Psychopharmacology

, Volume 127, Issue 1–2, pp 155–163 | Cite as

The use of a dual-task procedure for the assessment of cognitive effort associated with cigarette craving

  • Antonio Cepeda-Benito
  • Stephen T. Tiffany
Original Investigation

Abstract

Two experiments used a dual-task procedure to investigate Tiffany’s (1990) proposal that drug craving should disrupt activities that demand nonautomatic cognitive processing. The primary task required smokers to imagine sentences that incorporated urge or no-urge descriptors. During imagery, the subjects also responded to a secondary reaction time (RT) task. Additional dependent variables collected during the imagery manipulation included craving report, mood report, heart rate (HR), and skin conductance levels (SCL). In study 1, imagery of urge sentences produced slower probe RTs and increases in HR and SCL, greater urge and negative mood reports, and lower positive mood ratings. This same pattern of results was replicated in the second study, which utilized sentence types more closely matched on no-urge content. These results support Tiffany’s (1990) cognitive processing theory and suggest an innovative approach to the investigation of drug craving.

Key words

Urges Cravings Smokers Imagery Automatic Cognitive processing Cognitive capacity Heart rate Skin conductance levels 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brandon TH, Tiffany ST, Baker TB (1987) Characterization of the process of smoking relapse. In: Tims F, Eukefeld C (eds) Relapse and recovery in drug abuse (NIDA Res Monogr 72). US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, pp 104–117Google Scholar
  2. Brandon TH, Piasecki TM, Quinn EP, Baker TB (1995) Cue exposure treatment in nicotine dependence. In: Drummond DC, Tiffany ST, Glautier S, Remington B (eds). Addictive behaviour: Cue exposure theory and practice (The Wiley series in clinical psychology). Wiley, Chichester, England, pp 211–227Google Scholar
  3. Casper PA, Kantowitz BH (1987) Estimating the cost of mental loading in bimodal divided attention tasks: combining reaction time, heart rate variability and signal detection theory. Paper presented at the 1987 Mental State Estimation Workshop, Williamsburg, VaGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook EW, Atkinson L, Lang KG (1987) Stimulus control and data acquisition for IBM PCs and compatibles. Psychophysiology 24:726–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook EW, Hawk LW, Davis TL, Stevenson VE (1991) Affective individual differences and startle reflex modulation. J Abnorm Psychol 100:5–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drobes DJ, Tiffany ST (1996) A comparison of imaginal and cueexposure manipulations of smoking urge: the effect of nicotine deprivation. J Abnorm Psychol (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Droungas A., Childress AR, Ehrman R, Seamans M, O’Brien C (1992), Effect of smoking cues on physiological reactivity, subjective report of craving and Iatency to smoke in smokers. Paper presented at the Fifty-Fourth Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependency, Keystone, ColGoogle Scholar
  8. Elash CA, Tiffany ST, Vrana, SR (1995) The manipulation of smoking urges and affect through a brief imagery procedure: selfreport, psychophysiological, and startle probe responses. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 3:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis HC, Ashbrook PW (1988) Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In: Fiedler K, Forgus J (eds) Affect, cognition and social behavior. Hogrefe, Toronto Ontario, pp 25–43Google Scholar
  10. Fowles DC, Christie, MJ, Edelberg, R, Grings, WW, Lykken DT, Venables, PH (1981) Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology 18:232–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gross MT, Jarvik ME, Rosenblatt MR (1993) Nicotine abstinence produces content-specific Stroop interference. Psychopharmacology 110:333–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarvis M, Russell M, Saloojee Y (1980) Expired air carbon monoxide. A simple breath of tobacco smoke intake. BMJ 281:484–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerr B (1973) Processing demands during mental operations. Mem Cognit 1:401–412Google Scholar
  15. Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Logan GD (1988) Toward and instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev 95:492–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Niaura R, Goldstein M, Abrams D (1991) A bioinformational systems perspective on tobacco dependence. Bri J Addict 86:593–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norman DA, Shallice T (1985) Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D (eds) Consciousness and self-regulation (Advances in research theory, vol. 4). Plenum Press, New York, pp 2–18Google Scholar
  19. Posner MI, Snyder CR (1975) Attention and cognitive control. In: Solso RL (ed) Information processing and cognition: the Loyola symposium. Wiley New York, pp 55–85Google Scholar
  20. Sayette MA, Hufford MR (1994) Effects of cue exposure and deprivation on cognitive resources in smokers. J Abnorm Psychol 103:812–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sayette MA, Monti PM, Rosenhow DJ, Gulliver SB, Colby SM, Sirota AD, Niaura R, Abrams, DB (1994) The effects of exposure on reaction time in male alcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 55:629–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Spinks J, Kramer A (1991) Capacity views of human information processing: autonomic measures. In: Jennings JR, Coles MGH (eds) Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology; central and autonomic nervous system approaches. Wiley, West Sussex, England, pp 208–228Google Scholar
  23. Tiffany ST (1990) A cognitive model of drug urges and drug use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev 97:147–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tiffany ST (1992) A critique of contemporary urge and craving research: methodological, psychometric, and theoretical issues. Addict Behav Res Ther 14:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiffany ST (1995): The role of cognitive factors in reactivity to drug urges. In: Drummond DC, Tiffany ST, Glautier S, Remington B (eds) Addiction: cue exposure, theory and practice. Wiley, London, pp 137–165Google Scholar
  26. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ (1990) Imagery and smoking urges: the manipulation of affective content. Addict Behav 15: 531–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ (1991) The development and initial validation of a questionnaire of smoking urges. Br J Addict 86:1467–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tiffany ST, Hakenwerth DM (1991) The production of smoking urges through an imagery manipulation: psychophysiological and verbal manifestations. Addict Behav 16:389–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. VanOyen-Witvliet C, Vrana SR (1995) Psychophysiological responses as indices of affective dimensions. Psychophysiology 32:436–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. VanOyen-Witvliet CC, Panayiotou AG, Robinson JD, Vrana SR (1994) Emotional imagery: effects of arousal and valence on reaction time and heart rate. Psychophysiology 31:101–105Google Scholar
  31. Vrana SR, Lang PJ (1990) Fear imagery and the startle-probe reflex. J Abnorm Psychol 99:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wetter DW, Brandon TH, Baker TB (1992) The relation of affective processing measures and smoking motivation indices among college-age smokers. Adv Behav Res Ther 14:169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Cepeda-Benito
    • 1
  • Stephen T. Tiffany
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations