Economic Botany

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 442–447 | Cite as

Floral morphology of wild and cultivated cowpeas

  • W. M. Lush
Article

Abstract

Some lines of one of the wild subspecies of cowpeas, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. subspecies mensensis, which is characterized by large, conspicuous flowers, were found to set fruits poorly in the absence of a pollinator, whereas others, including cultivated lines, set well. These differences were related to the separation of anthers and stigma, the orientation of the stigmatic surface and the hairiness of the style, and differed from other outbreeding mechanisms reported in cowpeas. The results support division of wild cowpeas into two groups and suggest that an increase in the rate of inbreeding has accompanied their domestication.

Literature Cited

  1. Faris, D. G. 1965. The origin and evolution of the cultivated forms ofVigna sinensis. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 7: 433–452.Google Scholar
  2. Harland, S. C. 1919. Inheritance of certain characters in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). J. Genet. 8: 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Howlett, F. S. 1939. The modification of flower structure by environment in varieties ofLycopersicon esculentum. J. Agric. Res. 58: 79–117.Google Scholar
  4. Piper, C. V. 1912. Agricultural varieties of the cowpea and immediately related species. U.S.D.A. Bur. PI. Industr. Bull. 229.Google Scholar
  5. Purseglove, J. W. 1968. Tropical Crops. Dicotyledons. Longman, London.Google Scholar
  6. Rachie, K. O., R. Rawal, J. D. Franckowiak, and M. A. Akinpelu. 1975. Two outcrossing mechanisms in cowpeas,Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Euphytica 24: 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rawal, K. M. 1975. Natural hybridization among wild, weedy and cultivatedVigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Euphytica 24: 699–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. -,K. O. Rachie, and J. D. Franckowiak. 1975. Reduction in seed size in crosses between wild and cultivatedVigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Int. Inst. Tropical Agric. J. Series No. 50.Google Scholar
  9. Rick, C. M., and W. H. Dempsey. 1969. Position of the stigma in relation to fruit setting of the tomato. Bot. Gaz. 130: 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Steele, W. M. 1972. Cowpeas in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
  11. Stewart, K. A., and R. J. Summerfield. 1978. Effect of root temperature on floral morphology in cowpea(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) cv. K2809. PI. & Soil 49: 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Verdcourt, B. 1970. Studies in the Leguminosae-Papiliondideae for the “Flora of Tropical East Africa.” IV. Kew Bull. 24: 507–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Westphal, E. 1974. Pulses in Ethiopia, their Taxonomy and Agricultural Significance. Centre Agric. Publ., Wageningen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New York Botanical Garden 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. M. Lush
    • 1
  1. 1.Research initiated at International Institute of Tropical AgricultureIbadanNigeria
  2. 2.Botany DepartmentAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations