, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1437–1449 | Cite as

On the linkages among density, flow, and bathymetry gradients at the entrance to the Chesapeake Bay

  • Arnoldo Valle-Levinson
  • William C. Boicourt
  • Michael R. Roman


Linkages among density, flow, and bathymetry gradients were explored at the entrance to the Chesapeake Bay with underway measurements of density and flow profiles. Four tidal cycles were sampled along a transect that crossed the bay entrance during cruises in April–May of 1997 and in July of 1997. The April–May cruise coincided with neap tides, while the July cruise occurred during spring tides. The bathymetry of the bay entrance transect featured a broad Chesapeake Channel, 8 km wide and 17 m deep, and a narrow North Channel, 2 km wide and 14 m deep. The two channels were separated by an area with typical depths of 7 m. Linkages among flows, bathymetry, and water density were best established over the North Channel during both cruises. Over this channel, greatest convergence rates alternated from the left (looking into the estuary) slope of the channel during ebb to the right slope during flood as a result of the coupling between bathymetry and tidal flow through bottom friction. These convergences were linked to the strongest transverse shears in the along-estuary tidal flow and to the appearance of salinity fronts, most markedly during ebb periods. In the wide channel, the Chesapeake Channel, frontogenesis mechanisms over the northern slope of the channel were similar to those in the North Channel only in July, when buoyancy was relatively weak and tidal forcing was relatively strong. In April–May, when buoyancy was relatively large and tidal forcing was relatively weak, the recurrence of fronts over the same northern slope of the Chesapeake Channel was independent of the tidal phase. The distinct frontogenesis in the Chesapeake Channel during the increased buoyancy period was attributed to a strong pycnocline that insulated the surface tidal flow from the effects of bottom friction, which tends to decrease the strength of the tidal flow over relatively shallow areas.


Transverse Shear Neap Tide Bottom Friction Absolute Vorticity Salinity Front 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bowman, M. J. andR. L. Iverson. 1977. Estuarine and plume fronts, p. 87–104.In M. J. Bowman and W. E. Esaias (eds.), Oceanic Fronts in Coastal Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J., W. R. Turrell, andJ. H. Simpson. 1991. Aerial surveys of axial convergent fronts in UK estuaries and the implications for pollution.Marine Pollution Bulletin 22:397–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browne, D. R. andC. W. Fisher. 1988. Tide and tidal currents in the Chesapeake Bay. NOAA Technical Report NOS OMA 3. U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  4. Brubaker, J. M. andJ. H. Simpson. 1999. Flow convergence and stability at a tidal estuarine front: Acoustic Doppler current observations.Journal of Geophysical Research 104:18,257–18,268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrier, G. andJ. M. Anderson. 1997. A multi-disciplinary study of frontal systems in the Tay estuary, Scotland.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45:317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garvine, R. 1974. Dynamics of small-scale ocean fronts.Journal of Physical Oceanography 4:557–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geyer, W. R. 1993. Three-dimensional tidal flow around headlands.Journal of Geophysical Research 98:955–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill, A. E. 1982. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huzzey, L. M. andJ. M. Brubaker. 1988. the formation of longitudinal fronts in a coastal plain estuary.Journal of Geophysical Research 93:1329–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joyce, T. M. 1989. On in situ calibration of shipboard ADCPs.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 6:169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, C. andA. Valle-Levinson. 1999. A 2-D analytic tidal model for a narrow estuary of arbitrary lateral depth variation: The intra-tidal motion.Journal of Geophysical Research 104:23,525–23,543.Google Scholar
  12. Luketina, D. A. andJ. Imberger. 1989. Turbulence and entrainment in a buoyant surface plume.Journal of Geophysical Research 94:12,619–12,636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marmorino, G. O. andC. L. Trump. 1996. High-resolution measurements made across a tidal intrusion front.Journal of Geophysical Research 101:25,661–25,674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mied, R. P., R. A. Handler, andT. E. Evans. 2000. Longitudinal convergence fronts in homogeneous rotating channels.Journal of Geophysical Research 105:8647–8658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nunes, R. A. andJ. H. Simpson. 1985. Axial convergence in a well-mixed estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 20:637–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O'Donnell, J. 1993. Surface fronts in estuaries: A review.Estuaries 16:12–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O'Donnell, J. 1997. Observations of near-surface currents and hydrography in the Connecticut River plume with the surface current and density array.Journal of Geophysical Research 102: 25,021–25,033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O'Donnell, J., G. O. Marmorino, andC. L. Trump. 1998. Convergence and downwelling at a river plume front.Journal of Physical Oceanography 28:1481–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paraso, M. andA. Valle-Levinson. 1996. Atmospheric forcing effects on sea level and water temperature in the lower Chesapeake Bay: 1992.Estuaries 19:548–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pedlosky, J. 1979. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Sarabun, C. C. 1980. Structure and formation of Delaware Bay fronts. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.Google Scholar
  22. Simpson, J. H. andW. R. Turrell. 1986. Convergent fronts in the circulation of tidal estuaries, p. 139–152.In D. A. Wolfe (ed.), Estuarine Variability. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  23. Sletten, M. A., G. O. Marmorino, T. F. Donato, D. J. McLaughlin, andE. Twarog. 1999. An airborne, real aperture radar study of the Chesapeake Bay outflow plume.Journal of Geophysical Research 104:1211–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swift, M. R., D. W. Fredriksson, andB. Celikkol. 1996. Structure of an axial convergence zone from acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 43:109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turrell, W. R., J. Brown, andJ. H. Simpson. 1996. Salt intrusion and secondary flow in a shallow, well-mixed estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42:153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Valle-Levinson, A., C. Li, T. Royer, andL. Atkinson. 1998. Flow patterns at the Chesapeake Bay entrance.Continental Shelf Research 18:1157–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Valle-Levinson, A., C. Li, K. C. Wong, andK. M. M. Lwiza. 2000. Convergence of lateral flow along a coastal plain estuary.Journal of Geophysical Research 105:17,045–17,061.Google Scholar
  28. Valle-Levinson, A. andK. M. M. Lwiza. 1995. Effects of channels and shoals on the exchange between the lower Chesapeake Bay and the adjacent ocean.Journal of Geophysical Research 100:18,551–18,563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valle-Levinson, A. andJ. O'Donnell. 1996. Tidal interaction with buoyancy driven flow in a coastal plain estuary, p. 265–281.In D. G. Aubrey and C. T. Friedrichs (eds.), Buoyancy Effects on Coastal and Estuarine Dynamics, Coastal Estuarine Study, Volume 53. AGU, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnoldo Valle-Levinson
    • 1
  • William C. Boicourt
    • 2
  • Michael R. Roman
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Department of Ocean, Earth, and Atmospheric SciencesOld Dominion UniversityNorfolk
  2. 2.Horn Point LaboratoryUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental ScienceCambridge

Personalised recommendations