Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 60–68 | Cite as

Sugli atti di moto più rigidi possibile

  • Alberto Bressan
Article

Abstract

In [3] ([4]) M. Bartolozzi and Aldo Bressan considered a regular portion Δσ of a m-dim. Riemaniann manifold σ=σ(t), possibly moving in a Euclidean spaceS v and introduced the notion of (volume preserving) velocity fields as rigid as possible—in shortV F R P (V P V F R P)—as an extension of rigid velocity fields —R V F—of classical physics. Existence problems were not considered.

In the present paper, written in two parts, we observe that, forV F R P andV P V F R P, and existence theorem similiar to the one forR V F does not hold. Therefore, even if someV F R P (V P V R F P) do always exist, under vevy special constraints, it is natural to look for an alternative definition for the classesV F R P (V P V F R P), so that the existence question has a positive answer in a fully general case. To this end, here in Part 1, a new class V F R P of velocity fields as rigid as possible subject to a set of linear and continuous constraints Γ is introduced.

For this class a general existence theorem is proven. A uniqueness result, up to an intrinsecally rigid vector field, is also provided.

In part 2 we show how the set of constraints can be expressed in various ways, using integral conditions on volumes or hypersurfaces, essentially equivalent to prescribing the value of the fieldv i and of its spinv [i/h] at some pointP 0. We do this first using a generic field Σ(x)=(e(1) (x), ..., e(m) (x)) of orthonormalm-tuples of tangent vectors on Δσ. Phisically interesting choices of Σ(x) are then considerd: the ones which are as euclidan (i.e. as parallel) as possible. The existence of such Σ(x) is proven. It is also shown that, in the two-dimensional case, any two fields Σ, Σ’, both as euclidean as possible, differ by a constant rotation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. [1]
    Adams R. A.,Sobolev spaces, Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Baiocchi C., Capelo A.,Disequazioni variazionali e quasi variazionali, Vol. 1, Quaderni dell’U.M.I., Pitagora Ed., 1978.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bartolozzi M., Bressan A.,Moti più rigidi possibile, Rend. del Circolo Mat. di Palermo,29 (1980), pgg. 152–160.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bartolozzi M., Bressan A.,Sugli Atti di moto, eventualmente isocori, più rigidi possibile Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova,65 (1981), pgg. 235–249.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Fichera G.,Linear elliptic differential systems and eigenvalue problems, Lecture notes in Math.8 Springer 1965.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Binzi B., Pastori M.,Calcolo tensoriale ed applicazioni, Zanichelli Bologna 1961.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Payne L. E., Weinberger,On Korn’s Inequality, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.,8 (1961).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kinderlehrer D., Stampacchia G.,An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications, Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Bressan
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Matematica Applicata, UniversitàPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations