, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 22–40 | Cite as

Comparative genomics

A powerful new tool in biology
  • Anand K. Bachhawat
General Article


An important hallmark of biological research is the aspect of ‘comparisons’. As the complete genome sequences of numerous organisms have become available, the emphasis in biology has shifted to comparisons at the genome level. Indeed, the last few years have witnessed an exponential rise in the number of organisms whose complete genome has been sequenced, and we are still climbing up the graph. The present article, a primer, explains how one can extract a great deal of information from such analyses that is of great value in our research. The subject of comparative genomics impinges on evolutionary biology and phylogenetic reconstructions of the tree of life, drug discovery programs, function predictions of hypothetical proteins and genes, regulatory motifs and other non-coding DNA motifs, and genome flux and dynamics. Finally the article describes how the information one can extract from a comparative analysis of genomes depends to a large extent, on the specific aspect of the genomes that is being compared and the phylogenetic distances of the organisms involved.


Comparative genomics orthologue identification molecular phylogeny horizontal gene transfer genome flux 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  1. [1]
    C A Ball and M P Cherry, Genome comparisons highlight similarity and diversity within the eukaryotic kingdoms,Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., Vol. 5, p. 86, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chervitzet al, Comparison of the complete protein sets of worm and yeast: Orthology and divergence,Science, Vol. 282, p. 2022, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    G M Rubin,et al, Comparitive genomics of the eukaryotes,Science, Vol. 287, p. 2204, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M Y Galperin, D R Walker and E V Koonin, Analogous enzymes: Independent inventions in enzyme evolution,Genome Res., Vol. 8, pp. 779–790, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M Y Galperin and E V Koonin, Searching for drug targets in microbial genomes,Current Opinions in Microbial Genomes, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 571–578, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J P Gogarten and L Olendzenski Orthologs, Oaralogs and genome comparisons,Curr. Opin. Genetics & Develop., Vol. 9, pp. 630–636, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M A Nobrega and L A Pennachio, Comparative genomics as a tool for biological discovery,J.Physiol., Vol. 554, pp. 31–39, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M Kellis, N Patterson, M Endrizzi, B Birren, E S Lander, Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements,Nature, Vol. 423, pp. 241–254, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    P Cliften, P Sudarsanam, A Desikan, L Fulton, B Fulton, J Majors, R Waterston, B A Cohen, M Johnston M, Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting,Science, Vol. 301, pp. 71–76, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Microbial TechnologyChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations