Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 171–179 | Cite as

Recent advances in the molecular genetics of resin biosynthesis and genetic engineering strategies to improve defenses in conifers

  • Tang Wei
Article
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Since the first terpenoid synthase cDNA was obtained by the reverse genetic approach from grand fir, great progress in the molecular genetics of terpenoid formation has been made with angiosperms and genes encoding a monoterpene synthase, a sesquiterpene synthase, and a diterpene synthase. Tree killing bark beetles and their vectored fungal pathogens are the most destructive agents of conifer forests worldwide. Conifers defend against attack by the constitutive and inducible production of oleoresin that accumulates at the wound site to kill invaders and both flush and seal the injury. Although toxic to the bark beetle and fungal pathogen, oleoresin also plays a central role in the chemical ecology of these boring insects. Recent advances in the molecular genetics of terpenoid biosynthesis provide evidence for the evolutionary origins of oleoresin and permit consideration of genetic engineering strategies to improve conifer defenses as a component of modern forest biotechnology. This review described enzymes of resin biosynthesis, structural feathers of genes genomic intron and exon organization, pathway organization and evolution, resin production and accumulation, interactions between conifer and bark beetle, and engineering strategies to improve conifer defenses.

Keywords

Genetic engineering strategies Resin biosynthesis Bark beetles Genomics Molecular genetics 

CLC Number

Q341 TQ322.4 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubourg, S., Takvorian, A., Cheron, A., Kreis, M., Lecharny, A., 1997. Structure, organization and putative function of the genes identified within a 23.9kb fragment fromArabidopsis thaliana chromosome IV [J]. Gene,199: 241–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedard, W.E., Tilden, P.E., Wood, D.L., Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee RG,et al. 1969. Western pine beetle: field response to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene, myrcene [J]. Science164: 1284–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berryman AA. 1972. Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetlefungus associations [J]. BioScience,22: 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohlmann, J., Meyer-Gauen G, Croteau R. 1998. Plant terpenoid synthases: molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,95: 4126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohlmann, J., Phillips, M., Ramachandiran, V., Katoh, S., Croteau, R. 1999. cDNA cloning, characterization, and functional expression of four new monoterpene synthase members of theTpsd gene family from grand fir (Abies grandis) [J]. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,368: 232–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, S.P., Hain, F.P. 1988. Toxicity of host monoterpenes to Dendroctonus frontalis andIps calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) [J]. J. Entomol. Sci.,23: 287–92.Google Scholar
  7. Croteau, R. 1998. The discovery of terpenes [C]. In: S-D Kung, S-F Yang (ed) Discoveries in Plant Biology, 1: 329–43. Singapore: World Sci.Google Scholar
  8. Davis EM, Croteau R. 2000. Cyclization enzymes in the biosynthesis of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and diterpenes [C]. In: F Leeper, JC Vederas (ed) Topics in Current Chemistry: Biosynthesis, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 209: 53–95.Google Scholar
  9. Facchini, P.J., Chappell, J. 1992. Gene family for an elicitor-induced sesquiterpene cyclase in tobacco [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,89: 11088–11092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francke, W., Vite, J.P.Z. 1983. Oxygenated terpenes in pheromone systems of bark beetles (Polygraphus poligraphus, ips amitinus, ips typographus) [J]. Z. Angew. Entomol.,96: 146–56.Google Scholar
  11. Fryxell, K.J. 1996. The coevolution of gene family trees [J]. Trends Genet.,12: 356–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Funk, C., Croteau, R. 1994. Diterpenoid resin acid biosynthesis in conifers: characterization of two cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases and an aldehyde dehydrogenase involved in abletic acid biosynthesis [J]. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,308: 258–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Funk, C., Lewinsohn, E., Vogel, B.S., Steele, C.L., Croteau, R., 1994. Regulation of oleoresinosis in grand fir (Abies grandis): coordinate induction of monoterpene and diterpene cyclases and two cytochrome P450-dependent diterpene hydroxylases by stem wounding [J]. Plant Physiol.,106: 999–1005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gifford, E.M., Foster, A.S. 1988. Coniferophyta [C]. In: Morphology and Evolution of Vascular Plants. New York: Freeman, pp. 401–453Google Scholar
  15. Gijzen, M., Lewinsohn, E., Croteau, R. 1991. Characterization of the constitutive and wound-inducible monoterpene cyclases of grand fir (Abies grandis) [J]. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,289: 267–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gijzen, M., Lewinsohn, E., Croteau, R. 1992. Antigenic cross-reactivity among monoterpene cyclases from grand fir and induction of these enzymes upon stem wounding [J]. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,294: 670–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gijzen, M., Lewinsohn, E., Savage, T.J., Croteau, R.B. 1993. Conifer monoterpenes: biochemistry and bark beetle chemical ecology [C]. In: R Teranishi, RG Buttery, H Sugisawa (ed.) Bioactive VolatileCompounds from Plants. Washington, DC: Am. Chem. Soc., pp. 8–22.Google Scholar
  18. Jain, K.K. 1976. Evolution of wood structure in Pinaceae [J]. Isr. J. Bot.,25: 28–33.Google Scholar
  19. James, R.R. 1997. Utilizing a social ethic toward the environment in assessing genetically engineered insect-resistance in trees [J]. Agr. Hum. Values,14: 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katoh, S., Croteau, R. 1998. Individual variation in constitutive and induced monoterpene biosynthesis in grand fir (Abies grandis) [J]. Phytochemistry,47: 577–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keegstra, K., Olsen, L.J., Theg, S.M. 1989. Chloroplastic precursors and their transport across the envelope membrane [J]. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.,40: 471–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuroda, K., Shimaji, K. 1983. Traumatic resin canal formation as a marker of xylem growth. For. Sci.,29: 653–659.Google Scholar
  23. LaFever, R.E., Stofer, Vogel, B., Croteau, R. 1994. Diterpenoid resin acid biosynthesis in conifers: enzymatic cyclization of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate to abletadiene, the precursor of abietic acid [J]. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,313: 139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewinsohn, E., Gijzen, M., Croteau, R. 1992. Regulation of monoterpene biosynthesis in conifer defense [C]. In: WD Nes, EJ Parish, JM Trzaskos (ed.) Regulation of Isopentenoid Metabolism. Washington, DC: Am. Chem. Soc., pp. 8–17Google Scholar
  25. Lewinsohn, E., Gijzen, M., Muzika, R.M., Barton, K., Croteau, R. 1993. Oleoresinosis in grand fir (Abies grandis) saplings and mature trees: modulation of this wound response by light and water stresses [J]. Plant Physiol.,101: 1021–1028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewinsohn, E., Gijzen, M., Savage, T.J., Croteau, R. 1991. Defense mechanisms of conifers: relationship of monoterpene cyclase activity to anatomical specialization and cleoresin monoterpene content [J]. Plant Physiol.,96: 38–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewinsohn, E., Katoh, S., Croteau, R. 1999. Conifer chemical defenses against bark beetles: the modulation of monoterpene biosynthesis by wounding, environmental stress, and ethylene [C]. In: HR Lerner (eds.) Plant Responses to Environmental Stresses: From Phytohormones to Genome Reorganization. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 659–706Google Scholar
  28. Mau, C.J.D., West, C.A. 1994. Cloning of casbene synthase cDNA: evidence for conserved structural features among terpenoid cyclases in plants [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,91: 8497–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mutton, D.B. 1962. Wood resin [C]. In: WE Hillis (ed.) Wood Extractives. New York: Academic, pp. 331–63.Google Scholar
  30. Payne, T.L. 1989. Olfactory basis for insect enemies of allied species [C]. In: DL Kulhavy, MC Miller (ed.) Potential for Biological Control of Dendroctonus and Ips Bark Beetles. Nacogdoches, TX: Stephen F. Austin Univ. Press, pp. 55–69Google Scholar
  31. Phillips, M.A., Croteau, R. 1999. Resin based defenses in conifers [J]. Trends Plant Sci.,4: 184–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Puritch, G.S., Nijhoit, W.W. 1974. Occurrence of juvabione-related compounds in grand fir (Abies grandis) and pacific silver fir (Abies amabilis) infested by balsam wooly aphid (Adelges piceae) [J]. Can. J. Bot.,52: 585–87.Google Scholar
  33. Raffa, K.F., Berryman, A.A., Simasko, J., Teal, W., Wong, B.L. 1985. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and its symbiotic fungus [J]. Environ. Entomol.,14: 552–56.Google Scholar
  34. Robinson, C. 1999. Making forest biotechnology a commercial reality [J]. Nat. Biotechnol.17: 27–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savage, T.J., Hatch, M.W., Croteau, R. 1994. Monoterpene synthases ofPinus contorta: a new class of terpenoid cyclase [J]. J. Biol. Chem.,269: 4012–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Scagel, R.F., Bandoni, R.J., Rouse, G.E., Schofield, W.B., Stein, J.R.,et al. 1965. An Evolutionary Survey of the Plant Kingdom [M]. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, pp. 491–524.Google Scholar
  37. Schopf, R. 1986. The effect of secondary needle compounds on the development of phytophagous insects [J]. For. Ecol. Manage.,15: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sederoff, R. 1999. Building better trees with antisense [J]. Nat. Biotechnol.17: 750–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Starks, C.M., Back, K., Chappell, J., Noel, J.P. 1997. Structural basis for cyclic terpene biosynthesis by tobacco 5-epi-aristolochene synthase [J]. Science,277: 1815–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steele, C.L., Katoh, S., Bohlmann, J., Croteau, R. 1998. Regulation of oleoresinosis in grand fir (Abies grandis). Differential transcriptional control of monoterpene, sesquiterpene and diterpene synthase genes in response to wounding [J]. Plant Physiol,116: 1497–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steele, C.L., Lewinsohn, E., Croteau, R. 1995. Induced oleoresin biosynthesis in grand fir as a defense against bark beetles [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,92: 4164–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trapp, S., Croteau, R. 2001. Detensive resin biosynthesis in conifers [J]. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.,52: 689–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wildung, M.R., Croteau, R. 1996. AcDNA clone for taxadiene synthase, the diterpene cyclase that catalyzes the committed step of Taxol biosynthesis [J]. J. Biol. Chem.,271: 9201–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, D.C., McGarvey, D.J., Katahira, E.J., Croteau, R. 1998. Truncation of limonene synthase preprotein provides a fully active ‘pseudomature’ form of this monoterpene cyclase and reveals the function of the amino-terminal arginine pair [J]. Biochemistry,37: 12213–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wise, M.L., Croteau, R. 1999. Monoterpene biosynthesis [C]. In: DE Cane (ed.) Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry: Isoprenoids Including Steroids and Carotenoids. Oxford: Elsevier Sci.,2: 97–153Google Scholar
  46. Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, karomones and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beeties [J]. Annu. Rev. Entomol.,27: 411–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tang Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Biotechnology GroupNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations