Abstract
The present paper reports the K-Ar ages determined on glauconitic samples collected from the Ukra Member of the Mesozoic Bhuj Formation in two different sections, one located on the Ghuneri-Ghaduli road near Katesar Mahadeo temple and the other at the base of the Ukra hill in the northwestern part of the Kutch Mainland area.
Three glauconite samples viz., UkraKT-1, UkraKT-4 and UkraUH-3 have yielded K-Ar ages of 107.9 ± 3.4 Ma, 105.5 ± 3.3 Ma and 103.5 ± 3.4 Ma, respectively. The sample UkraKT-l treated with 0.5N HC1 and analysed in duplicate has yielded a mean age of 104 ± 2.3 Ma while the sample UkraKT-4 treated with 0.1N HCl has given an age of 106.5 ± 3.3 Ma. The ages of the treated and untreated glauconites are indistinguishable within 2σ uncertainty with a mean of 105.2 ± 1.3 Ma, which has been interpreted as the depositional age of the Ukra Member of the Mesozoic Bhuj Formation. The study has further indicated that mild acid treatment (up to 0.5N HCl) does not lead to any loss of radiogenic argon in the glauconites and can be helpful in purification of the samples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams C J D 1975 New Zealand Potassium-Argon age list-2;N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 18 443–467
Aronson J L and Burtner R L 1983 K/Ar dating of illitic clays in Jurassic Nugget Sandstone and timing of petroleum migration in Wyoming overthrust belt;Bull. Amer. Assoc. Pet. Geol. 67 414
Bentor Y K and Kastner M 1965 Notes on the mineralogy and origin of glauconite;J. Sediment. Petrol. 35 155–166
Biswas S K 1971 Note on the Geology of Kutch;Qtly. J. Geol. Min. Met. Soc. India 43(4) 220–235
Biswas S K 1977 Mesozoic rock stratigraphy of Kutch, Gujarat;Qtly. J. Geol. Min. Met. Soc. India 49 (3–4) 1–52
Biswas S K 1991 Stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of the mesozoic basin of Kutch, western India; In:Sedimentary Basins Of India: Tectonic Context (Edited by S K Tandon and S M Cashyap) pp 74–103
Bonhomme M G 1987 Type of sampling and comparison between K-Ar and Rb-Sr isotopic dating of fine fractions from sediments in an attempt to date young diagenetic events;Chem. Geol. (Isot. Geosci. Sect.) 65 209–222
Burst J F 1958a Mineral heterogeneity in glauconite pellets;Am. Mineralogist 43 481–497
Burst J F 1958b “Glauconite” pellets: Their mineral nature and applications to stratigraphic interpretations;Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 42 310–337
Clauer N, Keppens E and Stille P 1992 Sr isotopic constraints on the process of glauconitization;Geology 20 133–136
Clauer N, Liewig N, Mossem J R and Chaudhuri S 1986 Rb-Sr and K-Ar investigations used to reconstruct diagenetic evolution of sedimentary basins;Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 70(5)
Fairbridge R W 1967 Phases of diagenesis and authigenesis. In:Diagenesis in sediments (eds) G Larsen and G V Chilingar (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 19–89
Ghosh P K 1972 Ph. D. thesis Houston Texas pp. 136 In:Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy (ed) G S Odin (Chichester: John Wiley) pp. 387–403
Goldman M I 1921 Lithologic subsurface correlation in the “Bend” series of north-central Texas;U.S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Pap. 129 1–22
Howard J D and Singh I B 1985 Trace fossils in the Mesozoic sediments of Kachchh, western India;Paleogeog. Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol. 52 (1/2) 99–122
Hower J 1961 Some factors concerning the nature and origin of glauconites;Am. Mineralogist 46 313–334
Krishna J, Singh I B, Howard J D and Jafar S A 1983 Implications of new data on Mesozoic rocks of Kachchh, western India;Nature 305 790–792
Krishna J 1994 Environmental reconstruction studies of Mesozoic sedimentary sequences in western Kachchh;Unpub. project report submitted to KDMIPE, ONGC
Krishnan M S 1968 Geology of India and Burma; Madras: Higginbotham
Lamboy M and Odin G S 1975 Nouveaux aspects concernant les glaucomes du plateau continental Nord-Quest espagnol;Rev. Geogr. Phys. Geol. Dynam. 17 99–120
Lee M, Aronson J L and Savin S M 1985 K-Ar dating of the time of gas emplacement in Rotliegendes Sandstone, Netherlands;Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 67 1381–1385
Muller G 1967 Diagenesis in argillaceous sediments. In:Diagenesis in sediments (eds) G Larsen and G V Chilingar (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp. 127–177
Odin G S and Matter A 1981 De glauconarium origine;Sedimentology 28 611–641
Odin G S 1982 How to measure glaucony ages? In:Numerical Dating in Stratigraphy (ed.) G S Odin (Chichester: John Wiley) pp. 387–403
Odin G S and 35 Collaborators 1982 Interlaboratory standards for dating purposes. In:Numerical dating in stratigraphy (ed.) G S Odin (Chichester: John Wiley) pp. 123–150
Owens J P and Sohl N F 1973 Glauconites from New Jersey-Maryland Coastal Plain; their K-Ar ages and application in stratigraphic studies;Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 84(9) 2811–2838
Pascoe E H 1959 A manual of the geology of India and Burma;Geol. Surv. India volII pp. 484–1343
Rathore S S, Singh R R, Pal M, Prabhu B N and Misra K N 1993 Calibration of Argon-38 spike and standardization of K-Ar dating technique at KDMIPE, ONGC;Drill. Expl. World J. 4(2-3) 75–79
Sommer F 1975 Diagenesis history of a sandstone-like series on the north sea: Dating of the introduction of hydrocarbons;Revue de 1, Institut Francais du Petrole 30 729–741
Steiger R H and Jager E 1977 Subcommision on Geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 36 359–362
Velde B 1965 Experimental determination of muscovite polymorph stabilities;Am. Mineralogist 50 436–449
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rathore, S.S., Prabhu, B.N., Vijan, A.R. et al. K-Ar age of Ukra glauconites from the Kutch Basin, India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet Sci.) 108, 49–55 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02840824
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02840824