Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response ofZea mays andLycopersicon esculentum to the ethylene precursors, L-methionine and L-ethionine applied to soil

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glasshouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of L-methionine (L-MET) and L-ethionine (L-ETH) added to soil on the growth of corn (Zea mays L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), respectively. The application of L-MET and L-ETH stimulated C2H4 production in soil by 299- and 313-fold, respectively, over an unamended control. An L-MET treatment of 1.85 mg kg−1 soil was the most effective in increasing shoot height, shoot fresh weight, internodal distance, and stem diameter in two corn cultivars, Kandy Korn and Miracle, while shoot and root dry weights, leaf width, uppermost leaf collar base distance and resistance to stem breaking were increased in the case of Kandy Korn only. A significant epinastic response was observed in the second and third leaves of tomato plants when soil was treated with L-ETH. An L-ETH treatment of 0.2 mg kg−1 soil resulted in the maximum fresh fruit yield, while 0.02 and 2.0 mg kg−1 gave the most fruit and greater average weight of fresh fruit, respectively. Concentrations ranging from 0.002 to 2.0 mg L-ETH kg−1 soil initiated early fruit formation. Early fruit ripening was observed with an application rate of 20 mg L-ETH kg−1 soil. The mechanism of action of these chemicals could either be attributed to i) substrate-dependent C2H4 production in soil by the indigenous microflora, ii) uptake directly by plant roots followed by metabolism within the tissues, and/or iii) a change in the balance of rhizosphere microflora affecting plant growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arshad M and Frankenberger W T Jr 1988 Influence of ethylene produced by soil microorganisms on etiolated pea seedlings. App. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 2728–2732.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad M and Frankenberger W T Jr 1989 Biosynthesis of ethylene byAcremonium falciforme. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21, 633–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad M and Frankenberger W T Jr 1990a Microbial biosynthesis of ethylene and its influence on plant growth: A review. Adv. Microbiol. Ecol. 12. (in press.)

  • Arshad M and Frankenberger W T Jr 1990b Microbial production of plant hormones. Plant and Soil. (accepted.)

  • Arshad M and Frankenberger W T Jr 1990c Ethylene production in soil in response to organic amendments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54 (in press.)

  • Chou T W and Yang S F 1973 The biogenesis of ethylene inPenicillium digitatum. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 157, 73–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Considine P J and Patching J W 1975 Ethylene production by microorganisms grown on phenolic acids. Ann. Appl. Biol. 81, 115–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crossett R N and Campbell D J 1975 The effects of ethylene in the root environment upon the development of barley. Plant and Soil 42, 453–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahnous k, Vigue G T, Law A G, Konzak C F and Miller D G 1982 Height and yield response of selected wheat, barley and triticale cultivars to ethephon. Agron. J. 74, 580–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger W T Jr and Fitzpatrick K L 1984 Exogenous hormone production in soil-root systems.In Improving Efficiencies in Crop Production Systems. Proceedings of California Plant and Soil Conf., AM. Soc. Agron. pp 58–61.

  • Freytag A H, Wendt C W and Lira E P 1972 Effects of soil-injected ethylene on yields of cotton and sorghum. Agron. J. 64, 524–526.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodlass G and Smith K A 1979 Effects of ethylene on root extension and nodulation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Plant and Soil 51, 387–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ilag L and Curtis R W 1968 Production of ethylene by fungi. Science 159, 1357–1358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imaseki H and Pjon C J 1970 The effect of ethylene on auxininduced growth of excised rice coleoptile segments. Plant Cell Physiol 11, 827–829.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishizawa K and Esashi J 1984 Gaseous factors involved in the enhanced elongation of rice coleoptiles under water. Plant, Cell Environment 7, 239–245.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M B and Campbell D J 1975 Movement of ethylene from roots to shoots, a factor in the responses of tomato plants to waterlogged conditions. New Phytol. 74, 397–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kende H, Metraux J P, and Raskin I 1984 Ethylene-mediated growth response in submerged deep-water rice.In Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects. Eds. Y Fuchs and E Chalutz. pp 121–128. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings H and Jackson M B 1979 A relationship between rates of ethylene production by roots and the promoting or inhibiting effects of exogenous ethylene and water on root elongation. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 92, 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku H S, Suge H, Rappaport L and Pratt H K 1970 Stimulation of rice coleoptile growth by ethylene. Planta 90, 333–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo C G and Chen B W 1980 Physiological responses of tomato cultivars to flooding. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 195, 751–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan T D and Oplinger E S 1987 Growth and yield of ethephon treated maize. Agron. J. 79, 130–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A C 1980 Hormonal regulating systems in plants.In Recent Developments in Plant Sciences. Ed. S P Sen. pp 33–41. Today and Tomorrow Publishers, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M and Mapson L W 1964 Genesis and biogenesis of ethylene. Nature 204, 343–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J M and Harper S H T 1974 Fungal growth rate and formation of ethylene in soil. J. Gen. Microbiol. 85, 91–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield T A 1987 Hormones as regulators of water balance.In Plant Hormones and Their Role in Growth and Development. Ed. P J Davies. pp 411–430. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D J 1984 Ethylene and plants of aquatic and semiaquatic environments: A review. Plant Growth Regula. 2, 167–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philosoph-Hades S, Meir S, Pesis E, Reuveni A, and Aharoni N 1989 Hormone-enhanced ethylene production in leaves.In Biochemical and physiological Aspects of Ethylene Production in Lower and Higher Plants. Eds. H Clijsters, M D Proft, R Marcelle and M V Poucke. pp 134–142. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovaiah B W and Leopold A C 1973 Effects of ethephon on growth of grasses. Crop Sci. 13, 755–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primrose S B 1976a Formation of ethylene byEscherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 95, 159–165.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primrose S B 1976b Ethylene-forming bacteria from soil and water. J. Gen. Microbiol. 97, 343–346.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primrose S B 1979 A review, ethylene and agriculture: The role of microbes. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 46, 1–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin I and Kende H 1983 Regulation of growth in rice seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2, 193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid M S 1987 The functioning of hormones in plant growth and development. El. Ethylene in plant growth, development and senescence.In Plant Hormones and Their Role in Plant Growth and Development. Ed. P J Davies. pp 257–259. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riov J and Yang S F 1989 Ethylene and auxin-ethylene interaction in adventitious root formation in mung bean cuttings.In Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Ethylene Production in Lower and Higher Plants. Eds. H Clijsters, M D Proft, R Marcelle and M V Poucke. pp 151–156. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagee O, Goren R and Riov J 1989 Ethylene-induced changes in auxin metabolism in citrus leaf tissues.In Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Ethylene Production in Lower and Higher Plants. Eds. H Clijsters, M D Proft, R Marcelle and M V Poucke. pp 157–163. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satoh S and Esashi Y 1980 D-Amino-acid-stimulated ethylene production in seed tissues. Panta 149, 64–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A M and Cook R J 1974 Implication of ethylene production by bacteria and biological balance of soil. Nature 252, 703–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K A and Restall S W F 1971 The occurrence of ethylene in anaerobic soil. J. Soil Sci. 22, 430–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K A and Robertson P D 1971 Effect of ethylene on root extension of cereals. Nature 234, 148–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vendrell M and Dominguez M 1989 Effect of auxins on ethylene biosynthesis in banana fruit.In Biochemical and Physiological Aspects of Ethylene Production in Lower and Higher Plants. Ed. H Clijster, M D Proft, R Marcelle and M V Poucke. pp 143–150. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang S F and Hoffman N E 1984 Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 155–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp J H, Aung L H and Steffens G L 1986 Bioassay and other special techniques for plant hormones and plant growth regulators. pp 105–122. Plant Growth Regulator Soc. Amer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil and Environmental Science, University of California, 92521, Riverside, CA, USA

    Muhammad Arshad & W. T. Frankenberger

Authors
  1. Muhammad Arshad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. T. Frankenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arshad, M., Frankenberger, W.T. Response ofZea mays andLycopersicon esculentum to the ethylene precursors, L-methionine and L-ethionine applied to soil. Plant Soil 122, 219–227 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851979

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851979

Key words

Search

Navigation