Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 333–341 | Cite as

Forecasting of higher order spectral quantities of nonlinear random waves over surf zone

  • Young Jun Cho
  • Jae Il Lee
Water Engineering
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Accurate modeling of energy dissipation mechanisms due to wave breaking in the frequency domain is an overdue task hampered by the facts that wave breaking is highly localized in time. On the other hand, a spatially localized eddy viscosity formulation based on the mixing length hypothesis is capable of providing accurate predictions of wave skewness and asymmetry in the surf zone. In this study, the structure of dissipation term is re-examined using the data of Krauset al. (1992) and Buhr Hansen and Svendsen (1979) from the viewpoint of time dependent Boussinesq equations. Based on these results, the structure of frequency domain dissipation model over the surf zone is deduced. It turns out that dissipation due to wave breaking should be biased strongly toward higher frequencies in spectral calculations, and that a quadratic dependence on frequency within the dissipation coefficient comes closest to matching the desired structure of the breaking term. The prediction of skewness by numerical model with twenty harmonics involved is promising whereas the asymmetry in the surf zone is somewhat under-predicted.

Keywords

skewness asymmetry surf zone nonlinear random waves wave breaking model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, M. and Steguns, I.A. (1968)Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, Mineola, NY.Google Scholar
  2. Bur Hansen, J. and Svendsen, I. A. (1979)Regular waves in shoaling water, experimental data. Series paper 21, Inst. Hydr. Engr., Tech. Univ. Denmark.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, Y., Guza, R. T. and Elgar, S.(1996) “Modelling breaking surface waves in shallow water.”J. Geophysics. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Cayley, A. (1895)An elementary treatise on elliptic functions. Deighton Bell, London, England: reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., New York, N. Y.Google Scholar
  5. Elderberky, Y. and Battjes, J.A. (1996) “Spectral modeling of wave breaking: application to Boussinesq equations.”Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 102, pp. 1253–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elgar, S. and Guza, R.T. (1985) “Shoaling gravity waves: comparisons between field observations, linear theory and a nonlinear model”J. Geophysics. Res., Vol. 95, No. C9, pp. 16055–16063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elgar S. and Guza, R.T. (1986) “Nonlinear model predictions of bispectra of shoaling surface gravity waves.”J. Fluid Mech., 167, pp. 1–18.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elgar, S., Freilich, M.H. and Guza, R.T. (1990) “Model-data comparisons of moments of nonbreaking shoaling surface gravity waves.”J. Fluid Mech., 158, pp. 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flick, R.E., Guza, R.T. and Inman, D.L. (1981) “Elevation and velocity measurements of laboratory shoaling waves.”Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 86, pp. 4149–4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freilich, M.H. and Guza, R.T. (1984) “Nonlinear effects on shoaling surface gravity waves.”Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A, 311, pp. 1–41.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heitner, K.L. and Housner, G.W. (1970) “Numerical model for tsunami runup.”J. Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engrng, 96, pp.701–719.Google Scholar
  12. Kaihatu, J.M. and Kirby, J. T. (1996) “Effects of mode truncation and dissipation on predictions of higher order statistics”.Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. Teipei, pp.123–136.Google Scholar
  13. Karambas, Th., Krestenitis, Y. and Koutitas, C. (1990) “A numerical solution of Boussinesq equations in the inshore zone.”Hydrosoft, 3, pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
  14. Karambas, Th. and Koutitas, C. (1992) “A breaking wave propagation model based on the Boussinesq equations.”Coastal Engrng, 18, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirby, J.T. (1997) “Nonlinear, dispersive long waves in water of varivable depth in gravity waves in water of finite depth.” J. N. Hunt(ed),Advances in fluid mechanics, 10, Computational Mechanics Publications, pp. 55–125.Google Scholar
  16. Kirby, J. T. and Kaihatu, J.M. (1996) “Structure of frequency domain models for random wave breaking.”Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Orlando, FL.,Google Scholar
  17. Kraus, N.C., Smith, J.M. and Sollitt, C.K. (1992) “SUPERTANK laboratory data Collection project”.Proceedings of the 23rd Coastal Engineering Conference, ASCE, pp. 2191–2204.Google Scholar
  18. Mase, H. and Kirby, J. T (1992) “Modified frequency-domain KDV equation for random wave shoaling”.Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Venice.Google Scholar
  19. Peregrine, D.H. (1967) “Long waves on a beach.”J. Fluid Mech., 27, pp. 815–827.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thorton, E.B. and Guza, R.T. (1983) “Transformation of wave height distribution.”J. Geophys. Res., 88, pp. 5925–5938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vengayil, P. and Kirby, J. (1986) “Shoaling and reflection of nonlinear shallow water waves.”Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Teipei, pp. 794–806.Google Scholar
  22. Zelt, J.A. (1991) “The run-up of non-breaking and breaking solitary waves.”Coastal Engineering, 15, pp.205–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSCE and Springer jointly 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Young Jun Cho
    • 1
  • Jae Il Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniversity of SeoulSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniversity of SeoulSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations