Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 401–437 | Cite as

Carbonized food plants of Pompeii, Herculaneum, and the Villa at Torre Annunziata

  • Frederick G. Meyer
Article

Abstract

The remains of carbonized plants recovered from sites destroyed by Mount Vesuvius in A.D. 79 furnish valuable historical evidence on many staple food plants used by the ancient Campanians of the 1st century A.D. Carbonized seeds,grains, nuts, and fruits of 24 species identified from documented materials at Pompeii, Herculaneum, and the Roman villa at Torre Annunziata include: filbert, Corylus avellana;broadbean, Vicia fabavar. minor;bittervetch. Vicia ervilia;chickpea, Cicer arietinum;carob, Ceratonia siliqua;lentil, Lens culinaris;European chestnut, Castanea sativa;English or Persian walnut, Juglans regia;common onion, Allium cepa;garlic, Allium sativum;fig, Ficus carica;olive, Olea europaea;date, Phoenix dactylifera;stone pine, Pinus pinea;six-rowed barley, Hordeum vulgare;emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccon;common millet, Panicum miliaceum;Italian millet, Setaria italica;oat, Avena sativa;almond, Prunus dulcis;sour cherry, Prunus cerasus;pear, Pyrus communis;crabapple, Malussp.;and grape, Vitis vinifera.

Keywords

Seed Coat Economic Botany National Museum Sour Cherry Emmer Wheat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Apicius (Marcus Gabius Apicius). 1936. Cookery and Dining in Imperial Rome. Trans. J. D. Vehling. Walter M. Hill, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Almazan-Gil, F. J. 1974. Aportaciones al estudio sobre la toxicidad experimental del yero(Ervum ervilia). Rev. Nutr. Animal 12: 65–74.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, B. R. 1977. Oats: Wild and Cultivated, a Monograph of the GenusAvena L. (Poaceae). Canada Dept. Agric. Monograph No. 14. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Biffen, R. H. 1934. Report on Grain from the Fayum.In Caton-Thompson, G., and E. W. Gardner. The Desert Fayum. Roy. Anthropol. Inst., London.Google Scholar
  5. Burton, G. L. 1975. Plant studies in the People’s Republic of China. Millet, pp. 70–72. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Candolle, A. de. 1884. Origin of Cultivated Plants. Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., London.Google Scholar
  7. Chefranova, Z. V. 1978 (1971). Review of the species of the genusLens Mill. Novit. Syst. Pl. Vasc. 8: 197–204. Trans. B. R. Sharma. Amerind Publ. Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  8. Coit, J. E. 1951. Carob or St. John’s bread. Econ. Bot. 5: 82–96.Google Scholar
  9. Columella (Lucius Junius Moderatus Columella). 1960-1968. On agriculture(De re rustica). Trans. H. B. Ash and others. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  10. Condit, I. J. 1947. The Fig. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. Dioscorides Pedanios of Anazarbos. 1959 (reprint). The Greek Herbal of Dioscorides. Trans. John Goodyer. ed Ed., Robert T. Gunther. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Goor, A. 1966. The history of the grapevine in the Holy Land. Econ. Bot. 20: 46–64.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1967. The history of the date through the ages in the Holy Land. Econ. Bot. 21: 320–340.Google Scholar
  14. Harlan, J. R. 1979. On the origin of barley.In Barley: Origin, botany, culture, winter hardiness, genetics, utilization, pests. U.S.D.A. Handbook no. 338: 10–36.Google Scholar
  15. Hedrick, U. P. 1919. Sturtevant’s Notes on Edible Plants. State of New York Dept. Agric. 27th Ann. Rep. 2, pt. II. J. B. Lyon Co., Albany.Google Scholar
  16. Helbaek, H. 1956. Vegetables in the funeral meals of pre-urban Rome, Appendix I.In E. Gjerstad. Early Rome II. Acta Inst. Roman Suerciae scr. 4. 27: 287–294. Lund.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1960. The paleoethnobotany of the Near East and Europe.In Braidwood, R. J., and B. Howe. Prehistoric investigations in Iraq; Kurdistan, pp. 99–118. Oriental Institute, Univ. Chcago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1966. 1966—Commentary on the phylogenesis ofTriticum andHordeum. Econ. Bot. 20: 350–360.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1970. Excavations at Hacilar. Ed. J. Mellaart. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  20. Jashemski, W. F. 1968. Excavations in the “Foro Boario” at Pompeii: A preliminary report. Amer. J. Archaeol. 72: 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 1973. The discovery of a large vineyard at Pompeii: University of Maryland Excavations, 1970. Amer. J. Archaeol. 77: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. 1974. The discovery of a market-garden orchard at Pompeii: The garden of the “House of the ShipEuropa.” Amer. J. Archaeol. 78: 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. —. 1975. The gardens of Pompeii: an interim report. Cronache Pompeiane 1: 48–81.Google Scholar
  24. —. 1979a. The garden of Hercules at Pompeii (II.viii.6): The discovery of a commercial flower garden. Amer. J. Archaeol. 83: 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. —. 1979b. The Gardens of Pompeii and Herculaneum and the Villas destroyed by Vesuvius. Caratzas Brothers, New Rochelle, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Ladizinsky, G. 1975. On the origin of the broad bean,Vicia faba L. Israel J. Bot. 24: 80–88.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1979a. The origin of lentil and its wild genepool. Euphytica 28: 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. —. 1979b. Seed dispersal in relation to the domestication of Middle East legumes. Econ. Bot. 33: 284–289.Google Scholar
  29. —, and A. Adler. 1976. The origin of chickpea,Cicer arietinum L. Euphytica 25: 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, Hui-Lin. 1970. The origin of cultivated plants in southeast Asia. Econ. Bot. 24: 3–19.Google Scholar
  31. Licopoli, G. 1890. Sopre alcune sementi provenienti degli scavi di Pompei, in Rendiconto dell’ Accademia delle Scienze disiche e matematiche (sezione della societa reale di Napoli). Serv. 2. vol. 4 (anno 39). p. 85.Google Scholar
  32. Maesen, L. J. G. van der. 1972.Cicer L. A monograph of the genus with special reference to the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), its ecology and cultivation. Mededelingen Landbouwhoge-school, Wageningen, Nederland.Google Scholar
  33. Moldenke, H. N., and A. L. Moldenke. 1952. Plants of the Bible. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  34. Negrul, A. M. 1938. Evolution of cultivated forms of grapes. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. USSR 18: 585–588.Google Scholar
  35. Percival, J. 1921. The Wheat Plant. Duckworth and Co., London.Google Scholar
  36. Pickering, C. 1879. Chronological History of Plants. Little, Brown, and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  37. Pliny the Elder, 1938-1962. Natural History. Trans. H. Rackham and others. 10 vol. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  38. Pliny the Younger. 1969. Letters. Trans. B. Radice. 2 vol. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  39. Renfrew, J. M. 1969. The archaeological evidence for the domestication of plants: methods and problems.In Ucko, P. J., and G. W. Dimbleby. The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals. Gerald Duckworth and Co., London.Google Scholar
  40. —. 1973. Paleoethnobotany. The Prehistoric Food Plants of the Near East and Europe. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Ricciardi, M., and G. G. Aprile. 1978. Preliminary data on the floristic components of some carbonized plant remains found in the archaeological area of Oplontis near Naples. Ann. Fac. Sci. Agrar. Univ. Napoli in Portici. Ser. IV. 12: 204–212.Google Scholar
  42. Sosnovskii, D. I. 1949. Flora USSR (Vitaceae) 14: 686. Trans. R. Lavoot. Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
  43. Täckholm, V., and G. Täckholm. 1941. Flora of Egypt. Vol. 1. Otto Koeltz, Koenigstein, W. Germany (reprint, 1973).Google Scholar
  44. —, and M. Drar. 1950. Flora of Egypt. Vol. 2. Fouad I University Press, Cairo.Google Scholar
  45. Täckholm, V., and M. Drar. 1954. Flora of Egypt. Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  46. Theophrastus. 1968. Inquiry into Plants. Trans. Sir Arthur Hort. 2 vol. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  47. Turrill, W. B. 1952. Wild and cultivated olives. Kew Bull. No. 3. 437–442.Google Scholar
  48. Varro (Marcus Terrentius Varro). 1954. On agriculture (De re rustica). Trans. W. D. Hooper. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  49. Vavilov, N. I. 1926. Studies on the Origin of Cultivated Plants. Leningrad.Google Scholar
  50. Villaret-von Rochow, M. 1969. Fruit size variability of Swiss prehistoricMalus sylvestris.In Ucko, P. J., and G. W. Dimbleby. The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals. Gerald Duckworth and Co., London, pp. 201–206.Google Scholar
  51. Webb, D. A. 1968. Flora Europaea (Vitis) 2: 246. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  52. Wendelbo, B. 1971. Flora Iranica. Ed. K. H. Rechinger. No. 76/1.4(Allium). Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt. Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
  53. Wittmack, M. C. L. 1904. Die in Pompeji gefundenen pflanzlichen Reste. Bot. Jahr. Syst. 33, Beiblatt, no. 73: 38–66.Google Scholar
  54. Zohary, D., and M. Hopf. 1973. Domestication of pulses in the Old World. Science 182: 887–894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ŽZukovskij, P. M. 1950. Cultivated Plants and Their Wild Relatives. Trans. P. S. Hudson, 1962. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Farnham, Bucks, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick G. Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. National Arboretum, Agricultural ResearchScience and Education Administration, U.S. Dept. of AgricultureWashington, D.C.

Personalised recommendations