Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Effects of thinning on wind damage inPinus thunbergii plantation

Based on theoretical derivation of risk-ratios for assessing wind damage
  • Zhu Jiao-jun
  • Li Feng-qin
  • Gonda Yutaka
  • Takeshi Matsuzaki
  • Masashi Yamamoto
Article

Abstract

Based on paper of “Theoretical derivation of risk-ratios for assessing wind damage in coastal forest”, wind damage in the pine coastal forest, which was thinned at four levels in December of 1997, was investigated for four successive growing seasons. Besides wind damage, the wind profiles outside and inside the coastal forest stand and the distributions of optical stratification porosity (OSP) were also observed. Based on these data, risk-ratios of wind damage for both individual trees and stands were estimated according to the methods developed in “Theoretical derivation of risk-ratios for assessing wind damage in a coastal forest”. The results showed that risk-ratios of wind damage, which were calculated from the mean height and diameter only and from the combination of wind and stand structure profiles, accurately predicted wind damage in the plantation. Relationships between different thinning ratios and incidence of wind damage showed that stand stability decreased soon after the thinning. This was due to the immediate effects of thinning on increasing the canopy roughness and wind load, and on decreasing the sheltering effects from surrounding trees. However, thinning strategies could improve the stability by long-term effects on growth and development of trees against extreme wind. Only canopy damage was recorded during the experimental period, no stem damage was found, even though the maximum 10-min wind speed outside the coastal forest attained 30.2 m s−1. The results obtained in this study indicate that thinning is the most effective silvicultural strategy available for managing coastal forest despite the increased probability of wind damage soon after thinning.

Keywords

Thinning Wind damage Pine forest Risk-ratio 

CLC number

S728 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackburn, P. and Petty, J.A. 1988. Theoretical calculations of the influence of spacing on stand stability [J]. Forestry,61: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cremer, K.W., Borough, C.J., Mckinnell, F.H. and Carter, P.R. 1982. Effects of stocking and thinning on wind damage in plantations [J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science,12: 244–268.Google Scholar
  3. Galinski, W. 1989. A windthrow-risk estimation for coniferous trees [J]. Forestry, 61: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gardiner, B.A., Stacy, G.R., Belcher, R.E. and Wood, C.J. 1997. Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability [J]. Forestry,70: 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gardiner, B.A. and Quine, C.P. 2000. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage, a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,135: 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ishimura, S. 1994. Statistics processing [M]. Tokyo Book Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 224 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Matsuzaki, T. 1994. Impact of wind and snow on forest [C]. in: Proceedings of NAFRO seminar on sustainable forestry and its biological environment. Tokyo: Japan Society of Forest Planning Press, p 145–148.Google Scholar
  8. Mitchell, S.J. 2000. Stern growth responses in Douglas fir and Sklta spruce following thinning: Implications for assessing wind firmness [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,135: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. National Astronomical Observatory (NAO), 1997. Rika nenpyo (Chronological Scientific Tables). Maruzen Co. Ltd. Press. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Peltola, H. 1996. Swaying of trees in response to wind and thinning in a stand of Scots pine [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,77: 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Quine, C.P. 2000. Estimation of mean wind climate and probability of strong winds for wind risk assessment [J]. Forestry,73: 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rollinson, T.J. 1989. Respacing Sitka spruce [J]. Forestry,62: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Valinger, E. and Pettersson, N. 1996. Wind and snow damage in a thinned and fertilization experiment inPicea abies in southern Sweden [J]. Forestry,69: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhu, J.J., Matsuzaki, T., Gonda, Y., and Yamamoto M. 2000a. Estimation of optical stratification porosity (OSP) in a pine coastal forest with different thinning intensities using hemispherical photographic silhouettes [J]. Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture, Niigata University,53: 55–70.Google Scholar
  15. Zhu, J.J., Matsuzaki, T. and Sakioka, K. 2000b. Wind speeds within a single crown of Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) [J]. Forest Ecology Management,135: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhu, J.J., Matsuzaki, T. and Gonda, Y. 2001a. Wind profiles in a coastal forest of Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) with different thinning intensities [J]. Journal of Forest Research,6: 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhu J.J., Matsuzaki, T. and Gonda Y. 2001b. Extreme wind over a pine coastal forest established for sand-control at Aoyama of Niigata in Japan [J]. Journal of Erosion Control,54: 12–20.Google Scholar
  18. Zhu, J.J., Matsuzaki, T. and Gonda, Y. 2003. Optical stratification porosity as a measure of vertical canopy structure in a Japanese coastal forest [J]. Forest Ecology and management, 173: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhu, J.J., Matsuzaki, T., Li Fengqin, Gonda, Y.et al. 2002. Theoretical derivation of risk-ratios for assessing wind damage in a coastal forest [J]. Journal of Forestry Research,13(4): 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Board of Journal of Forestry Resarch. All rights reserved 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhu Jiao-jun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Li Feng-qin
    • 1
  • Gonda Yutaka
    • 2
  • Takeshi Matsuzaki
    • 2
  • Masashi Yamamoto
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Applied EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenyangP.R. China
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureNiigata UniversityNiiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations