Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Dedicated monitoring of anesthetic and respiratory gases By Raman scattering

  • Richard A. Van Wagenen
  • Dwayne R. Westenskow
  • Robert E. Benner
  • Donald E. Gregonis
  • Dennis L. Coleman
Original Article

Abstract

The monitoring of respiratory and anesthetic gases in the operating room is important for patient safety. This study measured the accuracy and response time of a multiplegas monitoring instrument that uses Raman light scattering. Measurements of oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane concentrations were compared with a gas mixer standard and with measurements made with an infrared anesthetic agent analyzer. Correlation coefficients were all greater than 0.999, and probable errors were less than 0.43 vol% for the gases and less than 0.03 vol% for the volatile anesthetics. Response time was 67 ms with a sample flow rate of 150 ml/min. There was some signal overlap between nitrogen and nitrous oxide and between the volatile anesthetic agents. Such overlap can be compensated for by linear matrix analysis. The Raman instrument promises a monitoring capability equivalent to the mass spectrometer and should prove attractive for the monitoring of respiratory and anesthetic gases in the operating room.

Key Words

Monitoring: anesthetic gas respiratory gas Measurement techniques: Raman light scattering Equipment: gas analyzers sensors, oxygen carbon dioxide nitrous oxide nitrogen anesthetic agent 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gravenstein JS, Paulus DA. Monitoring practice in clinical anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1982:147–165Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rendell-Baker L. Problems with anesthetic gas machines and their solutions. In: Rendell-Baker L, ed. Problems with anesthetic and respiratory therapy equipment. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1982;20:l-82Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calkins JM. Monitoring system gas concentrations. In: Brown BR Jr, ed. Future anesthesia delivery systems: contemporary anesthesia practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1984:137–145Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saidman LJ, Smith NT. Monitoring in anesthesia. New York: Wiley, 1978Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gravenstein JS, Newbower RS, Ream AK, Smith NT, eds. Monitoring surgical patients in the operating room. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1979Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ANSI Z 79.8 paragraph 16.1.2.1 American National Standards Committee 279. 1430 Broadway NY, NY 10018Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peters RM. Monitoring of ventilation in the anesthetized patient. In: Gravenstein JS, Newbower RS, Ream AK, Smith NT, eds. Monitoring surgical patients in the operating room. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1979:142–151Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Long DA. Raman spectroscopy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schrotter HW, Klockner HW. Raman scattering cross sections in gases and liquids. In: Weber A, ed. Raman spectroscopy of gases and liquids. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979:123–166Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallace WD, Clark JS, Cutler CA. Blood-gas analyzer calibration and quality control using a precision gasmixing instrument. Respir Care 1981:26:757–761PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colquhoun AD, Gray WM, Asbury AJ. An evaluation of the Datex Normac anaesthetic agent monitor. Anaesthesia 1986;41:198–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cerni RH, Foster LE. Measurement accuracy and precision and error. In: Dalley JW, Riley WF, eds. Instrumentation for engineering measurement. New York: Wiley, 1962:23–37Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graham AR. The static performance of instruments. In: Graham R, ed. An introduction to engineering measurements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975:54–79Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gravenstein N, Lampotang S, Beneken JEW. Factors influencing capnography in the Bain circuit. J Clin Monit 1985;l:6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sasse FJ. Can we trust end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements in infants? J Clin Monit 1985;1:147–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frans SD, Harris JM: Selection of analytical wavelengths for multicomponent spectrophotometric determinations. Ann Chem 1985;57:2680–2684CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Van Wagenen
    • 1
  • Dwayne R. Westenskow
    • 2
  • Robert E. Benner
    • 3
  • Donald E. Gregonis
    • 1
  • Dennis L. Coleman
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomaterials International, IncSalt Lake City
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations