Congenital malformations at birth — A prospective study from south India
Congenital malformations were studied prospectively from September 1989 to December 1992 covering 12,797 consecutive deliveries. The overall incidence of malformations was 3.7% and it was 3.2% among live births and 15.7% among still births. Three hundred and ninety seven birth defects were observed among 308 live births and 72 among 45 still births. The incidence of malformation was significantly higher among male babies (p <0.001), still births (p < 0.001), low birth weights (p < 0.001) and preterm babies (p < 0.001). Consanguinity among parents of malformed babies was more common (p < 0.001). Musculo-skeletal malformations were the commonest (9.69 per 1000) followed by cutaneous (6.33 per 1000), genitourinary (5.47 per. 1000), gastrointestinal (5.47 per 1000), central nervous system (3.99 per 1000) and cardiac anomalies (2.03 per 1000). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous and genitourinary malformations were common among live born babies while central nervous system and gastrointestinal defects were common among still born babies. Antenatal infections and ingestion of drugs were not found to be significant factors in the causation of birth defects.
Key wordCongenital malformations Newborn Consanguinity Low birth weight
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bhat BV, Ravikumara M. Perinatal mortality in India — Need for introspection.Indian J Maternal and Child Hlth 1996; 7: 31–33.Google Scholar
- 4.Singh M, Deerari AK, Khajuria RC, Paul VK. Perinatal and neonatal mortality in a hospital.Indian J Med Res 1994; 14:1–5.Google Scholar
- 5.Bhat BV, Babu L. Congenital musculoskeletal malformations (CMSM) in Pondicherry.The Antiseptic 1995; 92: 380–382.Google Scholar
- 18.Sugunabai SS, Mary M, Syamala K, Nair PM. An etiological study of congenital malformation in the newborn.Indian Pediatr 1982; 19: 1003–1007.Google Scholar
- 19.Gorvalingappa JP, Nash HK. Congenital malformations — A study of 2398 consecutive births.Indian J Med Res 1979; 69:149–154.Google Scholar
- 20.Saifullah S, Chandra RK, Pathak IC, Dhall GI. Congenital malformations in newborn — A prospective longitudinal study.Indian Pediatr 1968; 4: 251–261.Google Scholar
- 22.Mohanty C, Mishra OP, Das BK, Bhatia BD, Singh S. Congenital malformations in newborns. A study of 10,874 consecutive births.J Anat Soc India 1989; 38: 109–111.Google Scholar
- 23.Kesavan P, Nataraja H, Murugesah K, Ramakrishinan MS. Congenital malformations and consanguinity. In: Verma IC, Puri RK (eds)Medical genetics in India. Auroma enterprises, Pondicherry 1978; pp 65–72.Google Scholar
- 24.Verma IC. Neural tube defects in India. In : Verma IC, Puri RK (eds).Medical Genetics in India. Auroma enterprises, Pondicherry, p 33–38Google Scholar