian Jour. Genet. Plant Breed.1: 28–40.Google Scholar
  152. Palfi, G., Z. Visnyovszky, andB. Tranger. 1961. (The production of polyploid red peppers). Kiserlet. Közlem.54/C: 3–13.Google Scholar
  153. Perez, J. E., andJ. Adsuar. 1955. Antigenic relationship between Puerto Rican pepper-mosaic virus and a strain of potato virus Y. Jour. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico39: 165–167.Google Scholar
  154. Peterson, P. A. 1958. Cytoplasmically inherited male sterility inCapsicum. Amer. Nat.92: 111–119.Google Scholar
  155. —. 1959. Linkage of fruit shape and color genes inCapsicum. Genetics44: 407–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Pichenot, M. 1960. Sur la nature et le devenir des modifications obtenues chezCapsicum annuum L. var Cayennense à la suite de greffage surDatura stramonium L. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris250: 214–216; Agrobiologiya1960: 894–895.Google Scholar
  157. Pirovano, A. 1962. (Hereditary modifications produced by grafting). Frutticoltura24: 665–672.Google Scholar
  158. Raghavan, T. S., andK. R. Venkatasubban. 1940. Studies in the South Indian chillies. I. A description of the varieties, chromosome numbers and the cytology of some X-rayed derivatives inCapsicum annuum Linn. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.12 (Sect. B): 29–46.Google Scholar
  159. Ramiah, K., andM. R. Pillai. 1935. Pungency in chillies (Capsicum annuum). A mendelian character. Curr. Sci.4: 236–237.Google Scholar
  160. Rick, C. M. 1950.Capsicum pubescens, a little known pungent pepper from Latin America. Bull. Missouri Bot. Gard.38: 36–42.Google Scholar
  161. —, andL. Butler. 1956. Cytogenetics of the tomato. Adv. in Genetics8: 267–382.Google Scholar
  162. Riollano, A., J. Adsuar, andA. Rodriquez. 1948. Breeding peppers resistant to a Puerto Rican type of mosaic. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.51: 415–416.Google Scholar
  163. Safford, W. E. 1926. Our heritage from the American Indians. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst.1926: 405–410.Google Scholar
  164. Sagajdak, I. M. 1963. (Obtaining heterotic seed by supplementary root grafting). Dopov. Akad. Nauk Ukrajin RSR (Proc. Ukrain. Acad. Sci.)1963: 651–655.Google Scholar
  165. Sakai, K. 1952. Genetic studies on some fruit characters inCapsicum annuum. Ann. Rep. Natl. Inst. Genet. Japan2: 31.Google Scholar
  166. Samuel, E. 1960. Die Ganbapfianze. Saatgut-Wirt.12: 35.Google Scholar
  167. Schmidt, M. V. 1935. (A contribution to breeding and seed production in peppers and eggplants.) Nikita State Bot. Gard., Crimean Regional Exp. Sta. Veg. Culture, 105 pp.Google Scholar
  168. Schnack, B., andG. Covas. 1947. Karyological studies in flowering plants. Haumania1: 32–41.Google Scholar
  169. Shaw, F. J. F., andA. R. Khan. 1928. Studies in Indian chillies. I. The types ofCapsicum. India Dep. Agr. Mem., Bot. Ser.16: 59–82.Google Scholar
  170. Shinners, L. H. 1956. Technical names for the cultivatedCapsicum peppers. Baileya4: 81–83.Google Scholar
  171. Simmonds, N. W., andE. Harrison. 1959. The genetics of reaction to pepper veinbanding virus. Genetics44: 1281–1289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Singh, M. P., andR. S. Rov. 1945. Inheritance of fruit position in a chillie cross. Curr. Sci.14: 133.Google Scholar
  173. Sinha, N. P. 1950. The somatic chromosomes and meiosis inCapsicum. Indian Jour. Genet. Plant Breed.10: 36–42.Google Scholar
  174. Siskovic, M. 1962. (The production of autotetraploids of red pepper (Capsicum annuum)). Savremen. Poljopr., Novi Sad10: 227–239.Google Scholar
  175. Smith, P. G. 1948. Brown, mature fruit color in pepper (Capsicum frutesctns). Science107: 345–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. —. 1950. Inheritance of brown and green mature fruit color in peppers. Jour. Hered.41: 138–140.Google Scholar
  177. —. 1951a. Deciduous character of pepper; tiny fruited form is crossed with non-deciduous variety to get easy-to-pick pepper for commercial use. Calif. Agr.5: 12.Google Scholar
  178. —. 1951b. Deciduous ripe fruit character in peppers. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.57: 343–344.Google Scholar
  179. —, andC. B. Heiser, Jr. 1951. Taxonomic and genetic studies on the cultivated peppers,Capsicum annuum L. andC. frutescens L. Amer. Jour. Bot.38: 362–368.Google Scholar
  180. ——. 1957. Breeding behavior of cultivated peppers. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.70: 286–290.Google Scholar
  181. —, andP. A. Minces. 1951. Resistance of strains of California Wonder pepper toPhytophthora root rot. Plant Dis. Rep.35: 509.Google Scholar
  182. —,C. M. Rick, andC. B. Heiser, jr. 1951.Capsicum pendulum Willd., another cultivated pepper from South America. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.57: 339–342.Google Scholar
  183. South Carolina (W. C. Barnes). 1942. Paprika breeding. South Carolina Agr. Exp. Sta. Arm. Rep.1942: 148–150.Google Scholar
  184. Sowell, G., JR. 1960. Bacterial spot resistance in introduced peppers. Plant Dis. Rep.44: 587–590.Google Scholar
  185. Standley, P. C. 1938. Flora of Costa Rica. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser., Publ. 420,18: 783–1133.Google Scholar
  186. Sturtevant, E. L. 1885. Kitchen garden esculents of American origin. II. Peppers Amer. Nat.19: 544–550.Google Scholar
  187. —. 1890. Seedless fruits. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club1: 141–185.Google Scholar
  188. Swaminathan, M. S., T. Ninam, andM. L. Magoon. 1959. Effects of virus infection on microsporogenesis and seed fertility inCapsicum. Genetica30: 63–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Thresh, J. C. 1876. Note on capsaicin, the active principle of Cayenne pepper. Pharm. Jour. and Trans.7: 473.Google Scholar
  190. Tokunaga, K. 1934. Studies on the chromosome numbers of some species in Solanaceae. Jap. Jour. Genet.9: 231–238.Google Scholar
  191. Toole, Marguerite G., andR. Bamkord. 1945. Formation of diploid plants from haploid peppers. Jour. Hered.36: 67–70.Google Scholar
  192. Topornina, N. A. 1963. (Vegetative hybridization of sweet pepper). Agrobiologiya1963: 58–64.Google Scholar
  193. Vazart, J.. 1950a. On the existence of polyploid pollen grains inCapsicum annuum L. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris231: 1244–1245.Google Scholar
  194. —. 1950b. Nouvelles observations sur les noyaux à calotte: étude caryologique comparée deHordeum vulgare L.,Capsicum annuum L.,Pastinaca urens Req. etSolanum ovigerum Dun. I. Noyau interphasique et mitosis. Rev. Gén. Bot.57: 517–553.Google Scholar
  195. —. 1951. Nouvelles observations sur les noyaux à calotte: étude caryologique comparée deHordeum vulgare L.,Capsicum annuum L.,Pastinaca urens Req. etSolanum ovigerum Dun. II. La méiose et la formation du pollen chezCapsicum annuum L. Rev. Gén. Bot.58: 42–61.Google Scholar
  196. Webber, H. J. 1911. Preliminary notes on pepper hybrids. Ann. Rep. Amer. Breed. Assoc.7: 188–199.Google Scholar
  197. Yagishita, N. 1961a. Studies on graft hybrids inCapsicum annuum L. I. Variation in fruit shape caused by grafting and the effects in the first and second seed generations. Bot. Mag. Tokyo74: 122–130.Google Scholar
  198. —. 1961b. Studies on graft hybrids ofCapsicum annuum L. II. Variations in fruit shape caused by grafting for three successive generations and the effects in the progeny. Bot. Mag. Tokyo74: 480–489.Google Scholar
  199. Yamamoto, K., andK. Sakai. 1932. On the chromosome number in some Solanaceae. Jap. Jour. Genet.8: 27–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. F. Lippert
    • 1
  • P. G. Smith
    • 1
  • B. O. Bergh
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Vegetable Crops and Horticultural ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside and Davis

Personalised recommendations