Politics on the move: The democratic control of the design of sustainable technologies
Article
- 13 Downloads
- 15 Citations
Abstract
This article examines how “design rationality” could help remediate the controversy over environmental degradation. Drawing on the case of designing sustainable forms of traffic management, it argues that this will only be effective to a limited degree. “Policy conversation” does indeed take place but within a coalition of actions that pushes a particular set of solutions. This facilitates due procedure but erodes political legitimacy, thus potentially reproducing an intractable controversy. The article suggests a five-phase model of democratic control as an alternative.
Keywords
Sustainable Development Traffic Management Direct Democracy Representative Democracy Sustainable Technology
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Beck, U. (1992).Risk Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1993).Die Erfindung des Politischen. Frankfurt: M.Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Beck, U., Giddens, A. and S. Lash (1994)Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Bovens, M.A.P. (forthcoming).The Quest for Responsibility—Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. and B. Latour (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: K. Knoor-Cetina and A. Cicourel (Eds.)Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Ekins, P. (1992).A New World Order—Grassroots Movements for Global Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Frankenfeld, P.J. (1992). Technological citizenship: A normative framework for risk studies.Science, Technology & Human Values 17: 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grundmann, R. (1994). Car traffic at the crossroads. In: J. Summerton (Ed.)Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Hajer, M. (1995a).The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hajer, M. (1995b). Ecological modernisation as cultural politics. In: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne (Eds.)Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Laird, F.N. (1993). Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making.Science, Technology & Human Values 18: 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lash, S. and J. Urry (1994).Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In: J. Law (Ed.)A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schön, D.A. (1971).Beyond the Stable State. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Schön and Rein (1994).Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson (1990).Divided We Stand—Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
- Torgerson, D. (1990). Limits to the administrative mind. In: R. Paehlke and D. Torgerson (Eds.)Managing Leviathan—Environmental Politics and the Administrative State. Peterborough: Broadview.Google Scholar
- Vintgen, G. (Ed.) (1994).Wistleblowing: Subversion or Corporate Citizenship? London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
- Weidner, H. (1995).25 Years of Modern Environmental Policy in Germany: Treading a Well-Worn Path to the Top of the International Field. WZB-papers FS II 95-301. Berlin.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, A.D. (1994). Towards a more democratic ethic of technological governance.Science, Technology & Human Values 19: 86–107.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Transaction Publishers 1995