Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 109–113 | Cite as

Studies on the diversity of soil animals in Taishan Mountain

  • Yuan Xing-zhong
  • Liu Hong


Taishan Mountain has diverse habitats and abundant groups of soil animals. Five habitats,Platycladus orientalis forest,Pinus densiflora forest,Robinia pseudoacacia forest,Pinus tablaerormis forest and Grassland, were selected and the diversity of soil animals in different habitats in Mt. Taishan were investigated and studied in 1997–1999. Totally 52 groups of soil animals were found, belonging separately to 7 Phyla, 11 Classes, 25 Orders and 28 suborders or families. There exists remarkable difference in groups, quantity and diversity of soil animals among the five habitats. Grassland habitat was the highest andPinus densiflora forest was the lowest in groups, quantities, Density-group index (DG) and Diversity index of comparing many communities (DIC) of soil animals. Shannon-Wiener’s diversity index (H′) for soil animals of different habitats was in order ofPlatycladus orientalis forest>Pinus densiflora forest>Pinus tablaerormis forest>Grassland>Robinia pseudoacacia forest, Pielou’s equality index (J′) wasPlatycladus orientalis forest>Pinus densiflora forest>Grassland>Pinus tablaerormis forest>Robinia pseudoacacia forest, and Simposn’s dominant index (C) was Grassland>Robinia pseudoacacia forest>Pinus tablaerormis forest>Pinus densiflora forest>Platycladus orientalis forest. The H index and J index of macro-soil animal all were larger than that of mid-small soil animal. Clustering analysis for five soil animal communities and ordination analysis for community structure by multidimensional scaling (MDS) were made and completely identical results were obtained. Soil animal communities of five habitats were divided into 3 groups.


Diversity Soil animals Habitat Taishan Mountain 

CLC number


Document Code


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aoki, J. 1973. Soil Zoology. Tokyo, 1–814.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure [J]. Australian Journal of Ecology,18: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jin Jieliu. 1985. Morphological classification of insect [M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kevan, D. K. MeE. 1955. Soil zoology [M]. London: Butterworths Sci. Publ. 152p.Google Scholar
  5. Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement [M]. New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Ma Keping. 1994. The measurement of community diversity [C]. In: Principles and Methodologies of Biodiversity Studies (Biodiversity Committee of Chinese Academy of Science ed). Beijing: Chinese Science and technology Press, pp141–165.Google Scholar
  7. Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecological diversity [M]. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Watanabe, H., Kamihira, al. 1977. Soil animal community [J]. JIBP SYNTHESIS, TOKYO:15: 81–124Google Scholar
  9. Yin wenyinget al. 1992. Soil animals in subtropical zone of China [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 576p.Google Scholar
  10. Zhong Juemin. 1985. Pictorial handbook of insect classification [M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu science and technology Press, 318p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuan Xing-zhong
    • 1
  • Liu Hong
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal ResearchEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiP.R. China
  2. 2.Department of GeographyQufu Normal UniversityQufu, Shandong ProvinceP.R. China

Personalised recommendations