Advertisement

Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 3–20 | Cite as

Influence of geographical isolation on genetic diversity ofHimantoglossum hircinum (Orchidaceae)

  • Marion PfeiferEmail author
  • Gottfried Jetschke
Article

Abstract

Many plants live in habitats that are becoming increasingly rare and fragmented due to human disturbance. Studies of genetic diversity are necessary for understanding and evaluating the impact of habitat fragmentation, and land-use change on the dynamics of rare species to help in setting priorities for their management. We used AFLP markers to study variation in genetic structure within and among three border populations of the orchidHimantoglossum hircinum. Study sites were located in central Germany, which represents the north-eastern border of distribution, and they were separated from each other by a maximum distance of 10 km. Landscape between the populations was characterized by man-made habitat features including agricultural fields, major roads and settlements. We compared pairs of populations to evaluate genetic variation, genetic differentiation, and the current level of gene flow between them. Genetic diversity was high within the populations and higher within than between the populations. Population genetic differentiation was relatively high compared to other orchid species (G st=0.20). Gene flow between pairs of the populations varied and appeared to be influenced by landscape characteristics separating the localities. Recommendations for conservation ofH. hircinum are provided. Management activities should concentrate on maintenance or enlargement of habitat size to prevent loss of genetic diversity due to genetic drift. Sites are genetically relatively isolated, but using stepping stones to improve gene exchange would be problematic because of the intense land-use in the area.

Keywords

AMOVA Calcareous grassland Genetic differentiation Habitat fragmentation Mediterranean distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexandersson R. &Ågren J. (2000): Genetic structure in the nonrewarding bumblebee-pollinated orchidCalypso bulbosa.Heredity 85: 401–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Buylla E.R., Garcia-Barrios R. &Lara-Moreno C. (1996): Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: Applications and perspectives for tropical rainforest tree species.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 387–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arditti J. &Ghani A.K.A. (2000): Tansley Review No. 110. Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications.New Phytol. 145: 367–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arduino P., Verra F., Cianchi R., Rossi W., Corrias B. &Bullini L. (1996): Genetic variation and natural hybridization betweenOrchis laxiflora andOrchis palustris (Orchidaceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 202: 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avise J.C. &Hamrick J.L. (1996):Conservation genetics — case studies from nature. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Carey P.D. (1998): Modelling the spread ofHimantoglossum hircinum (L.)Spreng. at a site in the south of England.Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 126: 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey P.D. (1999): Changes in the distribution and abundance ofHimantoglossum hircinum (L.)Sprengel (Orchidaceae) over the last 100 years.Watsonia 22: 353–364.Google Scholar
  8. Carey P.D. &Farrell L. (2002):Himantoglossum hircinum (L.)Sprengel.J. Ecol. 90: 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey P.D., Farrell L. &Stewart N.F. (2002): The sudden increase in the abundance ofHimantoglossum hircinum in England in the past decade and what has caused it. In:Kindlmann P., Willems J.H. &Whigham D. (eds.),Trends and fluctuations and underlying mechanisms in terrestrial orchid populations, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
  10. Case M.A. (1994): Extensive variation in the levels of genetic diversity and degree of relatedness among five species ofCypripedium (Orchidaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 81: 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crow J.F. &Aoki K. (1984): Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 6073–6077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudash M.R., Carr D.E. &Fenster C.B. (1997): Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing inMimulus guttatus: Inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level.Evolution 51: 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehlers B.K. &Pedersen H.E. (2000): Genetic variation in three species ofEpipactis (Orchidaceae): geographic scale and evolutionary inferences.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E. &Quattro J.M. (1992): Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites.Genetics 131: 479–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Felsenstein J. (1985): Confidence limits on phylogeneis: an approach using the bootstrap.Evolution 39: 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenster C.B. (1991): Gene flow inChamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae) I. Gene dispersal.Evolution 45: 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer M. &Matthies D. (1998): RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rareGentianella germanica (Gentianaceae)Amer. J. Bot. 85: 811–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer M., Husi R. &Prati D. (2000): RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plantRanunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1128–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankel O.H. &Soulé M.E. (1981):Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Gilpin M. (1991): The genetic effective size of a metapopulation.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Good R. (1936): On the distribution of Lizard Orchid (Himantoglossum hircinumKoch).New Phytol. 35: 142–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gotelli N.J. (1991): Metapopulation models: the rescue effect, the propagule rain and the core satellite hypothesis.Amer. Naturalist 138: 768–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gram W.K. &Sork V.L. (2001): Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations.Ecology 82: 2012–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamrick J.L. &Godt M.J.W. (1990): Allozyme diversity in the grasses. In:Cheplick G.P. (ed.),Population biology of grasses, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
  25. Harrison S. &Hastings A. (1996): Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure.Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinrich W. (2000): Die Bocks-Riemenzunge (Himantoglossum hircinum) — Langzeitbeobachtungen auf markierten Dauerflächen. In:Arbeitskreis Heimische Orchideen (eds.),Heimische Orchideen. Artenmonitoring und Langzeitbeobachtung, Populationsdynamik und Artenschutz, AHO Thüringen e.V., Uhlstädt, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  27. Heinrich W. &Voelckel H. (1999): Die Bocks-Riemenzunge [Himantoglossum hircinum (L.)Spreng.] — Orchidee des Jahres 1999.Ber. Arbeitskreis. Heimische Orchid. 16: 83–123.Google Scholar
  28. Heinrich W., Jetschke G. &Pfeifer M. (2004): Populationsentwicklung der Bocks-Riemenzunge (Himantoglossum hircinum) — Untersuchungen auf Dauerflächen im NSG “Leutratal” bei Jena (Thüringen).Ber. Arbeitskreis. Heimische Orchid. 21: 81–99.Google Scholar
  29. Hellwig F.H., Nolte M., Ochsmann J. &Wissemann V. (1999): Rapid isolation of total cell DNA from milligram plant tissue.Haussknechtia 7: 29–34.Google Scholar
  30. Holzapfel S., Faville M.Z. &Gemmill C.E.C. (2002): Genetic variation of the endangered holoparasiteDactylanthus taylorii (Balanophoraceae) in New Zealand.J. Biogeogr. 29: 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hooftman D.A.P., Diemer M., Lienert J. &Schmid B. (1999): Does habitat fragmentation reduce the long-term survival of isolated populations of dominant plants? A field design.Bull. Geobot. Instit. ETH 65: 59–72.Google Scholar
  32. Huff D.R., Peakall R. &Smouse P.E. (1993): RAPD variation within and among populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchlöe dactyloides (Nutt.)Engelm.).Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 927–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jedicke E. (1997):Die Roten Listen. Gefährdete Pflanzen, Tiere, Pflanzengesellschaften und Biotoptypen in Bund und Ländern. Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  34. Jaccard P. (1908): Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution floral.Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 44: 223–270.Google Scholar
  35. Juan A., Crespo M.B., Cowan R.S., Lexer C. &Fay F. (2004): Patterns of variability and gene flow inMedicago citrina, an endangered endemic of islands in the western Mediterranean, as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP).Molec. Ecol. 13: 2679–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koelewijn H.P. (1998): Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness inPlantago coronopus.Evolution 52: 692–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kölliker R., Stadelmann F.J., Reidy B. &Nösberger J. (1998): Fertilization and defoliation frequency affect genetic diversity ofFestuca pratensisHuds. in permanent grasslands.Molec. Ecol. 7: 1557–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krzanowski W.J. (1990):Principles of multivariate analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Krüger A.M., Hellwig F.H. &Oberprieler C. (2002): Genetic diversity in natural and anthropogenic inland populations of salt-tolerant plants: random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses ofAster triploidum L. (Compositae) andSalicornia ramosissimaWoods (Chenopodiaceae).Molec. Ecol. 11: 1647–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewontin R.C (1972): The apportionment of human diversity.Evol. Biol. 6: 381–398.Google Scholar
  41. Lim S.H., Liew C.F., Lim C.N., Lee Y.H. &Goh C.J. (1997): A simple and efficient method of DNA isolation from orchid species and hybrids.Biol. Pl. 41: 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Linhart Y.B. &Grant M.C. (1996): Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants.Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 237–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meusel H., Jäger E. &Weinert E. (1965):Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, Jena.Google Scholar
  44. Michalakis Y. &Excoffier L. (1996): A genetic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci.Genetics 142: 1061–1064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller M. (1997):Tools For Population Genetic Analyses (TFPGA). Version 1.3. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
  46. Mitton J.B. (1997):Selection in natural populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Mueller U.G. &Wolfenbarger L.L. (1999): AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting.Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 389–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murren C.J. (2003): Spatial and demographic population genetic structure in Catasetum viridiflavum across a human-disturbed habitat.J. Evol. Biol. 16: 333–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murren C.J. &Ellison A.M. (1998): Seed dispersal characteristics ofBrassavola nodosa (Orchidaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 85: 675–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Negi M.S., Sabharwal V., Bhat R. &Lakshmikumaran M. (2004): Utility of AFLP markers for the assessment of genetic diversity withinBrassica nigra germplasm.Pl. Breeding 123: 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nei M. (1973): Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321–3323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nei M. (1978): Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.Genetics 89: 583–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nei M. (1987):Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Oostermeijer J.G.B., van Eijck M.W., van Leeuwen N.C. &den Nijs J.C.M. (1995): Analysis of the relationship between allozyme heterozygosity and fitness in the rareGentiana pneumonanthe.J. Evol. Biol. 8: 739–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oostermeijer J.G.B., van Eijck M.W. &den Nijs J.C.M. (1994a): Offspring fitness in relation to population size and genetic variation in the rare perennial plant speciesGentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae).Oecologia 97: 289–296.Google Scholar
  56. Oostermeijer J.G.B., van’t Veer R. &den Nijs J.C.M. (1994b): Population structure of the rare, long-lived perennialGentiana pneumonanthe in relation to vegetation and management in the Netherlands.J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ouborg N.J., Piquot Y. &van Groenendael M. (1999): Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants.J. Ecol. 87: 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pannell J.R. &Charlesworth B. (2000): Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity.Philos. Trans. Ser. B 355: 1851–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peakall R. &Beattie A.J. (1996): Ecological and genetic consequences of pollination by sexual deception in the orchidCaladenia tentactulata.Evolution 50: 2207–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peakall R. &Smouse P.E. (2001):GenAlEx V5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  61. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. &Huff D.R. (1995): Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of Buffalograss (Buchlöe dactyloides (Nutt.)Engelm.).Molec. Ecol. 4: 135–147.Google Scholar
  62. Petit R.J., El Mousadik A. &Pons O. (1998): Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers.Conservation Biol. 12: 844–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Powell W., Morgante M., Andre C., Hanafey M., Vogel J., Tingey S. &Rafalski A. (1996): The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (Microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis.Molec. Breeding 2: 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Qamaruz-Zaman F., Fay M.F., Parker J.S. &Chase M.W. (1998): The use of AFLP fingerprinting in conservation genetics: a case study ofOrchis simia (Orchidaceae).Lindleyana 13: 125–133.Google Scholar
  65. Raymond M. &Rousset F. (1994): An exact test for population differentiation.Evolution 49: 1280–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Richardson J.E., Fay M.F., Cronk Q.C.B. et al. (2003): Species delimiation and the origin of populations in island representatives ofPhylica (Rhamnaceae).Evolution 57: 816–827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rohlf F.J. (1998):NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.0. Applied Biostatistics, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Scacchi R., De Angelis G. &Lanzara P. (1990): Allozyme variation among and within elevenOrchis species (Fam.Orchidaceae), with special reference to hybridizing aptitude.Genetica 81: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scacchi R., De Angelis G. &Corbo R.M. (1991): Effect of the breeding system on the genetic structure in threeCephalanthera spp. (Orchideceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 176: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schaal B.A. (1975): Population structure and local differentiation inLiatris cylindracea.Amer. Naturalist 109: 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schneider S., Roessli D. &Excoffier L. (2000):ARLEQUIN, version 2.000. A Software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva.Google Scholar
  72. Shannon C.E. &Weaver W. (1949):The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  73. Simberloff D. &Abele L.G. (1982): Refuge design and island biogeographic theory: effects of fragmentation.Amer. Naturalist 120: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Slatkin M. (1987): Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural-populations.Science 236: 787–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Slatkin M. &Barton N.H. (1989): A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow.Evolution 43: 1349–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sneath P.H. &Sokal R.R. (1973):Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  77. Stenström A., Jonsson B.O., Jonsdottir I.S., Fagerströms T. &Augner M. (2001): Genetic variation and clonal diversity in four clonal sedges (Carex) along the Arctic coast of Eurasia.Molec. Ecol. 10: 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sun M. (1996): Effects of population size, mating system and evolutionary origin on genetic diversity inSpirantes sinensis andS. hongkongensis.Conservation Biol. 10: 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Syamsuardi &Okada H. (2002): Genetic diversity and genetic structure of populations ofRanunculus japonicusThunb. (Ranunculaceae).Pl. Spec. Biol. 17: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thompson J. (1999): Population differentiation in Mediterranean plants: insights into colonization history and the evolution and conservation of endemic species.Heredity 82: 229–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Travis S.E., Machinski J. &Keim P. (1996): An analysis of genetic variation inAstragalus cremnophylax var.cremnophylax, a critically endangered plant, using AFLP markers.Molec. Ecol. 5: 735–745.Google Scholar
  82. Tremblay R.L., Ackerman J.D., Zimmerman J.K. &Calvo R.N. (2005): Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84: 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M. &Zabeau M. (1995): AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407–4414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Waser N.M. (1987): Spatial genetic heterogeneity in a population of the montane perennial herbDelphinium nelsonii.Heredity 58: 249–256.Google Scholar
  85. Whitlock M.C. &McCauley D.E. (1999): Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups.Evolution 44: 1717–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Willis N. (1990):Lizard Orchid (Himantoglossum hircinum)wardening at Royal St. Georges Golf Course, Sandwich Bay, Kent. Kent Trust for Nature Conservation report, Kent Wildlife Trust, Maidstone.Google Scholar
  87. Winfield M.O., Arnold G.M., Cooper F., Le Ray M., White J., Karp A. &Edwards K.J. (1998): A study of the genetic diversity inPopulus nigra subsp.betulifolia in the Upper Severn area of the UK using AFLP markers.Molec. Ecol. 7: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wright S. (1951): The genetical structure of populations.Ann. Eugenics 15: 323–354.Google Scholar
  89. Wright S. (1978):Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  90. Yeh F.C., Yang R. &Boyle T. (1999):Popgene Version 1.31. Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  91. Young A.G., Brown A.H.D. &Zich F.A. (1999): Genetic structure of fragmented populations of the endangered daisyRutidosis leptorrhynchoides.Conservation Biol. 13: 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EcologyUniversity of JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations