Sports Engineering

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 137–146

Dirt absorption on the ski running surface — quantification and influence on the gliding ability

Article

Abstract

We propose a thesis that minimising dirt on the running surface of skis improves the surface glide. Waxing usually improves the gliding ability of skis in the short term. But how does waxing affect pollution absorption in the long term? In this study a number of skis with a transparent base and a white background were treated by steel scraping and with different glide waxes. The gliding ability of waxed and unwaxed skis, the sliding surface whiteness and the hydrophobicity were tested and documented. Tests were performed before and after the skis had been used for different distances. It was observed that all the waxed skis (regardless of the wax used) absorbed more dirt than unwaxed, and as a result all waxed skis lose their glide ability sooner than unwaxed (freshly scraped) skis in wet snow conditions.

Keywords

dirt glide ski wax 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cassie, A.B.D. & Baxter, S. (1994) Wettability of porous surfaces,Transactions of the Faraday Society 40, 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Colbeck, S.C. (1992) A review of the processes that control snow friction. InTechnical Report 2. US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
  3. Colbeck, S.C. (1994) A review of the friction of snow skis,Journal of Sports Sciences 12, 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colbeck, S.C. (1995) Electrical charging of skis gliding on snow,Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise 27 (1), 136–141.Google Scholar
  5. Kurtz, S.M. (2004)The UHMWPE Handbook. Elsevier Academic Press, Boston, MA, USA. URL: http://www.uhmwpe.org/Google Scholar
  6. Kuzmin, L. & Tinnsten, M. (2005) Contact angles on the running surfaces of cross-country skis. In A. Subic & S. Ujihashi (eds),The Impact of Technology on Sport, Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology. APCST 2005, Tokyo, pp. 318–323.Google Scholar
  7. Langevin, P. (1998)Ski reporting reference guide. Sport Activité Inc., Granby, (Que) Canada.Google Scholar
  8. T. Werder, J.H., Walther, R.J. & Koumoutsakos, P. (2003) Water-carbon interactions: Potential energy calibration using experimental data. InNanotech 2003, Vol. 3, NSTI Nanotechnology Conference & Trade Show, pp. 546–548, San Francisco, CA, USA. URL: www.nsti.orgGoogle Scholar
  9. Weisstein, E.W. (1994)Math World, World-Wide Web. URL: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Correlation Coefficient.htmlGoogle Scholar
  10. Wenzel, R.N. (1936) Surface roughness and contact angle,Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 28, 988–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© isea 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Engineering, Physics & MathematicsMid Sweden UniversityÖstersundSweden

Personalised recommendations