Advertisement

Genes & Nutrition

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 13–22 | Cite as

Ethical issues raised by personalized nutrition based on genetic information

  • Ulf Görman
Article

Abstract

Four principles are taken as basis for the ethical analysis: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Health is understood as a limited aspect of wellbeing. Food is understood as an important aspect of wellbeing, not only an instrument for health. Modern society is characterized by a tendency to identify wellbeing with external rather than subjective circumstances, to identify wellbeing with health, and to create exaggerated health expectations. Based upon this understanding, aspects of personalized nutrition are discussed: genetic testing, counselling, and development of special dietary products. Today the predictive value of genetic tests for personal nutrition is limited, and experimental at best. Recommendations for the future: Personalized nutrition must be based on solid knowledge. Phenotypic analyses should be used when adequate. When a genetic test can have a clear advantage, this should be preferred. Opportunistic screening should only be used when clearly beneficial. Specially trained persons should collect information from genetic tests and carry through councelling on a personal basis. Marketing of genetic tests directly sold to the public should be discouraged. Development of special products for personalized nutrition may be necessary in some cases. However, this may also lead to a medicalization of diet.

Key words

Ethics Genetic test Health Nutritional genomics Personalized nutrition Wellbeing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alber, J. and Fahey, T. (2004) Perceptions of living conditions in an enlarged Europe. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, (Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European communities).Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F. (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Bioethics Advisory committee, Singapore (2005) Genetic testing and genetic research. (Singapore). http://www.bioethics-singapore.orgGoogle Scholar
  4. Colditz, G.A., Willett, W.C., Rotnitzsky, A. and Manson, J.E. (1995) Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women.Annals of Internal Medicine 122, 481–486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Conrad, P. (1992) Medicalization and social control.Annual Review of Sociology 18, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Council of Europe Working party on Human Genetics (2003) Working document on the applications of genetics for health purposes, CDBI/INF. 3, Strasbourg. http://www.coe.int/T/E/ Legal_affairs/Legal_co-operation/ Bioethics/ Activities/ Human_genetics/INF(2003)3e_genetics_working_doc.aspGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, R. (1980) Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life.International Journal of Health Services 10, 365–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (2004) EUR 21120 — The 25 recommendations on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing, (Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities).http://europa.eu.int/comm/ research/conferences/2004/genetic/pdf/ recommendations_en.pdf Google Scholar
  9. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits.Policy Sciences,9, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick, M. (2001) The tyranny of health. Doctors and the regulation of lifestyle, (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  11. Food Ethics Council (2005) Getting personal: shifting responsibilities for dietary health, (Brighton: Food ethics council).http://foodethicscouncil.org Google Scholar
  12. Gibney, M.J. and Gibney, E.R. (2004) Diet, genes and disease: implications for nutrition policy.Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63, 491–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenhalgh, T. and Wessely, S. (2004) ‘Health for me’: a sociocultural analysis of healthism in the middle classes.British Medical Bulletin 69, 197–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Illich, I.(1976) Medical Nemesis. The Expropriation of Health, (New York: Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
  15. Joost, H.-G. and Mathers, J. (2005) Personalized nutrition: Status and perspectives, (Unpublished draft document).Google Scholar
  16. Juth, N. (2005) Genetic information — Values and rights. The morality of presymptomatic testing, (Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis).Google Scholar
  17. Levy, H.L. (1999) Phenylketonuria: Old disease, new approach to treatment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 1811–1813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., and Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings.Psychological Bulletin 127, 267–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Löwendahl, L. (2002) Med kroppen som instrument, (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).Google Scholar
  20. Magnusson, M. (2004) Consumer perception of organic and genetically modified foods. Health and environmental considerations, (Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis).http:// www.diva-portal.org/diva/getDocument?urn_nbn_se_uu_diva-4218-1 fulltext.pdf Google Scholar
  21. Meijboom, F.L.B., Verweij, M.F. and Brom, F.W.A. (2003) You eat what you are: moral dimensions of diets tailored to one’s genes.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16:557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitsis, P. (1988) Epicurus’ ethical theory. The pleasures of invulnerability, (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  23. Nordenfelt, L. (1995) On the nature of health. An action-theoretic approach. 2nd ed., (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer).Google Scholar
  24. O’Grady, K. The Medicalization of menopause. http:// www.cwhn.ca/resources/menopause/Google Scholar
  25. Oviedo Convention (1997) Convention for the protection of human beings and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention of human rights and biomedicine. (European treaty series 164.) http:// conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/196.htmGoogle Scholar
  26. Philipson, S.M., and Uddenberg, N. (eds.) (1989) Hälsa som livsmening, (Stockholm: Natur och Kultur).Google Scholar
  27. Rose, G. (1992) The strategy of preventive medicine, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Rose, G., Hamilton, P.J.S., Colwell, L. and Shipley, M.J. (1982) A randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice: 10-year results.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 36, 102–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sahi, T. (1994) Genetics and epidemiology of adult-type hypolactasia.Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 202 Supplement. 7–20.Google Scholar
  30. Sjöberg, L. (2004) Gene Technology in the eyes of the public and experts. Moral opinions, attitudes and risk perception, (SSE/ EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration No 2004:7) (Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics).http:// swoba.hhs.se/hastba/abs/hastba2004_007.htm Google Scholar
  31. Skrabanek, P. (1994) The death of humane medicine and the rise of coercive healthism, (London: The social affairs unit).Google Scholar
  32. Song, Y., Niu, T., Manson, J.E., Kwiatkowski, D.J. and Liu, S. (2004) Are variants in the CAPN10 gene related to risk of type 2 diabetes? A quantitative assessment of population and family-based association studies.American Journal of Human Genetics 74, 208–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sumner, L.W. (1996) Welfare, happiness, and ethics, (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  34. Wahrman, M.Z., (2002) Brave New Judaism. When science and scripture collide, (Hanover and London: Brandeis University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Wertz, D.C., Fletcher, J.C. and Berg, K. (2003) Review of Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics. Report of consultants to WHO. World Health Organisation, Human genetics Programme. http:// www.who.int/entity/genomics/publications/en/ ethical_issuesin_medgenetics%20report.pdfGoogle Scholar
  36. WHO (1946) Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization, adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946. http://www.who.int/about/ definition/en/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EthicsLund UniversityLund, Sweden

Personalised recommendations