Advertisement

American Potato Journal

, Volume 60, Issue 6, pp 461–468 | Cite as

Effect of total light energy on symptoms and growth of ring rot-infected Red Pontiac potato plants

  • G. A. Nelson
  • G. C. Kozub
Article

Abstract

The effect of total light energy levels on development of bacterial ring rot symptoms caused byCorynebacterium sepedonicum (Spieck. and Kotth.) Skapt. and Burkh., and growth (plant height) of cv. Red Pontiac was investigated by growing inoculated and uninoculated rooted stem cuttings under different pre-inoculation and post-inoculation total light energy levels. Infected plants grown under a 45 mW cm−2 hr pre-inoculation total light energy level had a higher (P< 0.01) mean ring rot severity rating than plants grown under 103 mW cm−2 hr. Disease severity increased as the postinoculation total light energy decreased. Plants inoculated withC. sepedonicum showed little growth under a post-inoculation total light energy of 45 mW cm−2 hr, however, under 103 mW cm−2 hr; significantly greater growth occurred. Uninoculated plants grew more rapidly than infected plants under all pre-and post-inoculation total light energy level combinations, except those grown at pre-inoculation levels of 45 mW cm−2 hr.

Key Words

Ring rot bacteria ring rot symptoms total light energy levels growth of infected potatoes 

Resumen

Se investigó el efecto de niveles de energía total de luz en el desarrollo de síntomas de pudrición anular bacteriana producidos porCorynebacterium sepedonicum (Speck. y Kotth.) Skapt. y Burkh., y en el crecimiento de la variedad Red Pontiac cultivando esquejes de tallo enraizados, inoculados y no inoculados, en diferentes niveles de energía total de luz antes y después de la inoculación. Plantas infectadas cultivadas en un nivel de energía total de luz de 45 mW cm−2 hr antes de la inoculación tenían más alto (P < 0.01) el grado de severidad promedio de pudrición anular que plantas cultivadas en 103 mW cm−2 hr. La severidad de la enfermedad incrementaba al reducirse la energía total de luz después de la inoculación. Plantas inoculadas conC. sepedonicum mostraron poco crecimiento en energía total de luz de 45 mW cm−2 hr después de la inoculación; sin embargo, hubo un crecimiento significativamente superior en 103 mW cm−2 hr. Plantas no inoculadas crecían más rápido que plantas infectadas en todas las combinaciones de niveles de energía total de luz antes y después de la inoculación, con excepción de las cultivadas en niveles de 45 mW cm−2 hr antes de la inoculación.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Colhoun, J. 1973. Effect of environmental factors on plant disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 11:355–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster, R.E. and J.C. Walker. 1947. Predisposition of tomato to Fusarium wilt. J Agric Res 74:165–185.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Logsdon, C.E. 1967. Effect of soil temperature on potato ring rot. Am Potato J 44:281–286.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson, G.A. 1980. Long-term survival ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum on contaminated surfaces and in infected potato stems. Am Potato J 57:595–600.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson, G.A. and F.R. Harper. 1973. Factors affecting ring rot development in rootinoculated potato plants originating from stem cuttings. Am Potato J 50:365–370.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nelson, G.A. and W.E. Torfason. 1974. Associative effects of leaf roll and ring rot on disease expression and yield of potatoes. Am Potato J 51:12–15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson, G.A., W.E. Torfason and F.R. Harper. 1971. Comparison of inoculation methods on ring rot development in potatoes. Am Potato J 48:225–229.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nilsen, K.N., J.P. Madsen and C.F. Hodges. 1979. EnhancedDrechslera sorokiniana leaf spot expression onPoa pratensis in response to photoperiod and blue-biased light. Physiol Plant Pathol 14:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., N.Y.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Nelson
    • 1
  • G. C. Kozub
    • 1
  1. 1.Agriculture Canada Research StationLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations