Advertisement

Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 71–101 | Cite as

The revision of species of the genusPeronospora on host plants of the familyRosaceae with respect to Central European species

  • Vladimír Skalický
Article

Abstract

This taxonomic revision is based on methods explained in the general part. The author’s collections and material from Czechoslovak herbaria were the essential matter for this study. Descriptions of all European species have been completed or precised and keys to their determination have been added. Substantial taxonomic changes were made in the species parasiting on host plants of the genusPotentilla. The author distinguished 11Peronospora-species onRosaceae, 3 species were found as new for Czechoslovakia.

Key words

Peronospora ssp. onRosaceae Central Europe Taxonomic revision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Baudyš E. etPicbauer R. (1923): Pátý příspěvek ku květeně moravských hub.— Čas. Mor. Zem. Mus. Brno 20–21 (1922–1923): 87–106.Google Scholar
  2. Berlese A. N. (1898): Icones fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum ... Phycomycetes.— 44. p., 67 tab., Patavii.Google Scholar
  3. Berlese A. N. (1897–1902): Saggio di una monografia dellePeronosporacee.—Riv. Patol. Veg., Firenze, 6: 78–101, 237–268, 1897; 7: 19–37, 1898; 9: 1–126, 1900 et 10(1901): 185–298, 1902.Google Scholar
  4. Bubák F. (1898): Zweiter Beitrag zur Pilzflora von Böhmen und Nordmähren.—Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien 48: 17–36.Google Scholar
  5. Bubák F. (1915): Beitrag zur Pilzflora von Montenegro. III.—Bot. Közl., Budapest, 14: (39)-(83).Google Scholar
  6. Buhr H. (1956): Zur Kenntnis der Peronosporaceen Mecklenburgs.—Arch. Freunde Naturgesch. Mecklenburg, Rostock, 2(1955/56): 109–243.Google Scholar
  7. Conners I. L. etSavile D. B. O. (1948): 27. annual report of the Canadian plant disease survey 1947.—118p., Ottawa [e ref.: Rev. Appl. Mycol. 27: 553–555, 1948].Google Scholar
  8. Cooke M. C. (1877): The rose and its ennemies. Fungi.—Gard. Chron., London, 8(1877), suppl.: (7)-(8).Google Scholar
  9. Czerniakowski Z. (1973): Masowy pojaw m⇓czniaka rzekomego róż w województwie rzeszowskim. —Ochr. Rośl., Warszawa, 17/12: 14–16.Google Scholar
  10. Davis J. J. (1926): Notes on parasitic fungi in Wiscosin XII.—Trans. Wiscosin Acad. Sci. Milwaukee, 22: 155–163.Google Scholar
  11. DeBary A. (1863): Recherches sur le développement de quelques champignons parasites.—Ann. Sci. Natur.—Bot., Paris, ser. 4, 20: 5–148.Google Scholar
  12. Doppelbaur H. et al. (1965): Die Peronosporaceen Bayerns.-Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges., München, 38: 69–88.Google Scholar
  13. Doppelbaur H[ans] etDoppelbaur H[anna] (1972): Nachträge zur Peronosporaceenflora Bayerns. —Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges., München, 43: 145–148.Google Scholar
  14. Fischer A. (1892):Phycomycetes.—In:Rabenhorst’s Krypt.—Fl. Deutschl..., ed. 2, 1 (Pilze)/4: 1–505, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  15. Gaponenko N. I. (1972): SemejstvoPeronosporaceae Srednej Azii i južnogo Kazachstana (opredelitel).—341 p., Taškent.Google Scholar
  16. Gäumann E. (1923): Beiträge zu einer Monographie der GattungPeronospora Corda.—Beitr. Krypt.—Fl. Schweiz, Zürich, 5: 1–360.Google Scholar
  17. Gustavsson A. (1953): Some species of the generaPeronospora andPseudoperonospora new to Sweden.—Bot. Not., Lund, 1953: 48–64.Google Scholar
  18. Gustavsson A. (1959a): Studies on nordic Peronosporas. I–II.—Opera Bot., Lund, 3/1: 1–271 et 3/2: 1–61.Google Scholar
  19. Gustavsson A. (1959b): Studies on the oospore development inPeronospora.—Bot. Not., Lund, 112: 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Holmgren P. K. etKeuken W. (1974): Index herbariorum. Part. 1: The herbaria of the world. Ed. 6.—Regnum Veg., Utrecht, 92: 1–397.Google Scholar
  21. Hruby J. (1928): Die Pilze Mährens und Schlesiens.—Hedwigia, Dresden, 68 (1928–1929): 119–190.Google Scholar
  22. Jaap O. (1907): Beiträge zur Pilzflora der Schweiz.—Ann. Mycol., Berlin, 5: 246–272.Google Scholar
  23. Jačevskij A. A. etJačevskij P. A. (1931): Opredelitel gribov ... I-Fikomicety. Ed. 3.—Moskva et Lenigrad [Peronosporales p. 91–168, dopolnenija p. 231–233].Google Scholar
  24. Jermalavičiūtė S. (1962): Nauja medžiaga Lietuvos TSR Peronosporainiams grybams (Peronosporales) pažinti.—Lietuvos TSR Mokslų Akad. Darbai, Vilnjus, ser. C, 3 (29): 13–22.Google Scholar
  25. Jörstad I. (1964): The phycomycetous generaAlbugo, Bremia, Plasmopara andPseudoperonospora in Norway, with an appendix containing unpublished finds ofPeronospora.—Nytt Mag. Bot., Oslo, 11: 47–82.Google Scholar
  26. Jörstad I. (1965): Parasitic fungi on the segregates ofAlchemilla vulgaris in Norway.—Nytt Mag. Bot., Oslo, 12: 135–144.Google Scholar
  27. Kochman J. etMajewski T. (1970): Grzyby (Mycota). IV. Glonowce (Phycomycetes). Wroślikowe (Peronosporales).—309 p., Warszawa.Google Scholar
  28. Konopacka W. (1927): M⇓czniak rzekomy na różach.—Rocn. Nauk Roln. i Leśn., Poznań, 18: separ. p. 1–4.Google Scholar
  29. Kranz J. etKnapp R. (1971): Parasitische Pilze aus dem Giessner Becken, dem Vogelsberg und angrenzenden Gebieten.—Nova Hedwigia, Weinheim, 21: 337–368.Google Scholar
  30. Kućmierz J. (1973): Grzyby pasożytnicze w zbiorowiskach roślinnych Ojcowskiego parku narodowego.—Ochr. Przyr., Kraków, 38: 155–211.Google Scholar
  31. Laubert R. (1931): Schmarotzerpilze aus den Sudeten.—Z. Pilzk., Heilbronn, 15 (=10 ser.n.): 42–49.Google Scholar
  32. Lind J. (1913): Danish fungi as represented in the herbarium of E. Rostrup.—Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  33. Lindquist J. C. (1939): Especies argentinas del género “Peronospora”.—Physis, Buenos Aires, 15: 13–20.Google Scholar
  34. Lindtner V. (1957): Plamenjače grada za kriptogamsku floru Jugoslavije.—Glasn. Prirod. Muz. Srp. Zem., Beograd, ser. B, 9: 1–153.Google Scholar
  35. Lucas M. T. etDias M. R. de S. (1976):Peronosporaceae Lusitaniae.—Agron. Lusit., Sacavém, 37: 281–299.Google Scholar
  36. MacLean N. A. etBaker K. F. (1951): Downy mildew of roses.—Roses (Incorp. Bull. no. 160, April 1951): p. 5–6 [separ.]Google Scholar
  37. Mayor E. (1958): Catalogue desPéronosporales, Taphrinales, Erysiphacées, Ustilaginales etUredinales du canton de Neuchâtel.—Mem. Soc. Neuchâtel. Sci. Natur. 9/1: 1–202.Google Scholar
  38. Morelet M. (1967): Contribution a l’étude de la microflore fongique.—Bull. Soc. Linn. Lyon 36: 40–43.Google Scholar
  39. Mugnier C. (1967): Notes de phytopathologie régionale: mildious, oïdiums et rouilles des environs de Dijon.—Bull. Sci. Bourgogne, Dijon, 24 (1966): 101–134.Google Scholar
  40. Nannfeldt J. A. (1948):Peronospora tomentosa Fuck.—In:Lundell S. etNannfeldt J. A.: (Schedae ad) Fungi exsiccati suecici, praesertim upsalienses, fasc. XXXIII–XXXIV, p. 32 (no. 1691), Uppsala.Google Scholar
  41. Niessl G. (1865): Vorarbeiten zu einer Kryptogamenflora von Mähren und Oesterr. Schlesien. II. Pilze und Myxomyceten. 1. Folge.—Verh. Naturforsch. Ver. Brünn 3 (1864): 60–190.Google Scholar
  42. Osipjan L. L. (1967): Peronosporovye griby.—In: Mikoflora Armjanskoj SSR 1:1–256, Erevan.Google Scholar
  43. Otth G. (1869): Sechster Beitrag zu dem in No. 15–23 der Mitteilungen enthaltenen Verzeichnisse schweizerischer Pilze ...—Mitt. Naturforsch. Ges. Bern 1868: 37–70.Google Scholar
  44. Palm B. (1908): Till kännedomen om Stockholmstraktens svampflora.—Svensk Bot. Tidskr., Stockholm, 2: 38–48.Google Scholar
  45. Passavali L. P. (1937): Difesa preventiva e curativa della fragola da malattie e insecti nocivi.— Bull. Soc. Tosc. Ortic., Firenze, 62: 55–60 (ex: Rev. Appl. Mycol. 16: 692–693, 1937).Google Scholar
  46. Patouillard N. etLagerheim G. (1891): Champignons de l’Equateur.—Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr., Paris, 7: 158–184.Google Scholar
  47. Petrak F. etLohwag I. (1972): Beiträge zur österreichischen Pilzflora.—Sydowia, Horn, 25 (1971): 77–88.Google Scholar
  48. Picbauber R. (1944): Zweiter Beitrag zur Pilzflora von Böhmen, Mähren und der Slowakei.— Verh. Naturforsch. Ver. Brünn 75 (1943): 172–186.Google Scholar
  49. Ramsfjell T. (1960): Distribution of the genusPeronospora in Norway.—Nytt Mag. Bot., Oslo, 8: 147–178.Google Scholar
  50. Rayss T. (1933): Deuxième contribution à la connaissance des micromycètes des environs de Besse (Puy-de-Dôme).—Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr., Paris, 49: 381–421.Google Scholar
  51. Romaszewska-Sałata J. (1973): Materiały do znajomości grzybów wroślikowych (Peronosporales) Lubelszczyzny.—Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin, ser. C., 28: 177–189.Google Scholar
  52. Sâvulescu T. (1939): Nouvelle contribution à la connaissance des Péronosporacées et Ustilaginacées de Roumaine.—Bull. Sect. Sci. Acad. Roum., Bucuresti, 20 (1938), no. 7:1–7.Google Scholar
  53. Sâvulescu T. (1948): Les espéces dePeronospora Corda de Roumanie.—Sydowia, Horn, 2 255–307.Google Scholar
  54. Sâvulescu T. etRayss T. (1930, 1934): Contribution à la connaissance des Péronosporacées de Roumanie. [1]. 3.—Ann. Mycol., Berlin, 28: 297–320, 1930 et 32: 36–51, 1934.Google Scholar
  55. Sâvulescu T. etSâvulescu O. (1964): Peronosporaceele diu Republica Popularâ Romînâ.— Lucr. Grad. Bot. Bucureşti 1963: 3–146.Google Scholar
  56. Skalický V. (1964a): Beitrag zur infraspezifischen Taxonomie der obligat parasitischer Pilze.— Acta Univ. Carol.—Biol., Praha, 1964, suppl. 2: 25–90.Google Scholar
  57. Skalický V. (1964b): Poznámky k biologii některých jarních plísní čelediPeronosporaceae. (Bemerkungen zur Biologie einiger Frühjahrspilze der Familie Peronosporaceae).—Čes. Mykol., Praha, 18: 85–90.Google Scholar
  58. Skalický V. (1966): Taxonomie der Gattungen der FamiliePeronosporaceae.—Preslia, Praha, 38: 117–129.Google Scholar
  59. Skalický V. (1973, oppon. 1974): Monografická studie roduAgrimonia L.—289p.+pars suppl., ms. (Kandidat. Dissert., Libr. Bot. Departments, Fac. Sci. Charles Univ. Praha sign. KP 47 a+b)Google Scholar
  60. Skalický V. (1976, ed. 1977): Metody a pokroky studia taxonomie peronospor. (Methods and progress in taxonomy of Peronosporaceae).—In: II. vědecký seminář o metodách studia taxonomie hub (souhrny referátů ÚVTIZ no. 166): p. 142–151, Praha.Google Scholar
  61. Skalický V. etUrban Z. (1978): Drobnohledné fytopatogenní houby a epifyti.—In: Kolektiv autorů: Sběr, preparace a konzervace rostlinného materiálu, p. 78–89, Praha.Google Scholar
  62. Smith H. C. etNewhook F. J. (1961): Dryberry of boysenberries caused by downy mildew.— Orchardist New Zealand, Wellington, 1961/April: separ. p. 1–2.Google Scholar
  63. Stahl M. (1973): Einige Beobachtungen über den “Falschen Mehltau” bei Rosen.—Nachr.— Bl. Deutsch. Pfl.—Schutzdienst., Braunschweig, 25: 161–162.Google Scholar
  64. Straňák F. etBlattný C. (1939): Důležití a významní škodliví činitelé kulturních rostlin v Čechách ve vegetační sezoně 1937–38.—Ochr. Rostl., Praha, 15: 3–12.Google Scholar
  65. Těšitel J. J. (1929): Nepravé padlí růžové (Peronospora sparsa Berk.).—Čs. Zahrad. Listy, Praha, 26: 246.Google Scholar
  66. Thümen F. (1875): Beiträge zur Pilz-Flora Böhmens.—Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien 25: 523–554.Google Scholar
  67. Tichá H. (1973):Peronospora na růžích.—Ochr. Rostl., Praha, 9 (=46): 215–216.Google Scholar
  68. Trail J. W. H. (1887): Revision of the ScotchPeronosporeae.—Scott. Natur., Perth, 9: 77–86.Google Scholar
  69. Ul’janiščev V. I. (1967): Mikoflora Azerbajdžana. 4. Peronosporovye griby.—352 p., Baku.Google Scholar
  70. Vasjagina M. P. (1960): K parazitnoj mikoflore melkosopočnika Central’nogo Kazachstana.— Mater. 1. Koord. Sovešč. Mikol. Respubl. Srednej Azii i Kazachstana, Frunze [sec.Gaponenko 1972].Google Scholar
  71. Viennot-Bourgin G. (1956): Mildious, oidiums. caries, charbons, rouilles des plantes de France.— In: Encycl. Mycol. fasc. 26–27: 1–317, Paris.Google Scholar
  72. Waterhouse G. M. (1973):Peronosporales. In:Ainsworth G. G. et al. [red.]: The fungi. IV B. A taxonomic review with keys:Basidiomycetes and lower fungi, p. 165–183, New York et London.Google Scholar
  73. Wilson G. W. (1908): Studies in North AmericanPeronosporales—IV. Host index.—Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. Lancaster, 35: 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wróblewski A. (1915): Spis grzybów zebranych na ziemiach polskich przez Feliksa Berdaua ...— Spraw. Kom. Fizjogr., Kraków, 49: 92–125.Google Scholar
  75. Zacha V. (1978): Peronospóra—nebezpečné ochorenie ruží.—Záhradníctvo, Bratislava, 3: 371Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimír Skalický
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cryptogamic Botany, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPraha 2Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations