American Potato Journal

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 185–196 | Cite as

Improving potato protein I. Evaluation of selection techniques

  • S. L. Desborough
  • C. J. Weiser
Article

Abstract

Nitrogen, amino acids and protein analyses were compared for determination of tuber protein. Micro-Kjeldahl nitrogen provided a poor estimate of both protein and amino acids (r = 0.55 and 0.45 respectively). Potato protein contains about 13.5% nitrogen, making 7.5 an appropriate conversion factor. Autoanalyzer determinations of amino acids were correlated with protein analyzed by a modified Potty technique (r = .82). Amounts of six specific protein-bound amino acids were also correlated. with protein. Free amino acids accounted for about 10% of the total and non-essential amino acids constituted over 90% of this free pool. Only 23% of total nitrogen was accounted for in the free pool. Protein content and tuber size were not correlatel. Protein content was similar in the cortical, medullary and pith region. Loss in tuber protein during six months of storage at about 3 C (38-40 F) was 3%.

Keywords

AMERICAN Potato Journal Amino Acid Analysis Tuber Size Total Amino Acid Grand Fork 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Desborough, S. and C. J. Weiser. 1972. Protein comparisons in selected Phureja-Haploid Tuberosum families. Amer. Potato J. 49: 227–233.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggum, B. O. 1970. Current methods of nutritional protein evalluation. p. 289–300.In: (IAEA-SM-132-40) Vienna.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore, S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 238: 235–237.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mossberg, R. 1969. Evaluation of protein quality and quantity by dye-bindjng capacity: a tool in plant breeding. p. 131–160.In: New approaches to breeding for improved plant protein. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niederhauser, J. 1967. Recommendations for an accelerated potato improvement program in West Paikstan, Report #9, Accelerated Crop Improvement Series, West Pakistan. 33 p.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Potty, V. H. 1969. Determination of proteins in the presence of phenols and pectins. Analy. Biochem. 29: 535–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Udy, D. C. 1954. Dye-binding capacities of wheat flour protein fractions. Cereal Chem. 31: 389–395.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. L. Desborough
    • 1
  • C. J. Weiser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Horticultural ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations