Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 945–958

Circulation in Carr Inlet, Puget Sound, during Spring 2003

  • Kathleen A. Edwards
  • Mitsuhiro Kawase
  • Christian P. Sarason
Article

Abstract

The relatively slow flow and exchange of Carr Inlet water with the main basin of Puget Sound, Washington, favor eutrophication. To study Carr Inlet’s circulation, the Model-measurement Integration Experiment in Estuary Dynamics (MIXED) was conducted in March–May 2003, spanning the spring bloom. From observations and numerical simulations the circulation was decomposed into tidal and subtidal components; the former was dominated by the M2 tide, the latter by atmospheric forcing. Near the surface, the subtidal velocity was correlated with wind. At mid depths, the subtidal velocity was organized into vertical bands arising from internal waves excited by wind forcing of the water surface. The tidal flow was more strongly steered by local bathymetry and weaker in peak magnitudes than the subtidal flow, yet it contributed more mechanical energy to the inlet. Tidal eddies reduce exchange of water through the inlet’s entrances. Numerical simulations with the Princeton Ocean Model recreated many observed features, including the three-layer vertical structure of outflow at the surface and bottom and inflow at mid depth, the mid-depth subtidal response to the wind, and characteristics of the tide. While the model produced greater subtidal flow magnitudes at depth and differences in the phase of the M2 tide compared to observations, overall the case study provided support for more comprehensive simulations of Puget Sound in the future.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Arneborg, L. andB. Liljebladh. 2001. The internal seiches in Gullmar Fjord. Part I: Dynamics.Journal of Physical Oceanography 31:2549–2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumberg, A. F. andG. L. Mellor. 1987. A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model, p. 55–88.In N. Heaps (ed.), Three-dimensional Coastal Ocean Models, Volume 4. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Bos, J. K., R. A. Reynolds, J. Newton, and S. A. Albertson. 2001. Assessing sensitivity to eutrophication of the southern Puget Sound basin: Spatial and seasonal perspectives. Proceedings of the Puget Sound Research Conference, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, D. A., M. W. Baca, andY.-T. Lo. 1999. Tidal circulation and residence time in a macrotidal estuary: Cobscook Bay, Maine.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49:647–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Asaro, E. A. 2003. Performance of autonomous Lagrangian floats.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 20:896–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunne, J. P., A. H. Devol, andS. Emerson. 2002. The Oceanic Remote Chemical/Optical Analyzer (ORCA): An autonomous moored profiler.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 19: 1709–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, J. E. Hare, A. A. Grachev, andJ. B. Edson. 2003. Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes: Updates and verification for the COARE algorithm.Journal of Climate 16: 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farmer, D. M. 1976. The influence of wind on the surface layer of a stratified inlet: Part II. Analysis.Journal of Physical Oceanography 6:941–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finlayson, D. P., R. A. Haugerud, H. Greenberg, andM. G. Logsdon. 2000. Puget Sound Digital Elevation Model. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. (http://students. washington.edu/dfinlays/pugetsound/).Google Scholar
  10. Flather, R. A. 1976. A tidal model of the northwest European continental shelf.Memoires de la Society Royal des Sciences de Liege 10:141–164.Google Scholar
  11. Heaps, N. S. andA. E. Ramsbottom. 1966. Wind effects on the water in a narrow two-layered lake.Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London 259:391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joyce, T. M. 1989. On the in ‘situ’ calibration’ of ship-board ADCP.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 6: 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joyce, T. M., C. Wunsch, andS. D. Pierce. 1986. Synoptic Gulf Stream velocity profiles through simultaneous inversion of hydrographic and acoustic Doppler data.Journal of Geophysical Research 91:7573–7585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kasai, A., A. E. Hill, T. Fujiwara, andJ. H. Simpson. 2000. Effect of the Earth’s rotation on the circulation in regions of freshwater influence.Journal of Geophysical Research 105:16,961–16,969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kawase, M. 1998. A numerical model of Puget Sound circulation, p. 209–216. InProceedings of the Puget Sound Research Conference, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  16. Kraus, E. B. andJ. S. Turner. 1967. A one-dimensional model of the seasonal thermocline.Tellus 19:98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Large, W. andS. Pond. 1981. Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds.Journal of Physical Oceanography 11:324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavelle, J. W., H. O. Mofjeld, E. Lempriere-Doggett, G. A. Cannon, D. J. Pashinski, E. D. Cokelet, L. Lytle, and S. Gill. 1988. A multiply-connected channel model of tides and tidal currents in Puget Sound, Washington and a comparison with updated observations. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memo ERL PMEL-84. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  19. Limeburner, R. 1985. CODE 2: Moored array and large-scale data report. CODE Technical Report No. 38, Woods Hole Ocean-ographic Institute Technical Report 85-35. Woods Hole, MA. Lincoln, J. H. and E. Collias. 1975. An oceanographic study of the Port Orchard system. University of Washington Report for URS, M75-102. Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  20. Mackas, D. L. andP. J. Harrison. 1997. Nitrogenous nutrient sources and sinks in the Juan de Fuca Strait/Strait of Georgia/ Puget Sound estuarine system: Assessing the potential for eutrophication.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mass, C. F., M. Albright, D. Ovens, R. Steed, M. MacIver, E. Grimit, T. Eckel, B. Lamb, J. Vaughan, K. Westrick, P. Storck, B. Colman, C. Hill, N. Maykut, M. Gilroy, S. A. Ferguson, J. Yetter, J. M. Sierchio, C. Bowman, R. Stender, R. Wilson, andW. Brown. 2003. Regional environmental prediction over the Pacific Northwest.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 84: 1353–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mellor, G. L. 2003. Users guide for a three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model, June 2003 version. Progress in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  23. Mellor, G. L. andT. Yamada. 1974. A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers.Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 31:1791–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newton, J., S. Albertson, andA. Thomson. 1998. Washington state marine water quality in 1996 and 1997. Technical Report 98-338. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
  25. Newton, J. A., E. Siegel, andS. L. Albertson. 2003. Oceano-graphic changes in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca during the 2000-01 drought.Canadian Water Resources Journal 28:715–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nystuen, J. A. 2001. Listening to raindrops from underwater: An acoustic disdrometer.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 18:1640–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Officer, C. B. 1976. Physical Oceanography of Estuaries (and Associated Coastal Waters). John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Pawlowicz, R., B. Beardsley, andS. Lentz. 2002. Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in Matlab using T_TIDE.Computational Geosciences 28:929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. RDI. 2005. WorkHorse Monitor ADCP User’s Guide. Teledyne RD Instruments, Poway, California. Available online at www. rdinstruments.com.Google Scholar
  30. Rehm, E. 2006. In-situ measurement of primary productivity from a Lagrangian float. Ocean Sciences Meeting Supplement, Abstract OS25N-10. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union 87.Google Scholar
  31. Ruef, W., A. Devol, S. Emerson, J. Dunne, J. Newton, R. Reynolds, and J. Lynton. 2003. In situ and remote monitoring of water quality in south Puget Sound: The ORCA time series. Proceedings of the 2003 Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Rynearson, T. A. andE. V. Armbrust. 2004. Genetic differentiation among populations of the planktonic marine diatomDitylum brightwellii (Bacillariophyceae).Journal of Phycology 40: 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spigel, R H. andJ. Imberger. 1980. The classification of mixed-layer dynamics in lakes of small to medium size.Journal of Physical Oceanography 10:1104–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strickland, R. M. 1983. The Fertile Fjord. Puget Sound Books, Washington Sea Grant Publication, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  35. Valle-Levinson, A., N. Sarkar, R Sanya, D. Soto, andJ. Leon. 2007. Spatial structure of hydrography and flow in a Chilean fjord, Estuario Reloncaví.Estuaries and Coasts 30:113–126.Google Scholar
  36. Washington Department of Ecology. 2002. Georgia Basin-Puget Sound Ecosystem Indicators Report, Spring 2002. Technical Report 02-01-002, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
  37. Washington Department of Ecology. 2003. South Puget Sound Model Nutrient Study. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/ spasm/.Google Scholar
  38. Winant, C. D. 2004. Three-dimensional flow in an elongated, rotating basin.Journal of Physical Oceanography 34:462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winter, D. F., K. Banse, andG. C. Anderson. 1974. The dynamics of phytoplankton blooms in Puget Sound, a fjord in the Northwestern United States.Marine Biology 29:139–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wong, K.-C. 1994. On the nature of transverse variability in a coastal plain estuary.Journal of Geophysical Research 99:14,209–14,222.Google Scholar

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  1. Devol, A. personal communication. School of Oceanography, Box 357940, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7940Google Scholar
  2. Emerson, S. personal communication. School of Oceanography, Box 357940, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7940Google Scholar
  3. Newton, J. personal communication. Applied Physics Laboratory, Box 355640, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105-6698Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen A. Edwards
    • 1
  • Mitsuhiro Kawase
    • 2
  • Christian P. Sarason
    • 3
  1. 1.Applied Physics LaboratoryUniversity of WashingtonSeattle
  2. 2.School of OceanographyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle
  3. 3.Seattle

Personalised recommendations