Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of bearing capacity characteristics of sand and gravel compaction pile treated ground

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sand compaction piles which are constructed as compacted sand piles in the weak soils are used frequently in Korea as one of the soil improvement techniques. But it is necessary to find a new technique which can replace sand compaction piles because of decrease of sand resources and increase of sand cost. In this study, load tests of model composite ground which is composed ofgravel compaction piles and clays are executed in order to find out bearing capacity characteristics and the same load tests of sand compaction piles are executed to compare the results of both load tests. Area replacement ratios of gravel compaction piles and those of sand compaction piles are 30%, 40%, and 50%, respectively and a model composite ground is preconsolidated by centrifugal consolidation apparatus before the load test. And the bearing capacities from test results are compared with those predicted by existing formulas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barksdale, R.D. (1981). “Site improvement in Japan using sand compaction piles.”Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pp. 48–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barksdale, R.D. and Bachus, R.C. (1983).Design and Construction of Stone Columns Vol, Report No. FHWA/RD-83/026, FHWA, Washington D.C., pp. 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoki, M., Yagi, N., Yatabe, R., and Ichimoto, E. (1991). “Shearing characteristic of composite ground and its application to stability analysis.”Deep Foundation Improvements: Design, Construction and Testing, ASTM STP 1089, pp. 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D.A. (1970). “Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surface.”Proc. Ground Engineering Conference, Institute of Civil Engineering, pp. 9–20.

  • Hansbo, S. (1994).Foundation Engineering Development in Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 95, pp. 450–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.M.O. and Withers, N.J. (1974). “Reinforcing of soft cohesive soils with stone column.”Ground Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3, May, pp. 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.K., Hong, E.J., Kim, S.I., and Jeong, S.S. (2002). “Load-settlement characteristics of sand compaction piles (SCP) in soft ground.”Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhav, M.R. and Vitkar, P.P. (1978). “Strip footing on weak clay stabilized with a granular trench or pile.”Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 605–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesic, A.S. (1972). “Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass.”Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division, ASCE. Vol. 98, No. SM3, pp. 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, H.Y. (1975). “Vibroflotation-its effect on weak cohesive soils.”Civil Engineering, No. 824, pp. 44–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, M.J., Lim, J.C., Park, L.K., and You, S.H. (2004). “A study on the shear strength of sand compaction pile with composite soil and mixed soil.”The KSCE Annual Conference and Civil Expo 2004, pp. 4–131.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byoung-Il Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, BI., Lee, SH. Comparison of bearing capacity characteristics of sand and gravel compaction pile treated ground. KSCE Int. J Civ Eng 9, 197–203 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829050

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829050

Keywords

Navigation