The Botanical Review

, 65:188 | Cite as

Fossils and ferns in the resolution of land plant phylogeny

  • Gar W. Rothwell
Article

Abstract

Fifty-two taxa of living and extinct vascular plants were evaluated in an unconstrained numerical cladistic analysis using 101 morphological characters to simultaneously resolve the phylogenetic relationships of ferns sensu lato. Included in the analysis were ferns assignable to the Cladoxylales, Stauropteridales, Rhacophytales, Zygopteridales, Ophioglossales, Marattiales, Filicales, and Hydropteridales, as well as a rhyniophyte, a trimerophyte, equisetophytes, lignophytes, and the psilotophytesPsilotum andTmesipteris. The results placed ferns and fernlike plants in three distinct clades, indicating that ferns s.l. are a polyphyletic grade group. Fern clades consist of extinct stauropterids; extinct cladoxylaleans, rhacophytaleans, and zygopteridaleans; and eusporangiates and leptosporangiates with living and extinct species. Psilotophytes occur near the base of the tree rather than nesting with the Filicales, as hypothesized by some. These results place Ophioglossales as the sister group to Marattiales plus the leptosporangiates, supporting the hypothesis that Ophioglossales represent ferns rather than progymnosperms. These analyses are a first attempt, which includes extinct plants, to develop cladistic hypotheses for the overall topology of fern phylogeny and to lay the groundwork for more detailed analyses of relationships among the homosporous leptosporangiates.

Keywords

Botanical Review Sister Group Parsimonious Tree Living Species Extinct Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Andrews, H. N. 1961. Studies in paleobotany. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. — &T. L. Phillips. 1968.Rhacophyton from the Upper Devonian of West Virginia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, R. M. 1991. Palaeobiological and phylogenetic implications of anatomically-preservedArchaeocalamites from the Dinantian of Oxroad Bay and Loch Humphrey Burn, Scotland. Palaeontographica 223B: 1–67.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, C. B. &D. D. Wight. 1988. Progymnosperms. Pp. 1–84in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bertrand, P. 1909. Étude de la fronde des Zygoptéridées. L. Danel, Lille.Google Scholar
  6. Bierhorst, D. W. 1968. On the Stromatopteridaceae (fam. nov. and the Psilotaceae. Phytomorphology 18:232–268.Google Scholar
  7. —. 1971. Morphology of vascular plants. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1977. The systematic position ofPsilotum andTmesipteris. Brittonia 29: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binney, E. W. 1872. Notes. Mem. Lit. Soc. Manchester 11: 69.Google Scholar
  10. Bower, F. O. 1923-1928. The ferns. Vols. I-III. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Chaloner, W. G. 1958. Isolated megaspore tetrads ofStauropteris burntislandica. Ann. Bot. 22: 197–204.Google Scholar
  12. Cichan, M. A. &T. N. Taylor. 1990. Evolution of cambium in geologic time-a reappraisal. Pp. 213–228in M. Iqbal (ed.), The vascular cambium. John Wiley & Sons (Research Studies Press Ltd.), Somerset, England.Google Scholar
  13. Cleal, C.J. 1993. Pteridopohyta. Pp. 779–794in M. J. Benton (ed.), The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  14. Collinson, M. E. 1996. “What use are fossil ferns?” 20 years on: With a review of the fossil history of extant pteridophyte families and genera. Pp. 349–394in J. Camus, M. Gibby & R. J. Johns (eds.), Pteridology in perspective. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  15. Conant, D. S., L. A. Raubeson, D. K. Attwood &D. B. Stein. 1995. The relationships of papuasian Cycatheaceae to New World tree ferns. Amer. Fern J. 85: 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Copeland, E. B. 1947. Genera Filicum-The genera of ferns. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Cornet, B., T. L. Phillips &H. N. Andrews Jr. 1976. The morphology and variation inRhacophyton ceratangium from the Upper Devonian and its bearing on frond evolution. Palaeontographica 158B: 105–129.Google Scholar
  18. Crane, E. H., D. R. Farrar &J. F. Wendel. 1995. Phylogeny of the Vittariaceae: Convergent simplification leads to a polyphyletic Vittaria. Amer. Fern J. 85: 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crane, P. R. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 72: 716–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delevoryas, T. &J. Morgan. 1954. A further investigation of the morphology ofAnachoropteris clavata. Amer. J. Bot. 41: 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeMason, D. A. 1983. The primary thickening meristem: Definition and function in monocotyledons. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dennis, R. L. 1974. Studies of Paleozoic ferns:Zygopteris from the Middle and Late Pennsylvanian of the United States. Palaeontographica 148B: 95–136.Google Scholar
  23. Dittrich, H. S., L. C. Matten &T. L. Phillips. 1983. Anatomyof Rhacophyton ceratangium from the Upper Devonian (Famennian) of West Virginia. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 40: 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donoghue, M. J., J. A. Doyle, J. Gauthier, A. G. Kluge &T. Rowe. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorn, J. 1980. A new species ofPsilophyton from the Lower Devonian of northern New Brunswick. Canad. J. Bot. 58: 2241–2262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Doyle, J. A. &M. J. Donoghue. 1992. Fossils and seed plant phylogeny reanalyzed. Brittonia 44: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eames, A. J. 1936. Morphology of vascular plants, lower groups. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Edwards, D. S. 1986.Aglaophyton major, a non-vascular land-plant from the Devonian Rhynie Chert. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 93: 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eggert, D. A. 1964. The question of the phylogenetic position of the Coenopteridales. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 21: 38–57.Google Scholar
  30. — &T. Delevoryas. 1967. Studies of Paleozoic ferns:Sermaya, gen. nov. and its bearing on filicalean evolution in the Paleozoic. Palaeontographica 120B: 169–180.Google Scholar
  31. Erwin, D. M. &G. W. Rothwell. 1989.Gillespiea randolphensis gen. et sp. nov. (Stauropteridales), from the Upper Devonian of West Virginia. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 3063–3077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Esau, K. 1943. Origin and development of primary vascular tissues in seed plants. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 9: 125–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Galtier, J. 1967. Les sporanges deBotryopteris antiqua Kidston. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci., ser. D 264: 897–900.Google Scholar
  34. —. 1981. Structures foliaires de fougeres et Pteridospermales du Carbonifere Inferieur et leur signification evolutive. Palaeontographica 180B: 1–38.Google Scholar
  35. — &T. L. Phillips. 1996. Structure and evolutionary significance of Paleozoic ferns. Pp. 417–434in J. Camus, M. Gibby & R. J. Johns (eds.), Pteridology in perspective. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  36. —&A. C. Scott. 1985. Diversification of early ferns. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 86B: 289–301.Google Scholar
  37. — &T. M. Taylor. 1994. The first record of ferns from the Permian of Antarctica. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 83:227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gastony, G. J. &D. R. Rollo. 1995. Phylogeny and generic circumscription of cheilanthoid ferns (Pteridaceae: Chelanthoideae) inferred from rbcL nucleotide sequences. Amer. Fern J. 85: 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gauthier, J., A. G. Kluge &T. Rowe. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gensel, P. G. &H. N. Andrews. 1984. Plant life in the Devonian. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Gifford, E. M. &A. S. Foster. 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. Ed. 3. W. H. Free-man, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Good, C. W. 1975. Pennsylvanian-age calamitean cones, elater-bearing spores, and associated vegetative organs. Palaeontographica 153B: 28–99.Google Scholar
  43. —. 1979.Botryopteris pinnules with abaxial sporangia. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. —. 1981. A petrified sporangium from the British Carboniferous. Palaeontology 24: 483–492.Google Scholar
  45. — &G. W. Rothwell. 1988. A reinterpretation of the Paleozoic fernNorwoodia angustum. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 56: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ——. 1991. A new genus of the Psalixochlaenaceae (Filicales) withBotryopteris vascular anatomy. Amer. J. Bot. 76(6): 114.Google Scholar
  47. Hamer, J. J. &G. W. Rothwell. 1988. The vegetative structure ofMedullosa endocentrica (Pteridopspermopsida). Canad. J. Bot. 66: 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hasebe, M. T., T. Omori, M. Nakazawa, T. Sano, M. Kato &K. Iwatsuki. 1994.RbcL gene sequences provide evidence for the evolutionary lineages of leptosporangiate ferns. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 91:5730–5734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. —,P. G. Wolf, K. M. Pryer, K. Ueda, M. Ito, R Sano, G. J. Gastony, J. Yokoyama, J. R. Man-hart, N. Murakami, E. H. Crane, C. H. Haufler &W. D. Hauk. 1995. A global analysis of fern phylogeny based onrbcL nucleotide sequences. Amer. Fern J. 85: 134–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Haufler, C. H. &T. A. Ranker. 1995.RbcL sequences provide phylogenetic insights among sister species of the fern genusPolypodium. Amer. Fern J. 85: 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hauk, W. D. 1995. A molecular assessment of relationships among cryptic species ofBotrychium subgenusBotrychium (Ophioglossaceae). Amer. Fern J. 85: 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hewitson, W. 1962. Comparative morphology of the Osmundaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 49: 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hill, C. R. &J. M. Camus. 1986. Evolutionary cladistics of marattialean ferns. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 14:219–300.Google Scholar
  54. Holden, H. S. 1962. The morphology ofBotryopteris antiqua. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 5: 361–380.Google Scholar
  55. Holmes, J. 1977. The Carboniferous fernPsalixochlaena cylindrica as found in Westphalian A coal balls from England. Part 1. Structure and development of the cauline system. Palaeontographica 164B: 33–75.Google Scholar
  56. —. 1981. The Carboniferous fernPsalixochlaena cylindrica as found in Westphalian A coal balls from England. Part II. The frond and fertile parts. Palaeontographica 176B: 147–173.Google Scholar
  57. —. 1989. Anomalous branching patterns in some fossil Filicales: Implications in the evolution of the megaphyll and the lateral branch, habit and growth pattern. Pl. Syst. Evol. 165: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Holttum, R. E. 1973. Posing the problems. Pp. 1–10in A. C. Jermy, J. A. Crabbe & B. A. Thomas (eds.), The phylogeny and classification of ferns. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 67 (Suppl. 1).Google Scholar
  59. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40: 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kato, M. 1988. The phylogenetic relationship of Ophioglossaceae. Taxon 37: 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kenrick, P. &P. R. Crane. 1997. The origin and early diversification of land plants: A cladistic study. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  62. Kramer, K. U. 1990. Notes on the higher level classification of the recent ferns. Pp. 49–52in K. Ku-bitzki (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants. I. Pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  63. Kräusel, R. &H. Weyland. 1926. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Devonflora, II. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. 41:317–359.Google Scholar
  64. Lang, W. H. 1913. Studies on the morphology and anatomy of the Ophioglossaceae. 1. On the branching ofBotrychium lunaria, with notes on the anatomy of the young and old rhizomes. Ann. Bot. 27: 203–242.Google Scholar
  65. Leclercq, S. 1951. Étude morphologique et anatomique d’une fourère du Dèvonien supèrieur, leRhacophyton zygopteroides nov. sp. ann. Mem. Soc. Gèol. Belgique, ser. 4, 9: 1–62.Google Scholar
  66. —. 1954. An Upper Devonian zygopterid showing clepsydropsoid and etapteroid features. Amer. J. Bot. 41:488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40: 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Maddison, M. J. &D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.01. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  69. Manhart, J. R. 1995. Chloroplast 16S rDNA sequences and phylogenetic relationships of fern allies and ferns. Amer. Fern J. 85: 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mickel, J. T. 1974. Phyletic lines in the modern ferns. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61: 474–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mickle, J. E. 1980.Ankyropteris from the Pennsylvanian of eastern Kentucky. Bot. Gaz. 141: 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Millay, M. A. 1979. Studies of Paleozoic marattialeans: A monograph of the American species ofScolecopteris. Palaeontographica 169B: 1–69.Google Scholar
  73. —. 1982. Studies of Paleozoic marattialeans: An evaluation of the genusCyathotrachus. Palaeontographica 180B: 65–81.Google Scholar
  74. — &G. W. Rothwell. 1983. Fertile pinnae ofBiscalitheca (Zygopteridales) from the Upper Pennsylvanian of the Appalachian Basin. Bot. Gaz. 144: 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. — &T. N. Taylor. 1980. An unusual botryopterid sporangial aggregation from the Middle Pennsylvanian of North America. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 758–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Morgan, J. 1959. The morphology and anatomy of American species of the genusPsaronius. Illinois Biological Monographs, No. 27. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  77. Nixon, K. C. 1996. Paleobotany in cladistics and cladistics in paleobotany: Enlightenment and uncertainty. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 90: 363–373.Google Scholar
  78. & J. M. Carpenter. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9: 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ogura, Y. 1972. Comparative anatomy of vegetative organs of the pteridophytes. Ed. 2. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
  80. Phillips, T. L. 1974. Evolution of vegetative morphology in coenopterid ferns. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61:427–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pichi Sermolli, R. E. G. 1977. Tentamen pteridophytorium genera in taxonomicum ordinem redigendi. Webbia: 31: 313–512.Google Scholar
  82. Pryer, K. M., A. R. Smith &J. E. Skog. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of extant pteridophytes based on evidence from morphology and rbcL sequences. Amer. Fern J. 85: 205–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Raubeson, L. A. &D. B. Stein. 1995. Insights into fern evolution from mapping chloroplast genomes. Amer. Fern. J. 85: 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Remy, W. &H. Hass. 1996. New information on gametophytes and sporophytes ofAglaophyton major and inferences about possible environmental adaptations. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 90: 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. —,P. Gensel &H. Hass. 1993. The gametophyte generation of some Early Devonian land plants. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 154:35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rothwell, G. W. 1976. Primary vasculature and gymnosperm systematics. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 22: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. —. 1986. Classifying the earliest gymnosperms. Pp.137–162in R. A. Spicer& B. A. Thomas (eds.), Systematic and taxonomic approaches in palaeobotany. The Systematics Association Special Volume No. 31, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  88. —. 1987. Complex Paleozoic Filicales in the evolutionary radiation of ferns. Amer. J. Bot. 74: 458–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. —. 1988. Upper Pennsylvanian Steubenville coal-ball flora. Ohio J. Sci. 88: 61–65.Google Scholar
  90. —. 1991.Botryopteris forensis (Botryopteridaceae), a trunk epiphyte of the tree fernPsaronius. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 782–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. —. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among ferns and gymnosperms: An overview. J. Pl. Res. 107: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. —. 1995. The fossil history of branching: Implications for the phylogeny of land plants. Pp. 71–86in P. C. Hoch & A. G. Stephenson (eds.), Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  93. —. 1996a. Phylogenetic relationships of ferns: A palaeobotanical perspective. Pp. 395–404in J. Camus, M. Gibby & R. J. Johns (eds.), Pteridology in perspective. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  94. —. 1996b. Pteridophytic evolution: An often underappreciated phytological success story. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 90: 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. — &E. E. Karrfalt. 1996. Origin and ontogeny of tissues in the ophioglossaceous fernBotrychium. Amer. J. Bot. 83 (Abstracts): 48.Google Scholar
  96. — &J. S. Pryor. 1991. Developmental dynamics of arborescent lycophytes-apical and lateral growth inStigmaria ficoides. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1740–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. — &R. Serbet. 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: A numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 19: 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. — &R. A. Stockey. 1994. The role ofHydropteris pinnata gen. et sp. nov. in reconstructing the cladistics of heterosporous ferns. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schmid, R. 1982. The terminology and classification of steles: Historical perspective and outlines of a system. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 48: 817–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schweitzer, H.-J. &P. Geisen. 1980. ÜberTaeniophyton inopinatum, Protolycopodites devonicus undCladoxylon scoparium aus dem Mitteldevon von Wuppertal. Palaeontographica 173B: 1–25.Google Scholar
  101. Serbet, R. &G. W. Rothwell. 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: A numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 19: 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Skog, J. E. 1992. The Lower Cretaceous ferns in the genusAnemia (Schizaeaceae), Potomac Group of Virginia, and relationships within the genus. Rev. Palaeobot. & Palynol. 70: 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Smith, A. R. 1995. Non-molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for ferns. Amer. Fern J. 85: 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Stein, D. B., D. S. Conant, M. E. Ahearn, E. T. Jordan, S. A. Kirch, M. Hasebe, K. Iwatsuki &M. K. Tan. 1992. Structural rearrangements of the chloroplast genome provide an important phylogenetic link in ferns. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 89: 1856–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stevenson, D. W. &H. Loconte. 1996. Ordinal and familial relationships of pteridophyte genera. Pp. 435–467in J. M. Camus, M. Gibby & R. J. Johns (eds.), Pteridology in perspective. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  106. Stewart, W. N. &G. W. Rothwell. 1993. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. Ed. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  107. Stidd, B. M. 1971. Morphology and anatomy of the frond ofPsaronius. Palaeontographica 134B: 88–123.Google Scholar
  108. Surange, K. R. 1952a. The morphology ofStauropteris burntislandica P. Bertrand and its megasporangiumBensonites fusiformis R. Scott. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 237B: 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. —. 1952b. The morphology ofBotryopteris antiqua with some observations onBotryopteris ramosa. Palaeobotanist 1: 420–434.Google Scholar
  110. Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1 Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.Google Scholar
  111. Taylor, T. N. &E. L. Taylor. 1993. The biology and evolution of fossil plants. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  112. Tidwell, W. D. &S. R. Ash. 1994. A review of selected Triassic and Early Cretaceous ferns. J. Pl. Res. 107: 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Trivett, M. L. 1986. Reconstructing zygopterid ferns-theCorynepteris-type plant. Amer. J. Bot. 73: 712.Google Scholar
  114. — &G. W. Rothwell. 1988. Modeling the growth architecture of fossil plants: A Paleozoic filicalean fern. Evol. Trends Pl. 2: 25–29.Google Scholar
  115. Tryon, A. F. &B. Lugardon. 1990. Spores of the Pteridophyta. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  116. Tryon, R. M. &A. F. Tryon. 1982. Ferns and allied plants with special reference to tropical America. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  117. Wagner, W. H., Jr. 1969. The construction of a classification. Pp. 230–256in U.S. Natl. Acad. Sci. Publ. No. 1692. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  118. —. 1989. Evolutionary diagram. P. 299in E. M. Gifford & A. S. Foster, Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. Ed. 3. W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  119. Wolf, P. G. 1995. Phylogenetic analyses of rbcL and nuclear ribosomal RNA gene sequences in Dennstaedtiaceae. Amer. Fern J. 85: 306–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. —,P. S. Soltis &D. E. Soltis. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of dennstaedtioid ferns: Evidence from rbcL sequences. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 3: 383–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gar W. Rothwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Plant Biology and Department of Biological SciencesOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations