Advertisement

Dao

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 185–207 | Cite as

A critique of Steven Katz’s “contextualism”: An Asian perspective

Article
  • 108 Downloads

Keywords

Religious Experience Linguistic Context Mystical Experience Ontological Structure Comparative Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dao De Jing. In Chan: 136–176.Google Scholar
  3. Dodds, E. R. 1951.The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dogen. 1980. “Koan Presenting” (Genjōkō). InShōbōgenzō. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1962.Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Jung, Carl. 1962. “Commentary.” InSecret of Golden Flower. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  7. Kasulis, T.P. 1981.Zen Action/Zen Person. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, Stephen. 1978. “Language, Epistemology, and Mysticism.” In Katz’sMysticism and Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978: 22–74.Google Scholar
  9. Hajime, Nakamura. 1977.The Suttanipāta (Budda no kotoba). Tokyo: Iwanami: Shoten.Google Scholar
  10. Yasuo, Yuasa. 1995.Synchronicity: Synchronistic View of the Cosmos (Shinkuronishiti: Kyojisei no uchūkan). Kyoto: Jinmon shoin: 81–121.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Publications 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Temple UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations