Advertisement

Comparison of two wind algorithms of ENVISAT ASAR at high wind

  • Song Guiting
  • Hou YijunEmail author
  • He Yijun
Article

Abstract

Two wind algorithms of ENVISAT advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR), i. e. CMOD4 model from the European Space Agency (ESA) and CMOD_IFR2 model from Quilfen et al., are compared in this paper. The wind direction is estimated from orientation of low and linear signatures in the ASAR imagery. The wind direction has inherently a 1801 ambiguity since only a single ASAR image is used. The 1801 ambiguity is eliminated by using the buoy data from the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) buoys moored in the Pacific. Wind speed is obtained with the two wind algorithms using both estimated wind direction and normalized radar cross section (NRCS). The retrieved wind results agree well with the data from Quikscat. The root mean square error (RMSE) of wind direction is 2.801. The RMSEs of wind speed from CMOD4 model and CMOD_IFR2 model are 1.09 m/s and 0.60 m/s respectively. The results indicate that the CMOD_IFR2 model is slight better than CMOD4 model at high wind.

Key words

ENVISAT ASAR wind retrieval wind speed 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpers, W. and B. Brummer, 1994. Atmospheric boundary layer rills observed by the synthetic aperture radar aboard the ERS-1 satellite.J. Geophys. Res. 99(C6): 12 613–12 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentamy, A., Y. Quilfen, P. Queuffeulou and A. Cavanie, 1994. Calibration of the ERS-1 scatterometer C-band mode. Tech. Rep. RSMAS p. 1:72.Google Scholar
  3. Fetterer, F., D. Gineris and C. S. Wackerman, 1998. Validating a scatterometer wind algorithm for ERS-1 SAR.IEEE Trans. Geophys. Remote Sensing 36(2): 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gerling, T. W., 1986. Structure of the surface wind field from the Seasat SAR.J. Geophys. Res. 91(C2): 2 308–2 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johannessen, J. A., P. W. Vachon and O. M. Johannessen, 1994. ERS-1 SAR imaging of marine boundary layer processes. ESA EOQ 46, Eur. Space Agency, p. 1–256, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  6. Quilfen, Y. and A. Bentamy, 1994. Calibration/validation of ERS-1 scatterometer precision products. Proceedings of IGARSS'94. IEEE press, Piscataway, USA, p. 945–947.Google Scholar
  7. Quilfen, Y., B. Chapron, T. Elfouhaily, K. Katsaros and J. Tournadre, 1998. Observation of tropical cyclones by high-resolution scatterometry.J. Geophys. Res. 103(c4): 7 767–7 786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stoffelen, A. and D. L. Anderson, 1997. ERS-1 scatterometer data characteristic and wind retrieval skill. Proc. First ERS-1 Symp., Noordwijk. ESA, The Netherlands. p. 1–359.Google Scholar
  9. Valwnzuela, G. R., 1978. Theories for interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves: A review.Boundary Layer Meteorol. 13: 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations