, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1494–1504 | Cite as

Relationships of nitrogen loadings, residential development, and physical characteristics with plant structure in New England salt marshes

  • Cathleen Wigand
  • Richard A. McKinney
  • Michael A. Charpentier
  • Marnita M. Chintala
  • Glen B. Thursby


We examined the vascular plant species richness and the extent, density, and height ofSpartina species of ten Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island (United States) fringe salt marshes which had a wide range of residential land development and N-loadings associated with their watersheds. Significant inverse relationships of tallS. alterniflora with species richness and with the extent and density ofS. patens and shortS. alterniflora were observed. Extent and density ofS. patens and extent of shortS. alterniflora were positively and significantly related with plant species richness. Marsh elevation and area did not significantly correlate with plant structure. Flood tide height significantly and inversely correlated withS. patens, but did not significantly relate toS. alterniflora or plant species richness. Marsh width significantly and positively correlated with plant species richness andS. patens and inversely correlated with tallS. alterniflora. Significant inverse relationships were observed for N-load, % residential development, and slope withS. patens, shortS. alterniflora, and species richness, and significant positive relationships with tallS. alterniflora. The marsh slope and width were significantly correlated with N-load and residential development that made it difficult to determine to what extent anthropogenic stressors were contributing to the variation in the plant structure among the marshes. At five marhes with similar slopes, there were significant inverse relationships of N-load withS. patens (density and extent) and a positive relationship with tallS. alterniflora (extent). Although there were no significant relationships of slope with the plant metrics among the five sites, other physical factors, such as the flood tide height and marsh width, significantly correlated with the extent and density ofSpartina species. Significant relationships of N-load with plant structure (albeit confounded by the effect of the physical characteristics) support the hypothesis of competitive displacement of dominant marsh plants under elevated nitrogen. It is likely that the varying plant structure in New England marshes is a response to a combination of natural factors and multiple anthropogenic stressors (e.g., eutrophication and sea level rise).


Salt Marsh Plant Species Richness Plant Structure High Marsh England Salt Marsh 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, andJ. T. Roach 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, A revision of the land use classification system as presented in U.S. Geological Survey Circular 671. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Aravena, R., L. Evans, andJ. A. Cherry. 1993. Stable isotopes of oxygen and nitrogen in source identification of nitrate from septic systems.Ground Water 31:180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertness, M. D. 1991. Zonation ofSpartina patens andSpartina alterniflora in a New England salt marsh.Ecology 72:138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness, M. D. 1992. The ecology of a New England salt marsh.American Scientist 80:260–268.Google Scholar
  5. Bertness, M. D. andA. M. Ellison. 1987. Determinants of pattern in a New England salt marsh plant community.Ecological Monographs 57:129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertness, M. D. andS. C. Pennings. 2000. Spatial variation in process and pattern in salt marsh plant communities in eastern North America, p. 39–58.In M. P. Weinstein, and D. A. Kreeger (eds.), Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  7. Bricker-Urso, S., S. W. Nixon, J. K. Cochran, D. J. Hirschberg, andC. Hunt. 1989. Accretion rates and sediment accumulation in Rhode Island salt marshes.Estuaries 12:300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, S., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. W. Howarth, S. N. Sharpley, andV. H. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen.Issues in Ecology 3:1–12.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, M. L., I. Valiela, K. D. Kroeger, G. L. Tomasky, J. Cebrian, C. Wigand, R. A. McKinney, S. P. Grady, and M. E. C. Silva. 2004. Assessment of a δ15N isotopic method to indicate anthropogenic eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems.Journal of Environmental Quality January/February 2004 (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Deegan, L. A. 2002. Lessons learned: The effects of nutrient envichment on the support of nekton by seagrass and salt marsh ecosystems.Estuaries 25:727–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnelly, J. P. andM. D. Bertness. 2001. Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cord grass in response to accelerated sea-level rise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98:14218–14223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emery, N. C., P. J. Ewanchuk, andM. D. Bertnes. 2001. Competition and salt-marsh plant zonation: Stress tolerators may be dominant competitors.Ecology 82:2471–2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, J. L., G. F. Somers, D. M. Grant, andD. M. Seliskar. 1988. Persistent differences in two forms ofSpartina alterniflora: A common garden experiment.Ecology 69:1005–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg, D. E. andT. E. Miller. 1990. Effects of different resource additions on species diversity in an annual plant community.Ecology 71:213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gormley, J. R. andR. F. Spalding. 1979. Sources and concentrations of nitrate-nitrogen in groundwater of the central Platte region, Nebraska.Ground Water 17:291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heltshe, J. F. andN. E. Forrester. 1983. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure.Biometrics 39:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howes, B. L., W. H. Dacey, andD. D. Goehringer. 1986. Factors controlling the growth form ofSpartina alterniflora: Feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen and salinity.Journal of Ecology 74:881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howes, B. L., R. W. Howarth, J. M. Teal, andI. Valiela. 1981. Oxidation-reduction potentials in a salt marsh: Spatial paterns and interactions with primary production.Limnology and Oceanography 26:350–360.Google Scholar
  19. Kreitler, C. W. andL. A. Browning. 1983. Nitrogen-isotope analysis of groundwater nitrate in carbonate aquifers Natural sources versus human pollution.Journal of Hydrology 61:285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreitler, C. W., S. Ragone, andB. G. Katz. 1978.15N/14N ratios of ground water nitrate, Long Island, NY.Ground Water 16: 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levine, J. M., J. S. Brewer, andM. D. Bertness 1998. Nutrients, competition, and plant zonation in a New England salt marsh.Journal of Ecology 86:285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McClelland, J. W. andI. Valiela. 1998. Linking nitrogen in estuarine producers to land-derived sources.Limnology and Oceanography 43:577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKee, K. L. andW. H. Patrick, Jr. 1988. The relationship of smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) to tidal datums: A review.Estuaries 11:143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKinney, R. A., W. G. Nelson, M. A. Charpentier, andC. Wigand. 2001. Ribbed mussel nitrogen isotope signatures reflect nitrogen sources in coastal salt marshes.Ecological Applications 11:203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mendelssohn, L. A., K. L. McKee, andW. H. Patrick. 1981. Oxygen deficiency inSpartina alterniflora roots: Metabolic addaptation to anoxia.Science 214:439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, W. B. andF. E. Egler. 1950. Vegetation of the Wequetequock-Pawcatuck tidal marshes, Connecticut.Ecological Monographs 20:143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niering, W. A. andR. S. Warren. 1980. Vegetation patterns and processes in New England salt marshes.BioScience 30:301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nixon, S. W. 1982. The ecology of New England high salt marshes: A community profile. FFWS/OBS-81/55. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Nixon, S. W. andC. A. Oviatt. 1973. Analysis of local variation in the standing crop ofspartina alterniflora.Botanica Marina 16:103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oviatt, C. A., S. W. Nixon, andJ. Garber. 1977. Variation and evaluation of costal salt marshes.Environmental Management 1: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Redfield, A. C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh.Ecological Monographs 42:201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roman, C. T., N. Jaworski, F. T. Short, S. Findlay, andS. Warren. 2000. Estuaries of the northeastern United States: Habitat and land use signatures.Estuaries 23:743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilman, D. 1984. Plant dominace along an artificial nutrient gradient.Ecology 65:1445–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tilman, D. 1987. Secondary dominance and the pattern of plant dominance along an experimental nutrient gradient.Ecological Monographs 57:189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thursby, G. B. and M. A. Abdelrhman. 2004. Growth of the marsh elderIva frutescens in relation to land elevation.Estuaries 27: (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Valiela, I., M. L. Cole, J. McClelland, J. Hauxwell, J. Cebrian, andS. B. Joye. 2000b. Role of salt marshes as part of coastal landscapes, p. 23–38.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger (eds.) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  37. Valiela, I., G. Collins, J. Kremer, K. Lajtha, M. Geist, B. Seely, J. Brawley, andC. H. Sham. 1997. Nitrogen loading from coastal watersheds to receiving estuaries: New method and applications.Ecological Applications 7:358–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Valiela, I., M. Geist, J. McClelland, andG. Tomasky. 2000a. Nitrogen loading from watersheds to estuaries: Verification of the Waquoit Bay Nitrogen Loading Model.Biogeochemistry 49: 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valiela, I. andJ. M. Teal. 1974. Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation, p. 563–574.In R. J. Reimold and W. H. Queen (eds.), Ecology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Valiela, I., J. M. Teal, andW. J. Sass. 1973. Nutrient retention in salt marsh plots experimentally fertilized with sewage sludge.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 1:261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valiela, I., J. M. Teal, andW. J. Sass. 1975. Production and dynamics of salt marsh vegetation and the effects of experimental treatment with sewage sludge.Journal of Applied Ecology 12:973–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vitousek, P. M., R. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. A. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, andG. D. Tilman. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Causes and consequences.Ecological Applications 7:737–750.Google Scholar
  43. Warren, R. S. andW. A. Niering. 1993. Vegetation change on a northeast tidal marsh: Interaction of sea-level rise and marsh accretion.Ecology 74:96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinstein, M. P. andJ. H. Balletto. 1999. Does the common reed,Phragmites australis, affect essential fish habitat?Estuaries 22:793–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wigand, C., R. Comeleo, R. McKinney, G. Thursby, M. Chintala, andM. Charpentier. 2001. Outline of a new approach to evaluate ecological integrity of salt marshes.Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 7:1541–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathleen Wigand
    • 1
  • Richard A. McKinney
    • 1
  • Michael A. Charpentier
    • 2
  • Marnita M. Chintala
    • 1
  • Glen B. Thursby
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research LaboratoryNarragansett
  2. 2.OAO CorporationNarragansett

Personalised recommendations