Dao

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 73–88

Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism

Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. 1963.The Platform Scripture: The Basic Classic of Zen Buddhism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1969.A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fang, Litian. 2000. “Zen Buddhism of theTathāgata and Zen Buddhism of the Master.Zhongguo Shehui Kexue. No. 5: 130–140.Google Scholar
  4. Gregory, Peter. 1994. “Tsung-mi and the Problem ofHongaku shiso.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute (Komazawa University). No. 5: 200–151.Google Scholar
  5. Hakamaya, Noriaki. 1989.Critique of Original Enlightenment Thought (Hongaku shiso hihan). Tokyo: Daizo Shupan.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1966.Discourse on Thinking. Trans. by John Anderson. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Hu, Shi. 1953. “Ch’an (Zen) Buddhism in China.”Philosophy East and West 3: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huikai.The Gateless Gate. InDaizokyo 48.Google Scholar
  9. Hubbard, James, & Paul Swanson, eds. 1997.Pruning the Bodhi Tree: Storm over Critical Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jan, Yun-hua. 1988.Zongmi. Taibei: Dongda Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  11. Matsumoto, Shiro. 1977. “Critiques ofTathāgata Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No.55: 232–215.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1994.Critical Studies on Zen Thought (Zen shiso no hihanteki kenkyu). Tokyo: Taizo Shuppan.Google Scholar
  13. -. 1996. “Buddha-nature as the Principle of Discrimination.”Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyugakubu Ronshu. No. 27: 328–296.Google Scholar
  14. —. 1997a. “The Doctrine ofTathāgata-garhha Is Not Buddhist” Translated by Jaime Hubbard. In Jamie Hubbard and Paul Swanson, ed. Hawaii: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
  15. -. 1997b. “Critiques of Tathāgatagarbha Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No 55: 232–215.Google Scholar
  16. -. 1999. “Critical Considerations on Zen Thought.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute. Komazawa University. No. 10: 238–217.Google Scholar
  17. Mou, Zongsan. 1982.Buddha-Nature and Prajna. Taipei: Xuesheng Shuju.Google Scholar
  18. Nāgājuna.Mādhyamika. InDaizokyo 30.Google Scholar
  19. Nishitani, Keiji. 1982.Religion and Nothingness. Trans. by Jan Van Bragt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro. 1953. “Zen: A Reply to Hu Shih.”Philosophy East and West 3: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swanson, Paul. 1993. “‘Zen is Not Buddhism’: Recent Japanese Critiques of Buddha-Nature.”Numan 40: 115–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zongmi.Preface to Origins of the Various Chan Teachings. Daizokyo 48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Scholarly Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations