Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 367–384 | Cite as

Genome size discriminates between closely related taxaElytrigia repens andE. intermedia (Poaceae: Triticeae) and their hybrid

  • Václav Mahelka
  • Jan Suda
  • Vlasta Jarolímová
  • Pavel Trávníček
  • František Krahulec


Flow cytometric and karyological investigations were performed on the closely related taxaElytrigia repens andE. intermedia (Poaceae: Triticeae) from the Czech Republic. DNA-hexaploids clearly prevailed among 238 examined plants and amounted to 96.2% of all samples. 2C-values ± s.d. for hexaploidElytrigia repens andE. intermedia were estimated at 23.27 ± 0.20 pg and 27.04 ± 0.24 pg respectively. Genome size thus allowed reliable separation of the two species (difference ca. 16%) as well as the identification of hybrid individuals. Natural hybridization inE. repens — E. intermedia alliance seems to be quite a common phenomenon as indicated from a large proportion (one sixth) of hexaploid samples with intermediate 2C-values. Previously, the crosses were most probably overlooked or misidentified due to their weak morphological differentiation. New nonaploid cytotypes (2n=9x=63) were revealed for both species as well as for the hybrid (determined on the basis of morphological characters only), representing the first records from the field. Fusion of unreduced and reduced gametes of the hexaploids is the most plausible mode of nonaploid origin.


C-value Chromosome number Cytotype DNA content Flow cytometry Hybridization Nonaploid Wheatgrass 


Löve 1984 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Assadi M. (1995): Meiotic configurations and chromosome number in some Iranian species ofElymus L. andAgropyronGaertner (Poaceae: Triticeae).Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 117: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assadi M. &Runemark H. (1995): Hybridisation, genomic constitution and generic delimitation inElymus s.l. (Poaceae: Triticeae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 194: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araratyan A.G. (1938): Chisla khromosom nekotorykh vidov i formAgropyrum (Chromosome numbers of some species and forms in the genusAgropyrum).Sovetsk. Bot. 6: 109–111.Google Scholar
  4. Araratyan A.G. (1939): K kariologicheskomu izucheniyu dyni (A contribution to caryological knowledge of melons).Dokl. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 25: 777–780. (n. v., cit. sec.Bolkhovskikh et al. 1969).Google Scholar
  5. Arohonka T. (1982): Chromosome counts of vascular plants of the island Seili in Nauvo, SW Finland.Turun Yliopiston Biol.-Laitoksen Julkaisula 3: 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. Avdulov N.P. (1931): Kario-sistematicheskoe issledovanie semeistva zlakov (Karyo-systematic study of the grasses).Trudy. Prikl. Bot. 44: 1–428.Google Scholar
  7. Barkworth M.E. &Dewey D.R. (1985): Genomically based genera in the perennialTriticeae of North America: identification and membership.Amer. J. Bot. 72: 767–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaudry J.R. (1951): Seed development following the matingElymus virginicus L. ×Agropyrum repens (L.) Beauv.Genetics 36: 109–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Belayeva V.A. &Siplivinski V. (1981): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), Chromosome number reports LXXIII,Taxon 30: 857–860.Google Scholar
  10. Bell G.D.H. (1950): Investigations in theTriticinae. I. Colchicine techniques for chromosome doubling in interspecific and intergeneric hybridization.J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 40: 9–18.Google Scholar
  11. Bell G.D.H. &Sachs L. (1953): Investigations in theTriticinae. II. The cytology and fertility of intergeneric and interspecific F1 hybrids and their derived amphidiplois.J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 43: 105–115.Google Scholar
  12. Bennett M.D. (2004): Perspectives on polyploidy in plants-ancient and neo.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennett M.D., Smith J.B. &Smith L.R.I. (1982): DNA amounts of angiosperms from the Antarctic and South Georgia.Environm. Exp. Bot. 22: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berchtold G.F. & Opiz P.M. (1836):Oekonomisch-technische Flora Böhmens I/2. J.H. Pospischil, Prag.Google Scholar
  15. Bolkhovskikh Z., Grif V., Matveieva T. &Zakharyeva O. (1969):Khromosomnye chisla tsvetkovykh rastenii (Chromosome numbers of flowering plants). Nauka, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  16. Bowden W.M. (1965): Cytotaxonomy of the species and interspecific hybrids of the genusAgropyron in Canada and neighboring areas.Canad. J. Bot. 43: 1421–1448.Google Scholar
  17. Cauderon Y. (1954): Obtention d’amphidiploides a partir de croisement entre desTriticum a 2n=28 etAgropyrum glaucum (2n=42). In:VIIIth International Botanical Congress, Rapp. Commun. Parvenus Avant Congr. Sect. 9 & 10, Paris, pp. 199–200. (n. v., cit. sec.Bolkhovskikh et al. 1969).Google Scholar
  18. Cauderon Y. (1958): Étude cytogénétique desAgropyrum français et de leurs hybrides avec les blés.Ann. Inst. Natl. Rech. Agron., Sér. B. 8: 389–543.Google Scholar
  19. Cauderon Y. (1962): Étude cytogénétique du genreAgropyrum.Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. 25: 287–301.Google Scholar
  20. Chen Q., Conner R.L., Laroche A. &Thomas J.B. (1998): Genome analysis ofThinopyrum intermedium andThinopyrum ponticum using genomic in situ hybridisation.Genome 41: 580–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chiznyak N.A. (1936): Formoobrazovanie u pshenichno-pyreinykh gibridov i vyvedenie mnogoletnikh pshenits (Formation ofTriticum-Elytrigia hybrids and production of perennial wheats).Selekts. & Semenov. 12: 20–33.Google Scholar
  22. Chopanov P. &Yurtsev B.N. (1976): Khromosomnye chisla nekotorykh zlakov Turkmenii. II. (Chromosome numbers of some grasses of Turkmenia. II.).Bot. Zhurn. 61: 1240–1244.Google Scholar
  23. Clayton W.D. &Williamson H. (2003):World grass flora: Nomenclature. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  24. Dempsey R.E., Gornall R.J. &Bailey J.P. (1994): Contributions to a cytological catalogue of the British and Irish flora, 4.Watsonia 20: 63–66.Google Scholar
  25. Devesa J.A., Ruiz T. &Tormo R., Munoz A., Viera M.C., Carrasco J., Ortega A. &Pastor J. (1990): Contribución al conocimiento cariológico de lasPoaceae en Extremadura II.Bol. Soc. Brot., ser. 2. 63: 153–205.Google Scholar
  26. Dewey D.R. (1961): Hybrids betweenAgropyron repens andAgropyron desertorum.J. Heredity 52: 13–21.Google Scholar
  27. Dewey D.R. (1967): Synthetic hybrids of New World and Old WorldAgropyrons: III.Agropyron repens × tetraploidAgropyron spicatum.Amer. J. Bot. 54: 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dewey D.R. (1970): A cytogenetic study ofAgropyron stipaefolium and its hybrids withAgropyron repens.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 97: 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dewey D.R. (1972): Cytogenetics ofElymus angustus and its hybrids withElymus giganteus, Elymus cinereus, andAgropyron repens.Bot. Gaz. 133: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dewey D.R. (1974): Cytogenetics of a polyhaploidAgropyron repens.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 101: 266–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dewey D.R. (1980): Morphological, cytological and taxonomic relationships betweenAgropyron repens andA. elongatiforme (Gramineae).Syst. Bot. 51: 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doležel J., Sgorbati S. &Lucretti S. (1992): Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants.Physiol. Pl. (Copenhagen) 85: 625–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eckardt N.A. (2001): A sense of self: The role of DNA sequence elimination in allopolyploidization.Pl. Cell 13: 1699–1704.Google Scholar
  34. Feldman M., Liu B., Segal G., Abbo S., Levy A. &Vega J.M. (1997): Rapid elimination of low-copy DNA sequences in polyploid wheat: a possible mechanism for differentiation of homoeologous chromosomes.Genetics 147: 1381–1387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fernandes A. &Queiros M. (1969): Contribution a la connaissance cytotaxonomique des Spermatophyta du Portugal. I.Gramineae. Bol. Soc. Brot., Ser. 2, 43: 3–140.Google Scholar
  36. Frey L., Mirek Z. &Mizianty M. (1977): Contribution to the chromosome numbers of Polish vascular plants.Fragm. Florist. Geobot. 23: 317–325.Google Scholar
  37. Gadella Th.W.J. &Kliphuis E. (1966): Chromosome numbers of flowering plants in the Netherlands II.Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch, Ser. C, Biol. Med. Sci. 69: 541–556.Google Scholar
  38. Gaul H. (1953a): Über meiotische Fragment- und Brückenbildung der BastardeSecale undTriticum ×Agropyrum.Chromosoma 6: 314–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gaul H. (1953b): Genomanalytische Untersuchungen beiTriticum × Agropyron intermedium unter Berücksichtigung vonSecale cereale × A. intermedium.Z. Vererbungsl. 85: 505–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gervais C., Trahan R. &Gagnon J. (1999): IOPB chromosome data 14.Newslett. Int. Organ. Pl. Biosyst. 30: 10–15.Google Scholar
  41. Gillett J.M. &Senn H.A. (1960): Cytotaxonomy and intraspecific variation ofAgropyron smithiiRydb.Canad. J. Bot. 38: 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goldblatt P. (ed.) (1984): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1979–1981.Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 8.Google Scholar
  43. Goldblatt P. (ed.) (1988): Index to plant chromosome numbers 1984–1985.Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 23.Google Scholar
  44. Goukasian A. &Nazarova E. (1998): Mediterranean chromosome number reports 8 (1009–1025).Fl. Medit.. 8: 307–313.Google Scholar
  45. Greilhuber J. (1998): Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment.Ann. Bot. (Oxford) 82 (Supplement A): 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Greilhuber J., Doležel J., Lysák M.A. &Bennett M.D. (2004): The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents.Ann. Bot. (Oxford) 94: 1–6.Google Scholar
  47. Guzik M.B. (1984): Khromosomnye chisla nekotorykh dikorastushchikh zlakov Predural’ya (Chromosome numbers of some spontaneous grass species from the Preduralic region).Ekol. Opyl. Rast. 8: 82–86. (n. v., cit. sec.Goldblatt 1988).Google Scholar
  48. Guzik M.B. &Levkovskii V.P. (1979): Khromosomnye chisla dikorastushchikh zlakov stepei Zabaikal’ya i Khakasii (Chromosome numbers of spontaneous grasses of Baikal and Khakassia steppe).Ekol. Opyl. 4: 26–32. (n. v., cit. sec.Goldblatt 1984).Google Scholar
  49. Hartung M.F. (1946): Chromosome numbers inPoa, Agropyron andElymus. Amer. J. Bot. 33: 516–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hegi G. (1997):Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa 1/3. Ed. 3. Parey Buchverlag im Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin, Wien.Google Scholar
  51. Heiser C.B. &Whitaker T.W. (1948): Chromosome number, polyploidy and growth habit in California weeds.Amer. J. Bot. 35: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Heneen W.K. (1972): Separation difficulties during anaphase I inElymus (Agropyron) species.Bot. Not. 125: 430–438.Google Scholar
  53. Hiddeman W., Schumann J., Andreef M., Barlogie B., Herman C.J., Leif R.C., Mayall B.H., Murphy R.F. &Sandberg A.A. (1984): Convention on nomenclature for DNA cytometry.Cytometry 5: 445–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hunziker J.H. (1954): Estudios citológecos en las Hordeas (Gramíneas). I.Revista Invest. Agric. 8: 99–104.Google Scholar
  55. Johnson G.A. &Jalal S.M. (1977): Meiotic behavior and fertility interrelationships inAgropyron andAgrohordeum species.Cytologia 42: 263–272.Google Scholar
  56. Johnson L.P.V. (1938): Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. IV. Further crossing results and studies on the F1 hybrids.Canad. J. Res., Sect. C., Bot. Sci. 16: 417–444.Google Scholar
  57. Jones K. (1957): Some aspects of plant variation: the grasses. In:Lousley J.E. (ed.),Progress in the study of the British flora, Bot. Soc. British Isles, London, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
  58. Jones K. (1960): Cytology.Rep. (Annual) Welsh Pl. Breed. Sta. 1959: 68.Google Scholar
  59. Kostoff D. (1941): Wheat phylesis and wheat breeding from a cytogenetic point of view.Bibliogr. Genet. 13: 149–224.Google Scholar
  60. Kozhuharov S.I. &Petrova A.V. (1973): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), IOPB chromosome number reports XL,Taxon 22: 285–291.Google Scholar
  61. Kruse A. (1974):Hordeum × Agropyrum hybrids.Hereditas 78: 291–294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J. jun.,Kaplan Z., Kirschner J. &Štěpánek J. (eds.) (2002):Klíč ke květeně České republiky (Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic), Academia, Praha.Google Scholar
  63. Leitch I.J. &Bennett M.D. (2004): Genome downsizing in polyploid plants.Biol. J. Linn Soc. 82: 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Levy A.A. &Feldman M. (2002): The impact of polyploidy on grass genome evolution.Pl. Physiol. (Lancaster) 130: 1587–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Limin A.E. &Fowler D.B. (1988): Cold hardiness expression in interspecific hybrids and amphiploids of theTriticeae.Genome 30: 361–365.Google Scholar
  66. Litardière R. de (1948): Nouvelles contributions a l’étude de la Corse (Fascicule 7).Candollea 11: 175–227.Google Scholar
  67. Liu Z.-W. &Wang R. R.-C. (1993): Genome analysis ofElytrigia caespitosa, Lophopyrum nodosum, Pseudoroegneria geniculata ssp.scythica, andThinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae: Gramineae).Genome 36: 102–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Löve Á. (1980a): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), IOPB chromosome number reports LXVI,Taxon 29: 166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Löve Á. (1980b): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), Chromosome number reports LXVII,Taxon 29: 350–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Löve Á. (1984): Conspectus of theTriticeae.Feddes Repert. 95: 425–521.Google Scholar
  71. Löve Á. (1986): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), Chromosome number reports XC,Taxon 35: 198.Google Scholar
  72. Löve Á. &Kjellqvist E. (1973): Cytotaxonomy of Spanish plants. II. Monocotyledons.Lagascalia 3: 147–182.Google Scholar
  73. Löve Á. &Löve D. (1956): Cytotaxonomical conspectus of the Icelandic flora.Acta Horti Gothob. 20: 65–291.Google Scholar
  74. Löve Á. &Löve D. (1961): Chromosome numbers of central and northwest European plant species.Opera Bot. 5: 1–581.Google Scholar
  75. Löve Á. &Löve D. (1982): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), IOPB chromosome number reports LXXVI,Taxon 31: 583–587.Google Scholar
  76. Lövkvist B. &Hultgård U.-M. (1999): Chromosome numbers in south Swedish vascular plants.Opera Bot. 137: 1–42.Google Scholar
  77. Lu B.-R., Yan J. &Yang J.-L. (1990): Cytological observations onTriticeae materials from Xinjiang, Qinghai and Sichuan.Acta Bot. Yunnan. 12: 57–66.Google Scholar
  78. Májovský J. et al. (1974): Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora. Part 4.Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae, Bot. 23: 1–23.Google Scholar
  79. Májovský J. et al. (1978): Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (Part 6).Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae, Bot. 26: 1–42.Google Scholar
  80. Mason-Gamer R.J. (2004): Reticulate evolution, introgression, and intertribal gene capture in an allohexaploid grass.Syst. Biol. 53: 25–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Matsumura M. (1951): Genome-analysis inAgropyrum, a genus related toTriticum.Rep. (Annual) Natl. Inst. Genet. 1: 25.Google Scholar
  82. Matsumura M. (1952): Studies onAgropyrum, a genus related toTriticum.Rep. (Annual) Natl. Inst. Genet. 2: 26.Google Scholar
  83. Matsumura S., Muramatsu M. &Sakamoto S. (1958a): Genome analysis inAgropyron, a genus related toTriticum.Proc. X Int. Congr. Genet. 2: 181–182. (n. v., cit. sec.Löve A. & Löve D. 1961: 365).Google Scholar
  84. Matsumura S., Muramatsu M. &Sakamoto S. (1958b): Genome analysis inAgropyron, a genus related toTriticum.Seiken Ziho 9: 39–48.Google Scholar
  85. Mičieta K. (1986): Karyological study of the Slovak flora XI.Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae, Bot. 33: 51–55.Google Scholar
  86. Mizianty M., Frey L. &Szczepaniak M. (2001): TheAgropyron-Elymus complex (Poaceae) in Poland: biosystematics. In:Frey L. (ed.),Studies on grasses in Poland, PAN, Krakow, pp. 25–77.Google Scholar
  87. Mowery M. (1929): Development of the pollen grain and the embryo sac ofAgropyron repens.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 56: 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mujeeb-Kazi A., Jahan Q. &Vahidy A.A. (1994): Application of a somatic and meiotic cytological technique to diverse plant genera and species in theTriticeae.Pakistan J. Bot. 26: 353–366.Google Scholar
  89. Muramatsu M. (1955): Karyological studies on the F1 hybrid betweenTriticum aegilopoides (autotetraploid) andAgropyron intermedium.Seiken Ziho 7: 75–85.Google Scholar
  90. Napier K.V. &Walton P.D. (1981): New interspecific hybrids in the genusAgropyron.Euphytica 30: 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Östergren G. (1940a): Cytology ofAgropyron junceum, A. repens and their spontaneous hybrids.Hereditas 26: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Östergren G. (1940b): On the morphology ofAgropyron junceum (L.) P.B.,A. repens (L.) P.B. and their spontaneous hybrids.Bot. Not. 133–143.Google Scholar
  93. Otto F. (1990): DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In:Crissman H.A. &Darzynkiewicz Z. (eds.),Methods in cell biology 33, Academic Press, New York, pp. 102–110.Google Scholar
  94. Parfenov V.I. &Dmitrieva S.A. (1988): Kariologicheskaya kharakteristika predstavitelei flory sosudistykh rastenii Berezinskogo biosfernogo zapovednika (Karyological characteristics of the vascular plants of “Berezinskoi zapovednik” biosphere reserve).Zapovedniki Belorussii, Issl. 12: 3–8.Google Scholar
  95. Peto F.H. (1929): Chromosome numbers inAgropyron.Nature 124: 181–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Peto F.H. (1930): Cytological studies inAgropyron.Canad. J. Res. 3: 428–448.Google Scholar
  97. Peto F.H. (1936): Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. II. Cytology of the male parents and F1 generation.Canad. J. Res., Sect. C., Bot. Sci. 14: 203–214.Google Scholar
  98. Peto F.H. (1938): Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. V. Doubling the chromosome number inT. vulgare and F1 ofT. vulgare × A. glaucum by temperature treatments.Canad. J. Res., Sect. C., Bot. Sci. 16: 516–529.Google Scholar
  99. Peto F.H. &Boyes J.W. (1940): Hybridization ofTriticum andAgropyron. VI. Induced fertility in vernal emmer ×A. glaucum.Canad. J. Res., Sect. C., Bot. Sci. 18: 230–239.Google Scholar
  100. Petrova O.A. (1975): O polimorfizme pyreya polzuchegoElytrigia repens (L.)Desv. i ego khromosomnom chisle (On polymorphism ofElytrigia repens (L.)Desv. and its chromosome number).Tsitol. Genet. 9: 126–128.Google Scholar
  101. Petrova A. &Stoyanova K. (1997): Mediterranean chromosome number reports 7 (783–802).Fl. Medit. 7: 204–213.Google Scholar
  102. Piao Z.S. (1982): The studies on the chromosomal morphology and banding pattern inAgropyron intermedium.Acta Genet. Sin. 9: 350–356.Google Scholar
  103. Pogan E., Czapik R. &Jankun A. (1985): Further studies in chromosome numbers of Polish angiosperms. Part XVIII.Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. 27: 57–74.Google Scholar
  104. Pogan E., Rychlewski J. et al. (1980): Further studies in chromosome numbers of Polish angiosperms.Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. 22. 129–153.Google Scholar
  105. Pólya L. (1948): Chromosome numbers of certain alkali plants.Arch. Biol. Hung. II. 18: 145–148.Google Scholar
  106. Pólya L. (1950): Magyarországi növényfajok kromoszómaszámai. II (Chromosome numbers of Hungarian plants. II.).Ann. Biol. Univ. Debrecen 1: 46–56.Google Scholar
  107. Pope W.K. &Löve R.M. (1952): Comparative cytology of colchicine-induced amphidiploids of interspecific hybrids:Agropyron trichophorum × Triticum durum, T. Timopheevi andT. macha.Hilgardia 21: 411–429.Google Scholar
  108. Probatova N.S. &Sokolovskaya A.P. (1978): Khromosomnye chisla i taksonomiya nekotorykh zlakov Kavkaza (Chromosome numbers and taxonomy of some grasses in Caucasus).Bot. Zhurn. 63: 1121–1131.Google Scholar
  109. Probatova N.S. &Sokolovskaya A.P. (1980): K kariotaksonomicheskomu izucheniyu zlakov gornogo Altaya (A karyotaxonomic study of the grasses of the Altai Mts.).Bot. Zhurn. 65: 509–520.Google Scholar
  110. Probatova N.S. &Sokolovskaya A.P. (1982): Konspekt khromosomnykh chiselPoaceae Sovetskogo Dalnego Vostoka. I. TribyOryzeae, Brachypodieae, Triticeae (Synopsis of chromosome numbers inPoaceae from the Soviet Far East. I. The tribesOryzeae, Brachypodieae, Triticeae).Bot. Zhurn. 67: 62–70.Google Scholar
  111. Prokudin Yu. N., Vovk A. G., Petrova O.A., Ermolenko E.D. &Vernichenko Yu.V. (1977):Zlaki Ukrainy (Grasses of the Ukraine). Naukova Dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
  112. Rohweder H. (1937): Versuch zur Erassung der mengenmässigen Bedeckung des Darss und Zingst.Planta 27: 501–549.Google Scholar
  113. Roos A.V. (1975): Khromosomnye chisla nekotorykh vidov zlakov (Chromosome numbers of some grass species).Bot. Zhurn. 60: 860–864.Google Scholar
  114. Rozanova M.A. (1940): O biologicheskoi izolyatsii i skrytykh vidakh (On biological isolation and “cryptic species”).Bot. Zhurn. S.S.S.R. 25: 304–308.Google Scholar
  115. Sachs L. (1952): Chromosome mosaics in experimental amphidiploids inTriticinae.Heredity 6: 157–170.Google Scholar
  116. Sakamoto S. &Muramatsu M. (1963): Chromosome numbers ofGramineae species collected in Pakistan, Afganistan and Iran.Rep. (Annual) Natl. Inst. Genet. (1962) 13: 48–50.Google Scholar
  117. Salomon B. &Lu B.-R. (1994): Genomic relationships between species of theElymus semicostatus group andElymus sensu lato (Poaceae).Pl. Syst. Evol. 191: 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Schiemann E. (1929): Zytologische Beiträge zur GattungAegilops. III. Chromosomenzahlen und Morphologie.Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 47: 164–181.Google Scholar
  119. Schulz-Schaeffer J. &Jura P. (1967): Biosystematic investigations in the genusAgropyron, IV. Species karyotype analysis, phytogeographic and other studies.Z. Pflanzenzücht. 57: 146–166.Google Scholar
  120. Senn H.A., Heimburger M.L. &Moore R.J. (1947): The cytotaxonomy of Canadian species ofAgropyron.Amer. J. Bot. 34: 607.Google Scholar
  121. Senn H.A., Bowden W.M. &Moore R.J. (1949): La citotaxonomia del generoAgropyron (Cytotaxonomy of the genusAgropyron).Lilloa 19: 119–120.Google Scholar
  122. Sharman B.C. (1943): Nucleoli inAgropyron repensBeauv.Nature 151: 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Simonet M. (1935): Contribution a l’étude cytologique et génétique de quelquesAgropyrum. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 201: 1210–1212.Google Scholar
  124. Singh D.N. (1964): Cytological studies in theGramimeae. III.Sci. & Cult. 30: 396–397.Google Scholar
  125. Sokolovskaya A.P. &Strelkova O.S. (1939): Geograficheskoe raspredelenie poliploidov. I. Issledovanie rastitelnosti Pamira (The geographical distribution of polyploids. I. Studies of the Pamir’s vegetation).Uchen. Zap. Leningr. Gosud. Univ., Ser. biol. 35: 42–62.Google Scholar
  126. Sokolovskaya A.P. &Strelkova O.S. (1948): Geograficheskoe raspredelenie poliploidov. II. Issledovanie flory Altaya (The geographical distribution of polyploids. II. Studies of the flora of the Altai Mts.).Uchen. Zap. Ped. Inst. Im. Gercena. 66: 179–193.Google Scholar
  127. Stebbins G.L. &Pun F.T. (1953): Artificial and natural hybrids in theGramineae, tribeHordeae. VI. Chromosome pairing inSecale cereale × Agropyron intermedium and the problem of genome homologies in theTriticinae.Genetics 38: 600–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Stolze K.V. (1925): Die Chromosomenzahlen der hauptsächlichsten Getreidearten nebst allgemeinen Betrachtungen über Chromosomen, Chromosomenzahlen und Chromsomgengrösse im Pflanzenreich.Bibliogr. Genet. 8: 1–71.Google Scholar
  129. Sun Y.K., Zhao Y.T., Dong Y.C., Zhou R.H. &Xu S.J. (1992): Karyotypes of eleven species ofTriticeae in Northeast China.Acta Phytotax. Sin. 30(4): 342–345.Google Scholar
  130. Šmarda P. &Kočí K. (2003): Chromsome number variability in Central European menbers of theFestuca ovina andF. pallens groups (sect.Festuca).Folia Geobot. 38: 65–95.Google Scholar
  131. Tateoka T. (1956): On morphological convergence betweenBrachypodium sylvaticum andAgropyron yezoense.Cytologia 21: 146–152.Google Scholar
  132. Thompson D.L. &Grafius J.E. (1950): Cytological observations of the F1 and two backcross generations ofTriticum vulgare × Agropyron trichophorum.Agron. Jour. 42: 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Váchová M. &Feráková V. (1980): [Reports]. In:Löve Á. (ed.), Chromosome number reports LXIX,Taxon 29: 722–723.Google Scholar
  134. Vakar B.A. (1934): Bastarde zwischen Arten der GattungTriticum und Arten der GattungAgropyrum.Züchter 6: 211–215.Google Scholar
  135. Vakar B.A. (1935):Tsitologiya pshenichno-pyreinykh gibridov (Cytology of the Triticum-Agropyronhybrids). Omskoje obl. izd., Omsk.Google Scholar
  136. Vakar B.A. (1936): Cytologische Untersuchung über F1 der Weizen-Queckengras Bastarde.Cytologia 7: 293–312.Google Scholar
  137. Vogel K.P., Arumuganathan K. &Jensen K.B. (1999): Nuclear DNA content of perennial grasses of theTriticeae.Crop Sci. (Madison) 39: 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Václav Mahelka
    • 1
  • Jan Suda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vlasta Jarolímová
    • 1
  • Pavel Trávníček
    • 1
    • 2
  • František Krahulec
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of BotanyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of BotanyCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations