Dao

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 73–88 | Cite as

Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism

Article
  • 148 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. 1963.The Platform Scripture: The Basic Classic of Zen Buddhism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1969.A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fang, Litian. 2000. “Zen Buddhism of theTathāgata and Zen Buddhism of the Master.Zhongguo Shehui Kexue. No. 5: 130–140.Google Scholar
  4. Gregory, Peter. 1994. “Tsung-mi and the Problem ofHongaku shiso.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute (Komazawa University). No. 5: 200–151.Google Scholar
  5. Hakamaya, Noriaki. 1989.Critique of Original Enlightenment Thought (Hongaku shiso hihan). Tokyo: Daizo Shupan.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1966.Discourse on Thinking. Trans. by John Anderson. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Hu, Shi. 1953. “Ch’an (Zen) Buddhism in China.”Philosophy East and West 3: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huikai.The Gateless Gate. InDaizokyo 48.Google Scholar
  9. Hubbard, James, & Paul Swanson, eds. 1997.Pruning the Bodhi Tree: Storm over Critical Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jan, Yun-hua. 1988.Zongmi. Taibei: Dongda Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  11. Matsumoto, Shiro. 1977. “Critiques ofTathāgata Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No.55: 232–215.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1994.Critical Studies on Zen Thought (Zen shiso no hihanteki kenkyu). Tokyo: Taizo Shuppan.Google Scholar
  13. -. 1996. “Buddha-nature as the Principle of Discrimination.”Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyugakubu Ronshu. No. 27: 328–296.Google Scholar
  14. —. 1997a. “The Doctrine ofTathāgata-garhha Is Not Buddhist” Translated by Jaime Hubbard. In Jamie Hubbard and Paul Swanson, ed. Hawaii: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
  15. -. 1997b. “Critiques of Tathāgatagarbha Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No 55: 232–215.Google Scholar
  16. -. 1999. “Critical Considerations on Zen Thought.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute. Komazawa University. No. 10: 238–217.Google Scholar
  17. Mou, Zongsan. 1982.Buddha-Nature and Prajna. Taipei: Xuesheng Shuju.Google Scholar
  18. Nāgājuna.Mādhyamika. InDaizokyo 30.Google Scholar
  19. Nishitani, Keiji. 1982.Religion and Nothingness. Trans. by Jan Van Bragt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro. 1953. “Zen: A Reply to Hu Shih.”Philosophy East and West 3: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swanson, Paul. 1993. “‘Zen is Not Buddhism’: Recent Japanese Critiques of Buddha-Nature.”Numan 40: 115–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zongmi.Preface to Origins of the Various Chan Teachings. Daizokyo 48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Scholarly Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations