Advertisement

Morphology of the subducted Indian plate in the Indo-Burmese convergence zone

  • S. S. Rai
  • D. Srinagesh
  • P. V. S. S. Rajagopala Sarma
Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Earthquake hypocenters and travel time residuals have been analysed to constrain the geometry and physical state of the subducted Indian plate in the Indo-Burmese convergence zone. A critical analysis of earthquake hypocenters reveals the existence of a non-uniform Benioff zone, progressively shortening from north to south. The deepest level of seismicity is observed beneath the Naga hills (160 km) followed by that under the Chin hills (120 km) and Arakan-Yoma ranges (80 km). The region seems to be devoid of moderate sized shallow (< 40 km) earthquakes. Differential travel time residuals from pairs of shallow and intermediate depth earthquakes recorded at teleseismic distances show significantly faster travel time (up to l.2s) in the north-northeast and south-southwest azimuths, whilst slower arrivals (1.2 to 1.5 s) are recorded in the transverse direction. This observation points to the presence of a high velocity slab possibly linked to the subduction of the Indian oceanic lithosphere.

Keywords

Benioff zone hypocenter subduction travel time residual Indo-Burmese range 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous Users Guide to FAISE: Retrieval Software for the ISC Bulletin Data Base Version 1.0 U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunnschweiler R O, On the geology of the Indo-Bunnan ranges;J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 13, 137–194Google Scholar
  3. Barazangi M and Isacks B 1976 Spatial distribution of earthquakes and subduction of the Nazca plate beneath South America;Geology 4 686–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barazangi M and Isacks B L 1979 Subduction of the Nazca plate beneath Peru: evidence from spatial distribution of earthquakes;Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 57 537–555Google Scholar
  5. Chen W P and Molnar P 1990 Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong Plateau and the northern Indo-Burman ranges;J. Geophys. Res 95 12527–12552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creager K C and Jordan T H 1984 Slab penetration into the lower mantle;J. Geophys. Res. 89 3031–3049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies D and McKenzie D P 1969 Seismic travel-time residuals and plates.Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 18 51–63Google Scholar
  8. Fitch T J 1970 Earthquake mechanisms in the Himalayan, Burmese and Andaman regions continental tectonics in central Asia;J. Geophys. Res. 75 2699–2709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grand S 1990 A possible station basis in travel time measurements reported to ISC;Geophys. Res. Lett. 17 17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glennon and Chen-Ping 1995 Travel times from earthquakes near southern Kuril and their implications for the fate of subducted lithosphere;Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 88 177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasegawa A, Umino, N and Talcagi A 1978 Double-planned deep seismic zone and upper mantle structure in the northeastern Japan arc;Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 54 281–296Google Scholar
  12. Hatzfeld D and Christopher M 1992 Intermediate depth seismicity in the Aegean defined by teleseismic data;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 113 267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isacks B and Barazangi M 1977 Geometry of Benioff zones: Lateral segmentation and downwards bending of the subducted lithosphere; Island Arcs, Deep sea trenches and Back arc basins, (eds.) M Talwani and W Pitman (American Geophysical Union), Ewing series 1, 99–114Google Scholar
  14. Jackson J 1980 Errors in focal depth determination and the depth of seismicity in Iran and Turkey;Geophys. 43 J. R. Astron. Soc. 61 285–301Google Scholar
  15. Jeffreys H and Bullen K E 1940 Seismological table, British Association for the Advancement of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  16. Jordan T H 1977 Lithospheric slab penetration into lower mantle beneath the sea of Okhotsk;J. Geophys. 43 473–496Google Scholar
  17. Kennet B L N and Engdahl E R 1991 Travel times, global earthquake locations and phase identification,Geophys. J. Int. 105 429–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lay T 1994 The fate of descending slab;Annu. Rev. Earth. Planet. Sci. 22 33–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Dain A Y, Tapponier P and Molnar P 1984 Active faulting and tectonics of Burma and surrounding regions;J. Geophys. Res. 89 453–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell A H G and McKerrow 1975 Analogous evolution of the Burma orogen and the Scottish Caledonides;Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86 305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mukhopadhyay M and Dasgupta S 1988 Deep structure and tectonics of the Burmese arc constraints from earthquake and gravity data;Tectonophysics 149 299–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ni J F, Guzman-Speziale M, Bevis M, Holt W E, Wallace T C and Seager W R 1989 Accretionary tectonics of Burma and the three-dimensional geometry of the Burma subduction zone;Geology 17 68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okano K and Suetsugu D 1992 Search for lower mantle high-velocity zones beneath the deepest Kuril and Mariana earthquakes;Geophys. Res. Lett. 19 745–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Santo T 1969 Regional study of the characteristic seismicity of the world, II, from Burma down to Java;Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Tokyo 47 1049–1061Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. S. Rai
    • 1
  • D. Srinagesh
    • 1
  • P. V. S. S. Rajagopala Sarma
    • 1
  1. 1.National Geophysical Research InstituteHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations