Relationship between levels of serum C-reactive protein, leucocyte count and carotid plaque in patients with ischemic stroke
- 33 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Summary
In order to study the relationship between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, leukocyte count and carotid plaque in patients with ischemic stroke, carotid duplex examination was performed by high-definition imaging (HDI) 5000 triplex system. Serum CRP was measured by nephelometry within 72 h after index ischemic stroke. A lesion was considered a plaque in the presence of a maximum intimal-medial wall thickness (IMT) 1.2 mm. Results of carotid ultrasonography were divided into two groups: M1, normal (IMT<1.2 mm) and M2, abnormal (IMT≥1.2 mm). The results showed that the mean age of M2 was significantly older than that of M1 (69.7±10.4 versus 62.5±9.6,P=0.001). The patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus (78%, 35% respectively) in M2 were significantly more than those (52%, 18% respectively) in M1 (P<0.01,P<0.05). There were 32 (65%) patients with elevated CRP levels in M2, but 33 (46%) patients with elevated CRP levels in M1, with the difference being significant between the two groups (P<0.05). The levels of serum glucose and leukocyte count (8.1±5.5, 10.3±4.0, respectively) in abnormal CRP group were significantly higher than that of normal CRP group (6.4±2.8, 8.7±3.4) (P<0.05,P<0.05); elevated CRP levels was found in 42 (62%), patients with territory infarction and 23 (43%) patients with lacunar infarction respectively, with the difference being significant between these two groups (P<0.05). It was concluded that the elevation of CRP levels was an significant clinical index for carotid plaque in patients with acute cerebral infarction.
Key words
C-reactive protein ischemic stroke leukocyte carotid plaquePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Ridker P M, Cushman M, Stampfer M Jet al. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med, 1997, 336: 973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ridker P M, Glynn R J, Hunnekens C H. C-reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1998, 97: 2007PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ridker P M, Buring J E, Shih Jet al. Prospective study of C-reactive protein and the risk of future cardiovascular events among apparently healthy women. Circulation, 1998, 98: 731PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Lowe G D. The relationship between infection, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease: an overview. Ann Periodontol, 2001, 6: 1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Elkind M S, Cheng J F, Albala B Bet al. Elevated white blood cell count and carotid plaque thickness: The Northern Manhattan stroke study. Stroke, 2001, 32: 842PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Salonen R, Salonen J T Progression of carotid athero-sclerosis and its determinants: a population-based ultrasonography study. Atherosclerosís, 1990, 81: 33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Van leeuwen M, van Rijswijk M H. Acute phase oroteins in monitoring of inflammatory disorders. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol, 1994, 8: 531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cortellaro M, Baldessare D, Cofrancesco Eet al. Relation between hemostatic variables and increase of common carotid intima-media thickness in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Stroke, 1996, 27: 450PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Tracy R P. Inflammation in cardiovascular disease: cart, horse, or both? Circulation, 1998, 97: 2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Mendall M A, Patel P, Ballam Let al. C-reactive protein and its relation to cardiovascular risk factors: a population based cross sectional study. BMJ, 1996, 312:1061PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Muir K W, Weir C J, Alwan Wet al. C-reactive protein and outcome after ischemic stroke. Stroke, 1999, 30: 981PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Di Napoli M, Papa F, Bocola V C-reactive protein in ischemic stroke. An idependent prognostic factor. Stroke, 2001, 32: 917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Prisant L M, Zemel P C, Nichols F Tet al. Carotid plaque associations among hypertensive patients. Arch Intern Med, 1993, 153: 501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar