Dao

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 209–228

Zen and zen philosophy of language: A soteriological approach

  • Jin Y. Park
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, Robert, trans. 1997.The Gateless Barrier. The Wu-men Kuan. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 1970/1982.The Empire of Signs. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  3. Blue Cliff Record. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō. 48.2003. 139a–292a.Google Scholar
  4. Buswell, Robert E. Jr. 1983.The Korean Approach to Zen: Collected Works of Chinul. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1986. “Chinul’s Systematization of Chinese Meditative Techniques in Korean Son Buddhism.” In Gregory 1986: 199–242.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1987. “The “Short-cut’ Approach of K’an-hua Meditation: The Evolution of a Practical Subitism in Chinese Zen Buddhism.” In Gregory 1987: 321–377.Google Scholar
  7. Chinul.Treatise on Resolving DoubtsAbout Kanhua Meditation. InComplete Works of Korean Buddhism 4. 732c–737c.Google Scholar
  8. Clearly, Thomas. 1983/1994.Entry Into the Inconceivable: An Introduction to Hua-yen Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  9. -, trans. 1997.Unlocking the Zen Koan: A New Translation of the Zen Classic Wumenguan. Berkeley: North Adantic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Clearly, Thomas and J. C. Clearly, trans. 1992.The Blue Cliff Record. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, Francis. 1991. “Fa-tsang’s Treatise on the Five-Doctrines: An Annotated Translation.” Ph. D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  12. DahuiDahui yulu.Taishō 47. 1998. 811b-943a.Google Scholar
  13. Diamond Sūtra. Taishō 8.235.748c–752c.Google Scholar
  14. Dumoulin, Heinrich. 1992.Zen Buddhism in the 20th Century (1990). Trans. Joseph S. O’Leary. New York: Weatherhill.Google Scholar
  15. Dushan.Cessation and Contemplation in the Five Teachings of the Huayen.Taisho 45. 1867. 509a-513c.Google Scholar
  16. Faure, Bernard. 1993.Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1991.The Rhetoric of Immediacy: A Cultural Critique of Chan /Zen Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fazang.Treatise on the Five Teachings.Taishō 45. 1866. 477a-509a.Google Scholar
  19. Foulk, Griffith T. 1995. “Myth, Ritual, and Monastic Practice in Sung Ch’an Buddhism.” In Patricia Buckley Ebrey and Peter N. Gregory, eds.,Religion and Society in T’ang and Sung China. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gateless Gates. Taisho 48.2005. 292a–299c.Google Scholar
  21. Gregory, Peter N. 1986.Traditions of Meditation in Chinese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1991.Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. —, ed. 1987.Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought. Studies in East Asian Buddhism 5. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory, Peter N. and Daniel A. Getz, Jr., eds. 1999.Buddhism in the Sung. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heine, Steven and Dale S. Wright, eds.. 2000.The Kōan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hsieh, Ding-hwa Evelyn. 1993. “A Study of the Evolution of K’an-hua Ch’an in Sung China: Yüan-wu K’o-ch’in (1063–1135) and the Function of Kung-an in Ch’an Pedagogy and Praxis.” Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1994. “Yuan-wu K’o-ch’in’s (1063–1135) Teaching of Zen Kung-an Practice: A Transition from the Literary Study of Ch’an Kung-an to the Practical K’an-hua Ch’an.”Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 17.1 (Summer): 66–95.Google Scholar
  28. Huong. 1579.The Mirror of Zen Teaching. InComplete Works of Korean Buddhism 7. 634c-646c.Google Scholar
  29. Koestler, Arthur. 1961.The Lotus and the Robot. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  30. Levering, Miriam L. 1978. “Zen Enlightenment for Laymen: Ta-hui and the New Religious Culture of the Sung.” Ph. D. dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  31. Lie, Ming-Wood. 1981. “TheP’an-chiao System of the Hua-yen School in Chinese Buddhism.”T’oung Pao 67. 1–2: 10–47.Google Scholar
  32. McPhail, Mark Lawrence. 1996.Zen in the Art of Rhetoric: An Inquiry into Coherence. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  33. Miura, Isshū, and Ruther Fuller Sasaki. 1965.The Zen Koan: Its History and Uses in Rinzai Zen. New York: Harcourt Brace and Javanovich.Google Scholar
  34. Mu Soeng, Sunim. 1991.Thousand Peaks: Korean ZenTradition & Teachers. Cumberland: Primary Point Press.Google Scholar
  35. Olson, Carl. 2000.Zen and the Art of Postmodern Philosophy: Two Paths of Liberation from the Representational Mode of Thinking. Albany. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  36. Park, Jin Young. 1998. “Deconstructive Framing: Son Buddhism and Postmodern Thought.” Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  37. Park, Sung Bae. 1983.Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pine, Red, trans. 1987.The Zen Teaching of Bodhidharma. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pomhu Chamyong. 1986.Study on Pojo Chinul’s Kanhwa Son. Seoul: Sonhak yon’ guwon.Google Scholar
  40. Sekida, Katsuki, trans. 1977.Two Zen Classics: Mumonkan and Hekiganroku. New York: Weatherhill, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Shim, Jae Ryong. 1979. “The Philosophical Foundation of Korean Zen Buddhism: The Integration of Son and Kyo by Chinul (1158–1210).” Ph. D. Dissertation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  42. Song, Sokku. 1979. “Essay on Pojo’sTreatise on Resolving Doubts about Hwadu meditation.”Tongguk sasang 12:21–34.Google Scholar
  43. Wonyung. 1993.Kanhua Son: The Correct Understanding of the Sudden Teaching of Son Buddhism Hapch’on, Korea: Jangkyonggak.Google Scholar
  44. Wright, Dale S. 1992. “Rethinking Transcendence: The Role of Language in Zen Experience,”Philosophy East and West 421: 113–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. -. 2000. “Kōan History: Transformative Language in Chinese Buddhist Thought.” In Steve Heine and Dale S. Wright, eds.The Kōan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism: 200–212.Google Scholar
  46. Yü, Chün-fang. 1979. “Ta-hui Tsung-kao and Kung-anZenJournal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Publications 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin Y. Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionAmerican UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations