Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Estimation of the mean floristic similarity between and within sets of vegetational relevés

  • Adolf Češka


Various possibilities of usingSörensen's coefficient of floristic similarity in plant sociology are summarized. A new formula (11), derived from that bySörensen and based on constancy values, is suggested in order to calculate the mean floristic similarity within a set of relevés.


Partial Similarity Folia GEOBOTANICA Floristic Similarity Percentage Constancy Leaf Hopper 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Dagnelie, P. (1960): Contribution à l'étude des communautés végétales par l'analyse factorielle. —Bull. Carte phytogeograph., ser. B., 5: 7–71, 93–195Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, E. (1960): Some measures of uniformity in vegetation analysis.—Ecology, 41: 805–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ghent, A. W. (1963): Kendall's “Tau” coefficient as an index of similarity in comparisons of plant or animal communities.—Canad. Entomol., 9: 568–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gleason, H. (1920): Some applications of the quadrat method.—Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 47: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jaccard, P. (1902): Gesetze der Pflanzenverteilung in der alpinen Region auf Grund statistisch-floristischer Untersuchungen.— Flora, 90: 349–377.Google Scholar
  6. Koch, L. T. (1957): Index of biotal dispersity.— Ecology, 38: 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kontkanen, P. (1950). Quantitative and seasonal studies on the leafhopper fauna of the field stratum on open areas in North Karelia.— Ann. zool. Soc. zool.— bot. fenn. Vanamo, 13(3): 1–91.Google Scholar
  8. Kulczynski, S. (1927): Zespoly roslin w Pieninach— Bull. Intern. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lett. Cl. Sci. Math. Nat., B (Sci. Nat.), 1927 (Suppl. 2): 57–203.Google Scholar
  9. Looman, J. andCampbell, J. B. (1960): Adaptation of Sörensen's K (1948) for estimating unit affinities in prairie vegetation.— Ecology, 41: 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Raabe, E. W. (1952): Über den “Affinitätswert” in der Pflanzensoziologie.—Vegetatio, 4: 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sokal, R. R. andSneath, P. H. A. (1963): Principles of numerical taxonomy.—359 p. London 1963.Google Scholar
  12. Sörensen, T. (1948): A method for establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons.— K. danske vidensk. Selsk. Skr. Biol. Skr., 5(4): 1–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ACADEMIA, nakladatelství Československé akademie věd 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adolf Češka
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanical Institute of the Czechoslovak Academy of SciencesPrůhonice near Praha

Personalised recommendations