Advertisement

Dao

, 4:299 | Cite as

What does Heidegger have to do with an east-west dialogue?

Special Topic: Heidegger and East-West Dialogue

Keywords

European Language Japanese Language Comparative Philosophy Japanese Word Western Metaphysic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bernasconi, Robert. 1995. “On Heidegger’s Other Sins of Omission—His Exclusion of Asian Thought from the Origins of Occidental Metaphysics and His Denial of the Possibility of Christian Philosophy.”American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69:333–350.Google Scholar
  2. Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 1997. “‘Iki’, Style, Trace: Schuzo Kuki and the Spirit of Hermeneutics.”Philosophy East & West 47: 554–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Denker, Alfred. 2000.Historical Dictionary of Heidegger’s Philosophy. Lanham/London: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dilworth, David A., ed. 1998.Sourcebook for Modern Japanese Philosophy: Selected Documents. Connecticut: Greenwood Westport.Google Scholar
  5. Feenberg, Andrew. 1999.Questioning Technolog. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1956.What is Philosophy? Schenectady, NY: The New College and University Press.Google Scholar
  7. —. 1959.Unterwegs zur Sprache. Stuttgart: Günther Neske.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1968.What is Called Thinking. Trans. by J. G. Gray. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. —. 1971. “A Dialogue on Language: Between a Japanese and an Inquirer.” InOn the Way to Language. Trans. by P. D. Hertz. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1979.Heraklit. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 55. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1993.Basic Writings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1994.Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 79. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  13. —. 2000.Elucidations of Hölderlin’s Poetry. Trans. by K. Hoeller. Amherst NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  14. Heine, Steven. 1990. “The Flower Blossoms ‘Without Why’: Beyond the Heidegger-Kuki Dialogue on Contemplative Language.”Eastern Buddhist 23: 60–86.Google Scholar
  15. Hsiao, Paul Shih-yi. 1987. “Heidegger and Our Translation of theToo Te Ching.” In Parkes 1987a.Google Scholar
  16. Kimmerle, Heinz. 2002. “Dialogue is a Form of Intercultural Philosophy.” Lecture delivered at the Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
  17. Kuki, Shuzo. 1997.Reflections on Japanese Taste. The Structure of Iki. Trans. by J. Clark. Sydney: Power Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Maraldo, John C. 1990. “Review of Heidegger and Asian Thought.”Philosophy East & West 40:100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May, Reinhard. 1989.Ex Oriente Lux. Heideggers Werk unter ostasiatischem Einfluss. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1996.Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on His Work. Trans. by G. Parkes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Ohashi, Ryôsuke. 1989. “Die frühe Heidegger-Rezeption in Japan.” InJapan und Heidegger. Gedenkschrift der Stadt Meβkirch zum hundersten Geburtstag Martin Heideggers, edited by H. Buchner. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke.Google Scholar
  22. Parkes, Graham, ed. 1987a.Heidegger and Asian Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  23. Parkes, Graham, 1987b. “Afterwords-Language.” In Parkes 1987a.Google Scholar
  24. -. 1996. “Translator’s Preface.” In May 1996.Google Scholar
  25. —. 1997. “Review ofAuthenticating Culture in Imperial Japan: Kuki Shuzo and the Rise of National Aesthetics.”Chanoyu Quarterly 86: 63–69.Google Scholar
  26. —. 2003. “Lao-Zhuang and Heidegger on Nature and Technology.”Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30: 19–38.Google Scholar
  27. Petzet, Heinrich Wiegand. 1983.Encounters and Dialogues with Martin Heidegger 1929–1976. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pincus, Leslie. 1996.Authenticating Culture in Imperial Japan: Kuki Shuzo and the Rise of National Aesthetics. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  29. Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. “West-East Dialogue: Heidegger and Lao-tzu.” In Parkes 1987a.Google Scholar
  30. Sakai, Naoki. 1997.Translation & Subjectivity: On “Japan” and Cultural Nationalism. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sandford, Stella. 2003. “Going-Back: Heidegger, East Asian and ‘The West’.”Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist philosophy. No. 120 (July/August): 11–22.Google Scholar
  32. Stambaugh, Joan. 1990.Impermanence is Buddha-Nature. Dogen’s Understanding of Temporality. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tezuka, Tomio. 1996. “An Hour with Heidegger.” In May 1996: 59–64.Google Scholar
  34. Wang, Qingjie (James). 2001. “Heng and Temporality ofDao: Laozi and Heidegger.”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1. 1: 55–72.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, Edward Q. 2002. “Time, History, and Dao: Zhang Xuecheng and Martin Heidegger.”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1. 2: 251–276.Google Scholar
  36. Wohlfart, Guenter. 2003. “Heidegger and Laozi:Wu (Nothing) on Chapter II of theDaodejing.Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, Xianglong. 1996.Heidegger’s Thought and the Chinese Heavenly Dao. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Scholarly Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations