Advertisement

Direct measurement of water availability in gelled plant tissue culture media

  • L. Art Spomer
  • Mary Ann Lila Smith
Physiology

Summary

Water constitutes nearly 100% of the volume and 95% of the mass of gelled plant tissue culture media. Even so, plant growth and development responses observed to occur with relatively small changes in gelling agent concentration (0.1% of media total mass) have been attributed to changes in media water availability. Measurements with three alternative direct techniques, specific for measuring physiochemical water availability indicated the effects of a change of this magnitude in gelling agent concentration negligibly affected the media water potential and water conductivity. Sensitive pressure membrane measurements indicated that incremental gelling agent concentration increases of 0.1% (of media total mass) within the range normally used for plant tissue culture media, depressed water matric potential only 1–2cm H2O (1–2×10−4 MPa (mega pascal.)); these values were confirmed with equally sensitive tensiometer measurements. Moreover, no effect of concentration on water movement could be detected with a precise constant-head permeameter over a broader range of gelling agent concentrations. These results indicate that eitherin vitro plants are extremely sensitive to subtle shifts in water status, or other physiochemical factors that also change with gelling agent concentration are contributing to the reported effects on plant growth and development.

Key words

agar media gelled media media matric potential media water availability media water potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beruto, D.; Beruto, M.; Ciccarelli, C., et al. Matric potential evaluations and measurements for gelled substrates. Physiol. Plant. 94:151–157 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhagyalakshmi; Singh N. S. Role of liquid versus agar-gelled media in mass propagation and ex vitro survival in bananas. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 41:71–73; 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bornman, C. H.; Vogelmann, T. C. Effect of rigidity of gel medium on benzyladenine induced adventitious bud formation and vitrificationin vitro inPicea abies. Physiol. Plant. 61:505–512; 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyer, J. S. Measurement of the water status of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 20:351–364; 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Debergh, P. C.; Harbaoui, Y.; Lemeur, R. Mass propagation, of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus): evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome hyperhydricity with special reference to water potential. Physiol. Plant. 53:181–187; 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghashghaie, J.; Brenckmann, F., Saugier, H. Effects of agar concentration on water status and growth of rose plants culturedin vitro. Physiol. Plant. 82:73–78; 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang, L.-C., Kohashi, C.; Vangundy, R., et al. Effects of common components on hardness of culture media prepared with Gelrite. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 31P:84–89; 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Ichi, T.; Koda, T., Asai, I., et al. Effects of gelling agents onin vitro culture of plant tissues. Agric. Biol. Chem. 50:2397–2399; 1986.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, A. M.; Petolino, J. F. Effects of support medium on embryo and plant production from cultured anthers of soft-red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 12:253; 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelms, L. R.; Spomer, L. A. The construction of serviceable, fast response tensiometers from porous ceramic tubes., Agron. J. 72(3):694–695; 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Obeidy, A.; Smith, M. A. L. Establishment of mature pecan embryo cultures on explanting media with low water availability. Plant Cell Rep. 9:463–465; 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Owens, L. D.; Wozniak, C. A. Measurment and effect of gel matric potential and expressibility on production of morphogenic callus by cultured sugar beet leaf disks. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 26:127–133; 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scherer, P. A.; Muller, E.; Loppert, H., et al. Multielement analysis of agar and gelrite impurities investigated by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry as well as physical properties of tissue culture media prepared with agar or gellan gum gelrite. Acta Hort. 226:655–668; 1988.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, M. A. L.; Spomer, L. A. Vessels, gels, liquid media, and support systems. In: Aitken-Christie, J.; Kozai, T.; Smith, M. A. L., eds. Automation and environmental control in plant tissue culture. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:371–404.Google Scholar
  15. Spomer, L. A. Measuring soil water. “quick response” tensiometers. Illinois State Florists' Assoc. Bull. 389:4–5; 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Spomer, L. A. Techniques for measuring plant water. Hort Science 20:1021–1028; 1985.Google Scholar
  17. Spomer, L. A. Evaluating “drainage” in container and other shallow-drained horticultural soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21:221–235; 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wetzstein, H. Y.; Kim, C.; Sommer, H. E. Vessel volume, gelling agent, and basal salts affect pH and gel strength of autoclaved tissue culture media. Hort Science 29:683–685; 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, R. R. Mineral nutritionin vitro—a mechanistic approach. Aust. J. Bot. 41:237–251; 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, R. R. The chemical microenvironment. In: Aitken-Christie, J.; Kozai, T.; Smith, M. A. L., eds. Automation and environmental control in plant tissue culture. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:213–229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for In Vitro Biology 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Art Spomer
    • 1
  • Mary Ann Lila Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbana

Personalised recommendations