Development of heat treatment parameters to improve fracture toughness and grain size of an embrittled maraging steel
- 60 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
An embrittled 18 Ni maraging steel rolled ring was examined and samples cut from the ring were subjected to a wide range of heat treatments including high temperature solutioning and thermal cycling. The effects of these treatments on toughness were evaluated by measuring impact energy and plain strain fracture toughness. The microstructural analyses were carried out using extensive optical and scanning electron microscopy, and scanning electron fractography. It has been established that the ring was embrittled due to the combined effects of deformed structure and grain boundary precipitation of TiC or Ti (CN). Heat treatment parameters have been devised to improve the fracture toughness and grain size of the materials affected by these two types of embrittlement. It has been suggested that toughness and grain size can be improved by (a) annealing at 1223 K followed by water quenching in the case where deterioration in toughness is marginal and is caused by nonrecrystallized grains or deformation texture, and (b) solutioning at 1473 K followed by water quenching, and thermal cycling twice between room temperature and 1198 K with a holding time of 30 min at peak temperature in the case where the loss in toughness is considerably large due to excessive grain boundary precipitation of second phase particles.
Keywords
Austenite Fracture Toughness Phase Particle Water Quenching Maraging SteelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G.J. Spaeder, R.M. Brown, and W.J. Murphy:Trans. ASM, 1967, 60, p. 418.Google Scholar
- 2.D. Kalish and H.J. Rack:Met Trans, 1971, 2, p. 2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.G.J. Spaeder:Met. Trans., 1970, i, p. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.H.J. Rack and P.H. Holloway;Met. Trans., 1977, 8A, p. 1313.Google Scholar
- 5.W.C. Johnson and D.F. Stein:Met. Trans., 1974, 5, p. 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.S.A. Rumugham, P.P. Sinha, T.S. Lakshamanan, and B.K. Sarkar: “Effects of Preforging on the Fracture Toughness of 18 Ni 1800 MPa Maraging Steel,” Proceedings of 10th International Forging Conference, Shefield, England, Sept. 1985.Google Scholar
- 7.A.G. Haynes: “The Making, Shaping and Heat Treating of 18% Ni Maraging Steels,” Proceedings of ASP A V Seminar, Madras, India, 1978, p. 38.Google Scholar
- 8.H. Zechemeister, H. Zeilinger, and K. Gunter:Arch. Eisenhuttenwes, 1978, 49, p. 489.Google Scholar
- 9.G.W. Tuffnel, D.L. Pasquine, and J.H. Olson: ASM, Trans. Quart. 1966, 59, p. 769.Google Scholar
- 10.C.S. Carter:Met. Trans. 1971, 2, p. 1621.Google Scholar
- 11.T. Yasunaka and T. Araki:J. Japan Inst. Metals, 1972, 36, p. 1202.Google Scholar
- 12.T. Yasunaka and T. Araki:J. Japan Jnst. Metals, 1974, 38, p. 877.Google Scholar
- 13.G. Saul, J.A. Roberson, and A.M. Adair:Met. Trans. 1970, 1, p. 383.Google Scholar
- 14.K. Nakazawa, Y. Kawabe, and S. Muneki:Mater. Sci. and Engg. 1978, 33, p. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.W.F. Browner and J.E. Srawley: “Plain Strain Fracture Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials,” ASTM Spl. Tech. Publication No. 410, ASTM, Philadelphia (1966).Google Scholar
- 16.T. Boniszewski and E. Boniszewski:JISI, 1966, 204, p. 360.Google Scholar
- 17.J.A. Psioda: The Effect of Microstructure, Strength on the Fracture Toughness of 18 Ni 300 Grade Maraging Steel,” Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1977.Google Scholar
- 18.N. Tsangarakis:Mater. Sci. Engg., 1983, 58, p. 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.E. Nes and G. Thomas:Met. Trans., 1976, 7A, p. 967.Google Scholar
- 20.A. Goldberg:Trans. ASM, 61, 1968, p. 26.Google Scholar
- 21.Y. Kawabe, K. Nakazawa, and S. Muneki:Tetsu-to-Hagane, 60, 1974, p. 269.Google Scholar
- 22.S.D. Antolovich, A. Saxena, and G.R. Chanani:Met. Trans. 5, 1974, p. 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.A.M. Hall:Metals Handbook, 8th Ed., 2, p. 255, ASM, Novelty, Ohio, 1964.Google Scholar