Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 29–39

Possibilities for management of coastal foredunes with deteriorated stands ofAmmophila arenaria (marram grass)

  • Putten W. H. van der 
  • Peters B. A. M. 
Article

Abstract

Ammophila arenaria (marram grass) is the most important plant species for sand stabilization in European coastal foredunes. Stand degeneration due to poor supply of wind-blown sand enhances the susceptibility for wind erosion when successional species do not become established. ReplantedA. arenaria often fails to become established.

In the present study we examined whether management practices such as mowing, fertilizing, burning or below-ground cutting of plants may be applied to re-establish the vigour ofA. arenaria. Field experiments performed at exposed sites, where naturally succeeding plant species are not supposed to become established due to salt spray, showed that none of the applied methods resulted into enhanced tiller density ofA. arenaria. Thus, further studies are necessary to solve this type of management problem.

At the leeward side of foredunes, the successional speciesFestuca rubra ssp.arenaria andElymus athericus could be established successfully as both pre-grown seedlings and planted bundles of cuttings (all further experiments were fertilized). When planted in spring, cuttings of successional plant species established less than those planted in early winter. Water repellency of the sand surface is supposed to be the main cause for this. Pre-grown seedlings were less susceptible for the season of planting. Direct sowing was not effective. Rabbit browsing had to be omitted to obtain successful establishment. When living rhizomes of successional plant species were still present in the soil profile, fencing alone turned out to be effective to re-establish vegetation at initially bare sites.

Keywords

Generative propagation Planting time Rabbit grazing Sand stabilization Succession Vegetative propagation Water repellency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adriani, M.J. & Terwindt, J.H.J. 1974.Sand stabilization and dune building. Rijkswaterstaat Communications no. 19: 68 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Boorman, L. A. 1989. The influence of grazing on British sand dunes. In: van der Meulen, F., Jungerius, P. D. & Visser, J. H. (eds.)Perspectives in Coastal Dune Management, pp. 121–124. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  3. Dekker, L. W. & Jungerius, P. D. 1990. Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to The Netherlands.Catena suppl. 18: 173–183.Google Scholar
  4. de Rooij-van der Goes, P.C.E.M. 1995. The role of plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne fungi in the decline ofAmmophila arenaria (L.) Link.New Phytol. 129: 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Ruig, J. 1995.De kust in breder perspectief. Basisrapport Kustnota 1995. Ministry of Transport and Public Works, RIKZ 95.005, The Hague. (In Dutch.)Google Scholar
  6. Desmukh, I.K. 1979. Fixation, accumulation and release of energy byAmmophila arenaria in a sand dune succession. In: Jefferies, R.L. & Davy, A.J. (eds.)Ecological processes in coastal environments, pp. 353–362. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, D. & Davy, A.J. 1986. Regenerative potential ofElymus farctus from rhizome fragments and seed.J. Ecol. 74: 1057–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huiskes, A.H.L. 1977. The natural establishment ofAmmophila arenaria from seed.Oikos 29: 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huiskes, A.H.L. 1979. Biological flora of the British isles:Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link (Psamma arenaria (L.) Roem. et Schult.:Calamagrostis arenaria (L.) Roth).J. Ecol. 67: 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jungerius, P.D. & Dekker, L.W. 1990. Water erosion in the dunes.Catena suppl. 18: 185–193.Google Scholar
  11. Lucas, J.J.M. & van der Hagen, H.G.J.M. 1992. Nieuw dodelijk koniinenvirus in Meijendel.Meijendel mededelingen 24: 32. Department of Population biology, University of Leiden, Leiden. (In Dutch.)Google Scholar
  12. Maun, M.A. 1994. Adaptations enhancing survival and establishment of seedlings on coastal dune systems.Vegetatio 111: 59–70.Google Scholar
  13. Maun, M.A. & Krajnyk, I. 1989. Stabilization of Great Lakes sand dunes: effect of planting time, mulches and fertilizer on seedling establishment.J. Coastal Res. 5: 791–800.Google Scholar
  14. Pluis, J.L.A. 1994. Algal crust formation in the inland dune area, Laarder Wasmeer, the Netherlands.Vegetatio 113: 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Seliskar, D.M. 1995. Coastal dune restoration: a strategy for alleviating dieout ofAmmophila breviligulata.Restor. Ecol. 3: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Seliskar, D.M. & Huettel, R.N. 1993. Nematode involvement in the dieout ofAmmophila breviligulata (Poaceae) on the Mid-Atlantic coastal dunes of the United States.J. Coast. Res. 9: 97–103.Google Scholar
  17. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1981.Biometry. Their Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  18. van Dieren, J.W. 1934.Organogene Dünenbildung: eine geomorphologische Analyse der Dünenlandschaft der West-Friesischen Insel Terschelling mit pflanzensoziologischen Methoden. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  19. van der Goes, P.C.E.M. & van der Putten, W.H. 1992. Nematode problems inAmmophila arenaria (marram grass).Meded. Facult. Landbouww.RUGent 57/3a: 847–856.Google Scholar
  20. van der Meijden, R. et al. 1990.Heukels'Flora van Nederland. 21th ed. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.Google Scholar
  21. van der Putten, W.H. 1990. Establishment and management ofAmmophila arenaria (marram grass) on artificial coastal foredunes in The Netherlands. In: Davidson-Arnott, R. (ed.)Proceedings Canadian symposium on coastal sand dunes, pp. 367–387. Associate Committee on Shorelines, National Research Council and Guelph University.Google Scholar
  22. van der Putten, W.H. & Kloosterman, E.H. 1991. Large-scale establishment ofAmmophila arenaria and quantitative assessment by remote sensing.J. Coastal Res. 7: 1181–1194.Google Scholar
  23. van der Putten, W.H. & Troelstra, S.R. 1990. Harmful soil organisms in coastal foredunes involved in degeneration ofAmmophila arenaria andCalammophila baltica.Can. J. Bot. 68: 1560–1568.Google Scholar
  24. van der Putten, W.H., Maas, P.W.Th., van Gulik, W.J.M. & Brinkman, H. 1990. Characterization of soil organisms involved in the degeneration ofAmmophila arenaria.Soil Biol. Biochem. 22: 845–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van der Putten, W.H., van der Werf-Klein Breteler, J.T. & van Dijk, C. 1989. Colonization of the root zone ofAmmophila arenaria by harmful soil organisms.Plant Soil 120: 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van der Putten, W.H., van Dijk, C. & Peters, B.A.M. 1993. Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation.Nature 362: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallén, B. 1980. Changes in structure and function ofAmmophila during a primary succession.Oikos 34: 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Willis, A.J. 1963. Braunton Burrows: the effects on the vegetation of the addition of mineral nutrients to dune soils.J. Ecol. 51: 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willis, A.J. 1965. The influence of mineral nutrients on the growth ofAmmophila arenaria.J. Ecol. 53: 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Willis, A.J. 1989. Coastal sand dunes as biological systems.Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., 96B: 17–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Putten W. H. van der 
    • 1
  • Peters B. A. M. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Netherlands Institute of EcologyHeterenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations