The Botanical Review

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 1–56 | Cite as

A revised classification of the Apocynaceae s.l.

  • Mary E. Endress
  • Peter V. Bruyns
Interpreting Botanical Progress

Abstract

The Asclepiadaceae, as traditionally defined, have repeatedly been shown to be an apomorphic derivative of the Apocynaceae. It has often been recommended that the Asclepiadaceae be subsumed within the Apocynaceae in order to make the latter monophyletic. To date, however, no comprehensive, unified classification has been established. Here we provide a unified classification for the Apocynaceae, which consists of 424 genera distributed among five subfamilies: Rauvolfioideae, Apocynoideae, Periplocoideae, Secamonoideae, and Asclepiadoideae. Keys to the subfamilies and tribes are provided, with lists of genera that (as far as we have been able to ascertain) are recognized in each tribe.

Zusammenfassung

Es wurde wiederholt festgestellt, dass die Asclepiadaceae in der traditionellen Umgrenzung ein apomorphes Derivat der Apocynaceae sind. Deshalb wurde oft vorgeschlagen, sie bei den Apocynaceae unterzubringen, damit die Apocynaceae eine monophyletische Gruppe darstellen. Bis jetzt wurde aber keine eingehende kombinierte Klassifikation publiziert. Hier stellen wir eine kombinierte Klassifikation vor für die Apocynaceae, mit 424 Gattungen, die in fünf Unterfamilien gegliedert sind: Rauvolfioideae, Apocynoideae, Periplocoideae, Secamonoideae und Asclepiadoideae. Schlüssel zu den Unterfamilien sowie den Triben werden gegeben. Die Gattungen, die zu jeder Tribus gehören (soweit bekannt) werden aufgelistet.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allorge, L. 1975. Rattachement de la tribu des Allamandées aux Echitoïdées (Apocynacées). Adansonia, sér. 2, 15: 273–276.Google Scholar
  2. Armbruster, W. S. 1996. Exaptation, adaptation, and homoplasy: Evolution of ecological traits inDalechampia vines. Pp. 227–243in M. J. Sanderson & L. Hufford (eds.), Homoplasy: The recurrence of similarity in evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  3. Bentham, G. 1876. Apocynaceae & Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 681–785in G. Bentham & J. D. Hooker (eds.), Gen. Pl., vol. 2, part 2. L. Reeve, London.Google Scholar
  4. Boke, N. H. 1948. Development of the perianth inVinca rosea L.. Amer. J. Bot. 35: 413–423.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, N. E. 1902–1903. Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 231–503in W. T. Thiselton-Dyer (ed.), Fl. Trop. Afr. 4(1). L. Reeve, London.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1907–1909. Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 518–1036in W. T. Thiselton-Dyer (ed.), Fl. Cap. 4(1): L. Reeve, London.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, R. 1810a. Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae van Diemen. London. Reprinted in C. G. D. Nees von Esenbeck (ed., 1827), Robert Brown’s vermischte botanische Schriften 3, issued 1828 as a separate work, Nuremberg.Google Scholar
  8. -. 1810b. On the Asclepiadeae, a natural order of plants separated from the Apocineae of Jussieu. [Preprint of Mem. Wern. Nat. Hist. Soc. 1: 12–78(1811)].Google Scholar
  9. Brummitt, R. K. 1992. Vascular plant families and genera. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  10. Bruyns, P. V. 1993. A revision ofHoodia andLavrania (Asclepiadaceae-Stapelieae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 115: 145–270.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1994. A note onRaphionacme namibiana. Aloe 31: 63–67.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1995. New records and new species of Asclepiadaceae from Namibia. Bothalia 25: 155–172.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1999. The systematic position ofEustegia. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 121: 19–44.Google Scholar
  14. — &P. I. Forster. 1991. Recircumscription of the Stapelieae (Asclepiadaceae). Taxon 40: 381–391.Google Scholar
  15. — &H. P. Linder. 1991. A revision ofMicroloma R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae-Asclepiadeae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 112: 453–527.Google Scholar
  16. Bullock, A. A. 1956. Notes on African Asclepiadaceae—VIII. Kew Bull. 1956: 503–522.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1963. Periplocaceae, Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 80–103in J. Hutchinson & J. M. Dalziel (eds.), Fl. W. Trop. Afr. Ed. 2. Millbank, London.Google Scholar
  18. Civeyrel, L. 1994. Variation et évolution des types polliniques du genreSecamone (Secamonoideae, Asclepiadaceae). C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 317: 1159–1165.Google Scholar
  19. -. 1995. Pollen morphology and ultrastructure of the genusSecamone in Africa. 2d Symposium on African Palynology, Tervuren (Belgium), 1995, Publ. Occas. CIFEG, Orléans, CIFEG: 207–215.Google Scholar
  20. -. 1996. Phylogenie des Asclepiadaceae: Approche palynologique et moleculaire. Ph.D. diss., Montpellier.Google Scholar
  21. —,A. Le Thomas, K. Ferguson &M. Chase. 1998. Critical reexamination of palynological characters used to delimit Asclepiadaceae in comparison to the molecular phylogeny obtained from plastidmatK sequences. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 9: 517–127.Google Scholar
  22. Coppen, J. J. W. &A. I. Cobb. 1983. The occurrence of iridoids inPlumeria andAllamanda. Phytochem. 22: 125–128.Google Scholar
  23. Dannenbaum, C. &R. Schill. 1991. Die Entwicklung der Pollentetraden und Pollinien bei den Asclepiadaceae. Biblioth. Bot. 141: 1–138.Google Scholar
  24. Decaisne, J. 1844. Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 940–665in A. P. De Candolle (ed.), Prodr. (DC.) 8. Paris.Google Scholar
  25. De Kruif, A. P. M. 1981. A Revision ofHolarrhena R. Br. (Apocynaceae). Meded. Landbouwhogeschool 81(2): 1–36.Google Scholar
  26. Demeter, K. 1922. Vergleichende Asclepiadeenstudien. Flora 115: 130–176.Google Scholar
  27. Dyer, R. A. 1975. The genera of southern African flowering plants. 1. Dicotyledons. Govt. Printer, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  28. Endlicher, S. L. 1838. Gen. Pl. 8: 577–599 (Apocynaceae & Asclepiadaceae). F. Beck, Vienna.Google Scholar
  29. Endress, M. E. 1997. Key characters at the interface of the apocynacs and the asclepiads. Amer. J. Bot. 84 (6, Abstracts): 189.Google Scholar
  30. — &V. A. Albert. 1995. A morphological cladistic study of Apocynaceae: Trends in character evolution within a broadened familial circumscription. Amer. J. Bot. 82 (6, Abstracts): 127.Google Scholar
  31. —,M. Hesse, S. Nilsson, A. Guggisberg &J.-P. Zhu. 1990. The systematic position of the Holarrheninae (Apocynaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 171: 157–185.Google Scholar
  32. —,B. Sennblad, S. Nilsson, L. Civeyrel, M. Chase, S. Huysmans, E. Grafström &B. Bremer, 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of Apocynaceaes.str. and some related taxa in Gentianales: A multidisciplinary approach. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 59–102.Google Scholar
  33. Endress, P. K. 1996. Homoplasy in angiosperm flowers. Pp. 303–325in M. J. Sanderson & L. Hufford (eds.), Homoplasy: The recurrence of similarity in evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  34. Fallen, M. E. 1983a. A systematic revision ofAnechites (Apocynaceae). Brittonia 25: 222–231.Google Scholar
  35. —. 1983b. A taxonomic revision ofCondylocarpon (Apocynaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 149–169.Google Scholar
  36. —. 1985. The gynoecial development and systematic position ofAllamanda (Apocynaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 72: 572–579.Google Scholar
  37. —. 1986. Floral structure in the Apocynaceae: Morphological, functional, and evolutionary aspects. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 106: 245–286.Google Scholar
  38. Fishbein, M. &R. Levin. 1997.Metastelma mexicanum (Asclepiadaceae): A new combination and reevaluation of the status ofBasistelma Bartlett. Madrõno 44: 268–276.Google Scholar
  39. Forster, P. I. 1991. The correct publication dates for some genera and species of Asclepiadaceae described by Robert Brown. Asklepios 52: 78–79.Google Scholar
  40. —. 1995. Circumscription ofMarsdenia (Asclepiadaceae: Marsdenieae), with a revision of the genus in Australia and Papuasia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 8: 703–933.Google Scholar
  41. Goyder, D. J. 1992.Secamone (Asclepiadaceae subfam. Secamonoideae) in Africa. Kew Bull. 47: 437–474.Google Scholar
  42. Hallier, H. 1905. Provisional scheme of the natural (phylogenetic) system of flowering plants. New Phytol. 4: 151–162.Google Scholar
  43. Huber, H. 1973. Apocynaceae, Periplocaceae and Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 1–57in B. A. Abeywickrama (ed.), A revised handbook to the flora of Ceylon, vol. 1, pt. 1. University of Sri Lanka Press, Colombo.Google Scholar
  44. Hufford, L. 1997. The roles of ontogenetic evolution in the origins of floral homoplasies. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 158 (Suppl. 6): S65-S80.Google Scholar
  45. Hutchinson, J. 1973. The families of flowering plants. Ed. 3. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  46. Judd, W. S., R. W. Sanders &M. J. Donoghue. 1994. Angiosperm family pairs: Preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Pap. Bot. 5: 1–51.Google Scholar
  47. Jussieu, A. L. de. 1789. Genera Plantarum. Herissant, Paris.Google Scholar
  48. Klackenberg, J. 1992a. Taxonomy ofSecamone (Asclepiadaceae) in Asia and Australia. Kew Bull. 47: 595–612.Google Scholar
  49. —. 1992b. Taxonomy ofSecamone s. lat. (Asclepiadaceae) in the Madagascar Region. Opera Bot. 112: 5–127.Google Scholar
  50. —. 1995a. Malagasy Asclepiadaceae: Reinstatement of the genusPervillea and two new combinations. Phytologia 78: 189–191.Google Scholar
  51. —. 1995b. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the SE Asian genusGenianthus (Asclepiadaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 117: 401–467.Google Scholar
  52. —. 1997a. Revision of the Malagasy genusCalyptranthera (Asclepiadaceae). Adansonia, sér. 3, 19: 21–37.Google Scholar
  53. —. 1997b. Revision of the genusBaroniella Costantin & Gallaud (Asclepiadaceae, Periplocoideae). Candollea 52: 383–407.Google Scholar
  54. —. 1998. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genusCamptocarpus s.l. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 120: 45–85.Google Scholar
  55. —. 1999. Revision of the Malagasy generaPentopetia andIschnolepis (Apocynaceaes.l., Periplocoideae). Candollea 54: 257–339.Google Scholar
  56. Kunze, H. 1990. Morphology and evolution of the corona in Asclepiadaceae and related families. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 76: 1–51.Google Scholar
  57. —. 1993. Evolution of the translator in Periplocaceae and Asclepiadaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 185: 99–122.Google Scholar
  58. —. 1994. Ontogeny of the translator in Asclepiadaceaes. str. Pl. Syst. Evol. 193: 223–242.Google Scholar
  59. —. 1995. Floral morphology of some Gonolobeae (Asclepiadaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 117: 211–238.Google Scholar
  60. —. 1996. Morphology of the stamen in the Asclepiadaceae and its systematic relevance. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 118: 547–579.Google Scholar
  61. —,U. Meve &S. Liede. 1994.Cibirhiza albersiana, a new species of Asclepiadaceae, and establishment of the tribe Fockeeae. Taxon 43: 367–376.Google Scholar
  62. Kupicha, F. K. 1984. Studies in African Asclepiadaceae. Kew Bull. 38: 599–672.Google Scholar
  63. Leeuwenberg, A. J. M. 1983. Some remarks on the taxonomy of the Plumerioideae (Apocynaceae). Bothalia 14: 799–801.Google Scholar
  64. —. 1988. The Nerieae (Apocynaceae-Apocynoideae). Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 25: 157–160.Google Scholar
  65. —. 1991. A revision ofTabernaemontana: The Old World species. Whitstable Litho, Whitstable.Google Scholar
  66. —. 1994. Taxa of the Apocynaceae above the genus level. Series of revisions of Apocynaceae, XXXVIII. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Papers 94(3): 45–60.Google Scholar
  67. —. 1997. Series of revisions of Apocynaceae XLIV.Craspidospermum Boj. ex A. DC,Gonioma E. Mey.,Mascarenhasia A. DC,Petchia Livera,Plectaneia Thou., andStephanostegia Baill. Wageningen Agric. Univ. Papers 97(2): 1–124.Google Scholar
  68. Liede, S. 1997. Subtribes and genera of the tribe Asclepiadeae (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae)—A synopsis. Taxon 46: 233–247.Google Scholar
  69. — &F. Albers. 1994. Tribal disposition of Asclepiadaceae genera. Taxon 43: 201–231.Google Scholar
  70. — &H. Kunze, 1993. A descriptive system for corona analysis in the Asclepiadaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 185: 99–284.Google Scholar
  71. —,U. Meve &P. G. Mahlberg. 1993. On the position of the genusKarimbolea Descoings. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 215–221.Google Scholar
  72. Lý, T. D. 1986. Die Familie Apocynaceae Juss. in Vietnam. Teil 1. Allgemeiner Teil. Feddes Repert. 97: 235–273.Google Scholar
  73. Mabberley, J. 1985. Jupiter Botanicus—Robert Brown of the British Museum. J. Cramer, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
  74. Markgraf, F. 1974. Morphologische Kleinigkeiten mit grösseren Folgen. Phyton (Austria) 16: 105–116.Google Scholar
  75. Meve, U. &S. Liede. 1994. Floral biology and pollination in stapeliads—New results and a literature review. Pl. Syst. Evol. 192: 99–116.Google Scholar
  76. Middleton, D. J. 1994. A revision ofUrceola (Apocynaceae) in Thailand. Kew Bull. 49: 757–767.Google Scholar
  77. —. 1995.Baharuia: A new genus of Apocynaceae from Malesia. Blumea 40: 443–447.Google Scholar
  78. —. 1997a. A revision ofParsonsia R. Br. (Apocynaceae) in Malesia. Blumea 42: 191–248.Google Scholar
  79. —. 1997b. A revision ofCarruthersia Seemann (Apocynaceae). Blumea 42: 489–498.Google Scholar
  80. Nicholas, A. 1992. The asclepiadaceous works of Rudolf F. Schlechter (1872–1925). Willdenowia 22: 215–264.Google Scholar
  81. — &H. Baijnath. 1994. A consensus classification for the order Gentianales with additional details on the suborder Apocynineae. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 60: 440–482.Google Scholar
  82. Nilsson, S. 1986. The significance of pollen morphology in the Apocynaceae. Pp. 359–374in S. Blackmore & I. K. Ferguson (eds.), Pollen and Spores: Form and Function. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  83. -. 1990. Taxonomic and evolutionary significance of pollen in Apocynaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 5: 91–102.Google Scholar
  84. -,M. E. Endress & E. Grafström. 1993. On the relationship of the Apocynaceae and Periplocaceae. Grana, Suppl. 2: 3–20.Google Scholar
  85. Nishino, E. 1982. Corolla tube formation in six species of Apocynaceae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 95: 1–17.Google Scholar
  86. Omlor, R. 1996. DoMenabea venenata andSecamonopsis madagascariensis represent missing links between Periplocaceae, Secamonoideae and Marsdenieae (Asclepiadaceae)? Kew Bull. 51: 695–715.Google Scholar
  87. -. 1998. Generische Revision der Marsdenieae (Asclepiadaceae). Ph.D. diss., Universität Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  88. Pichon, M. 1948a. Classification des Apocynacées. I. Carissées et Ambelaniées. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., sér. B, Bot. 24: 111–181.Google Scholar
  89. —. 1948b. Classification des Apocynacées. V. Cerbéroïdées. Not. Syst. Paris 13: 212–229.Google Scholar
  90. —. 1948c. Classification des Apocynacées. XIX. Le rétinacle des Echitoïdées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 95: 211–216.Google Scholar
  91. —. 1949. Classification des Apocynacées. IX. Rauvolfiées, Alstoniées, Allamandées et Tabernaémontanoidées. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 27: 153–251.Google Scholar
  92. —. 1950a. Classification des Apocynacées. XXV. Echitoïdées. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Sér. B, Bot. 1: 1–143.Google Scholar
  93. —. 1950b. Classification des Apocynacées. XXVIII. Supplément aux Plumérioïdées. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Sér. B, Bot. 1: 145–173.Google Scholar
  94. Potgieter, K. 1999. Phylogenetic study of Apocynaceae Juss. andAspidosperma Mart. & Zucc. Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  95. — &.V. A. Albert. 1997. Preliminary phylogenetic study of the genusAspidosperma (Apocynaceae) and closely related genera using ITS andtrnL-F sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 84 (6, Abstracts): 223.Google Scholar
  96. ——. 1998a.Aspidosperma evolution based on cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular (ITS,trnL-F) sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 85 (6, Abstracts): 151.Google Scholar
  97. ——. 1998b. Non-floral morphological correlates of the Apocynaceae s.s.-Periplocaceae-Asclepiadaceae transition (i.e., dispersal traits) mapped onto a trnL-F derived consensus tree. Amer. J. Bot. 85 (6, Abstracts): 152.Google Scholar
  98. Rosatti, T. J. 1989. The genera of suborder Apocynineae (Apocynaceae and Asclepiadaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 70: 307–401.Google Scholar
  99. Rothe, W. 1915. Über die GattungMarsdenia R. Br. und die Stammpflanze der Condurangorinde. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 52: 354–434.Google Scholar
  100. Safwat, F. M. 1962. The floral morphology ofSecamone and the evolution of the pollinating apparatus in Asclepiadaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 49: 95–129.Google Scholar
  101. Schill, R. &U. Jäckel. 1978. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Asclepiadaceen-Pollinarien. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 22: 1–122.Google Scholar
  102. Schlechter, F. R. R. 1905. Periplocaceae & Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 351–369in K. Schumann & K. Lauterbach (eds.), Nachträge zur Flora des Deutschen Südseegebiets. Borntraeger, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  103. Schumann, K. 1895. Apocynaceae & Asclepiadaceae. Pp. 109–305in A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds), Nat. Pflanzenfam. 4(2). Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  104. Sennblad, B. 1997. Phylogeny of the Apocynaceaes.l. (Ph.D. dissertation summary). Acta Universitas Uppsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries Uppsala Dissertations, Faculty of Science and Technology 295. 18 pp. Uppsala.Google Scholar
  105. — &B. Bremer. 1996. The familial and subfamilial relationships of Apocynaceae and Asclepiadaceae evaluated withrbcL data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 202: 153–175.Google Scholar
  106. —,M. E. Endress &B. Bremer. 1998. Morphology and molecular data in phylogenetic fraternity—The tribe Wrightieae (Apocynaceae) revisited. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1143–1158.Google Scholar
  107. Stapf, O. 1902. Apocynaceae. Pp. 24–231in W. T. Thiselton-Dyer (ed.), Fl. Trop. Afr. 4(1). L. Reeve, London.Google Scholar
  108. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: Evolution above the species level. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  109. Stevens, W. D. 1976. A revision ofMatelea subg.Dictyanthus (Apocynaceae, sensu lato). Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  110. Struwe, L., V. A. Albert &B. Bremer. 1994. Cladistics and family level classification of Gentianales. Cladistics 10: 175–206.Google Scholar
  111. Swarupanandan, K., J. K. Mangaly, T. K. Sonny, K. Kishorekumar &S. Chand Basha. 1996. The subfamilial and tribal classification of the family Asclepiadaceae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 120: 327–369.Google Scholar
  112. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York.Google Scholar
  113. Thorne, R. F. 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Evol. Biol. 9: 35–106.Google Scholar
  114. —. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365–389.Google Scholar
  115. Tsiang, Y. 1934. Notes on Asiatic Apocynales. II. Sunyatsenia 2: 90–202.Google Scholar
  116. Venter, H. J. T. &R. L. Verhoeven. 1993. A taxonomic account ofStomatostemma (Periplocaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 59: 50–56.Google Scholar
  117. —. 1994.Buckollia, a new genus in the Periplocaceae. S. Afr. J. Bot. 60: 93–98.Google Scholar
  118. —. 1997. A tribal classification of the Periplocoideae (Apocynaceae). Taxon 46: 705–720.Google Scholar
  119. Verhoeven, R. L. &H. J. T. Venter. 1988. Pollen morphologyoiRaphionacme (Periplocaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 54: 123–132.Google Scholar
  120. ——. 1998. Pollinium structure in Periplocoideae (Apocynaceae). Grana 37: 1–14.Google Scholar
  121. Vethacke, M. U. 1994. Systematische Untersuchungen an Gattungen der Tribus Gonolobeae (Asclepiadaceae). Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.Google Scholar
  122. Woodson, R. E., Jr. 1930. Studies in the Apocynaceae. I. A critical study of the Apocynoideae (with special reference to the genusApocynum). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 17: 1–213.Google Scholar
  123. —. 1941. The North American Asclepiadaceae. 1. Perspective of the genera. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 28: 193–244.Google Scholar
  124. —. 1951. Studies in the Apocynaceae. VIII. An interim revision of the genusAspidosperma Mart. & Zucc. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 38: 119–207.Google Scholar
  125. Zhu, J.-P., A. Guggisberg, M. Kalt-Hadamowsky &M. Hesse. 1990. Chemotaxonomic study of the genusTabernaemontana (Apocynaceae) based on their indole alkaloid content. Pl. Syst. Evol. 172: 13–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary E. Endress
    • 1
  • Peter V. Bruyns
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Systematic BotanyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Bolus HerbariumUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations