Advertisement

Estuaries

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 90–101 | Cite as

Factors controlling net ecosystem metabolism in U.S. estuaries

  • Jane M. Caffrey
Article

Abstract

High frequency dissolved oxygen data were analyzed to calculate primary production, respiration and net ecosystem metabolism (NEM) from 42 sites within 22 National Estuarine Research Reserves (NERR), 1995–2000. NERR sites are characterized by a variety of dominant plant communities including phytoplankton, salt marsh, seagrass, macroalgae, freshwater macrophyte, and mangrove, and are representative of the coastal bioregions of the United States. As expected from the wide diversity of sites, metabolic rates were temporally and spatially variable with the highest production and respiration occurring during the summer in Southeastern estuaries. Sites within different regions exhibited consistent seasonal trends in production, respiration, and NEM. Temperature was the most important environmental factor explaining within-site variation in metabolic rates; nutrient concentrations were the second most important factor. All but three of the 42 sites were heterotrophic (respiration was greater than production) on an annual basis. Habitat adjacent to the monitoring site, estuarine area, and salinity explained 58% of the variation in NEM. Open water sites or sites adjacent to mangroves or in marsh creeks were heterotrophic, while sites in or adjacent to submerged aquatic vegetation (eelgrass or macroalgal beds) were either autotrophic or near balance. Estuarine area was also a significant factor explaining variability in NEM; larger systems were closer to balance than smaller systems that trended toward heterotrophy. Freshwater sites were more heterotrophic than saline sites. Nutrient loading explained 68% of the variation in NEM among some of the sites. When these estimates were compared to the literature, metabolic rates from the NERR sites were much larger, often two to five times greater than rates from other estuarine and coastal systems. One explanation is that these small, generally shallow sites located near shore may have greater allochthonous organic inputs as well as significant benthic primary production than the large, deeper systems represented by the literature.

Keywords

Respiration Metabolic Rate Dissolve Inorganic Nitrogen Tidal Creek Submerged Aquatic Vegetation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Boynton, W. R. 1975. Energy basis of a coastal region: Franklin county and Apalachicola Bay, Florida, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Caffrey, J. M. 2003. Production, respiration and net ecosystem metabolism in U.S. estuaries.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 81:207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrfey, J. M., J. E. Cloern, andC. Grenz. 1998. Changes in production and respiration during a spring phytoplankton bloom in San Francisco Bay, California: Implications for net ecosystem metabolism.Marine Ecology Progress Series 172:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai, W.-J., L. R. Pomeroy, M. A. Moran, andY. Wang. 1999. Oxygen and carbon dioxide mass balance for the estuarine-intertidal marsh complex of five rivers in the southeastern U.S..Limnology and Oceanography 44:639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Copeland, B. J. andW. R. Duffer. 1964. Use of a clear plastic dome to measure gaseous diffusion rates in natural waters.Limnology and Oceanography 9:494–499.Google Scholar
  6. D'Avanzo, C., J. N. Kremer, andS. C. Wainright. 1996. Ecosystem production and respiration in response to eutrophication in shallow temperature estuaries.Marine Ecology Progress Series 141:263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eyre, B. D. andL. J. McKee. 2002. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus budgets for a shallow subtropical coastal embayment (Moreton Bay, Australia).Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1043–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gattuso, J.-P., M. Frankignoulle, andR. Wollast. 1998. Carbon and carbonate metabolism in coastal aquatic ecosystems.Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics 29:405–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartman, B. andD. E. Hammond. 1984. Gas exchange rates across the sediment water and air-water interfaces in South San Francisco Bay.Journal of Geophysical Research 89:3593–3603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heip, C. H. R., N. K. Goosen, P. M. J. Herman, J. Kromkamp, J. J. Middelburg, andK. Soetaert, 1995. Production and consumption of biological particles in temperature tidal estuaries.Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Reviews 33:1–149.Google Scholar
  11. Hopkinson, Jr.,C. S. 1988. Patterns of organic carbon exchange between coastal ecosystems: The mass balance approach in salt marsh ecosystems, p. 122–154.In B. O. Jansson (ed.), Coastal-Offshore Ecosystems Interactions. Springer Verlag. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  12. Howarth, R. W., R. Schneider, andD. Swaney. 1996. Metabolism and organic carbon fluxes in the tidal freshwater Hudson River.Estuaries 19:848–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kemp, W. M. andW. R. Boynton. 1980. Influence of biological and physical processes on dissolved oxygen dynamics in an estuarine system: Implications for measurement of community metabolism.Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 11:407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kemp, W. M., E. M. Smith, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, andW. R. Boynton. 1997. Organic carbon balance and NEM in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 150:229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marino, R. andR. W. Howarth. 1993. Atmospheric oxygen exchange in the Hudson River: Dome measurements and comparison with other natural waters.Estuaries 16:433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nixon, S. W., S. L. Granger, andB. L. Nowicki. 1995. An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay.Biogeochemistry 31:15–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Odum, H. T. 1956. Primary production in flowing waters.Limnology and Oceanography 1:102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oviatt, C. A., A. A. Keller, P. A. Sampou, andL. L. Beatty. 1986. Patterns of productivity during eutrophication: A mesocosm experiment.Marine Ecology Progress Series 28:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raymond, P. A., J. E. Bauer, andJ. J. Cole. 2000. Atmospheric CO2 evasion, dissolved inorganic carbon production and net heterotrophy in the York River estuary.Limnology and Oceanography 45:1707–1717.Google Scholar
  20. Raymond, P. A. andJ. J. Cole. 2001. Gas exchange in rivers and estuaries: Choosing a gas transfer velocity.Estuaries 24:312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, S. V. andJ. T. Hollibaugh. 1993. Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance.Reviews of Geophysics 31:75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, S. V. andJ. T. Hollibaugh. 1997. Annual cycle and interannual variability of ecosystem metabolism in a temperature climate embayment.Ecological Monographs 67:509–533.Google Scholar
  23. Swaney, D. P., R. W. Howarth, andT. J. Butler. 1999. A novel approach for estimating ecosystem production and respiration in estuaries. Application to the oligohaline and mesohaline Hudson River.Limnology and Oceanography 44:1509–1521.Google Scholar
  24. Twilley, R. R. 1988. Coupling of mangroves to the productivity of estuarine and coastal waters, p. 155–180.In B. O. Jansson (ed.), Coastal-Offshoré Ecosystems Interactions. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  25. Wenner, E. L., A. F. Holland, M. D. Arendt, D. Edwards, andJ. M. Caffrey. 2001. A Synthesis of Water Quality Data from the National Estuarine Research Research System-Wide Monitoring Program. NOAA Grant NA97OR0209, MRD Contribution No. 459. NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland.Google Scholar

Source of Unpublished Materials

  1. Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ). 2003. Biogeochemical Modelling Node. http://data.ecology. su.se/MNODE/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Environmental Diagnostics and BioremediationUniversity of West FloridaPensacola

Personalised recommendations