Use of pure nickel and LiOH for thermal energy storage
- 31 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
The solid to liquid phase transformation of LiOH has been proposed as an ideal candidate thermal energy storage media for a Rankine Cycle powered electrical generation unit envisioned in Space Station based solar dynamic systems. Due to the corrosive nature of molten hydroxides, long term containment of LiOH is of concern. Pure nickel is thought to be a suitably resistant material, and a program has been instituted to measure the effects of prolonged exposure of liquid and gaseous LiOH on the mechanical properties of pure nickel alloys. Results to date indicate that negligible weight and thickness changes occurred in Ni alloys exposed to LiOH for as long as 2500 hr at 775 K, and essentially no difference in 77–900 K tensile properties could be detected between LiOH exposed and vacuum annealed Ni specimens. Although there was little sign of outward damage, microstructural examination revealed that all hydroxide contaminated tensile test specimens had surface connected intergranular cracks along the gage lengths. Two other potential problems, which have strong implications with respect to a LiOH/Ni energy storage system, were also noted during the corrosion experiments. In particular stress corrosion cracking of weld joints in pressurized vessels and permeation of hydrogen through nickel, which leads to the loss of LiOH, were observed.
Keywords
Ultimate Tensile Strength Weld Joint LiOH Energy Storage System Intergranular CorrosionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.R.S. Downing and M.B. Parekh: “Thermal Energy Storage for an Organic Rankine Cycle Solar Dynamic Powered Space Station” (Paper 859061). Presented at the 20th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1985.Google Scholar
- 2.G.R. Heidenreich and M.B. Parekh: “Thermal Energy Storage for Organic Rankine Cycle Solar Dynamic Space Power Systems” (Paper No. 869175). Presented at the 21st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1985.Google Scholar
- 3.J.D. Whittenberger:J. Mater. Eng. Sys. 8 (1987) pp. 385–90.Google Scholar
- 4.N.W. Gregory and R.H. Mohr:J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) pp. 2142–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.M. Tetenbaum and C.E. Johnson:J. Nucl. Mater. 26 (1984) pp. 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.F.D. Richardson and J.H.E. Jeffes:J. Iron Steel Inst. 160 (194) p. 261. As modified by L.S. Darken and R.W. Gurry:Physical Chemistry of Metals, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953.Google Scholar
- 7.V.M. Robertson:Z. Mettalkde. 64 (1973) p. 436.Google Scholar
- 8.D.L. Cummings, R.L. Reuben, and D.A. Blackburn:Met. Trans. A 15A (1984) pp. 639–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.O. Kubaschewski and B.E. Hopkins:Oxidation of Metals and Alloys, Butters worth, London, 1967.Google Scholar
- 10.R. Herchl, N.N. Khoi, T. Homma, and W.W. Smeltzer:Ox. Met. 4 (1972) pp. 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.D.E. Larsen, Jr.:Scripta Metall. 21 (1987) pp. 1379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.A.W. Mullendore and N. J. Grant: “Grain Boundary Serrations Developed During Creep,” inStructural Processes in Creep, Iron and Steel Institute, London, 1961, pp. 44–55.Google Scholar
- 13.S.V. Raj and G.M. Phaar:Mater. Sci. Eng. 81 (1986) pp. 217–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar