Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 43–54 | Cite as

What happens when a reform works? The need to study unanticipated consequences of mandatory processing of domestic violence

  • Eve Buzawa
  • Gerald Hotaling
  • Andrew Klein


One of the primary facets of the sociology of law is concerned with the relationships between formal rules and regulations having the force of governmental social control and the values, norms and practices of those who enforce them (or not). This “law in action” perspective enables research to test out the differential impact on legal decisions of both formal and informal aspects of social control (Hawkins, 1992). One of the limitations of recent work on domestic violence is that it focuses too narrowly on one or two negative sanctions, e.g., arrest or restraining orders, to the exclusion of the other options and the mix of formal and informal decisions in the criminal justice system as a whole (Reiss, 1974). This research attempts through a close analysis of the workings of the Quincy, Massachusetts criminal justice system in response to domestic violence, to identify the consequences, unanticipated and anticipated, of decisions made in several domains (public, police, prosecutors, and courts) of the criminal justice system. This study uses in-depth interviews with batterers, victims and criminal justice agency and related personnel as well as agency policies, training materials and records to examine possible unintended consequences of aggressive intervention in cases of domestic violence. This study will explore the impact of the Quincy Domestic Violence Program, considered to be a national model, on the lives of victims and offenders who are treated by the court. We have selected the District Court at Quincy, Massachusetts as our research site. It has a well deserved national reputation treating abusers systematically from the initial intake by arresting officers through close supervision in probation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bachman, R. and Coker, A.L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offenders's history of violence, and race.Violence and Victims 10(2): 91106.Google Scholar
  2. Bayley, D.H. (1986). The tactical choices of police patrol officers.Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk, S.F., Campbell, A., Klap, R. & Western, B. (1992). Beyesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse assault experiment.Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, C. (1992). The arrest experiments: A feminist critique.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(1), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buzawa, E. (1979). Legislative responses to the problem of domestic violence in Michigan. Wayne LawReview 25 (3), 859–881.Google Scholar
  6. Buzawa, E. (1988).Explaining variations in police response to domestic violence: A case study in Detroit and New England. In G. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. Kirkpatrick & M. A. Straus (Eds.),Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 169–182). Newbury Park, Ca. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Buzawa, E. & Buzawa, C. (1990).Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Buzawa, E. & Buzawa, C. (1996).Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. 2nd Edition. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Buzawa, E. & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims.American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowell, N.A. & Burgess, A.W. (Eds.)Understanding Violence Against Women. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dunford, F.W., Huizinga, D., & Elliot, D. (1989).The Omaha domestic violence police experiment: Final report to the National Institute of Justice and the City of Omaha. Boulder, Co.: Institute of Behavioral Science.Google Scholar
  12. Dutton, D.G. (1986). Wife assaulters' explanations for assault: The neutralization of self punishment.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(4), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, D.S. (1989).Criminal justice procedures in family violence crimes. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.),Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 427–480). London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fireston, D. (1995, April 5). Giuliani and Council Class on Dormestic Violence Effort. NYT, p. 83.Google Scholar
  15. Ford, D. (1983). Wife battery and criminal justice: A study of victim decision-making.Family Relations, 32, 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, B. (1992).State codes on domestic violence: Analysis, commentary and recommendations. Reno, NV: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.Google Scholar
  17. Hart, B. (1995, March 31). Coordinated community approaches to domestic violence. Paper presented at the Strategic Planning Workshop on Violence Against Women, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC Reading, Pa.:” Battered Women's Justice Project, Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschel, J.D., Hutchison, I.W., Dean, C.W., Kelley, J.J., & Pesackis, C.E. (1991).Charlotte spouse assault replication project: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Langan, P. & Innes, C. (1986).Preventing domestic violence against women. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Langley, R. & Levy, R. (1977).Wife beating: The silent crisis. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  21. Lanza-Kaduce, L., Greenleaf, R. & Donahue, M. (1995). Trickle up report writing: The impact of a pro-arrest policy for domestic disturbances.Justice Quarterly, (12)3, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loving, N. (1980)Responding to spouse abuse and wife beating: A guide for police. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
  23. Manning, P. (1988).Symbolic interaction: Signifying calls and police response. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mastrofski, S. (1995, March). Comments made in a Workshop on Community Policing at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences meeting.Google Scholar
  25. Pate, A. & Hamilton, E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment.American Sociological Review, 57, 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pierce, G., Spaar, S. & Briggs, G. (1988, November).Character of calls for police work. NIJ Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, D. (1988). Personal violence and public order: The prosecution of ‘domestic’ violence in England and Wales.International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 16, 359–382.Google Scholar
  28. Sheptycki, J.W.E. (1993).Innovations in policing domestic violence. Newcastle upon Tyne: Athanaeum.Google Scholar
  29. Sherman, L. (1992). The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating for misdemeanor domestic violence.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85(1), 901–945.Google Scholar
  30. Stanko, E.A. (1989).Missing the mark? Police battering. In J. Hanmer, J. Radford, & B. Stanko (Eds.),Women, policing and male violence (pp. 46–49). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Straus, M.A. & Gelles, R.G. (1990).How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. M.A. Straus and R.J. Gelles (Eds.).Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8, 145 Families (pp. 49–73). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Urban Institute (1996, March 29).The VAWA Act of 1994: Evaluation of the STOP Block Grants to combat violence against women. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Victim Services Agency (1988).The law enforcement response to family violence: A state by state guide to family violence legislation. New York Victim Services Agency.Google Scholar
  34. Zorza, J. (1994). Must we stop arresting batterers? Analysis and policy implications of new police domestic violence studies.New England Law Review, 28, 929–990.Google Scholar
  35. Zorza, J. & Woods, L. (1994).Analysis and policy implications of the new police domestic violence studies. New York: National Center on Women and Family Law.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Police and Criminal Psychology 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eve Buzawa
    • 1
  • Gerald Hotaling
    • 1
  • Andrew Klein
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Massachusetts-LowellUSA
  2. 2.Quincy District CourtQuincyUSA

Personalised recommendations