, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 185–207 | Cite as

A critique of Steven Katz’s “contextualism”: An Asian perspective



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dao De Jing. In Chan: 136–176.Google Scholar
  3. Dodds, E. R. 1951.The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dogen. 1980. “Koan Presenting” (Genjōkō). InShōbōgenzō. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1962.Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Jung, Carl. 1962. “Commentary.” InSecret of Golden Flower. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  7. Kasulis, T.P. 1981.Zen Action/Zen Person. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, Stephen. 1978. “Language, Epistemology, and Mysticism.” In Katz’sMysticism and Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978: 22–74.Google Scholar
  9. Hajime, Nakamura. 1977.The Suttanipāta (Budda no kotoba). Tokyo: Iwanami: Shoten.Google Scholar
  10. Yasuo, Yuasa. 1995.Synchronicity: Synchronistic View of the Cosmos (Shinkuronishiti: Kyojisei no uchūkan). Kyoto: Jinmon shoin: 81–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Publications 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Temple UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations