Advertisement

Proceedings Mathematical Sciences

, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 57–75 | Cite as

Modular forms and differential operators

  • Don Zagier
Obituary note

Abstract

In 1956, Rankin described which polynomials in the derivatives of modular forms are again modular forms, and in 1977, H Cohen defined for eachn ≥ 0 a bilinear operation which assigns to two modular formsf andg of weightk andl a modular form [f, g]n of weightk +l + 2n. In the present paper we study these “Rankin-Cohen brackets” from two points of view. On the one hand we give various explanations of their modularity and various algebraic relations among them by relating the modular form theory to the theories of theta series, of Jacobi forms, and of pseudodifferential operators. In a different direction, we study the abstract algebraic structure (“RC algebra”) consisting of a graded vector space together with a collection of bilinear operations [,]n of degree + 2n satisfying all of the axioms of the Rankin-Cohen brackets. Under certain hypotheses, these turn out to be equivalent to commutative graded algebras together with a derivationS of degree 2 and an element Φ of degree 4, up to the equivalence relation (∂,Φ) ~ (∂ - ϕE, Φ - ϕ2 + ∂(ϕ)) where ϕ is an element of degree 2 andE is the Fuler operator (= multiplication by the degree).

Keywords

Modular forms Jacobi forms pseudodifferential operators vertex operator algebras 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Bo]
    Borcherds R, Vertex operator algebras, Kac-Moody algebras and the monster,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA83 (1986) 3068–3071CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [Co]
    Cohen H, Sums involving the values at negative integers of L functions of quadratic characters,Math. Ann. 217 (1977) 81–94Google Scholar
  3. [EZ]
    Eichler M and Zagier D, The Theory of Jacobi Forms,Prog. Math. 55, (Boston-Basel-Stuttgart, Birkhäuser) (1985)Google Scholar
  4. [Ge]
    Getzler E, Manin triples and N = 2 superconformal field theory (preprint), MIT (1993)Google Scholar
  5. [IZ]
    Ibukiyama T and Zagier D, Higher spherical polynomials (in preparation)Google Scholar
  6. [Ku]
    Kuznetsov N V, A new class of identities for the Fourier coefficients of modular forms (in Russian),Acta. Arith. 27 (1975) 505–519zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [MZ]
    Manin Yu I and Zagier D, Automorphic pseudodifferential operators, (in preparation)Google Scholar
  8. [Ra]
    Rankin R A, The construction of automorphic forms from the derivatives of a given form,J. Indian Math. Soc. 20 (1956) 103–116MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [Sp]
    Springer T A,Invariant Theory Lecture Notes585 (Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer) (1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [VZ]
    Rodriguez Villegas F and Zagier D, Square roots of central values of Hecke L-series, in “Advances in Number Theory, Proceedings of the third conference of the Canadian Number Theory Association” eds F Gouvea and N Yui (Oxford, Clarendon Press) (1993) 81–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Science 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don Zagier
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für MathematikBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations